Pressure Injury Knowledge Levels of Nursing Students Applying Computer-aided Simulation Application: A Quasi Experimental Study

Öz

Objective: To determine the effect of a computer-aided simulation application for pressure injury on nursing students’ knowledge and satisfaction level. Method: The study was a quasi-experimental study with a pre-test-post-test design. The study was con ducted with 184 second-year nursing students. Before the computer-aided simulation (CAS) application, the Student Identification Form and the Pressure Ulcer Knowledge Assessment Tool 2.0 (PUKAT 2.0) were applied to the students. Afterward, students were given online training. Two weeks after the training was completed, the CAS application was applied. After the application, an analysis session was held, and immediately afterward, the PUKAT and student satisfaction questionnaire were applied to the students online. Results: While the total PUKAT score average of the students for pressure injury was 8.61±3.36 before the CAS application, it increased to 12.94±2.90 after the application. The post-CAS satisfaction scores, we found that the average score was 44.77±6.54 (min:10-max:50). Conclusion: The scores of pressure injury information increased after the online education and CAS application given to the students.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Computer Aided Simulation
• Nursing Student
• Pressure Injury

Kaynakça

1. 1 Tolarba JEL. Virtual simulation in nursing education: a systematic review. İnt J Nurs Educ 2021;13(3):48-54. doi: 10.37506/ijone.v13i3.16310 google scholar 
2. 2 Watson C, Gömez-lbânez R, Granel N, Bernabeu-Tamayo MD. Nursing students first experience on high fidelity simulation: A phenomenological research study. Nurse Educ Pract 2021;55:103162. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2021.103162 google scholar 
3. 3 Azizi M, Ramezani G, Karimi E, Hayat AA, Faghihi SA, Keshavarzi MH. A comparison of the effects of teaching through simulation and the traditional method on nursing students’ self-efficacy skills and clinical performance: a quasi-experimental study. BMC Nurs 2022;21(1):283. doi: 10.1186/s12912-022-01065-z google scholar 
4. 4 Boztepe H, Terzioğlu F. Skill assessment in nursing education. J Anatolia Nurs Health Sci 2013;16(1):57-64.google scholar 
5. 5 Findik ÜY, Yeşilyurt DS, Makal E. Determining student nurses’ opinions of the low-fidelity simulation method. Nurs Pract Today 2019. doi: 10.18502/npt.v6i2.911 google scholar 
6. 6 Terzioğlu F, Kapucu S, Özdemir L, Boztepe H, Duygulu S, Tuna Z, Akdemir N. Nursing Students’ Opinions About Simulation Method. J Hacettepe Univ Fac Sci Nurs 2012;19(1):16-23. google scholar 
7. 7 Alharbi A, Nurfianti A, Mullen RF, McClure JD, Miller WH. The effectiveness of simulation-based learning (SBL) on students’ knowledge and skills in nursing programs: a systematic review. BMC Med Educ 2024;24(1):1099. doi: 10.1186/ s12909-024-06080-zgoogle scholar 
8. 8 Edeer AD, Sarıkaya A. Views, perceptions and recommendations of nursing students on screen-based computer simulation: qualitative. İnt J Psychol Educ Stud 2018;5(2):21-29. doi: 10.17220/ijpes.2018.02.003 google scholar 

