Relationship Between Perceived Social Support of Pregnant Women and Their Intentions Regarding Newborn Feeding

Öz

Objective: The research is intended to evaluate the perceived social support levels of pregnant women, ascertain their intentions regarding newborn breastfeeding, and examine the relationship between these concepts. Materials and Methods: This descriptive, correctional, and cross-sectional study was conducted with 331 pregnant women in the second and third trimesters who attended the Non-Stress Test (NST) Room of Bandırma Onyedi Eylül University Education and Research Hospital. The Personal Information Form, the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS), and the Infant Feeding Intentions Scale (IFI) were used as the data collection tool. Analyses were performed using SPSS Statistics 23. Results: The mean total scores of the MSPSS and IFI Scale were 67.20 ± 12.67 and 15.82 ± 0.69, respectively. No statistically significant correlation was observed between the MSPSS and IFI scores of pregnant women (p>0.05). A statistically significant difference was observed between the MSPSS scores and the following variables: education level, income level, employment status, health insurance status, and training status related to pregnancy and newborn care. (p<0.05). A significant difference was found in the IFI scale scores according to the working status (p<0.05). Conclusion: The findings show that the pregnant women in the sample reported high perceived social support levels and strong feeding intentions. No significant relationship was found between perceived social support and breastfeeding intention. Perceived social support and newborn feeding intention of pregnant women varied according to some socio-demographic variables.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Breastfeeding intention
• feeding intention
• gestational period
• newborn
• perceived social support
• pregnant women

Kaynakça

1. 1 Gümüşdaş M, Ejder ApaY S. The relationship between marital adjustment and social support during pregnancY. HSP. 2016;3(1):1-8. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/ pub/hsp/issue/25147/265526 google scholar
2. 2 Mermer G, Bilge A, Yücel U, Çeber E. Evaluation of perceived social support levels in the pregnancY and postpartum periods. J PsYchiatr Nurs. 2010;1(2):71-76. https://phdergi.org/jvi.aspx?pdir=phd&plng=tur&un=PHD-04127 google scholar
3. 3 Ardahan M. Social support and nursing. Anatolian J Nurs Health Sci. 2006;9(2):68-75. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ataunihem/issue/2633/33879. google scholar
4. 4 Sezen C, Ünsalver BÖ. The relationship between fear of childbirth and the level of social support: A review and pilot studY. J Neurobehav Sci. 2018;5(1):29-36. doi:10.5455/JNBS.1512387859 google scholar
5. 5 Henton S, Swanson VA. Mixed-methods analYsis of the role of online social support to promote psYchological wellbeing in new mothers. Digit Health. 2023;9. doi:10.1177/20552076221147433 google scholar
6. 6 Isiguzo C, Mendez DD, Demirci JR, Youk A, Mendez G, Davis EM, Documet P. Stress, social support, and racial differences: Dominant drivers of exclusive breastfeeding. Matern Child Nutr. 2023;19(2). doi:10.1111/mcn.13459 google scholar
7. 7 Mitra AK, KhourY AJ, Hinton AW, Carothers C. Predictors of breastfeeding intention among low-income women. Matern Child Health J. 2004;8:65-70. doi:10.1023/B.0000025728.54271.27 google scholar
8. 8 Li F, Huang C, Lin Q, Xi Y, Xiang C, Yong C, Deng J. Maternal characteristics, intention, self-efficacY, perceived social support, and exclusive breastfeeding practise: Structural equation modelling approaches. Healthcare. 2022;11(1):87. doi:10.3390/healthcare11010087 google scholar

9. 9 Nommsen-Rivers LA, DeweY KG. Development and validation of the infant feeding intentions scale. Matern Child Health J. 2009;13:334-342. doi:10.1007/ s10995-008-0356-Y google scholar
10. 10 Hauck YL, Blixt I, Hildingsson I, Gallagher L, Rubertsson C, Thomson B, Lewis L. Australian, Irish and Swedish women’s perceptions of what assisted them to breastfeed for six months: ExploratorY design using critical incident technique. BMC Public Health. 2016;16:1-12. doi:10.1186/s12889-016-3740-3 google scholar
