“Kalkınma İktisadı ve Sosyal Yapılar” Piyasa ve Sosyal Yapıların Çözünürlüğü

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Sosyal Yapılar, Kalkınma Doktrini, Sosyal Politika

Öz

Globalization is a process affecting all of the countries and compelling them to change. Pax Americana which is a recent example for the globalization whose former examples include Pax Romana, Pax Ottomana and Pax Britannica, seems to have an overwhelming and irreversible characteristic –at least for now. There are different arguments and opinions about its effects, particularly on less developed or developing countries. Of course, globalization is important because with this process, humankind has experienced quick and big developments. In areas like medicine, physics, chemistry, economy and telecommunication, for example, great developments have been achieved. But unfortunately we can not talk about the similar developments in social life. Development economics which had been suggested for the development of less developed countries just after the Second World War was disputed seriously, and after a long practice period culminating in failure, alternatives are required. We can say that neither neo-liberal policies as alternative to development economics could create an optimistic environment. It is claimed that, on the contrary, hunger, poverty, unemployment and social insecurity have resulted from the policies suggested by neo-liberalism. As a result of the globalization, development in a particular area expands to the extensive areas in a short term, and affects all fields of social structure. Within the global system, it can be claimed that open trade and free market economy which has been implemented for last four decades provided more opportunities, growth and welfare for many people in the world; but much more people live in poverty, hunger and misery. The world economic system, which has failed in giving fair opportunities to increase living standards, is not reliable anymore. It is estimated that only 20-25%of the world population directly benefit from globalization, while the rest of the world either marginally benefit or do not benefit at all. Only 1,8 billion of the world population 6 billion can meet the cost of the goods and services available to the world markets; and only half of this section can operate within the banking system. The main issue is how to provide job and better living standard for around 3 billion people earning less than 2 USD per day and for 2-3 billion prospective additions to the world population next 30-50 years. Achievement of this goal requires a brand new global development strategy, as well as taking pain over environmental and social assets. Another reason for neglect of the social development policies by the development economics has been its focus on the individualism versus collectivism, and market versus government, but not taking socio-cultural complexities of the world which it tried to model.

Kaynakça

1. Acemoglu, Daron, Simon Johnson ve James A Robinson. (2001), “The colonial origins of comparative development: An empirical investigation”, The American Economic Review; Dec 2001; 91, ss.1369-1401
2. Agénor, Pierre-Richard. (2002); Does globalization hurt the poor? World Bank, Policy Research Working Paper, No. 2922 (October).
3. Alesina, A and Rodrik, D. (1994); “Distributive Politics and Economic Growth.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109, ss.465-490
4. Arrow, Kenneth J. (1999), “Amartya K. Sen's Contributions to the Study of Social Welfare”, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 101(2), ss.163-172
5. Atkinson, Anthony B. (1999), “The Contributions of Amartya Sen to Welfare Economics,” Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 101(2), ss.173-190
6. Baeck, L. (1993); Post-War Development Theories and Practice, UNESCO and The International Social Science Council, Paris.
7. Balasubramanyam, V.N and Sanjaya Lall. (1991); Current Issues in Development Economics, Macmillan, London
8. Bernhard, G. Gunter and Rolph van der Hoeven. (2004); The social dimension of globalization: a review of the literature, Working Paper No. 24, Policy Integration Department World Commission on the Social Policy Integration Department World Commission on the Social Dimension of Globalization International Labour Office Geneva, June.

