RE-ASSESSMENT OF LEADERSHIP BEHAVIOR TAXONOMY CONSTRUCTS: CONSTRUCT VALIDATION ANALYSIS

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 17 Sayı: 33, 9 - 32, 13.03.2019

Mehtap Özşahin

https://doi.org/10.35408/comuybd.495869

Öz

Despite of the huge number of leadership behavior description measures in the
literature, construct assessment and validation studies are very rare in literature. In
this sense, this survey, which focused on the construct re-assessment and validation
of leadership behavior taxonomy, is expected to contribute to leadership literature.
Yukl’s Leadership Behavior Taxonomy (LBT) is focused on and the constructs of LBT
have been evaluated in terms of content validity, convergent validity, discriminant
validity and predictive validity in this study. The survey was conducted on 445 middle
level managers of 188 large-scale firms operating in manufactory industry and 550
managers operating in service industry in Turkey. Data obtained from 445 middle level
managers operating in manufacturing industry and 550 managers operating in service
industry were analyzed through the SPSS and AMOS statistical packet programs. The
findings of this survey revealed that 23 items-three factors-LBT model has better fit for
the managers of both manufacturing and service industry in Turkey.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Leadership behavior taxonomy, Task-oriented leadership, Relationsoriented leadership, Change-oriented leadership, Construct validation analysis

LİDERLİK DAVRANIŞI BOYUTLARININ YENİDEN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ: ÖLÇEK GEÇERLEME ÇALIŞMASI

Öz

Literatürde, liderlik davranışının ölçümüyle ilgili çok sayıda çalışma mevcut olmasına
rağmen, liderlik davranışı yapılarını ele alan ölçek geçerleme çalışmalarına nadiren
yer verilmektedir. Bu kapsamda, literatürde en çok kullanılan ölçeklerden biri olan
Yukl’un Liderlik Davranışı Sınıflaması (Leadership Behavior Taxonomy-LBT)
ölçeğini, içerik geçerliliği, yakınsama geçerliliği, ayrışma geçerliliği ve öngörü
geçerliliği bağlamında yeniden değerlendiren bu çalışmanın literatüre katkı sağlaması
beklenmektedir. Çalışma Türkiye’de üretim sektöründe faaliyet gösteren 188 büyük
ölçekli firmanın 445 orta düzey yöneticisi ile hizmet sektöründe çalışan 550 yönetici
üzerinde yürütülmüştür. Türkiye’deki üretim ve hizmet sektörü yöneticilerinden elde
edilen veriler SPSS ve AMOS istatistik programları kullanılarak değerlendirilmiş
ve analiz bulguları, liderlik davranışıyla ilgili 23 sorulu 3 boyutlu bir yapı ortaya koymuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Liderlik davranışı sınıflaması, Görev odaklı liderlik, İlişki odaklı liderlik, Değişim odaklı liderlik, Ölçek geçerleme analizi

