Toplumsal Cinsiyet Bakımından Evde Çalışma

Yıl 2011, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 29, 55 - 82, 01.01.2011

Tijen Erdut

Öz

Toplumsal cinsiyet bakımından evde çalışma büyük ölçüde kadınçalışması haline gelmiş olan, kadınların genellikle ücretsiz aile çalışanıstatüsünde bulunduğu, işbölümünün toplumsal cinsiyete dayandığı veyaşam alanının kadınlar tarafından ekonomik faaliyet alanınadönüştürüldüğü bir çalışma biçimi olarak tanımlanabilir. Evdeçalışma, kadın emeğine ulaşmak isteyen işverenler tarafındantoplumsal cinsiyet normlarının aşılmasını sağlayan ideal bir çalışmabiçimi olarak değerlendirilmekte, aile içi dayanışmanın, din, etnik vekast aidiyetinin sağladığı üstünlüklerden yararlanılması ve yasalarınaşılarak enformel alana erişilmesinde bir yöntem olarakkullanılmaktadır. Evde çalışma kadınların “kadın işleri” olaraktanımlanan işlerde, çalışma koşulları üzerinde kontrolü olmaksızınçalıştırılması, toplumsal yaşamdan dışlanması ve toplumsal cinsiyetedayalı eşitsizliğin yeniden üretilmesi ile sonuçlanmaktadır

Anahtar Kelimeler

Evde çalışma, taşeronlaşma, toplumsal cinsiyet

HOMEWORK FROM GENDER PERSPECTIVE

Öz

Homework, from gender perspective, can be described as a form ofemployment performed mostly by women who are in the status ofunpaid family members in which the division of labour is decided bygender and the living spaces are transformed into economically activespaces by women. It is considered as an ideal form of employment toovercome gender norms by employers who want to get access tofemale labour. Employers use homework to benefit from solidaritywithin households and religious, ethnical and cast identities, as well asto bypass labour legislations through informal labour markets.Homework leads women into so-called “women’s work” with nocontrol over working conditions and isolation from social life thusreproduces gender inequality

