KÜLTÜREL PEYZAJ KORUMA YAKLAŞIMINDA YENİ BİR BOYUT; SOSYO-EKOLOJİK SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİRLİK

Öz

Sürdürülebilirlik kavramı kültürel peyzaj bağlamında ele alındığında çoklu stratejilere odaklanan, yenilikçi teorik ve metodolojik yaklaşımların geliştirilmesine ihtiyaç duymaktadır. Kültürel peyzajları korumak, yalnızca kolektif mirasımızı korumak için değil, aynı zamanda toplulukların refahıyla içsel olarak bağlantılı olduğundan, sosyal-ekolojik sürdürülebilirliği teşvik etmek için de önemlidir. Sosyal ekoloji, toplum-doğa etkileşiminin tüm ilgili örgütsel, mekansal ve zamansal düzey ve ölçeklerdeki analiziyle ilgilenen disiplinler arası ve disiplinler arası bir bilim alanıdır. Bu araştırma makalesi, kültürel peyzajların korunması ile sosyal-ekolojik sürdürülebilirlik arasındaki kesişimleri araştırarak bu kritik alandaki zorlukları ve fırsatları incelemektedir. Özellikle yerel düzeyde kültürel peyzajların sürdürülebilirliğinde çevresel değişim ve çağdaş toplumsal gelişme tarafından kışkırtılan ortaya çıkan riskleri ve güvensizlikleri hafifletmek ve bunlara uyum sağlamak için toplumsal tepkilerin daha sağlam ve ayrılmaz bir unsuru haline nasıl gelebileceğini daha iyi anlamak amacıyla yazılmıştır. Çalışma, kapsayıcı yönetişimin, toplumsal katılımın ve yeşil altyapının geliştirilmesinin önemini vurgulayarak, sosyo-ekolojik sürdürülebilirliğe ulaşmak için çeşitli stratejileri araştırmaktadır. Sonuç olarak sosyo-ekolojik sürüdürülebilirliği sağlamak için çeşitlilik, bağlantı, değişkenleri yönetme, karmaşık sistemlerin anlaşılması-uyum kapasitesi, deneyim, katılım, yönetişim başlıkları altında öneriler geliştirmektedir. Bu sorunların ele alınması, eşitlikçi ve dayanıklı olan uzun vadeli, sürdürülebilir kentsel kalkınmayı başarmak için önemli olacaktır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Sürdürülebilirlik
• Kültürel Peyzaj Koruma
• Dayanıklılık
• sosyo-ekoloji

A NEW DIMENSION IN CULTURAL LANDSCAPE PROTECTION APPROACH; SOCIO-ECOLOGICAL SUSTAINABILITY

Öz

Sustainability, a multidimensional concept, needs the development of innovative theoretical and methodological approaches. Protecting cultural landscapes is important not only to preserve our collective heritage but also to promote social-ecological sustainability, as it is intrinsically linked to the well-being of communities. Socio-ecology is an interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary field of science that deals with the analysis of society-nature interactions at all relevant organizational, spatial, and temporal levels and scales. This research article examines the challenges and opportunities in this critical area by investigating the intersections between the protection of cultural landscapes and social-ecological sustainability. It is written with the aim of better understanding how the sustainability of cultural landscapes, especially at the local level, can become a more robust and integral element of societal responses to mitigate and adapt to emerging risks and insecurities provoked by environmental change and contemporary societal development. The study explores various strategies to achieve socio-ecological sustainability, emphasizing the importance of inclusive governance, community participation, and green infrastructure development. As a result, it develops recommendations under the headings of Diversity, Connectivity, Managing Variables, Understanding Complex Systems-Adaptive Capacity, Experience, Participation, and Governance to ensure socio-ecological sustainability. Addressing these issues will be important to achieve long-term, sustainable urban development that is equitable and resilient.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Sustainability
• Cultural Landscape Protection
• Socio-ecology
• Resilience

