BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

-

Yıl 2015, Cilt: 36 Sayı: 2, 51 - 62, 17.01.2015

Ergün Kasaka

Öz

Phytoplankton communities of Great Lota Lake and water quality properties of the lake water were examined between January 2001 and December 2001. 78 taxa belong to seven divisions in Phytoplankton. Of these taxa belong to 29 Chloroophyta (37,2 %), 28 Bacillariophyta (35,9 %), 13 Cyanophyta (16,7 %), 3 Pyrrophyta (3,8 %), 3 Cryptophyta (3,8 %), 1 Euglenophyta (1,3 %) and 1 Xanthophyta (1,3 %). The annual means of temperature, dissolved oxygen, pH, total phosphate, nitrate, amonia, silica, calcium, sulphate and chlorophyll are 18.9 oC , 6.5 mg/L, 8.3, 58 µg/L, 0.3 mg/L, 0.1 mg /L, 3. 6 mg/L, 449 mg/L, 269 mg/L and 1.5 µg/L respectively. The Great Lota Lake exhibits oligo-mesotrophic character in terms of the biological and chemical properties. Inland water resources classification criteria (WPCR) according enters the water class I and class II

Anahtar Kelimeler

The Great Lota Lake Phytoplankton Water Quality

Kaynakça

  • Egemen, Ö. ve Sunlu, U. (1996). Su Kalitesi, Ege Üniversitesi Basımevi, 2. Baskı, Bornova,
  • İzmir, 153 s.Borzov I.N., Beta-decay rates, Nucl.Phys.A 777, 645-675 (2006).
  • Taş, B., Gönülol, A., Derbent Baraj Gölü (Samsun, Türkiye)’nün Planktonik Algleri, Journal of FisheriesSciences.1 (3): 111-123. 2007.
  • Rawson, D.S. Algal indicators of trophic lake types. Limnology and Oceanography 1: 18-25. 19 Trifonova, I.S. Phytoplankton composition and biomass structure in relation to trophic gradient in some temperate and subarctic lakes of north-western Russia and the Prebaltic. Hydrobiologia 369-370: 99- 108. 1998.
  • Wetzel, R. G. Limnology: Lake and River Ecosystems. Third Edition, Academic Press, 1006 pp. 2001.
  • Reynolds, C.S., V. Huszar, C. Kruk, L. Naselli-Flores, S. Melo. Review towards a functional classification of the freshwater phytoplankton. Journal of Plankton Research 24: 417-428. 2002.
  • Kelly, M.G., Whitton, B.A. The Trophic Diatom Index: a New Index for Monitoring Eutrophication in Rivers. J. Appl. Phycol. 7: 433-444. 1995.
  • Lowe, R., Pan, Y. Benthic algal communities as biological monitors. In: Stevenson RJ, Bothwell M, Lowe R (ed.), Algal Ecology: Academic Press. pp.705-739. 1996.
  • Schneider, S., Schranz, C., Melzer, A. Indicating the trophic state of running waters by submersed macrophytes and epilithic diatoms. Limnologica. 30: 1 – 8. 2000.
  • Rimet, F., Ector, L., Cauchie, H.M., Hoffmann, L. Regional Distribution of Diatom Assemblages in the Headwater Streams of Luxemburg. Hydrobiologia. 520: 105-117. 2004.
  • Ünlü, A., Çoban, F., Tunç, M.S. (2008).
  • Hazar Gölü Su Kalitesinin Fiziksel ve İnorganik kimyasal Parametreler Açısından İncelenmesi. Gazi. Üniv. Müh. Mim. Fak. Der. cilt. 23, No.1, 119- Gökçe, A., Ceyhan, F. Miocene sediments in the southeast of the old gypsum plaster stratigraphy, structural properties and formation. J.of Enginer. 5: 91-112. 1988.
  • Günay, G. Gypsum karst, Sivas, Turkey. Environ. Geol. 42: 387-398. 2002.
  • Lund, J.W.G., Kipling, C., Gren, D.E. The inverted microscope method of estimation algal numbers and the statistical basis of estimation by counting. Hydrobiologia 11: 143-170. 1958.
  • Prescott, G.W. Algae of the Western Great Lakes Area, Otto Koeltz Science Publishers, Germany, 977p. 1982.