Kaynakça

• Acar, A Z.., & Zehir, C. (2009). Development and validation of a multidimensional business capabilities measurement instrument. Journal of Transnational Management, 14(3), 215-240.
• Antonakis, J., Avolio, B.J. & Sivasubramaniam, N. (2003). Context and Leadership: An Examination of the Nine-Factor Full-Range Leadership Theory Using the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire, The Leadership Quarterly, 14, 261-295.
• Aragon-Correa, J.A., Garcia-Moreales, V.J. & Cordon-Pozo, E. (2007). Leadership and Organizational Learning’s Role on Innovation and Performance: Lessons from Spain. Industrial Marketing Management, 36, pp.349-359.
• Avolio, B.J. & Bass, B.M. (1991). The Full Range Leadership Development Programs: Basic and Advanced Manuals. Binghamton, NY: Bass, Avolio & Associates.
• Avolio, B.J., Reichard, R.J., Hannah, S.T., Walumbwa, F.O & Chan, A. (2009). A Meta-analytic Review of Leadership Impact, Research: Experimental and Quasi-experimental Studies. The Leadership Quarterly, 20, pp.764-784.
• Avolio, B.J., Waldman, D.W. & Yammarino, F.L. (1991). Leading in the 1990’s: Towards Understanding the Four I’s of Transformational Leadership, Journal of European Industrial Training, 15 (4), 9-16.
• Avolio, B.J., Zhu, W. & Bhatia, P. (2004). Transformational Leadership and Organizational Commitment: Mediating Role of Psychological Empowerment and Moderating Role of Structural Distance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, pp. 951-968.
• Bagozzi, R.P. & Phillips, L.W. (1991). Assesing Construct Validity in Organizational Researc. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 421-458.
• Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. Collier Macmillan.
• Bass, B. M. (1990). Handbook of Leadership: A Survey of Theory and Research, New York: Free Press.
• Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1990). Transformational leadership development: Manual for the multifactor leadership questionnaire. Consulting Psychologists Press.
• Bass, B.M. (1998). Transformational Leadership: Industrial, Military, and Educational Impact. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Bennis, W. & Nanus, B. (1985). Leaders: The strategies for taking charge. New York, NY:
• Bollen, K.A. (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables, New York: Wiley.
• Bono, J.E. & Judge, T.A. (2003). Self-Concordance at Work: Toward Understanding the Motivational Effects of Transformational Leaders. Academy of Management Journal, 46(5), pp.554-571.
• Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sage focus editions, 154, 136-136.
• Castro, S.L. & Schriesheim, C. A. (1998). Tranformational Leadership: A Summary of the Behavioral Dimensions of the Construct and an Assessment of the Validity of New Scales Measuring Each Dimensions (In Yukl, G., Gordon, A. & Taber, T. “A Hierarcihical Taxonomy of Leadership Behavior: Integrating a Half Century of Behavior Research” Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 2002, Vol. 9, No1).
• Conger, J. A. & Kanungo, R. (1988). The empowerment process: Integrating theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 13, pp.471-482.
• Daft, R. L. (2008). The New Era of Management, Second Edition, Thomson South-Western Corporation, USA.
• Dess, G.G. & Picken, J.C. (2000). Changing Roles: Leadership in 21st Century. Organizational Dynamics, 28(3), pp.18-34.
• Dienesch, R. M. & Liden, R. C. (1986). Leader-member Exchange Model of Leadership: A Critique and Further Development, Academy of Management Review, 11, pp.618-634.
• Eicher, J. (1998). Leader-Manager Profile. King of Prussia, NJ: HRDQ.
• Ekvall, G., & Arvonen, J. (1991). Change-centered leadership: An extension of the two-dimensional model. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 7(1), 17-26.
• Finch, H. (2006). Comparison of the performance of varimax and promax rotations: Factor structure recovery for dichotomous items. Journal of Educational Measurement, 43(1), 39-52.
• Fleishman, E. A. (1953). The description of supervisory behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 37(1), 1-6.
• Fornell, C. & Larcker, D.D. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39-50.
• Ghiselli, E. E., Campbell, J. P., & Zedeck, S. (1981). Measurement theory for the behavioral sciences. A series of books in psychology. San Francisco: WH Freeman.
• Gottfredson, I.S. (1997), Construct Validity. (In C.A. Schriesheim, & C.C. Cogliser, 2009, Construct Validation in Leadership Research: Explication and Illustration, 20, pp.725-736).
• Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J. & Anderson R.E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspective, Seventh Ed., Pearson Prentice Hall, New Jersey.Harper & Row.
• Hooijberg, R. & Choi, J. (2000). Which Leadership Roles Matter to Whom? An Examination of Rater Effects on Perceptions of Effectiveness, The Leadership Quarterly, 11, 341-364.
• Howell, J.M. & Avolio, B.J. (1993). Transformational Leadership, Locus of Control and Support for Information: Key Predictors of Consolidated-Business-Unit Performance, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 78, pp.891-902.
• Javidan, M. (1992). Managers on leaders: Developing a profile of effective leadership in top management. (In Yukl, G., Gordon, A. & Taber, T. A Hierarchical Taxonomy of Leadership Behavior: Integrating a Half Century of Behavior Research, Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 2002, 9(1), 15-32).
• Kanter, R.M. (1983). The Change Masters, Simon & Schuster, New York, NY.
• Khandwalla, Pradiph N. (1977). The Design of Organizations. Harcourt, Brace Javanovich Inc. USA.
• Kim, H., & Yukl, G. (1995). Relationships of self-reported and subordinate-reported leadership behaviors to managerial effectiveness and advancement. Leadership Quarterly, 6(3), 361-77.
