Araştırma Makalesi

The effect of hand morphometric measurements on the manual dexterity in students of Vocational School of Health Services

Cilt: 48 Sayı: 3 30 Eylül 2023
PDF İndir
TR EN

The effect of hand morphometric measurements on the manual dexterity in students of Vocational School of Health Services

Abstract

Purpose: This paper aimed to evaluate the manual dexterity tests and hand morphometry, and to research whether the dexterity tests and hand lengths were affected by gender and body mass index (BMI) or not. Materials and Methods: This study was carried out on 114 adult subjects aged between 18 and 25 years (37 males and 77 females). Demographic characteristics including gender, age, dominant hand, height, weight, and body mass index (BMI) of all subjects were recorded. Additionally, hand morphometric measurements and manual dexterity tests called as O’Connor Finger Dexterity Test and Purdue Pegboard Test were applied. Results: Some values such as the hand length (right and left), palmar length (right and left), dominant and non-dominant hand finger, and O’Connor Finger Dexterity Test-Left side showed significant differences between genders. Additionally, O’Connor Finger Dexterity Test scores for both sides were lower in males than in females. Purdue Pegboard-Right, and Purdue Pegboard-Left, Purdue Pegboard-Both Hands, Purdue Pegboard total were higher in males, whereas Purdue Pegboard (Assembly) was higher in females than in males. However, Purdue Pegboard measurement scores did not show a significant difference between genders. Conclusion: Hand morphometric measurements and manual dexterity tests showed some changes in terms of gender and BMI. Additionally, the data obtained can provide crucial information for therapists and clinicians about hand rehabilitation.

Keywords

Manual dexterity test , O’Connor Finger Dexterity Test , Purdue Pegboard test , Hand dexterity

Kaynakça

  1. LaStayo P, Hartzel J. Dynamic versus static grip strength: how grip strength changes when the wrist is moved, and why dynamic grip strength may be a more functional measurement. J Hand Ther. 1999;12:212–8.
  2. Backman C, Cork S, Gibson G, Parsons J. Assessment of hand function: the relationship between pegboard dexterity and applied dexterity. Can J Occup Ther. 1992;59:208-13.
  3. Williams ME, Hadler NM, Earp JL. Manual ability as a marker of dependency in geriatric women. J Chronic Dis. 1982;35:115-22.
  4. Michimata A, Kondo T, Suzukamo Y, Chiba M, Izumi S. The manual function test: norms for 20- to 90-year-olds and effects of age, gender, and hand dominance on dexterity. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2008;214:257-67.
  5. Wang YC, Bohannon RW, Kapellusch J, Garg A, Gershon RC. Dexterity as measured with the 9-Hole Peg Test (9-HPT) across the age span. J Hand Ther. 2014;28:53-9.
  6. Peters M, Servos P, Day R. Marked sex differences on a fine motor skill task disappear when finger size is used as a covariate. J Appl Psychol.1990;75:87-90.
  7. Arthritis Research UK. Osteoarthritis in General Practice; 2013.
  8. Landsmeer JMF. Power grip and precision handling. Ann Rheum Dis.1962;21:164-70.
  9. Taylor C, Schwartz R. The anatomy and mechanics of the human hand. Artif Limbs. 1955;2:22-35.
  10. Napier JR. The prehensile movements of the human hand. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1956;38:902-13.

Kaynak Göster

MLA
Işık, Emir İbrahim, vd. “The effect of hand morphometric measurements on the manual dexterity in students of Vocational School of Health Services”. Cukurova Medical Journal, c. 48, sy 3, Eylül 2023, ss. 879-87, doi:10.17826/cumj.1323882.