Examining Hope and Meaning in Life among Women during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Öz

Objective: The aim was to examine women’s mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic in terms of hope and the meaning of life. Materials and Methods: The study population consisted of 384 women aged 18–65 years living in Turkey. Participants were reached using the random snowball method and Google Forms. Data were collected using the Socio-demographic Information Form, The Meaning in Life Questionnaire, and Dispositional Hope Scale. In the analysis of the data, descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation, number, and percentage), Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test, MannWhitney U test were used. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05. Results: 43.6% of the participants were aged between 18 and 26. A statistically significant, moderately positive correlation was found between the “presence of meaning” and “agency thinking” score (r=0.578, p<0.001). A statistically significant positive correlation was found between the “presence of meaning” and “dispositional hope” score (r=0.604, p<0.001). No statistically significant relationship was found between the “search for meaning” and “pathways thinking” scores (r = 0.035, p = 0.496). No statistically significant relationship was found between the “search for meaning” and “agency thinking” scores (r = 0.009, p = 0.855). Conclusion: It has been concluded that women’s mental health is at risk during the pandemic, that feelings of hope and meaning contribute to women’s psychological resilience, but that these psychological resources need to be supported. These findings form the basis for practices to improve women’s mental health and emphasise the importance of psychosocial support programmes for women in the postpandemic period.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• pandemic
• women's Mental Health
• hope
• meanin in life

Kaynakça

1. World Health Organisation (WHO). WHO Director-General’s opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19 – 11 March 2020. https://www.who.int/director-general/ speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19---11-march-2020. google scholar
2. Lai J, Ma S, Wang Y, Cai Z, Hu J, Wei N. et al. Factors associated with mental health outcomes among health care workers exposed to coronavirus disease 2019. JAMA Network Open. 2020;3(3):e203976-e203976. google scholar
3. Brooks SK, Webster RK, Smith LE, Woodland L, Wessely S, Greenberg N. et al. The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: Rapid review of the evidence. The Lancet, 2020;395(10227):912–920. google scholar
4. Uysal Yalçın S, Zonp Z. Intimate partner violence and women’s mental health during the pandemic. Journal of Psychiatric Nursing; 2024;15(1):17. google scholar
5. Hekler EB, Lambert J, Leventhal E, Leventhal H. Commonsense illness beliefs, adherence behaviours, and hypertension control among African Americans. Journal of Behavioural Medicine, 2008;31(5):391–400. google scholar
6. Kurt S, Karaaziz M. Covid-19 pandemisinin psikososyal alandaki etkileri. YDÜ Mimarlık Fakültesi Dergisi, 2021;3(2):81-91. google scholar
7. Bish A, Michie S. Demographic and attitudinal determinants of protective behaviours during a pandemic: A review. Br J Health Psychol, 2010;15(4):797-824. google scholar
8. UN Women. The impact of COVID-19 on women. 2020. https://www.unwomen.org/en/ digital-library/publications/2020/04/policy-brief-the-impact-of-covid-19-on-women google scholar

9. Connor J, Madhavan S, Mokashi M, Amanuel H, Johnson NR, Pace LE., et al. Health risks and outcomes that disproportionately affect women during the COVID-19 pandemic: A review. Soc Sci Med, 2020;266:113364. google scholar
10. Alon T, Doepke M, Olmstead-Rumsey J, Tertilt M. The impact of COVID-19 on gender equality. NBER Working Paper 2020;26947. google scholar
11. Özdin S, Bayrak Özdin Ş. Levels and predictors of anxiety, depression and health anxiety during COVID-19 pandemic in Turkish society: The importance of gender. Int J Soc Psychiatry, 2020;66(5):504-511 google scholar
12. Mazza C, Ricci E, Biondi S, Colasanti M, Ferracuti S, Napoli C, et al. P. A nationwide survey of psychological distress among Italian people during the COVID-19 pandemic: Immediate psychological responses and associated factors. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 2020;17(9):3165. google scholar
13. Gausman J, Langer A. Sex and gender disparities in the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Women’s Health, 2020;29(4):465-466. google scholar
14. Xue B, McMunn A. Gender differences in unpaid care work and psychological distress in the UK COVID-19 lockdown. PLOS ONE 2021;16(3):e0247959. google scholar
15. Karakılıç H, Özden D. COVID-19 pandemisinin kadınların ruh sağlığı üzerine etkisi. Anadolu Hemşirelik ve Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, 2021;24(2):278-285. google scholar
16. Yıldırım M, Arslan G. Exploring the associations between resilience, dispositional hope, preventive behaviours, subjective well-being, and mental health among adults during early stage of COVID-19. Curr Psychol 2020;41:5712–22. google scholar
17. Snyder CR. Hope theory: Rainbows in the mind. Psychological Inquiry, 2002;13(4):249-275. google scholar
18. Feldman DB, Snyder CR. Hope and the meaningful life: Theoretical and empirical associations between goal–directed thinking and life meaning. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 2005;24(3):401-421. google scholar
19. Steger MF, Frazier P, Oishi S, Kaler M. The meaning in life questionnaire: Assessing the presence of and search for meaning in life. Journal of Counselling Psychology, 2006;53(1):80-93. google scholar
20. Saltzman LY, Hansel TC, Bordnick PS. Loneliness, isolation, and social support factors in post-COVID-19 mental health. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy. 2020;12(S1):S55. google scholar
21. Yıldırım, M. Hope and resilience in the face of COVID-19: A path analysis. Journal of Adult Development, 2021;28(2):161-170. google scholar
22. Wenham C, Smith J, Morgan R. COVID-19: The gendered impacts of the outbreak. The Lancet, 2020;395(10227):846-848. google scholar
23. Erdoğan, S., Nahcivan, N., & Esin, M. N. Hemşirelikte Araştırma: Süreç, Uygulama ve Kritik. 2015, İstanbul: Nobel Tıp Kitabevleri. google scholar
24. Akın, A., Taş, İ., Meaning in life questionnaire: A study of validity and reliability. Turkish Studies-International Periodical for the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, 2015;10(3):27-36,, google scholar
25. Snyder CR, Harris C, Anderson JR, Holleran SA, Irving LM, Sigmon ST., et al. The Will and the Ways: Development and Validation of an Individual Differences Measure of Hope Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1991;60(4):570–585. google scholar
26. Tarhan, S. ve Bacanlı, H. Sürekli Umut Ölçeği’nin Türkçe’ye uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. The Journal of Happiness & Well-Being, 2015;3(1):1-14 google scholar
27. Zuo B, Yang K, Yao Y, Han S, Nie S, Wen F The relationship of perceived social support to feelings of hopelessness under COVID-19 pandemic: The effects of epidemic risk and meaning in life. Personality and Individual Differences, 2021;183, Article 111110. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.111110 google scholar
28. Jin S, Zheng L, Wen J, Miao M. The relationship between active coping and hope during the COVID-19 pandemic: The mediating role of meaning in life. J Health Psychol. 2022;27(12):2685-2695. google scholar
29. Feng L, Yin R. Social Support and Hope Mediate the Relationship Between Gratitude and Depression Among Front-Line Medical Staff During the Pandemic of COVID-19. Front Psychol 2021;12:623873. google scholar
30. Arslan G, Yıldırım M. Meaning-based coping and spiritual well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic: Mediating effects of hope and positive affect. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 2021;19:2306–2319 google scholar