The Effect of Microteaching On Pre-Service Chemistry Teachers’ Teaching Experiences

Yıl 2017, Cilt: 46 Sayı: 1, 202 - 230, 27.04.2017

Hüseyin Akkuş , Sinem Üner

https://doi.org/10.14812/cuefd.309459

Cited By: 9

Öz

The purpose of this research is to examine the
effect of microteaching on teaching experiences of pre-service chemistry
teachers. The research which was a one-group pretest-posttest design study was
conducted with 31 pre-service chemistry teachers in a state university in
Turkey in 2009-2010 fall semesters. The data of the research was collected by using
self-evaluation, group evaluation, peer-evaluation, researchers’ evaluations,
observer evaluation together with students’ self-reflective essays and feedback
forms. The data obtained from this study shows that pre-service chemistry
teachers lack skills related to teaching experience before applying
microteaching. Also the results of this study show that microteaching
contributed to the development of communication skills performance, illustrated
talk performance, and process skill lesson performance of the pre-service
teachers. Moreover, pre-service chemistry teachers realized the deficiencies in
their chemistry teaching practices and overcame them, emphasized the
relationship between chemistry and daily life more, became more aware of
students’ misconceptions about chemistry topics due to the microteaching
technique.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Microteaching, Teaching experience, Pre-service chemistry teacher

Kimya Öğretmen Adaylarının Öğretim Becerilerine Mikroöğretimin Etkisi

Öz

Bu araştırmanın amacı, kimya öğretmen adaylarının
öğretim becerileri üzerine mikro öğretimin etkisini incelemektir. Tek grup
öntest-sontest deseninde olan bu çalışma, 2009-2010 güz döneminde Türkiye’deki
bir devlet üniversitesinde öğrenim gören 31 kimya öğretmen adayı ile yürütüldü.
Araştırmanın verileri; öz-değerlendirme, grup değerlendirme, akran
değerlendirme, araştırmacı değerlendirmeleri ve gözlemci değerlendirmeleri ile
öğrenci dönüt formları ile toplandı. Çalışma grubundan elde edilen veriler,
öğretmen adaylarının uygulamadan önce öğretim deneyimleriyle ilgili
becerilerinde eksiklikler olduğunu göstermektedir. Ayrıca, bu çalışmanın
sonuçları mikro öğretimin, öğretmen adaylarının iletişim becerileri
performansı, gösterim ve sunum performansı ve dersle ilgili süreç becerisi
performansının gelişmesinde katkı sağladığını ortaya koymaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Mikroöğretim, Öğretim deneyimi, Kimya öğretmen adayı

