Mineralogical and geochemical characterisation of granite columns from the ancient city of Tyana (Niğde, Türkiye) and implications for their origin

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1, 53 - 65, 24.06.2025

Hacer Bilgilioğlu

https://doi.org/10.58598/cuhes.1629100

Cited By: 1

Öz

In this article, the mineralogical, petrographic and geochemical properties of the granite columns, which are significant architectural elements in the ancient city of Tyana in the Cappadocia region, are documented and their origins are inferred. Tyana granite columns have porphyro-aphanitic texture and are characterized by mega crystals. The main mineral assemblage in the the granite columns consists of K-feldspar, quartz, plagioclase, biotite, amphibole and accessoy titanite, zircon and opaque minerals. XRD analysis supports the primary mineral assemblage. CRS (Confocal Raman Spectroskopy) studies also revealed that the plagioclase is andesine and amphibolite is actinolite in composition. In addition, geochemical analyses revealed that the granite columns are calc-alkali and granodiorite in composition. In the tectonic evaluation, the granite samples are located in the area of volcanic arc granitoids. According to all analysis results, the Tyana granite columns are compatible with the Horoz granitoids. All the above features will be an important step for the conservation and restoration of future ancient structures.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Granite columns , Petrography , Geochemistry , Ancient city of Tyana

Teşekkür

I would like to thank Prof. Dr. Osman DOĞANAY, the head of the Tyana Excavation, and the excavation team for allowing this study to be carried out and for the use of the samples, Aksaray University Applied Geology Laboratory, Aksaray University Scientific and Technological Application and Research (ASÜBTAM) Laboratory, Ankara University Earth Sciences Application and Research Center (YEBİM) for the analyses, and the referees and editor who contributed to the article with their constructive comments.