  • Krammer, K. and Lange Bertalot, H. Süwasserflora von Mitteleuropa Bacillariophyceae, Band 2/1,1. Teil: Naviculaceae, Spectrum Academischer Verlag, Heidelberg, Berlin, 876p. 1999.
  • Moore, J.A. Charophytes of Great Britain and İreland, Botanical Society of the British Isles, London, 140p. 1986.
  • Lind, E.M., Brook, A.J. Desmids of the English Lake District, Freshwater Bio. Assoc. Scientific Pub. No. 42. 1980.
  • Clesceri, S., Greenberg, E.A., Eaton, D. Standard Methods for Examination of Water and Wastewater. 20. Eddition. American Public Health Association. 1999.
  • Mackeret, F.J.H., Heron, J., Talling, C.F. Water Analysis: Some Revised Methods for Limnologists. Freshwater Biological Association, 120p. 1978.
  • Tabitabai, M.A. Determination of Sulphate in Waters. Sulphur İnst. J. 10, 11-13. 1974
  • Chaney, A.L. & Morbach, E.P. Modified Reagents for The Determination of Urea and Amonia. Clin. Chem. 8, 130-132. 1962.
  • Elliot, R:J. & Porter, A.G. A Rapid Cadmium Reduction Method for The Determination of Nitrate in Bacon and Curing Brines. Analyst, Lond. 96, 522-527. 1971.
  • Mullin, J.D. & Riley, J. P. The Colorimetric Determination of Silica in Water. Part 3. Method for Determining The Total Silica Content. Analyst. Lond. 88, 446-455. 1955.
  • Legnerova, J. The Genera Ankistrodesmus Corda and Raphidium Ktitz. and Their Position In The Family Ankistrodesmusmaceae, Preslia (37),l-8. 1965.
  • Hutchinson, G. E. A treatise on Limnology, Vol: II, Introduction to Lake Biology and the Limnoplankton, John Wiley, New York, 1115 pp. 1967
  • Rodhe, W. Environmental Requirements of Fresh Water Plankton Algae. Experimental Studies in the Ecology of Phytoplankton. Symbolae Botanicae Upsaliensis 10, 1-149. 1948.
  • Round, F.E. The Biology of the Algae, Second Edition, Edward Arnold (Publishers) Ltd, London, 278 p. 1973.
  • Moss, B. A land awas with nutrients-the problem of eutrophication, Chemistry & Industry, 3 June 1996. Page: 407-411. 1996.
  • Stevenson, R.J., Bothwell, M.B., Lowe, R.L. Algal Ecology freshwater Benthic Ecosystems, Academic Press., p:753. 1996.
  • John, D. M., Whitton, B. A., Brook, A. J. The Freshwater Algal Flora of the British Isles, An identification guide to freshwater and terrestrial algae. Cambridge University Press, 702 p., Cambridge UK. 2003.
  • Anonim, (2004). Su Kirliliği ve Kontrolü Yönetmeliği, 31 Aralık 2004 tarihli Resmi Gazete, No: 25687

Büyük Lota Gölü (Hafik/SİVAS)’nün Fitoplankton Toplulukları ve Su Kalitesi

Yıl 2015, Cilt: 36 Sayı: 2, 51 - 62, 17.01.2015

Ergün Kasaka

Öz

Büyük Lota Gölü fitoplankton toplulukları ve su kalite özellikleri Ocak 2001-Aralık 2001 tarihleri arasında incelenmiştir. Fitoplanktonda 7 bölüme ait toplam 78 takson belirlenmiştir. Bu taksonların 29 tanesi Chlorophyta (% 37.2), 28 tanesi Bacillariophyta (% 35.9), 13 tanesi Cyanophyta (% 16.7), 3 tanesi Pyrrophyta (% 3.8), 3 tanesi Cryptophyta (% 3.8), 1 tanesi Euglenophyta (% 1.3) ve 1 tanesi Xanthophyta (% 1.3) bölümlerine aittir. Büyük lota gölünün yıllık ortalama sıcaklık: 18.9 oC, çözünmüş oksijen: 6.5 mg/l, pH: 8.3, toplam fosfat: 58 µg/l, nitrat: 0.3 mg/l, amonyak: 0.1mg /l, silika: 3.6 mg/l,  kalsiyum: 449 mg/l, sülfat: 269 mg/l ve klorofil a: 1.5 µg/l’dir. Biyolojik ve kimyasal özellikleri bakımından oligo-mezotrofik karakter gösteren göl, Kıta içi su kaynaklarının sınıflandırma kriterleri (SKKY)’ne göre I ve II sınıf su sınıfına girmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Büyük Lota Gölü Fitoplankton Su kalitesi