Kaynakça

1. Adger, W. N., Quinn, T., Lorenzoni, I., Murphy, C., & Sweeney, J. (2013). Changing social contracts in climate-change adaptation. Nature Climate Change, 3(4), 330-333.
2. Amster, R., & Grdina, L. B. (2021). Integrating Individual Well-Being with Environmental Systems. Stanf. Soc.Innov. Available online: https://ssir.org/articles/entry/integrating_individual_well_being_with_environmental_systems#(acc essed on 2 July 2022).
3. Anderies, J. M., Janssen, M. A., & Ostrom, E. (2004). A framework to analyze the robustness of social- ecological systems from an institutional perspective. Ecology and society, 9(1).
4. Angrisano, M., Biancamano, P. F., Bosone, M., Carone, P., Daldanise, G., De Rosa, F., ... & Girard, L. F. (2016). Towards operationalizing UNESCO Recommendations on “Historic Urban Landscape”: a position paper. Aestimum, 165-210.
5. Anjali, S., Satish, P., & Ashwani, K. (2024). Exploring the Application of Ecosystems Approach to Urban Planning. International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development, 12(2), 28-42.
6. Anschuetz, K. F., Wilshusen, R. H., & Scheick, C. L. (2001). An archaeology of landscapes: perspectives and directions. Journal of archaeological research, 9, 157-211.
7. Avrami, E. (2010). Heritage, values, and sustainability. In Conservation ( 177-183). Routledge.
8. Avrami, E., Macdonald, S., Mason, R., & Myers, D. (2019). 6. Understanding Values of Cultural Heritage within the Framework of Social Identity Conflicts. In Values in Heritage Management: Emerging Approaches and Research Directions. Getty Publications.