Kaynakça

• Guo, X., Zhang, Y., Xu, X., & Dai, S. (2023). Petrographic and geochemical analyses to characterise the source of built historical natural stones — a case study of the volcanic stones from historical quarries and Baoguosi Temple in the city of Ningbo, China. Built Heritage, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/S43238-023-00091-3
• Akçe, M. A., & Kadıoğlu, Y. K. (2020). Raman Spektroskopisinin İlkeleri ve Mineral Tanımlamalarında Kullanılması. Nevşehir Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, 9(2), 99–115. https://doi.org/10.17100/nevbiltek.778678
• Šekularac, N., Ristić, N. D., Mijović, D., Cvetković, V., Barišić, S., & Ivanović-Šekularac, J. (2019). The Use of Natural Stone as an Authentic Building Material for the Restoration of Historic Buildings in Order to Test Sustainable Refurbishment: Case Study. Sustainability 2019, Vol. 11, Page 4009, 11(15), 4009. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU11154009
• Tavares, M. L., Veiga, M. R., & Fragata, A. (2010). Grouting mortars for consolidation of historical renders showing loss of adhesion. 2nd Conference on Historic Mortars - HMC 2010 and RILEM TC 203-RHM final workshop, 743–752.
• Kaderli, L., Tarık Öğreten, M., & Hüsrevoğlu, B. G. (2024). Evaluation of current documentation methods: The case of Kültepe Karum Merchant Quarter. Cultural Heritage and Science-2024, 5(2), 113–128. https://doi.org/10.58598/cuhes.1582187
• Elyasi, S., & Yamacli, R. (2023). Cultural Heritage and Science Architectural sustainability with cultural heritage values. Cultural Heritage and Science, 4(2), 55–61. https://doi.org/10.58598/cuhes.1282179
• Biçen Çelik, A., Ay, İ., Ergin, Ş., & Dal, M. (2024). Stone deterioratins in Mardin Madrasas: The case of Şehidiye and Kasımiye Madrasas. Cultural Heritage and Science, 5(1), 38–51. https://doi.org/10.58598/cuhes.1441372
• Bilgilioğlu, H. (2023). Tarihi harç örneklerinin çoklu analitik yöntemler kullanılarak incelenmesi: Tyana Roma Hamamı (Niğde-Kemerhisar) örneği. Niğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 12(4), 1157–1167. https://doi.org/10.28948/NGUMUH.1274588
• Biçer, A. (2023). Research on The Physical Properties of The Building Stones in East Black See Region. Naturengs, 4(2), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.46572/NATURENGS.1312384
• Stratton, M. (2003). Industrial Buildings. (M. Stratton, Ed.). Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203362471
• De Vecchi, G., Lazzarini, L., Lünel, T., Mignucci, A., & Visonà, D. (2000). The genesis and characterisation of ‘Marmor Misium’ from Kozak (Turkey), a granite used in antiquity. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 1(2), 145–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1296-2074(00)00162-X
• Finger, F., Dörr, W., Gerdes, A., Gharib, M., & Dawoud, M. (2008). U-Pb zircon ages and geochemical data for the Monumental Granite and other granitoid rocks from Aswan, Egypt: Implications for the geological evolution of the western margin of the Arabian Nubian Shield. Mineralogy and Petrology, 93(3–4), 153–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00710-007-0227-Z/METRICS
• Kelany, A., Negem, M., Tohami, A., & Heldal, T. (2010). Granite quarry survey in the Aswan region , Egypt : shedding new light on ancient quarrying. QuarryScapes: ancient stone quarry landscapes in the Eastern Mediterranean, 12, 87–98.
• Klemm, D. D., & Klemm, R. (2001). The building stones of ancient Egypt – a gift of its geology. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 33(3–4), 631–642. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0899-5362(01)00085-9
• Lazzarini, L. (1998). Sul Marmo Misio, uno dei graniti più usati anticamente. Studi miscellanei : 31, 1998, 111–117.
• Lazzarini. (2010). Six coloured types of stone from asia minor used by the romans, and their specıfıc deterioration problems. Studies in Conservation, 55(sup2), 140–146. https://doi.org/10.1179/sic.2010.55.Supplement-2.140
• Liritzis, I., Sideris, C., Vafiadou, A., & Mitsis, J. (2008). Mineralogical, petrological and radioactivity aspects of some building material from Egyptian Old Kingdom monuments. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 9(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CULHER.2007.03.009
• Peacock, D. P. S., Williams-Thorpe, O., Thorpe, R. S., & Tindle, A. G. (1994). Mons Claudianus and the problem of the ‘granito del foro’: a geological and geochemical approach. Antiquity, 68(259), 209–230. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003598X00046536
• Williams‐Thorpe, O., & Thorpe, R. S. (1993). Magnetic susceptibilıty used in non-destructive provenancing of Roman granite columns. Archaeometry, 35(2), 185–195. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1475-4754.1993.TB01034.X
• Koralay, T., Deniz, K., Duman, B., & Kadıoğlu, Y. K. (2021). Mineralogical and geochemical characterization and implications for provenance of Roman granite columns in ancient Tripolis (Denizli, Turkey). Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 14(6), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12517-021-06744-W/TABLES/11
• Cirrincione, R., Fiannacca, P., Ortolano, G., Pezzino, A., & Punturo, R. (2013). Granitoid stones from Calabria (Southern Italy): petrographic, geochemical and petrophysical characterization of ancient quarries of Roman Age. Periodico di Mineralogia, 82(1), 41–59. https://doi.org/10.2451/2013PM0003
• Williams-Thorpe, O., & Potts, P. J. (2002). Geochemical and Magnetic Provenancing of Roman Granite Columns from Andalucía and Extremadura, Spain. Oxford Journal of Archaeology, 21(2), 167–194. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0092.00156
• Doğanay, O., & İşler, B. (2019). Geç Antik Çağdan Günümüze Tyana (Kemerhisar). Akdeniz Sanat, 13, 639–648. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/akdenizsanat/issue/49183/622197
• Şener, H. H., Bacak, K., & Doğanay, O. (2023). Tyana Antik Kenti Su Kemerleri ve Roma Havuzu Üzerine Genel Bir Değerlendirme. Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli University Journal of ISS, 13(4), 2477–2498. https://doi.org/10.30783/NEVSOSBILEN.1323267