Kaynakça

  • Egemen, Ö. ve Sunlu, U. (1996). Su Kalitesi, Ege Üniversitesi Basımevi, 2. Baskı, Bornova,
  • İzmir, 153 s.Borzov I.N., Beta-decay rates, Nucl.Phys.A 777, 645-675 (2006).
  • Taş, B., Gönülol, A., Derbent Baraj Gölü (Samsun, Türkiye)’nün Planktonik Algleri, Journal of FisheriesSciences.1 (3): 111-123. 2007.
  • Rawson, D.S. Algal indicators of trophic lake types. Limnology and Oceanography 1: 18-25. 19 Trifonova, I.S. Phytoplankton composition and biomass structure in relation to trophic gradient in some temperate and subarctic lakes of north-western Russia and the Prebaltic. Hydrobiologia 369-370: 99- 108. 1998.
  • Wetzel, R. G. Limnology: Lake and River Ecosystems. Third Edition, Academic Press, 1006 pp. 2001.
  • Reynolds, C.S., V. Huszar, C. Kruk, L. Naselli-Flores, S. Melo. Review towards a functional classification of the freshwater phytoplankton. Journal of Plankton Research 24: 417-428. 2002.
  • Kelly, M.G., Whitton, B.A. The Trophic Diatom Index: a New Index for Monitoring Eutrophication in Rivers. J. Appl. Phycol. 7: 433-444. 1995.
  • Lowe, R., Pan, Y. Benthic algal communities as biological monitors. In: Stevenson RJ, Bothwell M, Lowe R (ed.), Algal Ecology: Academic Press. pp.705-739. 1996.
  • Schneider, S., Schranz, C., Melzer, A. Indicating the trophic state of running waters by submersed macrophytes and epilithic diatoms. Limnologica. 30: 1 – 8. 2000.
  • Rimet, F., Ector, L., Cauchie, H.M., Hoffmann, L. Regional Distribution of Diatom Assemblages in the Headwater Streams of Luxemburg. Hydrobiologia. 520: 105-117. 2004.
  • Ünlü, A., Çoban, F., Tunç, M.S. (2008).
  • Hazar Gölü Su Kalitesinin Fiziksel ve İnorganik kimyasal Parametreler Açısından İncelenmesi. Gazi. Üniv. Müh. Mim. Fak. Der. cilt. 23, No.1, 119- Gökçe, A., Ceyhan, F. Miocene sediments in the southeast of the old gypsum plaster stratigraphy, structural properties and formation. J.of Enginer. 5: 91-112. 1988.
  • Günay, G. Gypsum karst, Sivas, Turkey. Environ. Geol. 42: 387-398. 2002.
  • Lund, J.W.G., Kipling, C., Gren, D.E. The inverted microscope method of estimation algal numbers and the statistical basis of estimation by counting. Hydrobiologia 11: 143-170. 1958.
  • Prescott, G.W. Algae of the Western Great Lakes Area, Otto Koeltz Science Publishers, Germany, 977p. 1982.
  • Krammer, K. and Lange Bertalot, H. Süwasserflora von Mitteleuropa Bacillariophyceae, Band 2/1,1. Teil: Naviculaceae, Spectrum Academischer Verlag, Heidelberg, Berlin, 876p. 1999.
  • Moore, J.A. Charophytes of Great Britain and İreland, Botanical Society of the British Isles, London, 140p. 1986.
  • Lind, E.M., Brook, A.J. Desmids of the English Lake District, Freshwater Bio. Assoc. Scientific Pub. No. 42. 1980.
  • Clesceri, S., Greenberg, E.A., Eaton, D. Standard Methods for Examination of Water and Wastewater. 20. Eddition. American Public Health Association. 1999.
  • Mackeret, F.J.H., Heron, J., Talling, C.F. Water Analysis: Some Revised Methods for Limnologists. Freshwater Biological Association, 120p. 1978.
  • Tabitabai, M.A. Determination of Sulphate in Waters. Sulphur İnst. J. 10, 11-13. 1974
  • Chaney, A.L. & Morbach, E.P. Modified Reagents for The Determination of Urea and Amonia. Clin. Chem. 8, 130-132. 1962.
  • Elliot, R:J. & Porter, A.G. A Rapid Cadmium Reduction Method for The Determination of Nitrate in Bacon and Curing Brines. Analyst, Lond. 96, 522-527. 1971.
  • Mullin, J.D. & Riley, J. P. The Colorimetric Determination of Silica in Water. Part 3. Method for Determining The Total Silica Content. Analyst. Lond. 88, 446-455. 1955.
  • Legnerova, J. The Genera Ankistrodesmus Corda and Raphidium Ktitz. and Their Position In The Family Ankistrodesmusmaceae, Preslia (37),l-8. 1965.
  • Hutchinson, G. E. A treatise on Limnology, Vol: II, Introduction to Lake Biology and the Limnoplankton, John Wiley, New York, 1115 pp. 1967
  • Rodhe, W. Environmental Requirements of Fresh Water Plankton Algae. Experimental Studies in the Ecology of Phytoplankton. Symbolae Botanicae Upsaliensis 10, 1-149. 1948.
  • Round, F.E. The Biology of the Algae, Second Edition, Edward Arnold (Publishers) Ltd, London, 278 p. 1973.
  • Moss, B. A land awas with nutrients-the problem of eutrophication, Chemistry & Industry, 3 June 1996. Page: 407-411. 1996.
  • Stevenson, R.J., Bothwell, M.B., Lowe, R.L. Algal Ecology freshwater Benthic Ecosystems, Academic Press., p:753. 1996.
  • John, D. M., Whitton, B. A., Brook, A. J. The Freshwater Algal Flora of the British Isles, An identification guide to freshwater and terrestrial algae. Cambridge University Press, 702 p., Cambridge UK. 2003.
  • Anonim, (2004). Su Kirliliği ve Kontrolü Yönetmeliği, 31 Aralık 2004 tarihli Resmi Gazete, No: 25687
Toplam 32 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Editöriyal
Yazarlar

