Çocukluk Çalışmaları: Sürdürülebilir Bir Paradigma mı?

Öz

Bu makale çocukluk çalışmalarının çoğu kez merkezî ilgileri arasında sayılan bazı fikirleri sorguluyor: çocuklar “müstakil” bir biçimde çalışılmaya değerdir; çocukluk “toplumsal bir inşadır”; çocuklar aktif fâillerdir ve böylece muamele görmelidirler; katılımcı yöntemler altın esasını teşkil eder, yani mümkün olan en iyi yöntemlerdir. Makale ayrıca bu fikirlerin kimi bakımlardan faydalı olduğunu teslim etmekle beraber temel bir takım sorunları da ihtiva ettiğini savunuyor

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Fâillik,özerklik,çocukluk çalışmaları,inşacılık,katılımcı soruşturma

Çocukluk Çalışmaları: Sürdürülebilir Bir Paradigma mı?

Öz

This article interrogates what are frequently taken to be central commitments of ChildhoodStudies: the idea that children are worthy of study ‘in their own right’, that childhood is a ‘social construction’, that children are and must be treated as active agents, and that participatory methods are the gold standard. It is argued that while these ideas have been fruitful in some respects, they involve fundamental problems

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Agency,autonomy,Childhood Studies,constructionism,participatory inquiry

Kaynakça

1. Becker H (1967) Whose side are we on? Problems 14: 239–247.
2. Bluebond-Langner M and Korbin J (2007) Challenges and opportunities in the anthropology of child- hoods: An introduction to ‘Children, Childhoods, and Childhood studies’. American Anthropologist 109(2): 241–246.
3. Bowden P (1997) Caring: Gender-Sensitive Ethics. London: Routledge.
4. Boyden J (1997) Childhood and the policy makers: A comparative perspective on the globalization of childhood. In: James A and Prout A (eds) Constructing and Reconstructing Childhood: Contempo- rary Issues in the Sociological Study of Childhood. London: Falmer Press, pp. 190–209.
5. Burr V (2015) Social Constructionism, 3rd ed. London: Routledge.
6. Chandler M and Chapman M (eds) (1991) Criteria for Competence: Controversies in the Conceptualiza- tion and Assessment of Children’s Abilities. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
7. Corsaro W (2003) We’re Friends Right? Inside Kids’ Culture. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press.
8. Cranston M (1994) The Romantic Movement. Oxford: Blackwell.

9. Denzin N (1977) Childhood Socialisation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
10. Dreitzel HP (ed.) (1972) Recent Sociology No. 5: Childhood and Socialization. New York: Macmillan.
11. Dyson A and Meagher N (2001) Reflections on the case studies. In: Clark J, Dyson A, Meagher N, et al. (eds) Young People as Researchers: Possibilities, Problems and Politics. Leicester: Youth Work Press, pp. 59–76.
12. Ferrando F (2013) Posthumanism, transhumanism, antihumanism, metahumanism, and new material- isms differences and relations. Existenz: An International Journal in Politics, Religion, Philosophy, and the Arts 8(2): 26–32. Available at: http://www.bu.edu/paideia/existenz/volumes/ Vol.8-2Fer- rando.pdf