Buzağılarda Grup Barındırmanın Davranış, Performans ve Sağlık Üzerine Etkisi

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 33 Sayı: 1, 95 - 102, 29.06.2018

Gökhan Gökçe , Serap Göncü , Mehmet Soytürk

Öz

Bu derlemede amaç buzağı barındırma yöntemlerinin
buzağıların büyüme, davranış ve sağlığına olan etkileri konusunda yapılan çalışmaların
incelenmesi, elde edilen bulguların gelecek araştırmalar ve pratik uygulama
alanlarına aktarılmasının sağlanmasıdır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Buzağı, Barındırma, Davranış, Performans

Kaynakça

• Bokkers, E. A. M., and P. Koene. 2001. Activity, oral behaviour and slaughter data as welfare indicators in veal calves: A comparison of three housing systems. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 75:1–15.
• Bouissou, M. F., A. Boissy, P. Neindre, and I. Veissier. 2001. The social behaviour of cattle. Pages 113–135 in Social Behaviour in Farm Animals. L. J. Keeling and H. W. Gonyou, ed. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK.
• Brickell, J. S., M. M. McGowan, D. U. Pfeiffer, and D. C. Wathes. 2009. Mortality in Holstein-Friesian calves and replacement heifers, in relation to body weight and IGF-I concentration, on 19 farms in England. Animal 3:1175–1182.
• Chua, B., E. Coenen, J. Van Delen, and D. M. Weary. 2002. Effects of pair versus individual housing on the behavior and performance of dairy calves. J. Dairy Sci. 85:360–364.
• Cooke, L., S. Carnell, and J. Wardle. 2006. Food neophobia and mealtime food consumption in 4–5 year old children. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 3:14.
• Costa, J. H. C., W. G. Costa, D. M. Weary, L. C. P. Machado Filho, and M. A. G. von Keyserlingk. 2016. Dairy heifers benefit from the presence of an experienced companion when learning how to graze. J. Dairy Sci. 99:562–568. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2015-9387.
• de Passillé, A. M. 2001. Sucking motivation and related problems in calves. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 72:175–187.
• Duve, L. R., and M. B. Jensen. 2011. The level of social contact affects social behaviour in pre-weaned dairy calves. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 135:34–43.
• Gaillard, C., R. K. Meagher, M. A. G. von Keyserlingk, and D. M. Weary. 2014. Social housing improves dairy calves' performance in two cognitive tests. PLoS ONE 9:e90205.
• Gulliksen, S. M., K. Lie, T. Loken, and O. Osteras. 2009. Calf mortality in Norwegian dairy herds. J. Dairy Sci. 92:2782–2795.
• Hanekamp, W. J. A., A. C. Smits, and H. K. Wierenga. 1994. Open versus closed barn and individual versus group-housing for bull calves destined for beef production. Livest. Prod. Sci. 37:261–270.
• Hänninen, L., H. Hepola, J. Rushen, A. M. de Passillé, P. Pursiainen, V. M. Tuure, L. Syrjälä-Qvist, M. Pyykkönen, and H. Saloniemi. 2003. Resting behaviour, growth and diarrhoea incidence rate of young dairy calves housed individually or in groups in warm or cold buildings. Acta Agric. Scand. A Anim. Sci. 53:21–28.
• Hötzel, M. J., C. Longo, L. F. Balcão, C. S. Cardoso, and J. H. C. Costa. 2014. A survey of management practices that influence performance and welfare of dairy calves reared in Southern Brazil. PLoS ONE 9:e114995.
• Hur, T. Y., Y. H. Jung, C. Y. Choe, Y. I. Cho, S. J. Kang, H. J. Lee, K. S. Ki, K. S. Baek, and G. H. Suh. 2013. The dairy calf mortality: The causes of calf death during ten years at a large dairy farm in Korea. Korean J. Vet. Res. 53:103–108.
• Jensen, M. B., K. S. Vestergaard, C. C. Krohn, and L. Munksgaard. 1997. Effect of single versus group housing and space allowance on responses of calves during open-field tests. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 54:109–121.
• Jensen, M. B. 2003. The effects of feeding method, milk allowance and social factors on milk feeding behaviour and cross-sucking in group housed dairy calves. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 80:191–206.
