Nursing Students’ Opinions on the Surgical Safety Checklist and Their Teamwork Attitudes
Öz
Objective: This study aimed to determine the thoughts and attitudes of undergraduate nursing students toward the Safe Surgical Checklist (SSC) and their teamwork attitudes, as well as to examine the factors influencing these attitudes.
Methods: This descriptive and cross-sectional study was conducted with 180 nursing students at a foundation university in Yeditepe University between December 2024 and March 2025. Data were collected using the participant information form and the Teamwork Attitudes Questionnaire (TAQ). Ethical approval, institutional permission, and informed consent were obtained. Data were analyzed using descriptive and comparative statistics at a 95% confidence interval and a significance level of p<0.05.
Results: 97.8% of the students viewed healthcare as team-based, and 96.1% believed teamwork enhances patient safety. However, only 68.3% identified themselves as team members during clinical practice. While 97.8% thought the SSC improves patient safety in surgery, 93.9% believed it strengthens team collaboration. The mean total TAQ score was 118.57±22.00. Students who wished to work in a team and saw themselves as team members had significantly higher “team structure” scores (p<0.05). In contrast, those who believed one person is sufficient for SSC implementation had lower “situation monitoring” and “communication” scores (p<0.05).
Conclusion: Students showed overall positive attitudes toward the SSC and teamwork. However, difficulties in communication, situation monitoring, and active participation were observed in clinical settings. The findings emphasize the importance of strengthening education–practice integration and improving team-based competencies to enhance patient safety and collaborative care.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- Urban D, Burian BK, Patel K, Turley NW, Elam M, MacRobie AG, et al. Surgical teams’ attitudes about surgical safety and the surgical safety checklist at 10 years: A multinational survey. Ann Surg Open 2021;2(3):e075. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000075
- Tartaglia A, Matos M. Surgical safety checklist: Fact or fake? Journal Einstein 2022;20:1-2. doi: 10.31744/einstein_journal/2022CE0059
- Akbuğa GA, Sürme Y, Esenkaya D. Compliance with and barriers to implementing the surgical safety checklist: A mixed-methods study. AORN J 2023;117(2):e1-e10. doi: 10.1002/aorn.13861
- Cabral RA, Eggenberger T, Keller K, Gallison BS, Newman D. Use of a surgical safety checklist to improve team communication. AORN J 2016;104(3):206-16. doi: 10.1016/j.aorn.2016.06.019
- Jager E, Gunnarsson R, Ho YH. Implementation of the World Health Organization surgical safety checklist correlates with reduced surgical mortality and length of hospital admission in a high-income country. World J Surg 2019;43(1):117-24. doi: 10.1007/s00268-018-4703-x
- O’Connor P, Reddin C, O’Sullivan M, O’Duffy F, Keogh I. Surgical checklists: The human factor. Patient Saf Surg 2013;7(1):14. doi: 10.1186/1754-9493-7-14
- Willassen ET, Jacobsen IL, Tveiten S. Safe surgery checklist, patient safety, teamwork and responsibility-coequal demands? A focus group study. Glob Qual Nur Res 2018;5:2333393618764070. doi: 10.1177/2333393618764070
- Rönnberg L, Nilsson U. Swedish nurse anesthetists’ experiences of the WHO surgical safety checklist. J Perianesth Nurs 2015;30(6):468-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jopan.2014.01.011
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
İngilizce
Konular
Cerrahi Hastalıklar Hemşireliği
Bölüm
Araştırma Makalesi
Yayımlanma Tarihi
30 Temmuz 2026
Gönderilme Tarihi
6 Ocak 2026
Kabul Tarihi
16 Nisan 2026
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 2026 Sayı: 11