Yenidoğanlarda COVID-19 ile ilgili yayınların küresel bibliyometrik analizi

Year 2023, Volume: 48 Issue: 4, 1265 - 1274, 29.12.2023

Adnan Barutçu , Sevil Alkan , Saliha Barutçu , Fatih Özdener , Cemile Uyar

https://doi.org/10.17826/cumj.1343840

Cited By: 1

Abstract

Amaç: COVID-19 ile yenidoğanlar arasındaki ilişkide eksik noktalar olmasına rağmen şu ana kadar hiçbir bibliyometrik analiz yayınlanmamıştır. Bu çalışma, aynı sorunu ele alan gelecekteki çalışmalara rehberlik etmek amacıyla yenidoğanlar ve COVID-19 arasındaki ilişkinin literatürüne bibliyometrik bir genel bakış yapmayı amaçlamaktadır.
Gereç ve Yöntem: Yenidoğanlar ve COVID-19 ile ilgili yayınlanmış literatürü taramak için Web of Science kullanıldı ve bibliyometrik ağlar VOSviewer yazılımı ile görselleştirildi. Anahtar kelime olarak COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, 2019-nCoV ile perinatal, neonatal, yenidoğan ve infant kullanıldı.
Tartışma: 1970-2021 döneminde 912 anahtar kelime uyumlu yayın bulundu (491; %54.43 yüksek kaliteli çalışma), bunların çoğu pediatri ve obstetrik jinekoloji ile ilgili olup bu yayınlarda en sık kullanılan anahtar kelimeler; COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Gebelik, Dikey Bulaş ve Yenidoğan idi. Amerika Birleşik Devletleri, Çin, İngiltere ve İtalya en fazla çalışmaya ve en fazla atıf sayısına sahipti. Yenidoğan sonuçları ve gebelik üzerine COVID-19 en yüksek alıntıyı aldı.
Sonuç: Bibliyometrik analiz yoluyla bilimsel ağ izleme çok önemlidir ve COVID-19 krizi sırasında oldukça faydalı olduğu kanıtlanmıştır. COVID-19 ve yenidoğan ile ilgili makalelerde yeterli sayıda alıntı bulunmasına rağmen, yetişkinler veya klinik özelliklerle ilgili diğer çalışmalara kıyasla çok daha az sayıdadır ve erken dönemde artırılması gerekmektedir.

Keywords

COVID-19, bibliyometrik analiz, yenidoğan, neonatal, bebek

Global bibliometric analysis of publications on COVID-19 in newborns

Abstract

Purpose: Though there are gaps in the relationship between COVID-19 and newborns no bibliometric analysis was published until now. This study aims to perform a bibliometric overview of literature of the relationship between newborns and COVID-19 in order to guide future studies addressing the same problem.
Materials and Methods: Web of science was used to scan the published literature on newborns & COVID-19 by searching studies with and bibliometric networks were visualized by VOSviewer software. COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, 2019-nCoV with perinatal, neonatal, newborn and infant were used as keywords.
Results: 912 keyword-coherent publications were found in the period 1970-2021, (491; 54.43% high quality studies) mostly about pediatrics and obstetrics gynecology with most frequent keywords; COVID-19, Sars-Cov-2, Pregnancy, Vertical Transmission and Newborn. United States, China, England and Italy have the highest number of studies as well as highest number of citations. COVID-19 on neonatal outcomes and pregnancy had highest citation.
Conclusion: Scientific network monitoring via bibliometric analysis is crucial and proved highly beneficial during COVID-19 crisis. Despite the articles on COVID-19 & newborn have a decent number of citations, it vastly lower compared to the other studies about adults or clinical features and should be increased while it is still early.

