Neolitik Boncuklu Höyük’te Taş Boncuk Üretimi ve Kullanımı İle İlgili Bulgular

Yıl 2014, Sayı: 13, 57 - 80, 01.06.2014

Emma Baysal

Öz

MÖ 9. bin sonu ile 8. bin yıllarına tarihlenen Boncuklu Höyük erken Neolitik Dönem yerleşimi Orta Anadolu’da Konya Ovasında yer almaktadır. Buluntu yeri, erken dönem yerleşik yaşamı, oval mimarisi, avcılık ve toplayıcılık aktiviteleri ile geniş bir alan boyunca olan ilişkileri hakkında verdiği bilgiler bakımından ilgi çekmektedir. Kullanılan detaylı kazı tekniği, özel aktivitelerin gerçekleştiği alanlar gibi yaşam biçimlerini anlamayı mümkün kılmaktadır. Boncuklu’daki 5 sezonluk kazı çalışmalarından sonra höyük, taş boncuk ve kolye tanelerinin erken Neolitik dönemde nasıl üretilmiş ve kullanılmış oldukları hakkında bilgi verebilmektedir. Yerleşim yerinin erken tarihi ve daimi yerleşik yaşamın erken evrelerinde gerçekleşen sosyal değişimler teknoloji ve üretim uygulamaları çalışmalarını ilginç kılmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Teknoloji, Boncuklar, Neolitik, zanaat uzmanlaşması

Findings Relating to the Manufacture and Use of Stone Beads at Neolithic Boncuklu Höyük

Öz

After five seasons’ work at Boncuklu Höyük it became clear that the site could tell us something about how stone beads were made and used in the early Neolithic. The early date of the site 8200-7700 BC and the social changes that occurred during the incipient stages of permanent sedentary settlement make study of technology and manufacturing practices particularly interesting. The site is unusual in having no easy access to stone sources, the nearest of which is located at a distance of 20km from the site. Archaeological evidence shows that bead manufacture took place at the site, and there are indications that raw material procurement included engagement with a broad area of the surrounding Konya Plain in Central Turkey. There is a wide variety of stone bead forms at Boncuklu, although the majority of the assemblage consists of stone disc beads which vary little in size or form but are made from a variety of stone types.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Technology, Beads, Neolithic, Recycling, craft specialization

