Profile of Drivers Whose Licences Were Temporarily Revoked for Driving under the Influence of Alcohol for the Second Time in the Province of Türkiye and Participated in Training: A Retrospective Study

Öz

Objective: This study aimed to determine the 2019 profile of drivers in a province in the south of Turkey who were detected by security forces while driving under the influence of alcohol for the second time, whose licences were confiscated for two years, and who were required to attend driver behaviour development training (DBDT) to get their licences back. Materials and Methods: This retrospective registry study's sample consisted of 601 people. The recorded data used by the Antalya Provincial Health Directorate were evaluated. The ethics committee and institutional permission were obtained for the study. Categorical data were given with percentages, and continuous data were given with mean, standard deviation, maximum and minimum values. Results: The average age of the drivers was 41.47±10.46, 98% were male, 32.9% were high school graduates, 65.9% lived in the city centre, and 88.5% were employed. It was determined that 40.8% of the participants had accidents involving property damage while driving under the influence of alcohol, and 43.1% of them consumed alcohol several times a week. Among the reasons for drivers’ drinking, socialisation (9.94±4.64) had the highest mean score. It was determined that 31.8% of the participants exhibited harmful alcohol use behaviour, and 48.6% had a 75% alcohol use disorder. Conclusion: This study revealed that the majority of drivers whose driver's licence was temporarily revoked for the second time due to alcohol-impaired driving were middle-aged, male, and employed; a significant proportion of them consumed alcohol frequently, were involved in accidents with property damage, and had a high risk of alcohol use disorder. The data emphasise the importance of developing targeted education and intervention programmes for this risk group.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Driving under the influence
• retrospective studies
• alcohol drinking
• accidents
• public health

Kaynakça

1. 1 ALgahtany MA. SecuLar trend, seasonaL variation, epidemioLogicaL pattern, and outcome of traumatic head injuries due to road traffic accidents in Aseer, Saudi Arabia. Int J Environ Res PubLic Health 2021;18(12)6623. doi: 10.3390/ ijerph18126623 google scholar
2. 2 Boo Y, Choi Y. Comparison of prediction modeLs for mortaLity related to injuries from road traffic accidents after correcting for undersampLing. Int J Environ Res Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021;18(11),5604. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18115604 google scholar
3. 3 Woryd Health Organization. Highlights. HoListic approach to prevent deaths from road traffic crashes underscored during UN Road Safety Week. 2022; Available from https:// www.who.int/sriLanka/news/detaiL/17052022hoListicapproachtopreventdeaths fromroadtrafficcrashesunderscored-duringunroadsafetYweek google scholar
4. 4 Nishitani Y. Alcohol and traffic accidents in Japan. IATSS Research 2019;43(2),7983. doi: 10.1016/j.iatssr.2019.06.002 google scholar
5. 5 Aktaş A, Döğer R, Akgür SA. Profesyonel araç sürücülerinde sürücü davranışları ve becerileri ile alkol, madde ve ilaç kullanımının değerlendirilmesi. Adli Tıp Bülteni 2019;24(2),100107. doi: 10.17986/bLm.2019250193 google scholar
6. 6 Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD). AvaiLabLe from https://www.madd.org/ drunkdriving google scholar
7. 7 Chang YH, Lu T, Hsu IL, Chen BL, Li CY. Risk of 30day mortaLity and its association with alcohol concentration LeveL among driver victims of motor vehicLe crashes: comparison of popuLationand hospitaLbased designs. J EpidemioL CommunitY HeaLth 2020;74(10),815823. doi: 10.1136/jech2020213953 google scholar
8. 8 Schumann J, Perkins M, Dietze P, Nambiar D, Mitra B, GerostamouLos D, et aL. The prevalence of alcohol and other drugs in fatal road crashes in Victoria,Australia. Accident Analysis & Prev. 2021;153,105905. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105905 google scholar