Kaynakça

• Allen, D. W. (1966). Micro-teaching: A new framework for in-service education. The High School Journal, 49, 355-362. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED013240).
• Ambusaidi, A. K., & Al-Balushi, S. M. (2012). A longitudinal study to identify prospective science teachers’ beliefs about science teaching using the draw-a-science-teacher-test checklist. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 7(2), 291-311. Retrieved from http://www.ijese.com/IJESE_v7n2_Ambusaidi-and-Al-Balushi.pdf
• Amobi, F. A., & Irwin, L. (2009). Implementing on-campus microteaching to elicit preservice teachers’ reflection on teaching actions: Fresh perspective on an established practice. Teacher Education Quarterly, 32, 115-130. Retrieved from ERIC database. (EJ854876)
• Amobi, F. A. (2005). Preservice teachers’ reflectivity on the sequence and consequences of teaching actions in a microteaching experience. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 9(1), 27-34. Retrieved from ERIC database. (EJ795309).
• Arsal, Z. (2014). Mikro öğretimin öğretmen adaylarının sınıf yönetimi tutum ve inançlarına etkisi. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 10(3), 137-150.
• Bakır, S. (2014). The effect of microteaching on the teaching skills of pre-service science teachers. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 13(6). 789-801.
• Bell, N. D. (2007). Microteaching: What is it that is going on here?. Linguistics and Education, 18, 24-40. doi:10.1016/j.linged.2007.04.002
• Benton-Kupper, J. (2001). The microteaching experience: Student perspectives. Education, 121(4), 830-835.
• Brown, G. (1975). Microteaching a programme of teaching skills. London: Methuen.
• Bulut, K., Açık, F., & Çiftçi, Ö. (2016). Mikro öğretim tekniğinin Türkçe öğretmen adaylarının konuşma becerilerine etkisi. Ana Dili Eğitimi Dergisi, 4(1), 134-150.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2010). Sosyal bilimler için very analizi el kitabı: İstatistik, araştırma deseni, SPSS uygulamaları ve yorum. (11. Baskı). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
• Cakir, O., & Aksan, Y. (1992). Yabancı dil öğretmeni yetiştirmede mikro öğretimin rolü: Bir model. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 7, 313-320.
• Can, V. (2009). A microteaching application on a teaching practice course. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 4, 125-140. Retrieved from http://www.world-education-center.org/index.php/cjes/article/viewFile/111/44
• Canbazoğlu Bilici, S., & Yamak, H. (2014). Teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgisi temelli bir araştırmada öğretmen adaylarının mikroöğretim hakkındaki görüşleri. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 32, 40-61.
• Cinici, A. (2016). Pre-service teachers’ science teaching self-efficacy beliefs: the influence of a collaborative peer microteaching program. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 24(3), 228-249. doi: 10.1080/13611267.2016.1222812
• Darling-Hammond, L., Hammerness, K., Grossman, P., Rust, F., & Shulman, L. (2005). The design of teacher education programs. In L. Darling-Hammond and J. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do (pp. 391-441). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• Demirbaş, M., & Afacan, Ö. (2013). The views of prospective classroom teachers on interactive microteaching applications about science. Balkan Physics Letters, 21, 21-28.
• Donnelly, R., & Fitzmaurice, M. (2011). Towards productive reflective practice in microteaching. Innovations in Education and Training International, 48(3), 335-346.
• Erokten, S., & Durkan, N. (2009). Özel öğretim yöntemleri II dersinde mikro öğretim uygulamaları. Paper presented at the 1st International Congress of Educational Research, Çanakkale, Türkiye.
• Fernandez, M. L. (2010). Investigating how and what prospective teachers learn through microteaching lesson study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 351-362. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2009.09.012
• Fernandez, M. L. (2005). Learning through microteaching lesson study in teacher preparation. Action in Teacher Education, 26(4), 37-47. doi:10.1080/01626620.2005.10463341
• Fernandez, M. L., & Robinson, M. (2006). Prospective teachers' perspectives on microteaching lesson study. Education, 127(2), 203-215. Retrieved from http://ehis.ebscohost.com/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?sid=5fb24c52-e5c0-4d83-84d2-303884f7f243%40sessionmgr10&vid=5&hid=7
• Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education. (8th Edition). New York: McGraw-Hill.
• Gee, J. B. (1992). Innovation in instructional strategies used with graduate students enrolled in an advanced heterogeneous methods class. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Mid‐South Educational Research Association, Knoxville.
• Gess-Newsome, J. (1999). Secondary teachers’ knowledge and beliefs about subject matter and their impact on instruction. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 51-94). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
• Gürbüzoğlu Yalmancı, S., & Aydın, S. (2014). The views of Turkish pre-service science teachers concerning microteaching practices. Turkish Journal of Education, 3(4), 4-14.
• He, C., & Yan, C. (2011). Exploring authenticity of microteaching in pre-service teacher education programmes. Teaching Education, 22(3), 291-302. doi: 10.1080/10476210.2011.590588
• Hu, C. (2008). Research into microteaching in application of mathematics teaching theory. Journal of Chongqing Normal University, 1, 87-90.
• Karataş, F. Ö., & Cengiz, C. (2016). Özel öğretim yöntemleri II dersinde gerçekleştirilen mikro-öğretim uygulamalarının kimya öğretmen adayları tarafindan değerlendirilmesi. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 24(2), 565-584.
• Klinzing, H. G., & Floden, R. E. (1991). The development of microteaching movement in Europe. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
• Kpanja, E. (2001). A study of the effects of the video tape recording in microteaching training. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32(4), 483-486. doi: 10.1111/1467-8535.00215
• Lu, C., Tsai, C., & Hong, J. (2008). Use root cause analysis teaching strategy to train pre-service science teachers. US-China Education Review, 5(12), 47-53. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED503886).
• Mergler, A. G., & Tangen, D. (2010). Using microteaching to enhance teacher efficacy in pre-service teachers. Teaching Education, 21(2), 199-210. doi: 10.1080/10476210902998466
• Molina, R., Fernandez, M. L., & Nisbet, L. (2011). Analyzing elementary preservice teachers’ development of content and pedagogical content knowledge in mathematics through microteaching lesson study. In M. S. Plakhotnik, S. M. Nielsen & D. M. Pane (Eds.), Proceedings of the Tenth Annual College of Education and GSN Research Conference (pp. 162-168). Miami: Florida International University.
• Pauline, R. F. (1993). Microteaching: an integral part of a science methods class. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 4, 9-17.
• Ravitch, D. (2007). Challenges of teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 58(4), 269-273. Retrieved from ERIC database. (EJ771933).
• Sevim, S. (2013). Mikro-öğretim uygulamasinin öğretmen adaylari gözüyle değerlendirilmesi. Dicle Üniversitesi Ziya Gökalp Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 21, 303-313.
• Singh, Y. K., & Sharma, A. (2004). Micro teaching. New Delhi: APH Publishing.
• Subramaniam, K. (2006). Creating a microteaching evaluation form: the needed evaluation criteria. Education, 126(4), 666-677. Retrieved from ERIC database. (EJ765785).
• Uzun, N., Keleş, Ö., & Sağlam, N. (2013). The effect of microteaching applications in environmental education. Çukurova University Faculty of Education Journal, 42(1), 13-22.