9. 9 Leighton K, Kardong-Edgren S, Schneidereith T, Foisy-Doll C, Wuestney KA. Meeting undergraduate nursing students’ clinical needs: a comparison of traditional clinical, face-to-face simulation, and screen-based simulation learning environments. Nurse Educ 2021;46(6):349. doi: 10.1097/ NNE.0000000000001064 google scholar 
10. 10 Durmaz A, Dicle A, Cakan E, Cakir S. Effect of screen-based computer simulation on knowledge and skill in nursing students’ learning of preoperative and postoperative care management: a randomized controlled study. CİN 2012;30(4):196-203. doi: 10.1097/NCN.0b013e3182419134 google scholar 
11. 11 Niyongabo E, Gasaba E, Niyonsenga P, Ndayizeye M, Ninezereza JB, Nsabimana D et al. Nurses’ Knowledge, attitudes and practice regarding pressure ulcers prevention and treatment. Open J Nurs 2022;12(5):316-333. doi: 10.4236/ ojn.2022.125022 google scholar 
12. 12 Sönmez M, Taşdemir N, Ören N. Pressure injury knowledge of Turkish internship nursing students. J Tissue Viability 2021;30(4):571-575. doi: 10.1016/ j.jtv.2021.07.004 google scholar 
13. 13 Simonetti V, Comparcini D, Flacco ME, Di Giovanni P, Cicolini G. Nursing students’ knowledge and attitude on pressure ulcer prevention evidence-based guidelines: a multicenter cross-sectional study. Nurse Educ Today 2015;35(4):573-579. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2014.12.020 google scholar 
14. 14 Dalvand S, Ebadi A, Gheshlagh RG. Nurses’ knowledge on pressure injury prevention: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on the pressure ulcer knowledge assessment tool. Clin Cosmet İnvestig Dermatol 2018;11:613. doi: 10.2147/CCİD.S186381 google scholar 
15. 15 Bollineni NJ. Knowledge and practices of student nurses of NRİ college of nursing in application of SSKİN towards prevention of pressure ulcers in NRİ hospital, Chinakakani, Mangalagiri, Guntur (dt). Asian J Nurs Educ Res 2019;9(1):17-22. doi: 10.5958/2349-2996.2019.00004.1 google scholar 
16. 16 Abrahams FR, Daniels ER, Niikondo HN, Amakali K. Students’ knowledge, attitude and practices towards pressure ulcer prevention and management. Health SA Gesondheid 2023;28(1). doi: 10.4102/hsag.v28i0.2180google scholar 
17. 17 Alyahyawi KO, Alshekh FO, Madkhali AY, Mosleh AA, Alfaifi İA, Omar RN et al. Knowledge and attitudes towards pressure ulcer prevention evidence-based guidelines among nursing students at Jazan University, Saudi Arabia. Ann Afr Med 2024;23(3):365-371. doi: 10.4103/aam.aam_149_23 google scholar 
18. 18 Kısacık ÖG, Sönmez M. Pressure ulcers prevention: Turkish nursing students’ knowledge and attitudes and influencing factors. J Tissue Viability 2020;29(1):24-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2019.11.003 google scholar 
19. 19 Ursavaş FE, İşeri Ö. Effects of education about prevention of pressure ulcer on knowledge and attitudes of nursing students. J Tissue Viability 2020;29(4):331-336. doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2020.06.006 google scholar 
20. 20 Yilmazer T, Tuzer H, İnkaya B, Elcin M. The impact of standardized patient interactions on nursing students’ preventive interventions for pressure ulcers. J Tissue Viability 2020;29(1):19-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2019.11.004 google scholar 
21. 21 Biçer E. Knowledge and practices of nursing students on pressure ulcer prevention. J Duzce Uni Health Sci İnst 2021;11:1-7. doi: 10.33631/ duzcesbed.691639 google scholar 
22. 22 Öntürk Akyüz H, Dindar Demiray E, Alkan S, Özlü A. Examination of nursing students’ knowledge levels about nursing care to prevent decubitus ulcers in immobile patients. Med Res Rep 2021;4(3):36-49.google scholar 
23. 23 Şahbudak, G. The effect of the pressure sore classification (Puclas-4) e-learning program on helping nursing students acquire pressure sore diagnosis and classification skills (dissertation). İzmir: Ege Univ. 2018. google scholar 
24. 24 Ören, N. Examination of nurses’ pressure sore knowledge and stage diagnosis levels (dissertation). Zonguldak: Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit Univ. 2019.google scholar 
25. 25 Ursavaş FE, Bayrak D. Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the pressure injury knowledge assessment tool 2.0. J Tissue Viability 2021;30(4), 582-587. doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2021.05.002 google scholar 