9. 9 TellioğLu M, Tekin ÖF, Arikan İ. Bir toplum sağlığı merkezinde sürücü davranışlarını geliştirme eğitimlerine katılan sürücülerin tanımlayıcı özellikleri. Eskişehir Türk Dünyası Uygulama ve Araştırma Merkezi Halk Sağlığı Dergisi 2019;4(2),176183. doi: 10.35232/estudamhsd.511917 google scholar
10. 10 Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu. Karayolu kaza trafik istatistikleri, 2022. Haber Bülteni Sayı: 49513. 2023; Available from https://data.tuik.gov.tr/BuLten/Index?p=KarayoluTrafikKazaIstatistikLeri202249513 google scholar
11. 11 Martin RJ, Cox MJ, ChaneY BH. Knowlden AP. Examination of associations between risky driving behavior sandhazardous drinking among a sampLe of coLLegestudents. Traffic Injury Prevention. 2018;19(6),563568. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2018.1476690 google scholar
12. 12 Taymur İ, Duyan V, Özdel K, Budak E, Güngör BB. Sürücü davranışlarını geliştirme eğitimi’nin alkollü araç kullanan bireylerin özdenetimlerine etkisi. Bilişsel Davranışçı Psikoterapi ve Araştırmalar Dergisi 2014;3,182190 google scholar
13. 13 United Nations. UN News. (30 June 2022). Global Perspective Human Stories. 2022; Available from https://news.un.org/en/storY/2022/06/1121732 google scholar
14. 14 Karayolları Trafik Kanunu. OfficiaL Newspaper, Law No: 2918, Date of Acceptance: October 13, 1983. Number: 18195. Available from https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/ mevzuatmetin/1.5.2918.pdf google scholar
15. 15 Avcı M, Bilgin, H. Alkollü araç kullanımı nedeniyle sürücü belgesine geçici süreli el konulması işlemleri üzerine bir inceleme. Uyuşmazlık Mahkemesi Dergisi 2019;(13),129166. google scholar
16. 16 T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı. Antalya İl Sağlık Müdürlüğü. Sürücü davranışlarını geliştirme eğitimi. Available from https://antalyaism.saglik.gov.tr/TR139934/su rucudavranislarinigelistirmeegitimi.html google scholar
17. 17 Cooper ML. Motivations for alcohol use among adolescents: Development and validation of a four factor model. Psychological Assessment 1994;6,117128. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/10403590.6.2.117 google scholar
18. 18 Topuz A. Alcohol use among Boğaziçi University students: Differences by drinking motive, gender, grade point average, Level of academic progress, Living arrangement, parental education, participation in sociaL activities and perceived harm of aLcohoL (dissertation). İstanbuL, Boğaziçi Univ. 2004. google scholar
19. 19 Babor TF, Higgins Biddle JC, Saunders JB, Monteiro MG. AUDIT: The alcohol use disorders identification test: Guidelines for use in primary health care. 2nd ed. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2001. Available from https://iris.who.int/ bitstream/handle/10665/67205/WHO_MSD_MSB_01.6aeng.pdf?sequence=1 google scholar
20. 20 Saatçioğlu Ö, Evren C, Çakmak D. Alkol kullanım bozuklukları tanıma testinin geçerliği ve güvenilirliği. Türkiye’de Psikiyatr 2002;4(23),107113. google scholar
21. 21 Ewing JA. Detecting aLcohoLism, the CAGE questionnaire. JAMA 1984;252,19051907. doi: 10.1001/jama.1984.03350140051025 google scholar
22. 22 Arıkan Z, Özdemir YD, Candansayar S, Işık E. SMAST ve CAGE tarama testlerinin alkolizmin tanısal önemi üzerine bir çalışma. 1991; 27. ULusal Psikiyatri Kongresi, Antalya. google scholar
23. 23 Maenhout TM, Poll, A, Vermassen T, De BuYzere ML, DeLanghe JR, ROAD Study Group. UsefuLness of indirect alcohol biomarkers for predicting recidivism of drunkdriving among previously convicted drunkdriving offenders: resuLts from the recidivism of aLcohoLimpaired driving (ROAD) studY. Addiction 2014;109(1),7178. doi: 10.1111/add.12372 google scholar
24. 24 Yılbaş B. Sürücü davranışlarını geliştirme eğitimine katılan erkek sürücülerin sosyodemografik özellikleri ve verilen eğitimin bireylerin özdenetimi üzerine etkisinin değerlendirilmesi. Bağımlılık Dergisi 2021;22(2):139147. doi: 10.51982/ bagimli.852403 google scholar
25. 25 National Highwal Traffic Safetl Administration. Young drivers. Available from https://www.nhtsa.gov/book/countermeasuresthatwork/Youngdrivers google scholar
26. 26 Mahdi AM. Genç sürücülerin karıştıkları trafik kazaları ve sürüş davranışları arasındaki ilişkinin Yapısal eşitlik modeLLemesi ile incelenmesi (dissertation). İzmir, Ege Univ. 2019. google scholar
27. 27 Yeşil A, Demircan YT, Aker AT. Ruhsal travmanın alkol etkisi altında araç kullanma riskine ve alkol içme nedenlerine etkileri. Turkiye KlinikLeri J Foren Sci Leg Med. 2020;17(3),217231 doi: 10.5336/forensic.202075003 google scholar
28. 28 Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu Gender Statistics, 2022. 2023; AvaiLabLe from https:// www.tuik.gov.tr/media/announcements/topLumsaL_cinsiyet_istatistikLeri.pdf google scholar
29. 29 Portman M, PenttiLa A, Haukka J, RajaLin S, Eriksson CJP, Gunnar T, et aL. ProfiLe of a drunk driver and risk factors for drunk driving. Findings in roadside testing google scholar