Araştırma Makalesi

Comparison of Traditional Methods and 3D Laser Scanners in Architectural Structures: The Case of Kuruçeşme in Mersin

Sayı: Advanced Online Publication Erken Görünüm Tarihi: 31 Ekim 2025
PDF İndir
EN

Comparison of Traditional Methods and 3D Laser Scanners in Architectural Structures: The Case of Kuruçeşme in Mersin

Öz

Laser scanners create three-dimensional models of surrounding objects and are used as a basis or reference in fields such as architecture, engineering, archaeology, and others. Three-dimensional modeling, area scanning, monitoring the progress of large projects, and other related topics provide significant advantages. These techniques and tools, which are used in various applications such as distance measurement, object detection, and remote sensing, have a wide range of applications. 3D laser scanning technologies offer benefits in many areas, from detailed documentation of existing buildings to the design of new projects and the management of construction processes. With their ability to perform fast, precise, and efficient measurements, laser scanners greatly facilitate architectural applications. In the future, it is expected that this technology will be used more widely in architectural processes. This study examines the measurement of the Kuruçeşme structure using traditional measurement techniques and 3D laser scanners, and compares these two methods. It focuses on identifying the advantages and disadvantages of these two methods and their compliance with acceptable error values.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Teşekkür

The authors gratefully acknowledge Prof. Dr. Murat Yakar for his valuable contributions and continuous support throughout the conduct of this study.

Kaynakça

  1. Alptekin, A., ve M. Yakar. "3D Modeling of Mersin Akyar Cliffs." Turkish Journal of LiDAR 2, 1 (2020): 5–9.
  2. Alptekin, A., ve M. Yakar. "Kaya Bloklarının 3B Nokta Bulutunun Yersel Lazer Tarayıcı Kullanarak Elde Edilmesi." Türkiye LİDAR Dergisi 2, 1 (2020): 1–4.
  3. AlYılmaz, C., S. AlYılmaz, ve M. Yakar. "Measurement of Petroglyphs (Rock of Arts) of Qobustan with Close Range Photogrammetry." International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 38, Part 5 (2010): 29–32.
  4. Atik, M. E., Ö. Güngör, E. Keskin, ve Z. Duran. "Classification of Photogrammetric Point Cloud Data Using Machine Learning." Journal of Geodesy and Geoinformation 9, 2 (2022): 137–149.
  5. Balcı, D. "The Use of Laser Scanners in Documenting Cultural Heritage." Turkish Journal of LiDAR 4, 1 (2022): 27–36.
  6. Ebrahim, M. "Overview of 3D Laser Scanners’ Techniques." International Journal of Scientific Research 4, 10 (2015): 323–331.
  7. Erdoğan, A., A. Kabadayı, ve E. S. Akın. "3D Modeling of Cultural Heritage by Photogrammetric Method: The Case of Karabıyık Bridge." Turkish Journal of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles 3, 1 (2021): 23.
  8. Güleç Korumaz, A., O. N. Dülgerler, ve M. Yakar. "Digital Approaches in the Documentation of Cultural Heritage." Selcuk University Journal of Engineering, Science and Technology 26, 3 (2011): 67–83.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Kent Tarihi

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Erken Görünüm Tarihi

31 Ekim 2025

Yayımlanma Tarihi

-

Gönderilme Tarihi

19 Ekim 2025

Kabul Tarihi

31 Ekim 2025

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2026 Sayı: Advanced Online Publication

Kaynak Göster

APA
Polat Uslu, M., & Karabacak, A. (2025). Comparison of Traditional Methods and 3D Laser Scanners in Architectural Structures: The Case of Kuruçeşme in Mersin. Cultural Heritage and Science, Advanced Online Publication, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.58598/cuhes.1806876
AMA
1.Polat Uslu M, Karabacak A. Comparison of Traditional Methods and 3D Laser Scanners in Architectural Structures: The Case of Kuruçeşme in Mersin. Cultural Heritage and Science. 2025;(Advanced Online Publication):1-18. doi:10.58598/cuhes.1806876
Chicago
Polat Uslu, Merve, ve Atilla Karabacak. 2025. “Comparison of Traditional Methods and 3D Laser Scanners in Architectural Structures: The Case of Kuruçeşme in Mersin”. Cultural Heritage and Science, sy Advanced Online Publication: 1-18. https://doi.org/10.58598/cuhes.1806876.
EndNote
Polat Uslu M, Karabacak A (01 Ekim 2025) Comparison of Traditional Methods and 3D Laser Scanners in Architectural Structures: The Case of Kuruçeşme in Mersin. Cultural Heritage and Science Advanced Online Publication 1–18.
IEEE
[1]M. Polat Uslu ve A. Karabacak, “Comparison of Traditional Methods and 3D Laser Scanners in Architectural Structures: The Case of Kuruçeşme in Mersin”, Cultural Heritage and Science, sy Advanced Online Publication, ss. 1–18, Eki. 2025, doi: 10.58598/cuhes.1806876.
ISNAD
Polat Uslu, Merve - Karabacak, Atilla. “Comparison of Traditional Methods and 3D Laser Scanners in Architectural Structures: The Case of Kuruçeşme in Mersin”. Cultural Heritage and Science. Advanced Online Publication (01 Ekim 2025): 1-18. https://doi.org/10.58598/cuhes.1806876.
JAMA
1.Polat Uslu M, Karabacak A. Comparison of Traditional Methods and 3D Laser Scanners in Architectural Structures: The Case of Kuruçeşme in Mersin. Cultural Heritage and Science. 2025;:1–18.
MLA
Polat Uslu, Merve, ve Atilla Karabacak. “Comparison of Traditional Methods and 3D Laser Scanners in Architectural Structures: The Case of Kuruçeşme in Mersin”. Cultural Heritage and Science, sy Advanced Online Publication, Ekim 2025, ss. 1-18, doi:10.58598/cuhes.1806876.
Vancouver
1.Merve Polat Uslu, Atilla Karabacak. Comparison of Traditional Methods and 3D Laser Scanners in Architectural Structures: The Case of Kuruçeşme in Mersin. Cultural Heritage and Science. 01 Ekim 2025;(Advanced Online Publication):1-18. doi:10.58598/cuhes.1806876


Online ISSN: 2757-9050