26. 26 Braden BJ. The Braden scale for predicting pressure sore risk: reflections after 25 years. Adv Skin Wound Care 2012;25(2):61. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000411403.11392.10 google scholar 
27. 27 Oğuz S, Olgun N. Predicting pressure sore risk with the Braden Scale and determining the effectiveness of predetermined nursing prevention of pressure sores. Nurs Forum in Turkish 1998; 1 (3): 131-5. google scholar 
28. 28 https://www.yoihd.org.tr/duyuru.aspx?id=12, Date of Access: 8 Haziran 2021 google scholar 
29. 29 Karahan E, Çelik S, Tank DY, Göğüş F. Training in a high-fidelity patient simulator: assessment of nursing students’ satisfaction and confidence in learning. Celal Bayar Uni Health Sci İnst J 2019; 6(2):106-110. doi: 10.34087/cbusbed.528867 google scholar 
30. 30 Ayhan H, Çinar Fİ, Şahin SY, Demirtaş A, Özkan Y, Külekçi E et al. Evaluation of student opinions regarding simulation applications carried out within the scope of surgical and internal medicine nursing education. Health Sci Uni Nurs J 2019;1(2):66-75.google scholar 
31. 31 Donovan LM, Argenbright CA, Mullen LK, Humbert JL. Computer-based simulation: Effective tool or hindrance for undergraduate nursing students? Nurse Educ Today 2018;69:122-127. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2018.07.007 google scholar 
32. 32 Durmaz A, Dicle A, Cakan E, Cakir S. Effect of screen-based computer simulation on knowledge and skill in nursing students’ learning of preoperative and postoperative care management: a randomized controlled study. CİN 2012;30(4):196-203. doi: 10.1097/NCN.0b013e3182419134 google scholar 
33. 33 Guhde J. Using online exercises and patient simulation to improve students’ clinical decision-making. Nurs Educ Perspect 2010;31(6):387-389.google scholar 
34. 34 Weatherspoon DL, Wyatt TH. Testing computer-based simulation to enhance clinical judgement skills in senior nursing students. Nurs Clin North Am 2012;47(4):481-491. doi: 10.1016/j.cnur.2012.07.002google scholar 
35. 35 Lancaster RJ. Serious game simulation as a teaching strategy in pharmacology. Clin Simul Nurs 2014;10(3):e129-e137. doi: 10.1016/j.ecns.2013.10.005google scholar 
36. 36 Boada İ, Rodriguez-Benitez A, Garcia-Gonzalez JM, Olivet J, Carreras V, Sbert M. Using a serious game to complement CPR instruction in a nurse faculty. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2015;122(2):282-291. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2015.08.006 google scholar 
37. 37 Hartjes LB, Baumann LC. Evaluation of a web-based malaria risk reduction game for study abroad students. J Am Coll Health 2012;60(5):403-414. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2012.673847 google scholar 
38. 38 Hwang J, Kim H. Comparison of training effectiveness for IV injections: Intravenous (IV) arm model versus computer simulator. J Korean Acad Fundam Nurs 2014;21(3):302-310. doi: 10.7739/jkafn.2014.21.3.302 google scholar 
39. 39 Reyes SD, Stillsmoking K, Chadwick-Hopkins D. Implementation and evaluation of a virtual simulator system: Teaching intravenous skills. Clin Simul Nurs 2008;4(1):e43-e49. doi: 10.1016/j.ecns.2007.06.002google scholar 
40. 40 Birrenbach T, Zbinden J, Papagiannakis G, Exadaktylos AK, Müller M, Hautz WE, et al. Effectiveness and utility of virtual reality simulation as an educational tool for safe performance of COVID-19 diagnostics: Prospective, randomized pilot trial. JMIR Serious Games 2021;9(4):e29586. doi: 10.2196/29586google scholar 
41. 41 Rafiei H, Mehralian H, Abdar ME, Madadkar T. Pressure ulcers: How much do nursing students really know? Br J Nurs 2015;24(Sup6):S12-S17. doi: 10.12968/ bjon.2015.24.Sup6.S12 google scholar 
42. 42 Beeckman D, Schoonhoven L, Boucque H, Van Maele G, Defloor T. Pressure Ulcers: e-learning to improve classification by nurses and nursing students. J Clin Nurs 2008;17(13):1697-1707. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.02200.x google scholar 
43. 43 Alvey B, Hennen N, Heard H. Improving accuracy of pressure ulcer staging and documentation using a computerized clinical decision support system. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 2012;(6):607-612. doi: 10.1097/ WON.0b013e31826a4b5c google scholar