9. Bhalla, A and Lapeyre F. (1997); ‘Social Exclusion: Towards an Analytical and Operational Framework’, Development and Change, July, ss.413-433
10. Bourguignon, Francois and Christian Morrisson. (2002); “Inequality among world citizens: 1820-1992”, American Economic Review, Vol: 92, No: 4 (September), ss.727-744
11. Brown, Gordon. (1999); “New Global Structures for the New Global Age”, Round Table, Jan99, Issue, 349, ss.39-50
12. Burtless, Gary. (2000); "Social Security Privatization and Financial Market Risk : Lessons from U.S. Financial History," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 211, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research
13. Carter, Alan. (1995); “The nation State and Underdevelopment”, Third Woorld Quartely, Dec 95, Issue 4, ss.595-618
14. Castells, Manuel. (1996); The Rise of the Network Society, Blackwell, Oxford.
15. Castles. Stephen. (1999); Development, Social Transformation and Globalization, CAPSTRANS, Centre for Asia Pacific Social Transformation Studies workshop 23-25 June 1999
16. Chenery, Hollis, Sherman Robinson ve Moshe Syrquin. (1986); Industrialization and Growth, A Comparative Study, A World Bank Research Publication, Oxford University Press
17. Cornia, Giovanni Andrea. (1999); Liberalization, Globalization and Income Distribution, UNU/WIDER, Helsinki March. de Rivero, Oswaldo. (2001); The Myth of Development: The Non-viable Economies in the 21st Century, Zed Books, New York, NY
18. Deacon. Bob, Hulse. Michelle, Stubbs. Paul. (1997); Global Social Policy, International Organizations and The Future Welfare, SAGE Publications, London
19. Desai, Meghnad. (2001), “Amartya Sen’s Contribution to Development Economics”, Oxford Development Studies, Vol. 29, No. 3, ss.213-223
20. Giddens. Anthony. (1991); Modernity and Self identity, Polity, Cambridge.
21. Grolier. (1996); "Third world", The Grolier multimedia encyclopaedia. USA: Grolier electronic publishing
22. Hirst. P, Thompson. G. (1996); Küreselleşme Sorgulanıyor, (Çev: Ç.Erdem,E.Yücel), Dost Kitabevi, Ankara.
23. Hulme, David, Karen Moore and Andrew Shepherd. (2001); Chronic Poverty: meanings and analytical frameworks, CPRC Working Paper 2, November 2001.
24. Jackson, Andrew. (2001); Globalization and Progressive Social Policy, Presentat- ion to the Tenth Biennial Conference on Canadian Social Welfare Policy, Calgary June 18, 2001
25. Jones, R.J.B. (1995); Globalization and Interdependence in the International Political Economy, London:Frances Pinter.
26. Lal, Deepak. (1983); The Poverty of Development Economics, Institute of Economic Affairs, London
27. Leibfried, Stephan. (2000); “National Welfare States, European Integration and Globalization: A Perspective for the Next Century”, Social Policy & Administration,, Vol:34, Issue:1, ss.44-63
28. Luo, Xiaowei. (2000), “The Rise of the Social Development Model: Institutional Construction of International Technology Organizations, 1856-1993”, International Studies Quarterly (2000) 44, ss. 147-175.
29. Mittelman, J.H. (2002); “Globalization as an Ascendant Paradigm?” International Studies Perspectives,3(1) (February), ss.1-14
30. Munck, Ronaldo. (2002); Emeğin Yeni Dünyası, (Çev:Mahmut Tekçe), Kitap Yayınevi, İstanbul.
31. Oslington, Paul, (2007); Development Economics and Classical Economics, http://www.unsw.adfa.edu.au/sbus/pdfs/edev.pdf
32. Piasecki, Ryszard ve Miron Wolnicki, (2004); “The evolution of development economics and globalization”, International Journal of Social Economics, Volume 31 Number 3 2004, ss.300-314
33. Radice, Hugo, (2001); Globalization, labour and socialist renewal, Capital&Class, Autumn, Issue 75, ss.113-126
34. Rama, Martín. (2003); “Globalization and Workers in Developing Countries”, World Bank, Policy Research Working Paper, No. 2958 (January).
35. Rodrik, Dani. (tarih yok); Küreselleşme Sınırı Aştı mı? Kızılelma Yayıncılık, İstanbul
36. Roy, Ash Narain, (1999); The Third World in the Age of Globalization: Requiem or New Agenda?, Zed Books, London
37. Saith, Ruhi, (2001); Social Exclusion: the Concept and Application to Developing Countries, Working Paper Number 72, Queen Elizabeth House, University of Oxford, May 2001.
38. Sandmo, Agnar. (2001); Globalisation and the Welfare State: More Inequality – Less Redistribution? presented at the conference of the European Institute of Social Security on 'European Social Security and Global Politics', Bergen, 27-29 September.
39. Sen, A. (1999); Development as Freedom, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
40. Sengenberger, Werner. (2003); Economic Globalization and Social Progress, What can be Done to Promote International Labour Standards ?A Proposal for Action Submitted to the FES, http://www.uta.fi/laitokset/sospol/opetus/kokemuksia/Sengenberger.PDF. 02.04.2003,
41. Stiglitz, Joseph, E. (2002); Küreselleşme: Büyük Hayal Kırıklığı, (Türkçesi: Arzu Taşçıoğlu, Deniz Vural), Plan. B.Basım Yayım Dağıtım, İstanbul.
42. Storm. Servaas, C.W.M. Naastepad (eds.). (2001); Globalization and economic development: essays in honour of J. George Waardenburg, Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
43. Şenkal Abdulkadir. (2005); Küreselleşme Sürecinde Sosyal Politika, Alfa Yayınları, İstanbul
44. Şenses, Fikret. (2001); Küreselleşmenin Öteki Yüzü Yoksulluk, İletişim Yayınları, İstanbul.
45. Thorbecke, Erik.(2005); The Evolution of the Development Doctrine, 1950-2005, www.wider.unu.edu/conference/conference-2005-3/conference-2005-3- papers/Thorbecke.pdf, 11.06.2006
46. TÜSİAD. (2000); Türkiye'de Bireysel Gelir Dağılımı ve Yoksulluk - Avrupa Birliği İle Karşılaştırma, Yay. No. Tüsiad-T/2000-12/95, http://www.tusiad.org/turkish/rapor/gelir/BOLUM6.pdf
47. Van Liemt, Gijsbert. (1989); "Minimum Labour Standards and International Trade: Would a Social Clause Work?" International Labour Review, 128 (No: 4).
48. Wallerstein, I. (1974); The Modern World System, Academic Press
49. Weber, Max. (1997); Protestan Ahlakı ve Kapitalizm Ruhu, (Çeviren: Zeynep Aruoba), (2.baskı), İmge Kitabevi, (2.baskı), İstanbul
50. World Bank. (1995); World Development Report 1995: Workers in an Integrating World, (Washington, DC).
51. World Bank. (2004); World Developmet Report