A Comparison of Coach-Related Emotional Maltreatment by Disability Status: A Study on Athletes With and Without Disabilities

Öz

Purpose: The aim of this study is to investigate whether the levels of emotional maltreatment perceived by athletes from their coaches differ according to their disability status.

Method: The study was conducted using the comparative survey model, one of the quantitative research methods. The sample consisted of 64 athletes with physical disabilities (56 women, 8 men; X̄age = 36.39 ± 11.83) and 69 able-bodied athletes (25 women, 44 men; X̄age = 20.65 ± 2.55), totalling 133 athletes. The Coach-Athlete Relationship Emotional Maltreatment Scale, developed by Dietz, Casey, Stirling and Porter (2015) and adapted into Turkish by Çetin (2022), was used as the data collection tool. The SPSS 25.0 statistical software package was used for data analysis. In the analysis of the data obtained, the independent samples t-test was used for comparisons between the two groups, and Pearson’s correlation analysis was used for correlational analyses.

Results: The research findings showed that non-disabled athletes scored significantly higher than disabled athletes on all sub-dimensions and the total score of the emotional maltreatment scale (p<0.05). Furthermore, whilst a weak positive correlation was found between sporting age and the ‘Embarrassing Behaviour’ sub-dimension among able-bodied athletes (r = 0.248; p < 0.05), no significant correlation was found between sporting age and the other sub-dimensions or the total score. Among athletes with disabilities, however, no significant correlation was found between sporting age and ‘emotional maltreatment’ (p > 0.05).

Conclusion: These findings suggest that a more protective coaching approach may have been adopted towards athletes with disabilities in sporting environments, and that emotional maltreatment may vary depending on the sporting discipline.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Emotional abuse
• coaches’ behaviour
• athletes with disabilities
• able-bodied athletes
• the sporting environment

Etik Beyan

This research was conducted in accordance with the ethical principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Atatürk University Faculty of Sports Sciences Unit Ethics Committee at its meeting dated 25/05/2025, Decision No: E-70400699-050.02.04-2500166526.

Antrenör Kaynaklı Duygusal Kötü Muamelenin Engel Durumuna Göre Karşılaştırılması: Engelli ve Engelsiz Sporcular Üzerine Bir Çalışma

Öz

Amaç: Bu araştırmanın amacı, sporcuların antrenörlerinden algıladıkları duygusal kötü muamele düzeylerinin engel durumuna göre farklılaşıp farklılaşmadığını incelemektir.

Yöntem: Araştırma nicel araştırma yöntemlerinden karşılaştırmalı tarama modeli kullanılarak gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırmanın örneklemini farklı branşlarda aktif olarak spor yapan 64 bedensel engelli sporcu (56 kadın, 8 erkek; X̄yaş = 36,39 ± 11,83) ve 69 engelsiz sporcu (25 kadın, 44 erkek; X̄yaş = 20,65 ± 2,55) olmak üzere toplamda 133 sporcu oluşturmaktadır. Veri toplama aracı olarak Dietz, Casey, Stirling ve Porter (2015) tarafından geliştirilen ve Çetin (2022) tarafından Türkçeye uyarlanan Antrenör-Sporcu İlişkisi Duygusal Kötü Muamele Ölçeği (ASİDKMÖ) kullanılmıştır. Verilerin analizi için SPSS 25.0 istatistik paket programı kullanılmıştır. Elde edilen verilerin analizinde iki gruplu karşılaştırmalarda bağımsız gruplarda independent sample t- testi ve ilişkisel analizler için pearson korelasyon analizi kullanılmıştır.

Bulgular: Araştırma bulguları, engelli olmayan sporcuların duygusal kötü muamele ölçeğinin tüm alt boyutları ve genel toplam puanlarında engelli sporculara kıyasla anlamlı düzeyde daha yüksek puanlara sahip olduğunu göstermiştir (p<0.05). Ayrıca engelsiz sporcularda spor yaşı ile utandırıcı davranış alt boyutu arasında düşük düzeyde pozitif bir ilişki bulunurken (r=0.248; p<0.05), diğer alt boyutlar ve toplam puan ile spor yaşı arasında anlamlı bir ilişki tespit edilmemiştir. Engelli sporcularda ise spor yaşı ile duygusal kötü muamele arasında anlamlı bir ilişki bulunmamıştır (p>0.05).

Sonuç: Bu bulgular, spor ortamlarında engelli sporculara yönelik daha koruyucu bir antrenörlük yaklaşımının benimsenmiş olabileceğine ve duygusal kötü muamelenin spor branşı bağlamına göre farklılaşabileceğine işaret etmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Duygusal kötü muamele
• antrenör davranışı
• engelli sporcular
• engelsiz sporcular
• spor ortamı

Etik Beyan

Bu araştırma, Helsinki Bildirgesi’nde belirtilen etik ilkelere uygun olarak yürütülmüş ve Atatürk Üniversitesi Spor Bilimleri Fakültesi Birim Etik Kurulu tarafından 25/05/2025 tarihli toplantısında, Karar No: E-70400699-050.02.04-2500166526 ile onaylanmıştır.

