Examining the Sustainability Performance of Post-Disaster Temporary Shelter Units Through Sample Analyses

Öz

Temporary shelter units should not only provide a temporary living space for disaster victims, but also support their health and well-being. These structures should provide the necessary facilities for the reintegration of disaster victims into social and economic life. Although the need for post-disaster shelter is critical, the design and implementation of these units often ignore the principles of sustainability, leading to environmental, social and economic problems. This study examines the design and implementation of temporary shelter units in accordance with sustainability criteria. The aim is to evaluate the units used as temporary shelter through sustainability criteria to emphasize their sustainability and to develop recommendations for their sustainability. In this context, the sustainability of temporary shelter units selected from the countries most affected by natural disasters between 1900 and 2024 and used in different disasters were analysed. The findings showed that the temporary shelter units analysed were positive in terms of environmental and economic aspects, but weak in terms of social sustainability. As a result of the study, suggestions were made based on the examined temporary shelter units for post-disaster construction and it is thought that these suggestions will shed light on future design and academic studies. As a result, designing temporary shelter units in accordance with sustainability criteria is vital to support the health, welfare and social integration of disaster victims.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Disaster
• Sustainability
• Temporary Shelter
• Post-disaster Shelter

Afet Sonrası Geçici Barınma Birimlerinde Sürdürülebilirlik Performansının Örnek Analizler Üzerinden İncelenmesi

Öz

Geçici barınma birimleri, afet mağdurlarına sadece geçici bir yaşam alanı sağlamakla kalmamalı, aynı zamanda sağlık ve refahlarını desteklemelidir. Bu yapılar, afet mağdurlarının sosyal ve ekonomik hayata yeniden entegrasyonu için gerekli olanakları sunmalıdır. Afet sonrası barınma ihtiyacı kritik olmasına rağmen, bu birimlerin tasarımı ve uygulanması genellikle sürdürülebilirlik ilkelerini göz ardı ederek çevresel, sosyal ve ekonomik sorunlara yol açmaktadır. Çalışma, afet sonrası geçici barınma birimlerinin sürdürülebilirlik kriterlerine uygun tasarım ve uygulamalarını incelemektedir. Amaç, geçici barınma olarak kullanılan birimlerin sürdürülebilirliğini vurgulamak amacıyla sürdürülebilirlik kriterleri aracılığıyla değerlendirmek ve sürdürülebilirliklerine dair öneriler geliştirmektir. Bu bağlamda, 1900-2024 tarihleri arasında doğal afetlerden en çok etkilenen ülkelerden seçilen ve farklı afetlerde kullanılan geçici barınma birimlerinin sürdürülebilirlikleri incelenmiştir. Bulgular, incelenen geçici barınma birimlerinin çevresel ve ekonomik açıdan olumlu olduğunu, ancak sosyal sürdürülebilirlik açısından zayıf kaldığını göstermiştir. Çalışma sonucunda, afet sonrası inşa edilecek yapılarak yönelik; incelenen geçici barınma birimlerinden yola çıkılarak önerilerde bulunulmuş ve bu önerilerin gelecekteki tasarım ve akademik çalışmalara ışık tutacağı düşünülmektedir. Sonuç olarak, geçici barınma birimlerinin sürdürülebilirlik kriterlerine uygun olarak tasarlanması, afet mağdurlarının sağlık, refah ve sosyal entegrasyonunu desteklemek açısından hayati önem taşımaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Afet
• Sürdürülebilirlik
• Geçici Barınma
• Afet Sonrası Barınma

Kaynakça

1. Abulnour, A. H. (2014). The post-disaster temporary dwelling: Fundamentals of provision, design and construction. HBRC Journal, 10(1), 10–24.
2. Afet ve Acil Durum Yönetimi Başkanlığı. (2015). Geçici barınma merkezlerinin kurulması, yönetimi ve işletilmesi hakkında yönerge. 10 Aralık 2024’te https://www.aile.gov.tr/ adresinden alındı.
3. Alemi, F., Ouyang, G., Nozick, L., & Xu, N. (2015). Comprehensive framework for selection of temporary housing site locations. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 12, 250–266.
4. Arquitectura Viva. (2024, June 20). Viviendas temporales container. Retrieved June 20, 2024, from https://arquitecturaviva.com/works/viviendas-temporales-container-
5. Arslan, H. (2007). Re-design, re-use and recycle of temporary houses. Building and Environment, 42(1), 400–406.
6. Arslan, H., & Coşgun, N. (2008). Reuse and recycle potentials of the temporary houses: Example of Düzce, Türkiye. Building and Environment, 43(5), 702–709. Asahi, S. (1995). 1995: Earthquake devastates Kobe. BBC Home. http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/january/17 /newsid_3375000/3375733.stm
7. Aysan, Y., & Davis, I. (1993). Rehabilitation and reconstruction: trainer's guide. Disaster Management Training Programme.
8. Baluken, C. (2023, 20 Nisan). Deprem sonrası barınma çözümleri için literatür ne diyor? Türkiye Ekonomi Politikaları Araştırma Vakfı. https://tepav.org.tr/tr/haberler/s/10561

