Çocuklarımız Ne Tür Yetişkinler Olacak? Medya Doygunluğuna Ulaşmış Bir Dünyada Büyümenin Etkileri

Öz

Bu makale çocuk ve medya araştırmacılarını günümüzdeki yaygın medya dünyasında yaşamanın çocuklar üzerindeki kapsamlı etkileri üzerinde düşünmeye davet etmekte ve daha geniş bir sosyo-kültürel bağlamda, medya etkileri teknolojinin çocukların öğrenme ve gelişim sürecinde nasıl bir “knowledgeable other” bilgili öteki, bkz. Vygotski ve yapı temeli rolü oynayabileceğini göz önünde bulundurmayı amaçlamaktadır. Bu bağlamda araştırmacıların dijital çağda yaşamanın çocukların gelişimsel yörüngelerini nasıl etkileyebileceği üzerine düşünmeleri önem taşımaktadır. Çocuk ve medya araştırmacılarını, medyanın çocukların öğrenme ve gelişim yörüngüleri üzerinde giderek artan etkileri hakkında daha derin araştırmalar yapmaya davet ediyoruz

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Çocuk ve medya,gelişim yörüngeleri,Vygotski,araştırma gündemi,yapı temeli

Çocuklarımız Ne Tür Yetişkinler Olacak? Medya Doygunluğuna Ulaşmış Bir Dünyada Büyümenin Etkileri

Öz

This article urges children and media scholars to consider the broader consequences of the ubiquitous media environment in which children live today. We consider, within a broader sociacultural context, the ways in which media and interactive technology serve as more knowledgeable others, scaffolding children’s learning and development. Given this context, it is imperative for researchers to consider the consequences of living in the digital age and how broader developmental trajectories may be influenced. We call upon children and media researchers to contemplate more thoughtful research agendas that begin to assess the larger impact of media on children’s learning and developmental trajectories

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Children and media,developmental trajectories,Vygotsky,research agenda,scaffolds

Kaynakça

1. Anderson, C. A., & Bushman, B. J. (2002). Human aggression. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 27–51. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135231
2. Anderson, D. R., & Pempek, T. A. (2005). Television and very young children. American Behavioral Scientist, 48, 505–522. doi:10.1177/0002764204271506
3. Anderson, D. R., Bryant, J., Wilder, A., Santomero, A., Williams, M., & Craley, A. M. (2000). Researching Blue’s Clues: Viewing behavior and impact. Media Psychology, 2, 171–194.
4. Anderson, D. R., Huston, A. C., Schmitt, K. L., Linebarger, D. L., & Wright, J. C. (2001). Abstract. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 66, vii–viii.
5. Blackwell, C. K. (2015, March). iPads in kindergarten: Investigating the effects of tablet computers on student achievement. Poster presented at the Society for Research in Child Development Biennial Meeting, Philadelphia, PA.
6. Borzekowski, D. L. G., & Macha, J. E. (2010). The role of Kilimani Sesame in the healthy development of Tanzanian preschool children. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 31, 298–305. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2010.05.002
7. Clarke, B. (2014). The use of tablet computers in UK schools. UK: Tablets for Schools. Retrieved from http:// tabletsforschools.org.uk/new-research-launched-tablet-computers-in-69-of-uk- schools/
8. Cole, M., & Gajdamaschko, N. (2010). Vygotski and context: Toward a resolution of theoretical disputes. In S. Kirschner & J. Martin (Eds.), The sociocultural turn in psychology: The contextual emergence of mind and self (pp. 253–280). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