Ergün Kasaka

Yayımlanma Tarihi 17 Ocak 2015
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2015 Cilt: 36 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Kasaka, E. (2015). Büyük Lota Gölü (Hafik/SİVAS)’nün Fitoplankton Toplulukları ve Su Kalitesi. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, 36(2), 51-62.
AMA Kasaka E. Büyük Lota Gölü (Hafik/SİVAS)’nün Fitoplankton Toplulukları ve Su Kalitesi. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi. Mart 2015;36(2):51-62.
Chicago Kasaka, Ergün. “Büyük Lota Gölü (Hafik/SİVAS)’nün Fitoplankton Toplulukları Ve Su Kalitesi”. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi 36, sy. 2 (Mart 2015): 51-62.
EndNote Kasaka E (01 Mart 2015) Büyük Lota Gölü (Hafik/SİVAS)’nün Fitoplankton Toplulukları ve Su Kalitesi. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi 36 2 51–62.
IEEE E. Kasaka, “Büyük Lota Gölü (Hafik/SİVAS)’nün Fitoplankton Toplulukları ve Su Kalitesi”, Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, c. 36, sy. 2, ss. 51–62, 2015.
ISNAD Kasaka, Ergün. “Büyük Lota Gölü (Hafik/SİVAS)’nün Fitoplankton Toplulukları Ve Su Kalitesi”. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi 36/2 (Mart 2015), 51-62.
JAMA Kasaka E. Büyük Lota Gölü (Hafik/SİVAS)’nün Fitoplankton Toplulukları ve Su Kalitesi. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi. 2015;36:51–62.
MLA Kasaka, Ergün. “Büyük Lota Gölü (Hafik/SİVAS)’nün Fitoplankton Toplulukları Ve Su Kalitesi”. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, c. 36, sy. 2, 2015, ss. 51-62.
Vancouver Kasaka E. Büyük Lota Gölü (Hafik/SİVAS)’nün Fitoplankton Toplulukları ve Su Kalitesi. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi. 2015;36(2):51-62.