9. Barakat, S. (2003). Housing reconstruction after conflict and disaster. Overseas Development Institute.
10. Barenstein, J. D. (2006). Housing reconstruction in post-earthquake Gujarat: A comparative analysis. Humanitarian Practice Network.
11. Berg, R. (2009). Tropical Cyclone Report: Hurricane Dolly. National Hurricane Center.
12. Chandler, P. J. (2007). Environmental factors influencing the sitting of temporary housing in Orleans Parish [Master’s thesis, Louisiana State University]. LSU Scholarly Repository. https://repository.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/3888
13. Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. SAGE Publications.
14. Corsellis, T. (2012). Transitional shelter guidelines. Ginebra: Shelter Center.
15. Cuny, F. C. (1994). Disasters and development. Intertect Press.
16. Dalgish, G. (2013). Disaster, resilience and cultural heritage. Archeology International, 16, 75–85.
17. Daneshpour, A., & Mahmoudinejad, H. (2015). Factors affecting the form of temporary housing after disasters in developing countries. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 201, 267–276.
18. Davey, L. (1991). The application of case study evaluations. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 2(9), 1-2. https://doi.org/10.7275/02g8-bb93
19. Dayanır, H., Çınar, A. K., & Akgün, Y. (2022). Post-disaster temporary shelter area selection and planning by using Delphi method: Izmir/Seferihisar case. Journal of Natural Hazards and Environment, 8(1), 87–102. https://doi.org/10.21324/dacd.936585
20. Dikmen, N. (2019). Temporary housing assessment in the context of vulnerability and sustainability after the 2011 Van earthquake. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 10(2/3), 134–149.
21. Duksi, A., & Küçükali, U. F. (2016). Sustainable temporary architecture. A+Arch Design International Journal of Architecture and Design, 2(2).
22. Emergency Event Database. (2024). Monitoring hazards & disasters worldwide since 1988. Retrieved December 15, 2024, from https://public.emdat.be/data.
23. El-Anwar, O., El-Rayes, K., & Elnashai, A. (2009). Disasters, optimizing large-scale temporary housing arrangements after natural. Computing in Civil Engineering, 23(2), 110–118.
24. Gharaati, M. (2006). An overview of the reconstruction program after the earthquake of Bam, Iran. Retrieved December 15, 2024, from http://www.grif.umontreal.ca/pages/gharaati_mehran.pdf
25. Faragallah, N. R. (2021). Fundamentals of temporary dwelling solutions: A proposed sustainable model for design and construction. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 12(3), 3305–3316.
26. Félix, D., Branco, J. M., & Feio, A. (2013). Temporary housing after disasters: A state of the art survey. Habitat International, 40, 136–141.
27. Félix, D., Monteiro, D., Branco, J. M., Bologna, R., & Feio, A. (2015). The role of temporary accommodation buildings for post-disaster housing reconstruction. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 30(4), 683–699.
28. Hadafi, F., & Fallahi, A. (2010a). Temporary housing respond to disasters in developing countries – Case study: Iran Ardabil and Lorestan Province earthquakes. International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(6), 1326–1332.
29. Hadafi, F., & Fallahi, A. (2010b). Temporary housing respond to disasters in developing countries – Case study: Iran Ardabil and Lorestan Province earthquakes. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 66, 1536–1541.
30. Halliday, S. (2008). Sustainable construction. Butterworth-Heinemann.
31. Hayles, C. S. (2010). An examination of decision making in post-disaster housing reconstruction. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 1(3), 290–302.
32. Hosseini, S. M. A., Pons, O., & De La Fuente, A. (2019) A sustainability-based model for dealing with the uncertainties of post-disaster temporary housing. Sustainable and Resilient Infrastructure, 5(5), 330–348.
33. Hoşkara, E. (2007). Strategic method model for sustainable construction suitable for national conditions [Doktora tezi, İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi]. YÖK Ulusal Tez Merkezi. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi
34. International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies. (2011). Transitional shelters - Eight designs. IFRC. https://s3.eu-north-1.amazonaws.com/cdn.sheltercluster.org/public/docs/Transitional%20Shelters%20-%20Eight%20Designs.pdf
35. International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies. (2013). Post–disaster shelter: Ten designs. IFRC. https://www.shelterprojects.org/tshelter-8designs/10designs2013/2013-10-28-Post-disaster-shelter-ten-designs-IFRC-lores.pdf