Anahtar Kelimeler

Homework, subcontracting, gender

Kaynakça

• CHEN Martha; “The business environment and the informal economy: creating conditions for poverty reduction,” Paper for Committee of Donor Agencies for Small Enterprise Development Conference on “Reforming the Business Environment” November 2005, Cairo, Egypt.
• CHEN Martha, SEBSTAD Jennefer, O’CONNELL Lesley; “Counting the invisible workforce: The case of homebased workers,” World Development. Vol. 27, No. 3, 1999, s. 603–610.
• CLARKE Marlea, GODFREY Shane, THERON Jan; “Homework in the clothing industry,” Labour and Enterprise Project Homework Research Report. University of Cape Town, 2005.
• CUNNINGHAM Wendy, GOMEZ Carlos Ramos; “The home as factory floor: Employment and remuneration of home-based workers,” Prepared for the Latin American and Caribbean Annual Study: “From Natural Resources to the Knowledge Economy”, The World Bank, 1999.
• FREEMAN Dena; “Homeworkers in global supply chains,” Greener Management International. No. 43, Autumn 2003.
• GHAFUR Shayer; “Gender implications of space use in home-based work: evidences from slums in Bangladesh,” Habitat International. No. 26, 2002, s. 33–50.
• HEYES Jason, GRAY Alex; “Homeworkers and the national minimum wage: Evidence from the textiles and clothing industry,” Work, Employment and Society. Vol. 15, No. 4, 2001, s. 863–873.
• HASSLER Markus; “Home-working in rural Bali: The organization of production and labour relations,” The Professional Geographer. Vol. 57, No. 4, 2005, s. 530-538.
• ILO; Women and Men in the Informal Economy: A Statistical Picture. International Labour Office, Geneva, 2002.
• ILO; Recognising and Supporting Home-based Workers, South Asian Regional Consultation on National Policy for Home-based Workers in Pakistan. Women’s Employment Concerns and Working Conditions in Pakistan (WEC-PK), International Labour Organization, 2010.
• JHABVALA Renana, TATE Jane; “Out of the shadows: Homebased workers organize for international recognition,” SEEDS Working Paper, No. 18, 1996.
• KANTOR Paula; “Women’s empowerment through home-based work: Evidence from India,” Development and Change. Vol. 34, No. 3, 2003, s. 425–445.
• KELLET Peter, TIPPLE A. Graham; “The home as workplace: a study of income-generating activities within the domestic setting,” Environment and Urbanization. Vol. 12, No. 1, April 2000, s. 203–213.
• KHAN Shahrukh Rafi, KAZMI Sajid; “Value chains in the informal sector: income shares of home-based subcontracted workers in Pakistan,” International Review of Applied Economics. Vol. 22, No. 3, May 2008, s. 339–352.
• KIDDER Thalia, RAWORTH Kate; “ ‘Good jobs’ and hidden costs: women workers documenting the price of precarious employment,” Gender and Development. Vol. 12, No. 2, July 2004, s. 12–21.
• LAVINAS Lena, SORJ Bila, LINHARES Leila, JORGE Angela; “Home Work in Brazil: New Contractual Arrangements,” SEED Series on Homeworkers in the Global Economy, Working Paper No. 7, International Labour Office, Geneva.
• LEACH Belinda; “Industrial homework, economic restructuring and the meaning of work,” Labour/Le Travial, No. 41, Spring 1998, s. 97-115.
• LEONARD Madeleine; “Old wine in new bottles? Women working inside and outside the household,” Women’s Studies International Forum. Vol. 24, No. 1, 2001, s. 67–78.
• LESSER BLUMBERG Rae; “ ‘We are family’; Gender, microenterprise, family work, and well-being in Ecuador and the Dominican Republic –with comparative data from Guatemala, Swaziland, and Guinea-Bissau,” History of the Family. No. 6, 2001, s. 271-299.
• MAHMUD Shihabuddin; “Women and the transformation of domestic spaces for income generation in Dhaka bustees,” Cities. Vol. 20, No. 5, 2003, s. 321–329.
• McMORMICK Dorothy, SCHMITZ Hubert; Manual for Value Chain Research on Homeworkers in the Garment Industry, 2001.
• MEHROTRA Santos, BIGGERI Mario; “Social Protection in the Informal Economy: Home Based Women Workers and Outsourced Manufacturing in Asia,” Working Paper No. 97, United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) Innocenti Research Centre, December 2002.
• MITTER Swasti; “Industrial restructuring and manufacturing homework: immigrant women in the UK clothing industry,” Capital and Class. No. 27, Winter 1985, s. 37–80.
• MOORE J.; “Homeworking and work-life balance: does it add to quality of life?” Revue européenne de psychologie appliquée. No. 56, 2006, s. 5–13.
• OSNOWITZ Debra; “Managing time in domestic space: Home-based contractors and household work,” Gender and Society. Vol. 19, No. 1, February 2005, s. 83–103.
• PRUGL Elisabeth; “Home-based workers: A comparative exploration of Mies’s theory of housewifization,” Frontiers. Vol. 17, No. 1, 1996, s. 114–135.
• PRUGL Elisabeth, TINKER Irene; “Microentrepreneurs and homeworkers: Convergent categories,” World Development. Vol. 25, No. 9, 1997, s. 1471–1482.
• SCHNEIDER DE VILLEGAS Gisela; “Home work: A case for social protection,” International Labour Review. Vol. 129, No. 4, 1990, s. 423–439.
• SIEGMANN Karin Astrid; “The agreement on textiles and clothing: Potential effects on gendered employment in Pakistan,” International Labour Review. Vol. 144, No. 4, 2005, s. 401–421.
• SUDARSHAN Ranta, UNNI Jeemol; “When home-based workers raise their voices: An Indian perspective,” SAIS Review. Vol. XX, No. 1, Winter-Spring 2001, s. 109–115.
• SULLIVAN Cath, SMITHSON Janet; “Perspectives of homeworkers and their partners on working flexibility and gender equity,” International Journal of Human Resource Management. Vol. 18, No. 3, 2007, s. 448-461.
• TASSIE Jane; “Home-based workers at risk: Outworkers and occupational health and safety,” Safety Science. Vol. 25, No. 1–3, 1997, s. 179–186.
• TOMEI Manuela; “Home work in selected Latin American countries: A comparative view,” Infocus Programme on Boosting Employment through Small Enterprise Development (IFP/SED) Job Creation and Enterprise Department, International Labour Organization, 2000.
• UN; The World’s Women 2010, Trens and Statistics. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, New York, 2010.