11. 11 Al Naseeb NM, Badr H, Alghamdi S. A correlational studY of breastfeeding duration among Saudi mothers: The role of self-efficacY, intention, and social support. Belitung Nurs J. 2023;9(2):132. doi:10.33546/bnj.2510 google scholar
12. 12 Baumgartner T, Bhamidipalli SS, Guise D, DaggY J, Parker CB, Westermann M, nuMoM2b studY. PsYchosocial and sociodemographic contributors to breastfeeding intention in first-time mothers. Matern Child Health J. 2020;24:1047-1056. doi:10.1007/s10995-020-02928-0 google scholar
13. 13 Permatasari TAE, Sartika RAD, Achadi EL, Purwono U, Irawati A, OcviYanti D. Does breastfeeding intention among pregnant mothers associate with earlY initiation of breastfeeding? J Kesehatan Reproduksi. 2016;7(3):169-184. google scholar
14. 14 Kafulafula UK, Hutchinson MK, Gennaro S, Guttmacher S, Kumitawa A. Exclusive breastfeeding prenatal intentions among HIV-positive mothers in BlantYre, Malawi: A correlation studY. BMC PregnancY Childbirth. 2013;13:1-11. doi:10.1186/1471-2393-13-203 google scholar
15. 15 Mortazavi F, Mousavi SA, Chaman R, Khosravi A, Janke JR. Cross-cultural adaptation, validitY, and reliabilitY of the Farsi breastfeeding attrition prediction tools in Iranian pregnant women. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2015;17(3). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4441781/ google scholar
16. 16 Dewanti LP, Novianti A. Exclusive breastfeeding intention of pregnant mothers in the region of Kebon Jeruk District West Jakarta Public Health Centre. Int J Nurs Health Serv. 2022;5(1):1-7. doi:10.35654/ijnhs.v5i1.471 google scholar
17. 17 Donath SM, Amir LH, ALSPAC StudY Team. Relationship between prenatal infant feeding intention and initiation and duration of breastfeeding: A cohort studY. Acta Paediatr. 2003;92(3):352-356. doi:10.1111/j.1651-2227.2003.tb00558.x google scholar
18. 18 Zhang Q, Lamichhane R, Wouk K, Guthrie J, Li K. Prenatal perception of breastfeeding recommendations predicts the earlY breastfeeding outcomes of participants in the Special Supplemental Nutrition Programme for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC). Am J Clin Nutr. 2021;114(6):1949-1959. doi:10.1093/ ajcn/nqab268 google scholar
19. 19 Naja F, Chatila A, AYoub JJ, Abbas N, Mahmoud A, MINA collaborators, Nasreddine L. Prenatal breastfeeding knowledge, attitude and intention, and their associations with feeding practises during the first six months of life: A cohort studY in Lebanon and Qatar. Int Breastfeed J. 2022;17(1):15. doi:10.1186/ s13006-022-00456-x google scholar
20. 20 Wilhelm SL, Rodehorst TK, Stepans MBF, Hertzog M, Berens C. Influence of intention and self-efficacY levels on the duration of breastfeeding for midwest rural mothers. Appl Nurs Res. 2008;21(3):123-130. doi:10.1016/j.apnr.2006.10.005 google scholar
21. 21 Metin A, AltınkaYnak S. The effect of sociodemographic characteristics of fathers on spousal support and breastfeeding success. JAREN. 2020;6(1):109-16. doi:10.5222/jaren.2020.68552. google scholar
22. 22 Bal Z, Can Kantar E, Uçar T. The relationship of loneliness with social support, breastfeeding, and maternal attachment. J Health Sci Univ Nurs. 2021;3(1):21-28. doi:10.48071/sbuhemsirelik.833156. google scholar
23. 23 Demirçelik Y, Örsdemir Hortu H, Üzüm Ö, Eliaçık K, Helvacı M. Effect of social support and workplace breastfeeding conditions on breastfeeding duration among working mothers at an educational research hospital. Forbes J Med. 2021;2(1). doi:10.5222/forbes.2021.04706. google scholar
24. 24 Bektas I, Arkan G. Effect of perceived social support of SYrian mothers on their infant feeding attitudes. J Pediatr Nurs. 2021;57. doi:10.1016/j.pedn.2020.10.005 google scholar
25. 25 Menekşe D, Çınar N. The effect of breastfeeding education given to pregnant women expecting twins on breastfeeding intentions. OTSBD. 2022;7(4):593-601. doi:10.26453/otjhs.1097111. google scholar
26. 26 Topaloğlu Ören ED, Ünsal Atan Ş, Kavlak O. Breastfeeding attitudes and influencing factors among women in the postpartum period. Izmir Katip Celebi Univ J Health Sci. 2023;8(1):27-35. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ikcusbfd/ issue/75682/1061234. google scholar