36. Javanforouzande, A., Asgari Namin, E., Asefi, M., & Shakeri, K. (2020). Explaining the conceptual model of the post-disaster sustainable temporary housing system (Case study: Sar-e-Pol Zahab). Journal of Sustainable Rural Development, 4(2), 185–200.
37. Johnson, C. (2002, May 14–17). What’s the big deal about temporary housing? Planning considerations for temporary accommodation after disasters: Example of the 1999 Turkish earthquakes [Conference presentation]. 2002 TIEMS Disaster Management Conference, Waterloo Canada.
38. Johnson, C. (2007a). Impacts of prefabricated temporary housing after disasters: 1999 earthquakes in Turkey. Habitat international, 31(1), 36-52.
39. Johnson, C. (2007b) Strategic planning for post-disaster temporary housing. Disasters, 31(4), 435–458.
40. Khalili, R., & Amindeldar, S. (2014). Sustainable post-disaster temporary housing: Lessons from Iran. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 5(1), 93–108.
41. Kuzucuoğlu, H., & Başbuğ Erkan, B. (2020). The role of civil initiatives in reducing disaster risks: Sample of TRI DRR. Journal of Disaster and Risk, 3(2), 101–124.
42. Lizarralde, G., & Davidson, C. (2006). Learning from the poor. In D. Alexander (Ed.), Post-disaster reconstruction: Meeting stakeholders’ interest. Università degli Studdi.
43. Oliver, P. (2003). Dwellings: The vernacular house worldwide. Phaidon Press.
44. Özcan, U., Güler, B., & Korkmaz, B. (2021). Shigeru Ban ve “geçici barınak” kavramı. International Journal of Social and Humanities Sciences (IJSHS), 5(2), 65–90.
45. Patel, S. B., & Hastak, M. (2013). A framework to construct post-disaster temporary housing. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 4(1), 43–58.
46. Pourdeihimi, S. (2011). Sustainable post-disaster temporary housing: Lessons from Iran. Procedia Engineering, 21, 595–602.
47. Rethinking the Future. (2024, June 20). Paper Log Houses by Shigeru Ban: Recyclable materials and architecture. Retrieved June 20, 2024, from https://www.re-thinkingthefuture.com/case-studies/a4922-paper-log-houses-by-shigeru-ban-recyclable-materials-and-architecture/
48. Quarantelli, E. L. (1995). Patterns of sheltering and housing in US disasters. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, 4(3), 43–53.
49. Sanderson, D., Sharma, A., Kennedy, J., & Burnell, J. (2014). Lost in transition: principles, practice and lessons from Haiti for urban post-disaster shelter recovery programs. Asian Journal of Environment and Disaster Management, 6 (2), 131-151.
50. Shelter Projects. (2010). Indonesia - Sumatra - 2009 – Overview. Retrieved December 14, 2024, from https://shelterprojects.org/ shelterprojects2010/A-12-A15-Indonesia-Pedang.pdf
51. Sev, A. (2009). Sustainable architecture. Yem Yayınları.
52. Shigeru Ban Architects. (2023). Paper Log House. Shigeru Ban Architects. https://shigerubanarchitects.com/works/paper-tubes/paper-log-house-kobe/
53. Shigeruban Architects. (2024, June 20). Paper Log House – India. Retrieved June 20, 2024, from https://shigerubanarchitects.com/works/paper-tubes/paper-log-house-india
54. Sphere. (2018). The Sphere Handbook: Humanitarian charter and minimum standards in humanitarian response. https://spherestandards.org/wp-content/uploads/Sphere-Handbook-2018-Turkish.pdf
55. Tarakçı, B. İ. (2024, December 10). Personal archive.
56. Tarakçı, B. İ., Ertaş Beşir, Ş., & Seyfettinoğlu, M. (2024, September 27–29). The effectiveness of disaster management and temporary shelter units: Examples from around the world and Turkey [Congress presentation]. IX. International Social Sciences Congress, Ankara, Türkiye.
57. Turner, J. F. (1972). Housing as a verb. In J. F. C. Turner & R. Fichter (Eds.), Freedom to build: Dweller control of the housing process (pp. 148–175). Macmillan.
58. Twigg, J. (2015). Disaster risk reduction. Overseas Development Institute.
59. Usta, G. (2023). Statistical analysis of disasters in the world (1900–2022). Gümüşhane University Journal of Social Sciences, 14(1), 172–186.
60. Wei, L., Li, W., Li, K., Liu, H., & Chenguse, A. L. (2012). Decision support for urban shelter locations based on covering model. Procedia Engineering, 43, 59–64.
61. Yılmaz, S. (2021). Evaluation of the environmental, economic and social sustainability of temporary shelter after disaster [Yüksek lisans tezi, Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi]. YÖK Ulusal Tez Merkezi. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi
62. Yin, R. (1984). Case study research: Design and methods. Sage Publications.