• Gürkan, T., & Doğanay, O. (2020). Tyana Roma Hamamı Kazılarında Ortaya Çıkan Sütun Başlık Parçaları. Karadeniz Uluslararası Bilimsel Dergi, 1(48), 327–353. https://doi.org/10.17498/KDENIZ.833275
• Günözü, H. (2017). Kapadokya Bölgesi Bizans Dönemi Kaya Kiliseler Duvar Resimlerinde Ticari ve Ticari-Olmayan Enjeksiyon Harçlarının Performans Problemleri Üzerine Analitik Bir Değerlendirme. Art-Sanat Dergisi, (8), 153–179. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/iuarts/issue/47866/604036
• Karataş, L., Alptekin, A., & Yakar, M. (2023). Material analysis for restoration application: a case study of the world’s first university Mor Yakup Church in Nusaybin, Mardin. Heritage Science, 11(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/S40494-023-00935-2/TABLES/7
• Karataş, L., Alptekin, A., & Yakar, M. (2022). Detection and documentation of stone material deterioration in historical masonry structures using UAV photogrammetry: A case study of Mersin Aba Mausoleum. Advanced UAV, 2(2), 51-64.
• Karataş, L., Alptekin, A., & Yakar, M. (2022). Detection and documentation of stone material deterioration in historical masonry structures using UAV photogrammetry: A case study of Mersin Aba Mausoleum. Advanced UAV, 2(2), 51-64.
• Berges, D. (2002). Tyana in Kappadokien: Von der hethitischen Residenz zur gräco-römischen Colonia. Antike Welt, 33(2), 177–187.
• French, D. (1981). Roman roads and milestones of Asia Minor = Küçük Asya’daki Roma yolları ve miltaşları. Oxford B.A.R.
• Magie, D. (2017). Roman rule in Asia Minor : to the end of the third century after Christ. Princeton University Press.
• Ketin, İ. (1969). Tectonic Units of Anatolia. Bulletın of The Mıneral Research and Exploratıon. Retrieved January 27, 2024, from https://dergi.mta.gov.tr/article/show/862
• Göncüoğlu, M. (1986). Geochronological Data from the Southern Part (Niğde Area) of the Central Anatolian Massif. Bulletin of the Mineral Research and Exploration, 105–106(105–106), 92–106. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/bulletinofmre/issue/3925/52241
• Dirik, K., & Göncüoglu, M. C. (1996). Neotectonic Characteristics of Central Anatolia. International Geology Review, 38(9), 807–817. https://doi.org/10.1080/00206819709465363
• Toprak, V., & Göncüoglu, M. C. (1993). Tectonic control on the development of the Neogene-Quaternary Central Anatolian Volcanic Province, Turkey. Geological Journal, 28(3–4), 357–369. https://doi.org/10.1002/GJ.3350280314
• Çalapkulu, F. (1980). Horoz Granodiyoritinin Jeolojik İncelemesi. Bulletin of the Geological Society of Turkey, 23, 59–68.
• Kocak, K., & Zedef, V. (2016). Interaction of the lithospheric mantle and crustal melts for the generation of the Horoz pluton (Niğde, Turkey): whole-rock geochemical and Sr-Nd-Pb isotopic evidence. Estonian Journal of Earth Sciences, 65, 138–160. https://doi.org/10.3176/earth.2016.14
• Kocak, K., Zedef, V., & Kansun, G. (2011). Magma mixing/mingling in the Eocene Horoz (Nigde) granitoids, Central southern Turkey: Evidence from mafic microgranular enclaves. Mineralogy and Petrology, 103(1–4), 149–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/S00710-011-0165-7/FIGURES/10
• Kadioglu, Y. K., & Dilek, Y. (2010). Structure and geochemistry of the adakitic Horoz granitoid, Bolkar Mountains, south-central Turkey, and its tectonomagmatic evolution. International Geology Review, 52(4–6), 505–535. https://doi.org/10.1080/09507110902954847
• Korkanç, M. (2018). Characterization of building stones from the ancient Tyana aqueducts, Central Anatolia, Turkey: implications on the factors of deterioration processes. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 77(1), 237–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10064-016-0930-2/FIGURES/13
• Korkanç, M., & Savran, A. (2015). Impact of the surface roughness of stones used in historical buildings on biodeterioration. Construction and Building Materials, 80, 279–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONBUILDMAT.2015.01.073
• Güllü, B., & Akşit, A. (2023). Fingerprint of magma mixture in the leucogranites: Spectroscopic and petrochemical approach, Kalebalta-Central Anatolia, Türkiye. Open Geosciences, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/GEO-2022-0548
• Kurt, H., Koçak, K., Asan, K., & Karakaş, M. (2013). Petrogenesis of the Üçkapılı Granitoid and its Mafic Enclaves in Elmalı Area (Niğde, Central Anatolia, Turkey). Acta Geologica Sinica - English Edition, 87(3), 738–748. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-6724.12085
• Cox, K. G., Bell, J. D., & Pankhurst, R. J. (1979). The Interpretation of Igneous Rocks. The Interpretation of Igneous Rocks. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-3373-1
• Irvine, T. N., & Baragar, W. R. A. (1971). A Guide to the Chemical Classification of the Common Volcanic Rocks. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 8(5), 523–548. https://doi.org/10.1139/e71-055
• Ishihara, S., Japan, B. C.-B. of the G. S. of, & 2008, U. (2008). Chemical compositions of the Paleogene granitoids of eastern Shimane prefecture, Sanin district, southwest Japan. Bulletin of the Geological Survey of Japan, 59(6), 225–254.
• Debon, F., & le Fort, P. (1983). A chemical–mineralogical classification of common plutonic rocks and associations. Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of The Royal Society of Edinburgh, 73(3), 135–149. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0263593300010117
• U.S. Geological Survey. (1965). Geological Survey Research 1965. https://doi.org/10.3133/pp525C
• Pearce, J. A., Harris, N. B. W., & Tindle, A. G. (1984). Trace Element Discrimination Diagrams for the Tectonic Interpretation of Granitic Rocks. Journal of Petrology, 25(4), 956–983. https://doi.org/10.1093/PETROLOGY/25.4.956
• Batchelor, R. A., & Bowden, P. (1985). Petrogenetic interpretation of granitoid rock series using multicationic parameters. Chemical Geology, 48(1–4), 43–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2541(85)90034-8