9. Dayanim, S., & Namy, L. L. (2015). Infants learn baby signs from video. Child Development, 86, 800–811. doi:10.1111/cdev.12340
10. Druin, A. (2009). Mobile technology for children: Designing for interaction and learning. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
11. Elkind, D. (2006). The hurried child: Growing up too fast too soon. Boston, MA: Da Capo Press.
12. Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. New York, NY: Norton. GSM Association, & NTT DOCOMO. (2014). Children’s use of mobile phones 2013: An international comparison. Retrieved from http://www.gsma.com/publicpolicy/myouth/research
13. Krcmar, M., & Cingel, D. P. (2014). Parent–child joint reading in traditional and electronic formats. Media Psychology, 17, 262–281. doi:10.1080/15213269.2013.840243
14. Lillard, A. S., & Peterson, J. (2011). The immediate impact of different types of televi sion on young children’s executive function. Pediatrics, 128, 644–649. doi:10.1542/peds.2010- 1919
15. Livingstone, S. (2008). Taking risky opportunities in youthful content creation: Teenagers’ useof social networking sites for intimacy, privacy, and self-expression. New Media & Society, 10, 393–411. doi:10.1177/1461444808089415
16. Livingstone, S., Haddon, L., Hasebrink, U., O’Neill, B., Smahel, D., & Staksrud, E. (2014). EU kids online: Findings, methods, recommendations. Retrieved from http://lsedesignunit. com/EUKidsOnline/index. html?r=64
17. Mares, M. L., & Acosta, E. E. (2008). Be kind to three-legged dogs: Children’s literal interpre tations of TV’s moral lessons. Media Psychology, 11, 377–399. doi:10.1080/15213260802204355
18. Means, B., & Olson, K. (1997). Technology and education reform: Studies of education reform. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
19. Meyrowitz, J. (2005). No sense of place: The impact of electronic media on social behavior. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20. Neuman, S. B., Newman, E. H., & Dwyer, J. (2011). Educational effects of a vocabulary interven tion on preschoolers’ word knowledge and conceptual development: A cluster-randomized trial. Reading Research Quarterly, 46, 249–272. doi:10.1598/RRQ.46.3.3
21. Pew Research Center. (2015). Social networking fact sheet. Retrieved from http://www. pewinternet.org/ fact-sheets/social-networking-fact-sheet/
22. Piaget, J. (1962). Play, dreams and imitation in childhood. New York, NY: Norton.
23. Quintana, C., Shin, N., Norris, C., & Soloway, E. (2006). Learner-centered design. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 119–134). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
24. Rideout, V. (2013). Zero to eight: Children’s media use in America. Retrieved from https://www. commonsensemedia.org/research/zero-to-eight-childrens-media-use-in-america-2013
25. Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2008). Adolescents’ identity experiments on the internet: Consequences for social competence and self-concept unity. Communication Research, 35, 208–231. doi:10.1177/0093650207313164
26. Valkenburg, P. M., Peter, J., & Schouten, A. P. (2006). Friend networking sites and theirrelationship to adolescents’ well-being and social self-esteem. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 9, 584–590. doi:10.1089/ cpb.2006.9.584
27. Viriyapong, R., & Harfield, A. (2013). Facing the challenges of the One-Tablet-Per-Child policy in Thai primary school education. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications(IJACSA), 4, 176–184.
28. Vygotski, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
29. Wartella, E., Rideout, V., Zupancic, H., Beaudoin-Ryan, L., & Lauricella, A. R. (2015). Teens, health, and technology: A national study. Evanston, IL: Center on Media and Human Development, School of Communication, Northwestern University.
30. Wartella, E., Lauricella, A. R., Cingel, D. P., & Connell, S. (2016). Television, computers, and media viewing. In H. Friedman, R. Schwarzer, R. C. Silver, D. Spiegel, N. E. Adler, R. D. Parke, & C. Peterson (Eds.), Encyclopedia of mental health (2nd ed.). Oxford: Elsevier.
31. Watkins, B. (1985). Television viewing as a dominant activity of childhood: A developmental theory of television effects. Critical Studies in Mass Communication,2, 323–337. doi:10.1080/15295038509360095
32. Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem sol ving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 89–100. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x
33. Yelland, N., & Masters, J. (2007). Rethinking scaffolding in the information age. Computers & Education, 48, 362–382. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.01.010