Need to Amend Turkish Legislation to Ensure Political Participation in Turkey

Yıl 2013, Cilt: 11 Sayı: 21, 205 - 224, 01.03.2013

Sinem Yargıç

Öz

The Turkish Constitution of 1982 states that political parties are indispensable elements of democratic political life. However many of the grounds for the prohibition and dissolution of political parties which are stated in the Law no. 2820 on Political Parties are incompatible with the law of the ECHR. In addition, the national election threshold of 10% which is stipulated in the Law no. 2839 on the election of members of the National Assembly is the highest of all the thresholds applied in Europe. The organizations such as the Council of Europe, the OSCE and the European Union call on Turkey to consider lowering it. In order to ensure political plurality and political participation in Turkey, the legislation such as the Law no. 2820 on Political Parties and the Law no. 2839 on the election of members of the National Assembly should be amended.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Political pluralism, political parties, national election threshold

Türkiye’de Siyasal Katılımı Sağlamak için Türk Mevzuatı’nda Değişiklik Yapma İhtiyacı

Öz

1982 Anayasası, siyasi partilerin, demokratik siyasal hayatın vazgeçilmez unsurları olduğunu belirtmektedir. Bununla birlikte 2820 sayılı Siyasi Partiler Kanunu’nda düzenlenen siyasi parti yasaklarının birçoğu, İnsan Hakları Avrupa Sözleşmesi Hukuku’nun ortaya koyduğu kriterlerle çelişmektedir. 2839 sayılı Milletvekili Seçimi Kanunu’nda öngörülen %10’luk ulusal seçim barajı ise Avrupa’da uygulanan * Assistant Professor Dr. in Constitutional Law, Istanbul University, Faculty of Political Sciences, [e-mail] it is stated by the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR), “democracy appears to be the only political model contemplated by the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) and, accordingly, the only one compatible with it” and “there can be no democracy without pluralism”. For the Court, since the political parties have an “essential role in ensuring pluralism and the proper functioning of democracy” which is “a fundamental feature of the European public order”, they are under the protection of articles 10 and 11 of the ECHRThe Turkish Constitution of 1982 also states that political parties are indispensable elements of democratic political life. However the constitutional criteria for prohibition and dissolution of political parties of the 1982 Constitution go beyond the criteria recognised as legitimate by the ECtHR and the Venice Commission. The Law no. 2820 on Political Parties of 1983 is also being criticized for not being compatible with the European criteria.Besides the Law no. 2820 on Political Parties, the Electoral Law no. 2839 on the Election of Members of the National Assembly stipulates that in a general election, political parties may not win seats unless they obtain nationally, more than 10% of the votes validly cast. This national threshold of 10% of the Turkish election system has also been questioned on its compatibility with the principle of a democratic state. Because of their importance for ensuring political pluralism, especially political participation in Turkey, in this article, firstly, related provisions concerning prohibition and dissolution of political parties in the Law on en yüksek orandaki seçim barajıdır. Avrupa Konseyi, AGİT, Avrupa Birliği gibi örgütler, Türkiye’ye, seçim barajını indirmesi çağrısında bulunmaktadır. Türkiye’de siyasi çoğulculuğun ve siyasi katılımın sağlanabilmesi için 2820 sayılı Siyasi Partiler Kanunu ile 2839 sayılı Milletvekili Seçimi Kanunu’nda değişikliklerin yapılması gereklidir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Siyasi çoğulculuk, siyasi partiler, ulusal seçim barajı