• Jensen, M. B., and L. E. Larsen. 2014. Effects of level of social contact on dairy calf behavior and health. J. Dairy Sci. 97:5035–5044.
• Johnson, K., C. C. Burn, and D. C. Wathes. 2011. Rates and risk factors for contagious disease and mortality in young dairy heifers. Anim. Sci. Rev. 205:101–113.
• Keil, N. M., and W. Langhans. 2001. The development of intersucking in dairy calves around weaning. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 72:295– 308.
• Kiyokawa, Y., S. Hiroshima, Y. Takeuchi, and Y. Mori. 2014. Social buffering reduces male rats' behavioral and corticosterone responses to a conditioned stimulus. Horm. Behav. 65:114–118.
• Lidfors, L. M. 1996. Behavioural effects of separating the dairy calf immediately or 4 days post-partum. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 49:269–283.
• Lidfors, L., and L. Isberg. 2003. Intersucking in dairy cattle—Review and questionnaire. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 80:207–231.
• Maatje, K., J. Verhoeff, W. D. J. Kremer, A. L. M. Cruijsen, and T. S. G. A. M. van den Ingh. 1993. Automated feeding of milk replacer and health control of group-housed veal calves. Vet. Rec. 133:266–270.
• Margerison, J. K., T. R. Preston, N. Berry, and C. J. C. Phillips. 2003. Cross-sucking and other oral behaviours in calves, and their relation to cow suckling and food provision. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 80:277–286.
• Nicol, C. 2006. How animals learn from each other. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 100:58–63.
• Nolte, D. L., F. D. Provenza, and D. F. Balph. 1990. The establishment and persistence of food preferences in lambs exposed to selected foods. J. Anim. Sci. 68:998–1002.
• Ortiz-Pelaez, A., D. G. Pritchard, D. U. Pfeiffer, E. Jones, P. Honeyman, and J. J. Mawdsley. 2008. Calf mortality as a welfare indicator on British cattle farms. Vet. J. 176:177–181.
• Raboisson, D., F. Delor, E. Cahuzac, C. Gendre, P. Sans, and G. Allaire. 2013. Perinatal, neonatal, and rearing period mortality of dairy calves and replacement heifers in France. J. Dairy Sci. 96:2913–2924.
• Rault, J. L. 2012. Friends with benefits: Social support and its relevance for farm animal welfare. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 136:1–14.
• Raussi, S., S. Nivskanen, J. Siivonen, L. Hänninen, H. Hepola, L. Jauhiainen, and I. Veissier. 2010. The formation of preferential relationships at early age in cattle. Behav. Processes 84:726–731.
• Steenkamer, N. 1982. Alternative housing systems for veal calves, their effect on welfare and performance and their economic feasibility. Pages 226–234 in Welfare and Husbandry of Calves: Current Topics in Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science. J. P. Signoret, ed. Springer, Hingham, MA.
• USDA. 2008. Dairy 2007, Part III: Reference of Dairy Cattle Health and Management Practices in the United States. USDA, National Animal Health Monitoring System, Fort Collins, CO.
• Veissier, I., P. Chazal, P. Pradel, and P. Le Neindre. 1997. Providing social contacts and objects for nibbling moderates reactivity and oral behaviors in veal calves. J. Anim. Sci. 75:356–365.
• Veissier, I., A. M. De Passille, G. Després, J. Rushen, I. Charpentier, A. R. Ramirez De La Fe, and P. Pradel. 2002. Does nutritive and non-nutritive sucking reduce other oral behaviors and stimulate rest in calves? J. Anim. Sci. 80:2574–2587.
• von Keyserlingk, M. A. G., and D. M. Weary. 2007. Maternal behavior in cattle. Horm. Behav. 52:106–113.
• Walker, W. L., W. B. Epperson, T. E. Wittum, L. K. Lord, P. J. Rajala-Schultz, and J. Lakritz. 2012. Characteristics of dairy calf ranches: Morbidity, mortality, antibiotic use practices, and biosecurity and biocontainment practices. J. Dairy Sci. 95:2204–2214.
• Webster, A. J. F., C. Saville, B. M. Church, A. Gnanasakthy, and R. Moss. 1985. Some effects of different rearing systems on health, cleanliness and injury in calves. Br. Vet. J. 141:472–483.