• Kline, R.B. (1998). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. New York: Guildford Press.
• Kotter, J. P. (1990). A Force for Change: How Leadership Differs from Management. New York: Free Press.
• Li, S., Rao, S.S., Ragu-Nathan, T.S. & Ragu-Nathan, B. (2005). Development and Validation of a Measurement Instrument for Studying Supply Chain Management Practices. Journal of Operations Management, 23, 618-641.
• Liden, R.C. & Graen, G.B. (1980). Generalizability of the Vertical Dyad Linkage Model of Leadership, Academy of Management Journal, 23, 451-465.
• Lindell, M. & Rosenqvist, G. (1992). Management Behavior Dimensions and Development Orientation, The Leadership Quarterly, 3, 355-377.
• McGregor, D. (1960). The human side of enterprise. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill
• Meydan, C.H & Şeşen, H. (2011). Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi: AMOS Uygulamaları, (Structural Equation Modeling: AMOS Applications. Detay Yayıncılık, First Ed., Ankara.
• Miller, D. & Friesen, P.H. (1982). Innovation in Conservative and Entrepreneurial Firms: Two Models of Strategic Momentum. Strategic Management Journal, 3, 1-25.
• Mowday, R., Porter, L. & Steers, R. (1982). Employee-Organization Linkages: The Psychology of Commitment, Absenteeism, and Turnover. New York: Academic Press.
• Nadler, D.A., Shaw, R.B., Walton, A.E. and Associates (1995). Discontinuous Change: Leading Organizational Transformation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric Theory. McGraw-Hill, New York.
• Podsakoff, P. M., & Todor, W. D. (1985). Relationships between leader reward and punishment behavior and group processes and productivity. Journal of Management, 11(1), 55-73.
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, N. P., & Lee, J. Y. (2003). The mismeasure of man (agement) and its implications for leadership research. The Leadership Quarterly, 14(6), 615-656.
• Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Moorman, R.H., & Fetter, R. (1990). Transformational Leader Behaviors and Their Effects on Followers’ Trust in Leader, Satisfaction, and Organizational Citizenship Behavior. The Leadership Quarterly, 1, 107-142.
• Prajogo, Daniel I. & Sohal, Amrik S. (2006). The Integration of TQM and Technology / R&D Management in Determining Quality and Innovation Performance. Omega 34, 296-312.
• Quin, R.E., Faerman, S.R., Thompson, M.P. & McGrath, M.R. (1996), Becoming a Master Manager: A Competency Framework, New York, USA: Wiley.
• Rowold, J., Borgmann, L., & Bormann, K. (2014). Which leadership constructs are important for predicting job satisfaction, affective commitment, and perceived job performance in profit versus nonprofit organizations?. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 25(2), 147-164.
• Schein, E.H, (1992). Organizational Culture and Leadership. (2nd Ed.). San Francisco: Josey-Bass.
• Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müler, H. (2003). Evaluating the Fit of Structural Models: Tests of Significance and Descriptive Goodness-ıf-Fit Measures, Methods of Psychological Research Online 8(2), 23-74.
• Schriesheim, C. A., & Cogliser, C. C. (2009). Construct validation in leadership research: Explication and illustration. The Leadership Quarterly, 20(5), 725-736.
• Schumacker, R.E. & Lomax, R.G. (1996). A Beginner’s Guide to Structural Equation Modeling, Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Schwap, D.P. (1980), Construct Validity in Organizational Research, Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol.2, 3-43.
• Senge, P.M. (1990). The Fifth Dicipline: The Art and Practice of Learning Organization. New York: Doubleday Currency.
• Steyrer, J., Schiffinger, M. & Lang, R. (2008). Organizational Commitment-A Missing Link Between Leadership Behavior and Organizational Performance?. Scandinavian Journal of Management, (24), pp.364-374.
• Stogdill, R.M. (1974), Handbook of Leadership, New York: Free Press.
• Strang, David K. (2007), Examining Effective Technology Project Leadership Traits and Behaviors, Computers in Human Behavior, 1(23), pp.424-462.
• Trice, H.M. & Beyer, J.M. (1993). The Cultures of Work Organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
• Ulrich D., Jick, T. & Glinow, M.A. (1993). High Impact Learnig: Building and Diffusing Learning Capability. Organizational Dynamics, 22 (1), pp.52-79.
• Walumbwa, F.O., Orwa, B., Wang, P. & Lawler, J.J. (2005). Transformational Leadership, Organizational Commitment, and Job Satisfaction: A Comparative Study of Kenyan and U.S. Financial Firms. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 16 (2), pp.235-255.
• Werts, C.E., Linn, R.L., & Joreskog, K.G. (1974). Interclass Reliability Estimates: Testing Structural Assumptions. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 34, 25-33.
• Wikoff, M. B., Anderson, D. C., & Crowell, C. R. (1983). Behavior management in a factory setting: Increasing work efficiency. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 4(1-2), 97-128.
• Yukl, G. (2002). Leadership in Organizations. Fifth Edition, Prentice Hall Inc., New Jersey.
• Yukl, G. (2012). Effective leadership behavior: What we know and what questions need more attention. Academy of Management Perspectives, 26(4), 66-85.
• Yukl, G., Gordon, A. & Taber, T. (2002). A Hierarchical Taxonomy of Leadership Behavior: Integrating a Half Century of Behavior Research. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 9(1), 15-32.
• Yukl, Gary (1998). Leadership in Organizations. (4th ed.), Eaglewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
• Zaleznik, A. (1977). Managers and leaders: Are they different? Harvard Business Review, 55(5), 67-80.