Kaynakça

• Altınbilek, Ç. – G. Coşkunsu – Y. Dede – M. Iovino – C. Lemorini – A. Özdoğan 2001 “Drills from Çayönü. A combination of ethnographic, experimen- tal and use-wear analysis”, I. Caneva – C. Lemorini – D. Zampetti – P. Biagi (eds.), Beyond Tools, redefining the PPN lithic assemblages of the Levant, Berlin: 137-144.
• Bains, R. – M. Vasić – D. Bar-Yosef Mayer – N. Russell – K. Wright – C. Doherty 2013 “A technological approach to the study of personal ornamentation and social expression at Çatalhöyük”, I. Hodder (ed.), Substantive techno- logies at Çatalhöyük: reports from the 2000-2008 seasons, Volume 9, London: 331-363.
• Baird, D. – A. Fairbairn – L. Martin – C. Middleton 2012 “The Boncuklu project: the origins of sedentism, cultivation and her- ding in Central Anatolia”, M. Özdoğan – N. Başgelen – P. Kuniholm (eds.), The Neolithic in Turkey Volume 3: Central Turkey, Istanbul: 219-244.
• Bar-Yosef Mayer, D. 2013 “Towards a typology of stone beads in the Neolithic Levant”, Journal of Field Archaeology 38.2: 129-142.
• Baysal, E – B. Erdoğu 2014 “Frog in the pond: Gökçeada (Imbros), an Aegean stepping stone in the use of Spondylus shell”, Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 80. Beck, H. 1928 “Classification and nomenclature of beads and pendants”, Archaeologia 77: 1-76.
• Calley, S. – R. Grace 1988 “Technology and function of micro-borers from Kumartepe (Turkey)”, S. Beyries (ed.), Industries lithiques tracéologie et technologie volume 1. Oxford: 69-81.
• Coşkunsu, G. 2008 “Hole-making tools of Mezraa Teleilat with special attention to micro-borers and cylindrical polished drills and bead production”, Neo-Lithics 1/08: 25-36.
• Fabiano, M. – F. Berna – E. Borzatti von Löwenstein 2004 “Pre-pottery Neolithic amazonite bead workshops in southern Jordan”, I. Jadin - A. Hauzeur (eds.), The Neolithic in the Near East and Europe. Acts of the XIVth UISPP Congress, University of Liege, Belgium, 2-8th September 2001, Oxford: 265-273.
• Garfinkel, Y. 1987 “Bead Manufacture on the Pre-Pottery Neolithic B site of Yiftahel”, Mitekufat Haeven, Journal of the Israel Prehistoric Society 20: 79-90.
• Gurova, M. – C. Bonsall – B. Bradley – E. Anastassova 2013 “Approaching prehistoric skills: experimental drilling in the context of bead manufacturing”, Bulgarian e-Journal of Archaeology 3: 201-221.
• Gwinnett, A. – L. Gorelick 1981 “Beadmarking in Iran in the Early Bronze Age Derived by Scanning Electron Microscopy”, Expedition 24.1: 10-23.
• Iovino, M. 2004 “Use wear trace analysis on obsidian tools from the early Neolithic of Yumuktepe”, I. Caneva – V. Sevin (eds.), Mersin-Yumuktepe a reapp- raisal. Lecce: 153-157.
• Iovino, M. – C. Lemorini 1999 “Lithic industry at Çayönü: different raw material used, different function(s) done? The lithic assemblage of the channeled building DI”, TÜBA-AR 2: 139-153.
• Kenoyer, J. – M. Vidale – K. Bhan 1991 “Contemporary stone beadmaking in Khambhat, India: patterns of craft specialisation and organisation of production as reflected in the archaeological record”, World Archaeology 23: 44-63.
• Last, J. 1998 “A design for life: interpreting the art of Çatalhöyük”, Journal of Material Culture 3: 335-378.
• Mellaart, J. 1962 “The earliest frescoes yet found on a man-made wall: remarkable disco- veries in the excavations at Anatolian Catal Huyuk - part 2”, Illustrated London News Archaeological Section 2095: 976-978.
• Özdoğan, A. “Çayönü”, M. Özdoğan – N. Başgelen (eds.), Türkiye’de Neolitik Dönem, İstanbul: 57-98. Rollefson, G. 2002 “Bead-making tools from al-Basît, Jordan”, Neo-Lithics 2/02: 5-7.
• Türkmenoğlu, A. – A. Baysal – V. Toprak – C. Göncüoğlu 2001 “Raw Material Types of Groundstones from Çatalhöyük Neolithic Site in Turkey”, Slovak Geological Magazine 7(4): 409-411.
• Türkmenoğlu, A. – A. Baysal – V. Toprak – C. Göncüoğlu 2005 “Ground-stone Raw Material from Çatalhöyük”, I. Hodder, (ed.), Changing Materialities at Çatalhöyük, Reports from the 1995-1999 Seasons, Cambridge: 369-371.
• Wright, K. – P. Critchley – A. Garrard “Stone bead technologies and early craft specialization: insights from two Neolithic sites in eastern Jordan”, Levant 40.2: 131-165.
• Wright, K. – R. Bains 2007 “Stone bead technology at Çatalhöyük”, Çatalhöyük 2007 Archive Report. http://www.ctalhoyuk.com/archive_reports/2007/
• Wright, K. – A. Baysal 2012 “Ground stone tools and technologies associated with buildings in the BACH area”, R. Tringham – M. Stevanović (eds.), Last house on the hill: BACH area reports from Çatalhöyük, Turkey. Los Angeles: 415-422.
• Wright, K. – A. Garrard 2003 “Social identities and the expansion of stone beadmaking in Neolithic western Asia: new evidence from Jordan”, Antiquity 77: 267-284.