Olgu Sunumu

Balancing High Clinical Suspicion Against Doubts: A Clinical Dilemma

Cilt: 5 Sayı: 2 31 Ağustos 2025
PDF İndir
EN TR

Balancing High Clinical Suspicion Against Doubts: A Clinical Dilemma

Öz

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a significant cause of mortality and is often difficult to diagnose, frequently being overlooked. Current clinical guidelines recommend fibrinolytic therapy for high-risk PE patients without contraindications. However, evidence indicates that fibrinolytic therapy is administered to only approximately 33% of eligible high-risk pulmonary embolism patients. We aim to present a case of successful resuscitation in a 54-year-old female patient with a history of head trauma and suspected gastrointestinal bleeding who presented to our emergency department with dyspnea and later suffered a witnessed cardiac arrest. Fibrinolytic therapy was given during cardiopulmonary resuscitation, leading to the return of spontaneous circulation. The use of fibrinolytic therapy in high-risk pulmonary embolism patients remains a complex and often controversial decision, especially when relative contraindications are present. This case underscores the critical importance of individualized clinical judgment and timely intervention, even in the context of potential bleeding risks. It further illustrates that, with careful risk–benefit evaluation and multidisciplinary collaboration, fibrinolytic therapy can be a life-saving measure in selected patients.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Etik Beyan

Conducted in accordance with the 1989 Helsinki Declaration

Kaynakça

  1. Oger E. Incidence of venous thromboembolism: a community-based study in Western France. Thromb Haemost 2000; 83:657–60.
  2. Konstantinides SV., Meyer G., Becattini C., et al. 2019 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism developed in collaboration with the European Respiratory Society (ERS): The Task Force for the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Respir J 2019; 54(3): 1901647. Doi: 10.1183/13993003.01647-2019.
  3. Russell C., Keshavamurthy S., Saha S. Classification and stratification of pulmonary embolisms. Int J Angiol 2022; 31(3):162–5. Doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1756218.
  4. Becattini C., Agnelli G., Lankeit M., et al. Acute pulmonary embolism: mortality prediction by the 2014 European Society of Cardiology risk stratification model. Eur Respir J 2016; 48(3):780–6. Doi: 10.1183/13993003.00024-2016.
  5. Keller K., Hobohm L., Ebner M., et al. Trends in thrombolytic treatment and outcomes of acute pulmonary embolism in Germany. Eur Heart J 2020; 41(4):522–9. Doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehz236.
  6. Jaff MR., McMurtry MS., Archer SL., et al. Management of massive and submassive pulmonary embolism, iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis, and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2011 ;123(16):1788–830. Doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e318214914f.
  7. Kearon C., Akl EA., Comerota AJ., et al. Antithrombotic therapy for VTE disease: antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest 2012; 141(2):e419S–96S. Doi: 10.1378/chest.11-2301.
  8. Zuin M., Rigatelli G., Zuliani G., Zonzin P., Ramesh D., Roncon L. Thrombolysis in hemodynamically unstable patients: still underused: a review based on multicenter prospective registries on acute pulmonary embolism. J Thromb Thrombolysis 2019; 48(2):323–30. Doi: 10.1007/s11239-019-01867-0.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Acil Tıp

Bölüm

Olgu Sunumu

Yayımlanma Tarihi

31 Ağustos 2025

Gönderilme Tarihi

24 Haziran 2025

Kabul Tarihi

9 Ağustos 2025

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2025 Cilt: 5 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA
Arslan, M., Ay, F., Karadağ, H., Mercan Başpınar, M., & Çalık, M. (2025). Balancing High Clinical Suspicion Against Doubts: A Clinical Dilemma. Güncel Tıbbi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5(2), 19-23. https://izlik.org/JA93WM76WF
AMA
1.Arslan M, Ay F, Karadağ H, Mercan Başpınar M, Çalık M. Balancing High Clinical Suspicion Against Doubts: A Clinical Dilemma. GÜTAD. 2025;5(2):19-23. https://izlik.org/JA93WM76WF
Chicago
Arslan, Müge, Furkan Ay, Hazal Karadağ, Melike Mercan Başpınar, ve Mustafa Çalık. 2025. “Balancing High Clinical Suspicion Against Doubts: A Clinical Dilemma”. Güncel Tıbbi Araştırmaları Dergisi 5 (2): 19-23. https://izlik.org/JA93WM76WF.
EndNote
Arslan M, Ay F, Karadağ H, Mercan Başpınar M, Çalık M (01 Ağustos 2025) Balancing High Clinical Suspicion Against Doubts: A Clinical Dilemma. Güncel Tıbbi Araştırmaları Dergisi 5 2 19–23.
IEEE
[1]M. Arslan, F. Ay, H. Karadağ, M. Mercan Başpınar, ve M. Çalık, “Balancing High Clinical Suspicion Against Doubts: A Clinical Dilemma”, GÜTAD, c. 5, sy 2, ss. 19–23, Ağu. 2025, [çevrimiçi]. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA93WM76WF
ISNAD
Arslan, Müge - Ay, Furkan - Karadağ, Hazal - Mercan Başpınar, Melike - Çalık, Mustafa. “Balancing High Clinical Suspicion Against Doubts: A Clinical Dilemma”. Güncel Tıbbi Araştırmaları Dergisi 5/2 (01 Ağustos 2025): 19-23. https://izlik.org/JA93WM76WF.
JAMA
1.Arslan M, Ay F, Karadağ H, Mercan Başpınar M, Çalık M. Balancing High Clinical Suspicion Against Doubts: A Clinical Dilemma. GÜTAD. 2025;5:19–23.
MLA
Arslan, Müge, vd. “Balancing High Clinical Suspicion Against Doubts: A Clinical Dilemma”. Güncel Tıbbi Araştırmaları Dergisi, c. 5, sy 2, Ağustos 2025, ss. 19-23, https://izlik.org/JA93WM76WF.
Vancouver
1.Müge Arslan, Furkan Ay, Hazal Karadağ, Melike Mercan Başpınar, Mustafa Çalık. Balancing High Clinical Suspicion Against Doubts: A Clinical Dilemma. GÜTAD [Internet]. 01 Ağustos 2025;5(2):19-23. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA93WM76WF