The Validity and Reliability of the Perceived Maternal Parenting Self-Efficacy Scale: Turkish Version

Öz

Objective: Preterm birth can result in a situation where mothers feel less confident in newborn care skills due to being unprepared. They may also experience emotional shock, anxiety, and depression. Thus it is important to determine maternal parenting self-efficacy in order for the mothers to cope with the potential difficulties involved in preterm newborn care. The purpose of this psychometric study is to test the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Perceived Mother Parenting Self-Efficacy Scale. Materials and Methods: The study uses a psychometric approach. Online distribution of a questionnaire between the beginning of March and the end of May 2021 was applied. Data was collected from 105 mothers of preterm infants aged between 1-28 days. The original scale was translated into Turkish and content validity was evaluated. Explanatory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis were tested in order to determine validity, and Cronbach’s α internal consistency coefficient, item‐total correlation, test‐retest analysis, and equivalent form analysis were tested to determine reliability. Results: The mean age of the participants was 32.29±5.33. The factor loads of the items were between 0.361 and 0.911. The Cronbach’s α, internal consistency coefficient was 0.891, and the test–retest reliability was 0.851 (p<0.001). A significant positive correlation between the Turkish version of the Perceived Maternal Parenting Self-Efficacy Scale and the Maternal Attachment Inventory (r=0.533, p<0.05) was found. Conclusion: The Turkish version of the Perceived Maternal Parenting Self-Efficacy Scale is a valid and reliable instrument to evaluate maternal parenting self-efficacy. Further studies are needed to measure the parenting self-efficacy levels of mothers with preterm infants.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Maternal self-efficacy
• parenting self-efficacy
• preterm birth
• self-efficacy

Kaynakça

1. 1. Bandura, A. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman and Co, 1997. google scholar
2. 2. Klassen RM, Klassen JRL. Self-efficacy beliefs of medical students: a critical review. Perspect Med Educ. 2018;7(2):76-82. doi:10.1007/s40037-018-0411-3 google scholar
3. 3. Turan Kavradim S, Yangöz ŞT, Canli Ozer Z, Boz I. Instruments to assess self-efficacy among people with cardiovascular disease: A COSMIN systematic review. Int J Clin Pract. 2020;74(11):1-15. doi:10.1111/ijcp.13606 google scholar
4. 4. Kurokawa M, Yamamoto A, Takada S. Translation and Psychometric Analysis of the Japanese Version of the Perceived Maternal Parenting Self-Efficacy Scale. JOGNN - J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2021;50(2):214-224. doi:10.1016/j.jogn.2020.10.006 google scholar
5. 5. Botha E, Helminen M, Kaunonen M, Lubbe W, Joronen K. Mothers’ parenting self-efficacy, satisfaction and perceptions of their infants during the first days postpartum. Midwifery. 2020;88:102760. doi:10.1016/j.midw.2020.102760 google scholar
6. 6. Derwig M, Tiberg I, Björg J, Kristensson Hallström I. Changes in perceived parental self-efficacy after a Child-Centred Health Dialogue about preventing obesity. Acta Paediatr. 2022;111(10): 1956-1965. google scholar
7. 7. Abuhammad S. Predictors of maternal parenting self-efficacy for infants and toddlers: A Jordanian study. PLoS One. 2020;15(11):1-10. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0241585 google scholar
8. 8. Cheong JLY, Burnett AC, Treyvaud K, Spittle AJ. Early environment and long-term outcomes of preterm infants. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2020; 127(1):1-8. doi: 10.1007/s00702-019-02121-w. google scholar

9. 9. Altay M, Bayram M, Biri A, Büyükbayrak EE, Deren Ö, Ercan F, Eroğlu D, et al. Perinataloji Uzmanları Derneği Preterm Eylem ve Doğum Klavuzu. 2020. google scholar
10. 10. Fuentefria R do N, Silveira RC, Procianoy RS. Desenvolvimento motor de prematuros avaliados pela Alberta Infant Motor Scale: artigo de revisao sistemática. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2017;93(4):328-342. doi:10.1016/j.jped.2017.03.003 google scholar
11. 11. Fernández Medina IM, Granero-Molina J, Fernández-Sola C, Hernández-Padilla JM, Camacho Ávila M, López Rodríguez M del M. Bonding in neonatal intensive care units: Experiences of extremely preterm infants’ mothers. Women and Birth. 2018;31(4):325-330. doi:10.1016/j.wombi.2017.11.008 google scholar
12. 12. Lang T, Secic M. How to report statistics in medicine: Annotated guidelines for authors, editors, and reviewers. ACP Press, 2006. google scholar
13. 13. Hair JF, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, Black WC. Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Prentice Hall, 1998. google scholar
14. 14. Tristao RM, Neiva ER, Barnes CR, Adamson-Macedo E. Validation of the scale of perceived self-efficacy of maternal parenting in Brazilian sample. J Hum Growth Dev. 2015;25(3):277-286. doi:10.7322/jhgd.96759 google scholar
15. 15. Pedrini L, Ferrari C, Ghilardi A. Psychometric Properties of the Italian Perceived Maternal Parenting Self-Efficacy (PMP S-E). J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2019;26(2):173-182. doi:10.1007/ s10880- 018-9578-3 google scholar
16. 16. Barnes CR, Adamson-Macedo EN. Perceived Maternal Parenting Self-Efficacy (PMP S-E) tool: Development and validation with mothers of hospitalized preterm neonates. J Adv Nurs. 2007;60(5):550-560. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04445.x google scholar
17. 17. Kavlak O, Şirin A. The Turkish version of Maternal Attachment Inventory. Int J Human Sci. 2009;6(1):188-202. google scholar
18. 18. Büyüköztürk Ş. Data Analysis for Social Sciences (16th ed.). Pegem Publication, 2012:167-182. google scholar
19. 19. Karagöz Y. SPSS 23 and AMOS 23 applied statistical analysis. Nobel Akademik Publication, 2016. google scholar
20. 20. Gozum S, Aksayan S. Guidelines for cross-cultural scale adaptation II: psychometric properties and cross-cultural comparison. Turkish J Nurs Res Dev. 2002;5:3-14. google scholar