Open-Delta Three-Phase Inverter Current Control Using Predictive Control For PV System Connected To The Grid

Yıl 2015, Cilt: 36 Sayı: 3, 121 - 134, 13.05.2015

Zohre Abbasi Hassan Feshki Farahani

Öz

Abstract. Predictive control method has advantages such as simple structure, functional and follow the simple mathematical. In this paper, a new method is provided for controlling the open-Delta three-phase inverter . Model-based predictive control system is used for controlling the current of a open-Delta three-phase inverter, which is in the process of converting the photovoltaic energy conversion plays a three-phase network. The controller at any time, the next period current are estimated using a model system. Four switches are used to build a open-delta three-phase inverter, that Four signal switches are necessary for inverter and Signals can be done based on the cost function minimization. Open-Delta Three-phase inverter, produces four pulses required to conduct two basic switching using switching PWM. Appropriate choice of switching states and estimated future states of the phase currents, the inverter may be provided with reasonable accuracy the phase currents. In this study the effect of different parameters such as: inductance coupling inductors, capacitors and reference current is evaluated on the performance of the proposed controller. A sample of inverters, with nominal power 3300 VA is simulated by SIMULINK MATLAB software.  At the simulation section of  paper, An example of the current predictive controller is designed for Open-Delta three-phase inverter , and is implemented in SIMULINK MATLAB software. The current predictive controller for the six-switch three-phase inverter is designed and implemented in SIMULINK MATLAB software and simulation results have been compared both three-phase inverter topology.

Anahtar Kelimeler

PV systems, Open-Delta three phase inverters, Estimated load, Model-based predictive control method

Kaynakça

• S. Buso, et al., "Uninterruptible power supply multiloop control employing digital predictive voltage and current regulators," Industry Applications, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 37, pp. 1846-1854, 2001.
• F. Blaabjerg, et al., "Comparison of a space-vector modulation strategy for a three phase standard and a component minimized voltage source inverter," Comparison of a Space-Vector Modulation Strategy for a Three Phase Standard and a Component Minimized Voltage Source Inverter, 1995.
• F. Blaabjerg, et al., "A new optimized space-vector modulation strategy for a component- minimized voltage source inverter," Power Electronics, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 12, pp. 704- 714, 1997.
• F. Blaabjerg, et al., "Adaptive SVM to compensate DC-link voltage ripple for four-switch three-phase voltage-source inverters," Power Electronics, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 14, pp. 743-752, 1999.
• G.-T. Kim and T. A. Lipo, "VSI-PWM rectifier/inverter system with a reduced switch count," in Industry Applications Conference, 1995. Thirtieth IAS Annual Meeting, IAS'95., Conference Record of the 1995 IEEE, 1995, pp. 2327-2332.
• D. T. Liang and J. Li, "Flux vector modulation strategy for a four-switch three-phase inverter for motor drive applications," in Power Electronics Specialists Conference, 1997. PESC'97 Record., 28th Annual IEEE, 1997, pp. 612-617.
• W. McMurray, "Modulation of the chopping frequency in DC choppers and PWM inverters having current-hysteresis controllers," Industry Applications, IEEE Transactions on, pp. 763-768, 1984.
• R. Ribeiro, et al., "AC/AC converter with four switch three phase structures," in Power Electronics Specialists Conference, 1996. PESC'96 Record., 27th Annual IEEE, 1996, pp. 134- 139.
• H. W. Van Der Broeck and J. D. Van Wyk, "A comparative investigation of a three-phase induction machine drive with a component minimized voltage-fed inverter under different control options," Industry Applications, IEEE Transactions on, pp. 309-320, 1984.
• P. C. Loh and D. G. Holmes, "Analysis of multiloop control strategies for LC/CL/LCL- filtered voltage-source and current-source inverters," Industry Applications, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 41, pp. 644-654, 2005.
• P. C. Loh, et al., "A comparative analysis of multiloop voltage regulation strategies for single and three-phase UPS systems," Power Electronics, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 18, pp. 1176-1185, 2003.
• M. Kojima, et al., "Novel vector control system using deadbeat-controlled PWM inverter with output LC filter," Industry Applications, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 40, pp. 162-169, 2004. [13] O. Kukrer, "Deadbeat control of a three-phase inverter with an output LC filter," Power Electronics, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 11, pp. 16-23, 1996.
• P. Mattavelli, "An improved deadbeat control for UPS using disturbance observers," Industrial Electronics, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 52, pp. 206-212, 2005.
• A. Kulka, et al., "Stationary frame voltage harmonic controller for standalone power generation," in Power Electronics and Applications, 2007 European Conference on, 2007, pp. 1- 10.
• M. N. Marwali and A. Keyhani, "Control of distributed generation systems-Part I: Voltages and currents control," Power Electronics, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 19, pp. 1541-1550, 2004.
• G. Escobar, et al., "An adaptive control for UPS to compensate unbalance and harmonic distortion using a combined capacitor/load current sensing," Industrial Electronics, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 54, pp. 839-847, 2007.
• G. Escobar, et al., "Repetitive-based controller for a UPS inverter to compensate unbalance and harmonic distortion," Industrial Electronics, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 54, pp. 504-510, 2007.
• G. H. Bode, et al., "An improved robust predictive current regulation algorithm," Industry Applications, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 41, pp. 1720-1733, 2005.
• L. Malesani, et al., "Robust dead-beat current control for PWM rectifiers and active filters," in Industry Applications Conference, 1998. Thirty-Third IAS Annual Meeting. The 1998 IEEE, 1998, pp. 1377-1384.
• P. Mattavelli, et al., "Predictive digital control of power factor preregulators with input voltage estimation using disturbance observers," Power Electronics, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 20, pp. 140-147, 2005.
• S.-M. Yang and C.-H. Lee, "A deadbeat current controller for field oriented induction motor drives," Power Electronics, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 17, pp. 772-778, 2002.
• A. Nasiri, "Digital control of three-phase series-parallel uninterruptible power supply systems," Power Electronics, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 22, pp. 1116-1127, 2007.
• Y.-R. Mohamed and E. F. El-Saadany, "An improved deadbeat current control scheme with a novel adaptive self-tuning load model for a three-phase PWM voltage-source inverter," Industrial Electronics, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 54, pp. 747-759, 2007.
• Y.-R. Mohamed and E. F. El-Saadany, "Robust high bandwidth discrete-time predictive current control with predictive internal model—A unified approach for voltage-source PWM converters," Power Electronics, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 23, pp. 126-136, 2008.
• Y.-R. Mohamed and E. F. El-Saadany, "Adaptive discrete-time grid-voltage sensorless interfacing scheme for grid-connected DG-inverters based on neural-network identification and deadbeat current regulation," Power Electronics, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 23, pp. 308-321, 2008.
• Q. Zeng and L. Chang, "An advanced SVPWM-based predictive current controller for three-phase inverters in distributed generation systems," Industrial Electronics, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 55, pp. 1235-1246, 2008.