27. 27 Zimet GD, Dahlem NW, Zimet SG, FarleY GK. The multidimensional scale of perceived social support. J Pers Assess. 1988;52(1):30-41. doi:10.1207/ s15327752jpa5201_2 google scholar
28. 28 Eker D, Arkar H. Factorial structure, validitY, and reliabilitY of the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support. Turk J PsYchol. 1995;10(34):45-55. google scholar
29. 29 Eker D, Akar H, Yaldız H. The review form of the Multidimensional Perceived Social Support Scale’s factor structure, validitY and reliabilitY. Turk PsikiYatri Derg. 2001;2:17-25. google scholar
30. 30 Nommsen-Rivers LA, DeweY KG. Development and validation of the infant feeding intentions scale. Matern Child Health J. 2009;13:334-342. doi:10.1007/ s10995-008-0356-Y google scholar
31. 31 Güneri SE, Muslu GK, Güner Ö. The Turkish Version of the Infant Feeding Intention Instrument (IFI-T). DOI: 10.14744/etd.2019.70487 google scholar
32. 32 Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics. (6th edition). Pearson Education. google scholar
33. 33 Ibrahim HA, Alshahrani MA, Al-ThubaitY DD, said SH, Almedhesh SA, Elgzar WT. Associated factors of exclusive breastfeeding intention among pregnant women in Najran, Saudi Arabia. Nutrients. 2023;15(13):3051. doi:10.3390/ nu15133051 google scholar
34. 34 Silva LF, Cortellazzi KL, Melo LSA D, Silva SRC D, Rosell FL, Valsecki A, Tagliaferro EPD S. Exclusive breastfeeding intention among pregnant women and associated variables: A cross-sectional studY in a Brazilian communitY. Rev Paul Pediatr. 2023;42. doi:10.1590/1984-0462/2024/42/2022192 google scholar
35. 35 Mroskovâ S, Schlosserovâ A, Rel'ovskâ M. Analysis of selected determinants of the intention to breastfeed. Cent Eur J Nurs MidwiferY. 2018;9(4):939-946. doi:10.15452/CEJNM.2018.09.0027 google scholar
36. 36 Davie P, Bick D, Chilcot J. To what extent does the maternal bodY mass index predict the intentions, attitudes, or practises of earlY infant feeding? Matern Child Nutr. 2019;15(4). doi:10.1111/mcn.12837 google scholar
37. 37 Wallenborn JT, Perera RA, Wheeler DC, Lu J, Masho SW. Workplace support and breastfeeding duration: The mediating effect of breastfeeding intention and self-efficacy. Birth. 2019;46(1):121-128. doi:10.1111/birt.12377 google scholar
38. 38 Senghor T, Omotosho TA, Ceesay O, Williams DCH. Predictors of exclusive breastfeeding knowledge and the intention to or practise of exclusive breastfeeding among antenatal and postnatal women receiving routine care: A cross-sectional study. Int Breastfeed J. 2018;13:1-8. doi:10.1186/ s13006-018-0154-0 google scholar
39. 39 Huang R, Han H, Ding L, Zhou Y, Hou Y, Yao X, Jiang H. Using the theory of planned behaviour model to predict factors influencing breastfeeding behaviour among preterm mothers at week 6 postpartum: The mediating effect of breastfeeding intention. Front Psychol. 2023;14:1228769. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1228769 google scholar
40. 40 Ihudiebube-Splendour CN, Okafor CB, Anarado AN, Jisieike-Onuigbo NN, Chinweuba AU, Nwaneri AC, Chikeme PC. Exclusive breastfeeding knowledge, intention to practise and predictors among primiparous women in Enugu South-East, Nigeria. J Pregnancy. 2019;2019:9832075. doi:10.1155/2019/9832075 google scholar
41. 41 Thomas JS, Yu EA, Tirmizi N, Owais A, Das SK, Rahman S, Stein AD. Maternal knowledge, attitudes and self-efficacy in relation to the intention to exclusively breastfeed among pregnant women in rural Bangladesh. Matern Child Health J. 2015;19:49-57. doi:10.1007/s10995-014-1494-z google scholar
42. 42 Flax VL, Ipadeola A, Schnefke CH, Ralph-Opara U, Adeola O, Edwards S, Brower AO. Breastfeeding interpersonal communication, cell phone support, and mass media messaging increase exclusive breastfeeding at 6 and 24 weeks among clients of private health facilities in Lagos, Nigeria. J Nutr. 2022;152(5):1316-1326. doi:10.1093/jn/nxab450 google scholar
43. 43 Dikmen HA. The relationship between the level of perceived social support, distress, depression, and sleep quality in pregnant women. Türkiye Klinikleri J Health Sci. 2020;5(3). doi:10.5336/healthsci.2019-71676. google scholar
