Budyko Yaklaşımına Dayanan Bir Su Bütçesi Modeli ve Parçacık Sürü Optimizasyonu Algoritması ile Kalibrasyonu

Öz

Sunulan çalışmada, aylık yağış-akış ilişkisini tanımlamak amacıyla Budyko yaklaşımına dayanan bir su bütçesi modeli kullanılmıştır. Önerilen beş parametreli model girdi olarak sadece aylık ortalama yağış ve potansiyel evapotranspirasyon verilerine ihtiyaç duymaktadır. Çalışma sahası Gediz Havzası’ndaki Nif Çayı’nı kapsamaktadır. Model parçacık sürü optimizasyonu algoritması (PSO) ile kalibre edilmiştir. PSO ile kalibre edilen modelin performansını sınamak maksadıyla istatistiksel ölçütler değerlendirilmiştir. Çalışmadan elde edilen bulgular, su bütçesi modelinin aylık akış serilerini modellemede başarılı olduğunu göstermiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Su Bütçesi Modeli,Budyko Yaklaşımı,Parçacık Sürü Optimizasyonu,Nif Çayı

A Water Balance Model Based on Budyko Framework and Its Calibration through Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm

Öz

In the study presented, to define monthly rainfall-runoff relation, a water budget model based on Budyko approach was used. Proposed five-parameter model requires only monthly mean precipitation and potential evapotranspiration data as input. The study region covers the Nif Creek located at the Gediz Basin. Model was calibrated with particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm. To validate the performance of model calibrated via PSO, statistical measures were assessed. The results derived from the study show that water budget model is successful in modeling of monthly runoff series.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Water Budget Model,Budyko Framework,Particle Swarm Optimization

Kaynakça

1. Atkinson S.E., Woods R.A., Sivapalan M., (2002), Climate and landscape controls on water balance model complexity over changing timescales, Water Resource Research, 38 (12), 1-17.
2. Budyko M.I., (1958), The Heat Balance of the Earth’s Surface, U.S. Department of Commerce, Weather Bureau, Washington, DC.
3. Chau K.W., (2006), Particle swarm optimization training algorithm for ANNs in stage prediction of Shing Mun River, Journal of Hydrology, 329 (3–4), 363–367.
4. Choudhury B.J., (1999), Evaluation of an empirical equation for annual evaporation using field observations and results from a biophysical model, Journal of Hydrology, 216, 99–110.
5. Chu H., Chang L., (2009), Applying Particle Swarm Optimization to Parameter Estimation of the Nonlinear Muskingum Model, Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 14(9), 1024–1027.
6. Farmer D., Sivapalan M., Jothityangkoon C., (2003), Climate, soil, and vegetation controls upon the variability of the water balance in temperate and semiarid landscapes: downward approach to water balance analysis, Water Resource Research, 39(2), 1-21.
7. Fıstıkoğlu O., Harmancıoğlu N., (2001), Yukarı Gediz havzasında aylık su bütçesi modeli uygulaması, III. Ulusal Hidroloji Kongresi, İzmir.
8. Fıstıkoğlu O., Okkan U., (2010), Tahtalı havzası için aylık su bütçesi modeli, VI. Ulusal Hidroloji Kongresi, Denizli, 546–554.

9. Fu B.P., (1981), On the calculation of the evaporation from land surface, Scientia Atmospherica Sinica, 5, 23–31.
10. Gill M.K., Kaheil Y.H., Khalil A., McKee M., Bastidas L., (2006), Multiobjective particle swarm optimization for parameter estimation in hydrology, Water Resource Research, 42 (7), 1-14.
11. Goswami M., O'Connor K.M., (2007), Comparative assessment of six automatic optimization techniques for calibration of a conceptual rainfall-runoff model, Hydrological Science Journal, 52(3), 432-449.
12. Kennedy J., Eberhart R.C., (1995), Particle Swarm Optimization, In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, 4, 1942-1948, Perth, Australia, IEEE Service Center, Piscataway, NJ.
13. Kuok K.K., Harun S., Chiu P.C., (2011), Comparison of Particle Swarm Optimization and Shuffle Complex Evolution for Auto-Calibration of Hourly Tank Model’s Parameters, Int. J. Advance. Soft Comput. Appl., 3(3), 1-17.
14. Makhlouf Z., Michel C., (1994), A two-parameter monthly water balance model for French watersheds, Journal of Hydrology, 162, 299–318.
15. Milly P.C.D., (1994), Climate, soil water storage, and the average annual water balance, Water Resource Research, 30, 2143–2156.
16. Moriassi D.N., Arnold J.G., Van Liew M.W., Bingner R.L., Harmel R.D., Veith T.L., (2007), Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations, Transaction of the ASABE, 50(3), 885–900.
17. Okkan U., Inan G., (2015), Statistical downscaling of monthly reservoir inflows for Kemer watershed in Turkey: Use of machine learning methods, multiple GCMs and emission scenarios, International Journal of Climatology, 35, 3274–3295.
18. Reddy M.J., Kumar D.N., (2007), Multi-objective particle swarm optimization for generating optimal trade-offs in reservoir operation, Hydrological Processes, 21, 2897–2909.
19. Xu C.Y., Singh V.P., (1998), A Review on Monthly Water Balance Models for Water Resources Investigations, Water Resources Management, 12, 20–50.
20. Zhang L., Potter N., Hickel K., Zhang Y.Q., Shao Q.X., (2008), Water balance modeling over variable time scales based on the Budyko framework – model development and testing, Journal of Hydrology, 360 (1–4), 117–131.