Kaynakça

1. Al-Harahsheh, S. T., Swart, K., Neves, J., & Shaban, S. (2022). Inclusion of persons with disability in sport: part 1–rights and challenges in Qatar. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 56(22), 1257-1258. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2022-106224
2. Baykan, E. (2026). Coachperpetrated emotional maltreatment in organized sport settings: differences by sport-related and demographic variables. Journal of Sport for All and Recreation, 8(3), 431444. https://doi.org/10.56639/jsar.1965137
3. Brassard, M. R., & Donovan, K. L. (2006). Defining Psychological Maltreatment. In M. M. Freerick, J. F. Knutson, P. K. Trickett, & S. M. Flanzer (Eds.), Child Abuse and Neglect: Definitions, Classifications, and a Framework for Research (pp. 151-197). Paul H. Brookers Publishing.
4. Crooks, C. V., & Wolfe, D. A. (2007). Child abuse and neglect. In E. J. Mash & R. A. Barkley (Eds.), Assessment of childhood disorders (4th ed., pp. 639–684). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
5. Çetin, E. (2022). Turkısh Adaptatıon Of Coach-Athlete Relatıonshıp Emotıonal Maltreatment Scale (Carems). Spormetre The Journal of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, 20(4), 142-156. https://doi.org/10.33689/spormetre.1133456
6. Çetin, E. (2023). Examination of Emotional Maltreatment Experienced by Young Athletes in Turkey with the Variables Related to The Sports Institution. The Journal of Sociology, 45, 29-47. doi.10.59572/sosder.1263276
7. Dietz, C. M., Casey, S. L., Stirling, A. E., Porter, N. (2015). Development and validation of the coach-athlete relationship emotional maltreatment scale (CAREMS). Athletic Insight, 7(3), 209-226.
8. Gervis, M. & Dunn, N. (2004). The emotional abuse of elite child athletes by their coaches. Child Abuse Rev., 13(3), 215-223. https://doi.org/10.1002/car.843

9. González-Hernández, J., Gómez-López, M., Carlo, G., & Manzano-Sánchez, D. (2025). Is it possible to talk about violence climate in grassroots sport? A study on the psychosocial adaptations of young athletes. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1426900. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1426900
10. Hagerty, S., & Felizzi, M. (2023). The impact of authoritarian coaching styles on athletes’ anxious states. Sport Social Work Journal, 3(1), 67-76. https://doi.org/10.33043/SSWJ.3.1.67-76
11. Karasar, N. (2017). Scientific research method (35. bs). Nobel Academic Publishing.
12. Kerr, G., Willson, E., & Stirling, A. (2020). “It was the worst time in my life”: The effects of emotionally abusive coaching on female Canadian national team athletes. Women in Sport and Physical Activity Journal, 28(1), 81-89. https://doi.org/10.1123/wspaj.2019-0054
13. Kirby, S. L., Demers, G., & Parent, S. (2008). Vulnerability/prevention: Considering the needs of disabled and gay athletes in the context of sexual harassment and abuse. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 6(4), 407-426. https://doi.org/10.1080/1612197X.2008.9671882
14. Kirby, S. L., Greaves, L., & Hankivsky, O. (2000). The dome of silence: Sexual harassment and abuse in sport. Halifax: Fernwood.
15. Liu, J., Yu, H., Bleakney, A., & Jan, Y.-K. (2024). Factors influencing the relationship between coaches and athletes with disabilities: A systematic review. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 6, 1461512. https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2024.1461512
16. Malm, C., Jakobsson, J., & Isaksson, A. (2019). Physical activity and sports—real health benefits: a review with insight into the public health of Sweden. Sports, 7(5), 127. https://doi.org/10.3390/sports7050127
17. Mountjoy, M., Brackenridge, C., Arrington, M., Blauwet, C., Carska-Sheppard, A., Fasting, K., ... & Budgett, R. (2016). International Olympic Committee consensus statement: harassment and abuse (non-accidental violence) in sport. British journal of sports medicine, 50(17), 1019-1029.
18. Rulofs, B., Rau, T., & Allroggen, M. (2021). Elite athletes’ experiences of interpersonal violence in organized sport in Germany, the Netherlands, and Belgium. European journal of sport science, 21(4), 604-613. https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2020.1781266
19. Pan, F., & Sui, W. (2025). Research on coach-athlete relationship and team performance based on 3Cs theory: the chain mediating role of emotional intelligence and athletic engagement. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1587900. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1587900
20. Parent, S., Lavoie, F., Thibodeau, M. È., Hébert, M., Blais, M., & Team PAJ. (2016). Sexual violence experienced in the sport context by a representative sample of Quebec adolescents. Journal of interpersonal violence, 31(16), 2666-2686. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515580366
21. Stirling, A. E., & Kerr, G. A. (2008). Defining and categorizing emotional abuse in sport. European journal of sport science, 8(4), 173-181. https://doi.org/10.1080/17461390802086281
22. Stirling, A., & Kerr, G.A. (2013). The perceived effects of elite athletes’ experiences of emotional abuse in the coach-athlete relationship. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 11(1), 87–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/1612197X.2013.752173
23. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Pearson.
24. Townsend, R. C., Smith, B., & Cushion, C. J. (2016). Disability sports coaching: Towards a critical understanding. Sports Coaching Review, 5(2), 80–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/21640629.2016.1157324
25. Tuakli-Wosornu, Y. A., & Kirby, S. L. (2022). Safeguarding reimagined: Centering athletes’ rights and repositioning para sport to chart a new path. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 815038. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.815038
26. Tuakli-Wosornu, Y. A., Sun, Q., Gentry, M., Ayala, K. E. O., Doolan, F. C., Ottesen, T. D., ... & Kirby, S. (2020). Non-accidental harms (‘abuse’) in athletes with impairment (‘para athletes’): a state-of-the-art review. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 54(3), 129-138.
27. Willson, E., Buono, S., Kerr, G., & Stirling, A. (2023). Maltreatment experiences and mental health indicators among elite athletes. Psychology of sport and exercise, 69, 102493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2023.102493
28. Winnick, J. P. (2017). Adapted Physical Education and Sport. İstanbul: Ekin Sports Books.
29. Young, M. E., Nosek, M. A., Howland, C. A., Chanpong, G., & Rintala, D. H. (1997). Prevalence of abuse of women with physical disabilities. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 78(Suppl), S34–S38. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-9993(97)90219-7