44. 44 Yeşilçınar İ, Şahin E, Özçam N. Assessment of prenatal attachment and perceived social support in pregnant women living in the southeastern region of our country: A cross-sectional study. Türkiye Klinikleri Journal of Nursing Sciences. 2021;13(3). doi:10.5336/nurses.2020-80600. google scholar
45. 45 Azimi M, Fahami F, Mohamadirizi S. The relationship between perceived social support in the first pregnancy and the fear of childbirth. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2018;23(3):235-239. doi:10.4103/ijnmr. IJNMR_170_16 google scholar
46. 46 Yurdakul M. Perceived social support in pregnant adolescents in the Mersin area in Turkey. Pak J Med Sci. 2018;34(1):115. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/ articles/PMC5856994/ google scholar
47. 47 Kanığ M, Eroğlu K. Perceived Level of Social Support among Pregnant Women and Affecting Factors. Journal of Education & Research in Nursing. 2019;16(2). doi:10.5222/HEAD.2019.125. google scholar
48. 48 Çıtak-Bilgin N, Coşkun H, Coşkuner Potur D, İbar Aydın E, Uca E. Psychosocial predictors of the fear of childbirth in Turkish pregnant women. Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2021;42(2):123-131. https://doi.org/10.1080/0167482 X.2020.1734791. google scholar
49. 49 Çalpbinici P, Terzioğlu F, Koç G. Relationship between perceived social support, personality traits, and self-esteem with childbirth fear in pregnant women. International Journal of Women's Health Services. 2023;44(10-11):1423-1437. doi:10.1080/07399332.2021.2007925. google scholar
50. 50 Zamani P, Ziaie T, Lakeh NM, Leili EK. Correlation between perceived social support and childbirth experience in pregnant women. Midwifery 2019;75:146-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2019.05.002. google scholar
51. 51 Chen Z, Li Y, Chen J, Guo X. The mediating role of coping styles in the relationship between perceived social support and antenatal depression among pregnant women: a cross-sectional study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022;22(1):188. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04377-9. google scholar
52. 52 Yüksel A, Bayrakçı H. Self-efficacy, psychological well-being and perceived social support levels in pregnant women. Int J Caring Sci. 2019;12(2):1-10. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/ self-efficacy-psychological-well-being-perceived/docview/2303668465/se-2? accountid=37146. google scholar
53. 53 Aksoy YE, Yılmaz SD, Aslantekin F. Prenatal attachment and social support in high-risk pregnancies. Turkiye Klinikleri J Health Sci. 2016;1(3):163-169. DOI: 10.5336/healthsci.2016-50668. google scholar
54. 54 Erbil RN, Akın Ö. The effect of perceived social support on pregnancy stress: a descriptive and cross-sectional study. Int J Caring Sci. 2024;17(1):426-437. https://internationaljournalofcaringsciences.org/docs/41.ozlem.pdf. google scholar
55. 55 Özdemir F, Bodur S, Nazik E, Nazik H, Kanbur A. Investigation the perceived social support levels of pregnant with hyperemesis gravidarum. Türk Silahlı Kuvvetleri Koruyucu Hekimlik Bülteni. 2010;9(5):463-470. doi:10.5555/20103335458. google scholar
56. 56 Mitra AK, Khoury AJ, Hinton AW, Carothers C. Predictors of breastfeeding intention among low-income women. Matern Child Health J. 2004;8:65-70. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MACI.0000025728.54271.27. google scholar
57. 57 Victora CG, Bahl R, Barros AJ, França GV, Horton S, Krasevec J et al. Breastfeeding in the 21st century: epidemiology, mechanisms, and lifelong effect. Lancet. 2016;387:475-490. doi: 101016/80140-6736(15)01024-7. google scholar
58. 58 Hamid SBA, Yahya N. Knowledge, attitude, prior exposure and intention to breastfeed among undergraduate university students. J Clin Health 8ci. 2018;3(2):26-35. doi:10.24191/jchs.v3i2.7083. google scholar
59. 59 Insaf TZ, Fortner RT, Pekow P, Dole N, Markenson G, Chasan-Taber L. Prenatal stress, anxiety, and depressive symptoms as predictors of intention to breastfeed among Hispanic women. J Women Health. 2011;20:1183-1192. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2010.2276. google scholar