Keywords

COVID-19, bibliometric analysis, newborn, neonate, infant

References

• WHO. Tracking SARS-CoV-2 variants. https://www.who.int/en/activities/tracking-SARS-CoV-2-variants/. (Accessed 09.03.2022)
• Understanding the long-term health effects of COVID-19. EClinicalMedicine. 2020;26:100586.
• Dweck MR, Bularga A, Hahn RT, Bing R, Lee KK, Chapman AR et al. Global evaluation of echocardiography in patients with COVID-19. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020;21:949-58.
• Ahmed M, Advani S, Moreira A, Zoretic S, Martinez J, Chorath K et al. Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children: A systematic review. EClinicalMedicine. 2020;26:100527.
• Wang P, Tian D. Bibliometric analysis of global scientific research on COVID-19. J Biosaf Biosecur. 2021;3:4-9.
• Yu Y, Li Y, Zhang Z, Gu Z, Zhong H, Zha Q et al.. A bibliometric analysis using VOSviewer of publications on COVID-19. Ann Transl Med. 2020;8:816.
• Pasin O, Pasin T. Bibliometric analysis of COVID-19 and the association with the number of total cases. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2022;16:1947-52.
• Cooper ID. J Med Libr Assoc. 2015;103:217-8.
• LC Analytics. The history of ISI and the work of Eugene Garfield. 2022. https://clarivate.com/webofsciencegroup/solutions/the-history-of-isi/ (Accesed 09.03.2022)
• LC Analytics. Web of Science. 2022. https://clarivate.com/. (Accesed 09.03.2022)
• Centre for Science and Technology Studies LU. VOSviewer Visualizing Scientific Landscapes. https://www.vosviewer.com. (Accesed 15.06.2022)
• Xu Z, Qu H, Ren Y, Gong Z, Ri HJ. Update on the COVID-19 vaccine research trends: a bibliometric analysis. 2021;14:4237-47.
• Ahmad T, Murad MA, Baig M. Research trends in COVID-19 vaccine: a bibliometric analysis. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2021;17:2367-72.
• Sarirete A. A Bibliometric analysis of COVID-19 vaccines and sentiment analysis. Procedia Comput Sci. 2021;194:280-7.
• Guleid FH, Oyando R, Kabia E, Mumbi A, Akech S, Barasa E. A bibliometric analysis of COVID-19 research in Africa. BMJ Global Health. 2021;6:e005690.
• Chen Y, Cheng L, Lian R, Song Z, Tian J. COVID-19 vaccine research focusses on safety, efficacy, immunoinformatics, and vaccine production and delivery: a bibliometric analysis based on VOSviewer. BioScience Trends. 2021;15:64-73.
• Patralekh MK, Iyengar KP, Jain VK, Vaishya R. Bibliometric analysis of COVID-19 related publications in Indian orthopaedic journals. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2021;22:101608.
• Chen Q, Allot A, Lu Z. Keep up with the latest coronavirus research. Nature. 2020;579:193.
• Chen Q, Allot A, Lu Z. LitCovid: an open database of COVID-19 literature. Nucleic acids research. 2021;49(D1):D1534-40.
• Soytas RB. A bibliometric analysis of publications on COVID-19 and older adults. Ann Geriatr Med Res. 2021;25:197-203.
• Hu S, Wang X, Ma Y, Cheng H. Global research trends in pediatric COVID-19: a bibliometric analysis. Front Public Health. 2022;10 798005.
• Özdener F. Clinical Research at MENA. Challenges and Solutions. Lausanne, Peter Lang Verlag, 2022.
• Monzani A, Tagliaferri F, Bellone S, Genoni G, Rabbone I. A global overview of COVID-19 research in the pediatric field: bibliometric review. JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2021;4:e24791.
• Yu Y, Li Y, Zhang Z, et al. A bibliometric analysis using VOSviewer of publications on COVID-19. Ann Transl Med. 2020;8:816.
• Sheikh A, Siddique N, Qutab S, Khan MA, Mahmood K. An investigation of emerging COVID-19 research trends and future implications for LIS field: A bibliometric mapping and visualization. J Librariansh Inf Sci. 2023;55:3-17.
• Mustafa K, Erbay E. Global trends of the researches on Covid-19: A bibliometric analysis via VOSviewer. Ankara Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. 2020;9:201-16.
• Stilwell PA, Munro APS, Basatemur E, Talawila Da Camara N, Harwood R, Roland D. Bibliography of published COVID-19 in children literature. Arch Dis Child. 2022;107:168-72.
• Martinez-Perez C, Alvarez-Peregrina C, Villa-Collar C, Sánchez-Tena MÁ. Citation network analysis of the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17:7690.
• Guan WJ, Ni ZY, Hu Y, Liang WH, Ou CQ, He JX et al. Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in China. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:1708-20.
• Zhou F, Yu T, Du R, et al. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 2020;395:1054-62.
• Wu Z, McGoogan JM. Characteristics of and important lessons from the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in China: Summary of a report of 72 314 cases from the Chinese center for disease control and prevention. JAMA. 2020;323:1239-42.