Comparative Analysis Of Dispute Resolution Councils With Similar Legal Institutions In English Law

Yıl 2015, Cilt: 36 Sayı: 3, 1347 - 1355, 13.05.2015

Amin Abdollahı

Öz

Abstract. Iranian lawmakers have established Dispute Resolution Councils by article 189 of The Third Development Plan Law, in order to decrease time of judgment and density of files in Department of Justice, and agreement between two sides of lawsuits. Consequently, Islamic Parliament of Iran approved Law of Dispute Resolution Councils in 2009. At comparative viewpoint, County Courts and Peace Courts in English Law are similar institutions with Dispute Resolution Councils in Iran. However, certainly, there are diversities between them. This research has studied Dispute Resolution Councils in Iran with similar institutions in England with analytic-descriptive way. Until will be presented recent achievements and solutions for improvement of this institution.  

Anahtar Kelimeler

Profitability, Earnings, Tehran Stock Exchange, Earnings per share

Kaynakça

• are chosen by local authorities’ opinions. Moreover magistrates services their clients free same as Dispute Resolution Councils’ judges.
• The first distinction is about their power of decision. Magistrates are independent in their responsibility, but Dispute Resolution Councils’ judges are free for resolving disputes exclusively. The second difference is about way of their elections. Magistrates only should be native and has adequate local information, but Dispute Resolution Councils’ judges should have 9 conditions.
• Comparison of Jurisdiction of Dispute Resolution Councils with Jurisdiction of county courts
• Comparison of Jurisdiction of Dispute Resolution Councils with Magistrates courts
• The Magistrates courts are more similar to Dispute Resolution Councils than county courts, because both of them have legal and criminal Jurisdiction. Both of them are limited. Some inferior crimes are common between them such as traffic regulations and stop in prohibited areas, therefore they have identified punishments.
• One of the most important differences is sentence of imprisonment, Dispute Resolution Councils in contradict with magistrates courts could not issue Sentence of imprisonment. In addition, magistrates courts perform as a reference for a preliminary investigation in crimes which has no Jurisdiction about them, but Dispute Resolution Councils has not that capability. 6. CONCLUSION
• 3,28x1019 4,38x1019 1,02x1024 1,41x1024 1,61x1023 11,00 Test
• J. R. Spencer (2005) Criminal Procedure in England , translated by Leila Meghdadi and Mohammad Reza Goudarzi, Jungle Publication [2] H. Jafari (2007) Jurisdiction of Dispute Resolution Councils and its regulations, Thesis, University of Qom
• S. Hoseini Shirazi consultation in Islam http://www.shirazi.ir
• David René (1991) Great Contemporary Legal Systems translated by M. Hosein Safaie & M. Ashouri
• Y. Darvish Howeida (2010) Alternative methods of dispute settlement , Mizan Publishing, Tehran
• A. H. Rahgosha (2005) A viewpoint to Dispute Resolution Council, Daneshvar Publishing, Tehran
• Cavendish Research Group (2009) British legal system, translated by N. Mehra, Mizan Publishing, Tehran
• Y. Moradi (2009) analyzing of legal Jurisdiction of Dispute Resolution Council with comparative studying in British Law, Govah Magazine, Vol 23
• H. Mir Mohammad Sadeghi(2000) A glance at the public courts of England, Legal Viewpoints Magazine, vol 4
• colin frank, padfield., 1997, law made simple. Published by arian.
• Hunt Martin,2004, A LEVEL AND AS LAVEL LAW.Tehran: Published by Majd
• W.j.brown, 2009, GCSE LAW (Tehran: published by majd
• Geoffrey Rivlin, (2004),Understanding the Law, Oxford, History of the judiciary
• http://www.judiciary.gov.uk/