Kaynakça

• Books ÇAVUŞOĞLU, Naz: Anayasa Notları, İstanbul, Beta,1997
• TEZİÇ, Erdoğan: Anayasa Hukuku, 5. bası, İstanbul, Beta,1998
• UYGUN, Oktay: Kamu Hukuku İncelemeleri, İnsan Hakları, Demokrasi, Hukuk Devleti, Egemenlik, Istanbul, On İki Levha Yayıncılık, Ocak 2011 Articles
• Çağlar, Bakır: “Anayasa Mahkemesi Kararlarında ‘Demokrasi’”, Anayasa Yargısı, No.7, 1990.
• Çağlar, Bakır, ÇAVUŞOĞLU, Naz: ‘Parti Kapatma Davalarında Mermer Mozaik İkilemi’, Anayasa Yargısı, No.16,1999.
• Çavuşoğlu, Naz:‘Cultural Identity: A Minority Question?’, İstanbul Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi, Sayı:23-24, Ekim 2000-Mart 2001
• Köker, Levent: “A Key to the “Democratic Opening”: Rethinking Citizenship, Ethnicity and Turkish Nation-State”, Insight Turkey, Vol.12, No.2, 2010.
• Özbudun, Ergun: “Turkey’s Search for a New Constitution”, Insight Turkey, Vol.14, No.1, 2012.
• Sağlam, Fazıl: ‘Siyasi Partiler Kanunu’nda Uluslararası Normlara Uygunluk Sağlamak İçin Yapılması Gereken Değişiklikler’, Anayasa Yargısı, No.17, 2000. Yüzbaşıoğlu, Necmi: “Türkiye’de Uygulanan Seçim Sistemleri ve Bunlara İlişkin Anayasa Mahkemesi Kararlarına Göre Nasıl Bir Seçim Sistemi”, İHFM, C.LV, 1996 Documents Council of Europe
• European Commission for Democracy Through Law, Opinion on The Constitutional and Legal Provisions Relevant to the Political Parties in Turkey, Opinion No. 489/2008, CDL-AD (2009)06, Strasbourg, 13 March 2009
• European Commission for Democracy Through Law, Report on Thresholds and Other Features of Electoral Systems Which Bar Parties From Access to Parliament (II),CDL-AD(2010)007, 15 March 2010
• Parliamentary Assembly, Resolution 1547(2007), 18 April 2007
• Parliamentary Assembly, Recommendation 1791(2007), 18 April 2007
• Parliamentary Assembly, Resolution 1705(2010), 27 January 2010
• Parliamentary Assembly, Resolution1380(2004), 22 June 2004
• Parliamentary Assembly, Observation of the Parliamentary elections in Turkey (22 July 2007), Doc.11367, 12 September 2007 OSCE
• OSCE, Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights, The Republic of Turkey Parliamentary Elections 3 November 2002, OSCE/OIDHR Assessment Report, 4 December 2002
• OSCE, Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights, The Republic of Turkey Parliamentary Elections 22 July 2007, OSCE/OIDHR Needs Assessment Mission Report 29 May-1 June 2007, 12 June 2007 European Union
• Commission of the European Communities, 2004 Regular Report on Turkey’sProgress Towards Accession, {COM(2004)656 final}, 6.10.2004
• Commission of the European Communities, 2003 Regular Report on Turkey’s progress towards accession, 5.11.2003
• Commission of the European Communities, Turkey 2006 Progress Report, {COM(2006)649final}, 8.11.2006
• Commission of the European Communities, Turkey 2007 Progress Report, {COM(2007)663}, 6.11.2007
• European Commission, Commission Staff Working Paper Turkey 2011 Progress Report, SEC(2011) 1201 final, 12.10.2011
• European Parliament, European Parliament resolution on Turkey’s progress towards accession, 27 September 2006, OJ C 306 E, 15.12.2006
• European Parliament, European Parliament resolution of 24 October 2007 on EUTurkey relations, OJ C 263 E, 16.10.2008
• European Parliament, European Parliament resolution of 21 May 2008 on Turkey’s 2007 progress report, OJ C 279 E, 19.11.2009
• European Parliament, European Parliament Resolution of 10 February 2010 on Turkey’s progress report 2009, 10 February 2010, par.7, http://www.europarl. europa.eu/sides/getDoc. do?language=EN&reference=B7-0068/2010, (Erişim Tarihi: 10 Mayıs 2010). Jurisprudence
• Turkish Constitutional Court, E. 1968/15, K. 1968/13, KT.3,4 ve 6/5/1968.
• Turkish Constitutional Court, E. 1984/1, K.1984/2, K.T. 1/3/1984.
• Turkish Constitutional Court, E. 1995/54, K. 1995/59, K.T. 18/11/1995.
• ECtHR, Case of Yumak and Sadak v. Turkey, Judgment of 30 January 2007.
• ECtHR, Case of Yumak and Sadak v. Turkey, Judgment of 8 July 2008.
• ECtHR, Case of Partidul Comunistulor (Nepeceristi) and Ungureanu v. Romania, Judgment of 3 February 2005.
• ECtHR, Case of United Communist Party of Turkey and Others v. Turkey, Judgment of 30 January 1998.
• ECtHR, Case of Socialist Party and Others v. Turkey, Judgment of 25 May 1998.
• ECtHR, Case of Freedom and Democracy Party (ÖZDEP) v. Turkey, Judgment of 8 December 1999.
• ECtHR, Case of Yazar and Others v. Turkey, Judgment of 9 April 2002.
• ECtHR, Case of Dicle for the Democratic Party (DEP) of Turkey v. Turkey, Judgment of 10 December 2002.
• ECtHR, Case of Socialist Party of Turkey (SPT) and Others v. Turkey, Judgment of 12 November 2003.
• ECtHR, Case of Democracy and Change Party and Others v. Turkey, Judgment of 26 April 2005.
• ECtHR, Case of Emek Partisi and Senol v. Turkey, Judgment of 31 May 2005.
• ECtHR, Case of Demokratik Kitle Partisi and Elçi v.Turkey, Judgment of 3 May 200 ECtHR, Case of HADEP and Demir v. Turkey, Judgment of 14 December 2010.