9. Azpeitia Santander, A., Azkarate Garai-Olaun, A., & De la Fuente Arana, A. (2018). Historic urban landscapes: A review on trends and methodologies in the urban context of the 21st century. Sustainability, 10(8), 2603.
10. Bassett, T. J., & Fogelman, C. (2013). Déjà vu or something new? The adaptation concept in the climate change literature. Geoforum, 48, 42-53.
11. Berkes, F., Armitage, D., Ibarra, M. A., Charles, A., Loucks, L., Graham, J., ... & Abraham, J. (2014). Guidelines for analysis of social-ecological systems. CCRN Working Group on Social-Ecological Systems and Community Resilience. Retrieved Online October, 24, 2019.
12. Berkes, F., Folke, C., & Colding, J. (Eds.). (1998). Linking social and ecological systems: management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience. Cambridge University Press.
13. Berkes, F., Folke, C., & Gadgil, M. (1994). Traditional ecological knowledge, biodiversity, resilience and sustainability. In Biodiversity conservation: problems and policies. Papers from the biodiversity programme beijer international Institute of ecological economics royal Swedish academy of sciences (pp. 269-287). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
14. Blaser, M. (2004). Life projects: Indigenous peoples’ agency and development. In the way of development: Indigenous peoples, life projects and globalization, 31(1), 23-43.
15. Bodin, Ö., Crona, B., & Ernstson, H. (2006). Social networks in natural resource management: what is there to learn from a structural perspective?. Ecology and society, 11(2).
16. Bodin, Ö., & Crona, B. I. (2009). The role of social networks in natural resource governance: What relational patterns make a difference?. Global environmental change, 19(3), 366-374.
17. Bond, S., & Worthing, D. (2016). Managing built heritage: The role of cultural values and significance. John Wiley & Sons.
18. Bouamrane, M., Spierenburg, M., Agrawal, A., Boureima, A., Cormier-Salem, M. C., Etienne, M., ... &
19. Mathevet, R. (2016). Stakeholder engagement and biodiversity conservation challenges in social-ecological systems: some insights from biosphere reserves in western Africa and France. Ecology and Society, 21(4).
20. Bouchenaki, M. (2003). The interdependency of the tangible and intangible cultural heritage.
21. Buttimer, A. (1998). Landscape and life: Appropriate scales for sustainable development. Irish Geography, 31(1), 1-33.
22. Colavitti, A. M., & Usai, A. (2019). Applying the HUL approach to walled towns of Mediterranean seaport cities: Lessons and guidelines through the experience of four UNESCO walled towns. Journal of Place Management and Development, 12(3), 338-364.
23. Colding, J., & Barthel, S. (2019). Exploring the social-ecological systems discourse 20 years later. Ecology and Society, 24(1).
24. Currie, T. E., Borgerhoff Mulder, M., Fogarty, L., Schlüter, M., Folke, C., Haider, L. J., ... & Waring, T. M. (2024). Integrating evolutionary theory and social–ecological systems research to address the sustainability challenges of the Anthropocene. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 379(1893), 20220262.
25. Çatalbaş, F., & Kılıç, S. E. (2022). Tarihi Kentsel Peyzaj [Historic Urban Landscape (HUL)] yaklaşımı perspektifinde İzmir tarihi liman kentinde planlama ve kültürel mirasın korunmasına yönelik katılımcı bir model. Megaron, 17(3), 526-541.
26. Davidson-Hunt, I., & Berkes, F. (2003). Learning as you journey: Anishinaabe perception of social- ecological environments and adaptive learning. Conservation ecology, 8(1).
27. Del Mar Delgado-Serrano, M., Oteros-Rozas, E., Vanwildemeersch, P., Ortíz-Guerrero, C., London, S., & Escalante, R. (2015). Local perceptions on social-ecological dynamics in Latin America in three community-based natural resource management systems. Ecology and Society, 20(4).
28. Demetriades, J., & Esplen, E. (2010). The gender dimensions of poverty and climate change adaptation. Social dimensions of climate change: Equity and vulnerability in a warming world, 4(2), 133-143.
29. Deslatte, A., Szmigiel-Rawska, K., Tavares, A. F., Ślawska, J., Karsznia, I., & Łukomska, J. (2022). Land use institutions and social-ecological systems: A spatial analysis of local landscape changes in Poland. Land Use Policy, 114, 105937.
30. Dinçer, İ. (2013). Thinking together urban conservation with urban modernization in the process of urban transformation: The possibilities of" historic urban landscape" concept. ICONARP International Journal of Architecture and Planning, 1(1), 22-40.
31. Edge, S., & McAllister, M. L. (2009). Place-based local governance and sustainable communities: lessons from Canadian biosphere reserves. Journal of environmental planning and management, 52(3), 279-295.
32. Edwards, M., & Sen, G. (2000). NGOs, social change and the transformation of human relationships: A 21st-century civic agenda. Third World Quarterly, 21(4), 605-616. European Commission; 2005: ec.europa.eu/dgs/enterprise/move.htm
33. Europian Council (2000, October). European landscape convention. In Report and convention.
34. Fidel, M., Kliskey, A., Alessa, L., & Sutton, O. O. P. (2014). Walrus harvest locations reflect adaptation: A contribution from a community-based observation network in the Bering Sea. Polar Geography, 37(1), 48-68.
35. Fischer, J., Gardner, T. A., Bennett, E. M., Balvanera, P., Biggs, R., Carpenter, S., ... & Tenhunen, J. (2015). Advancing sustainability through mainstreaming a social–ecological systems perspective. Current opinion in environmental sustainability, 14, 144-149.
36. Folke, C. (2004). Traditional knowledge in social–ecological systems. Ecology and society, 9(3).
37. Folke, C. (2006). Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social–ecological systems analyses. Global environmental change, 16(3), 253-267.
38. Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., & Norberg, J. (2005). Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour., 30(1), 441-473.
39. Forman, R. T. (1995). Some general principles of landscape and regional ecology. Landscape ecology, 10, 133-142.
40. Frantzeskaki, N., & Rok, A. (2018). Co-producing urban sustainability transitions knowledge with community, policy and science. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 29, 47-51.
41. Fraser, B. (2009). An account of discourse markers. International review of Pragmatics, 1(2), 293-320.
42. Fusco Girard, L. (2013). Toward a smart sustainable development of port cities/areas: The role of the “Historic Urban Landscape” approach. Sustainability, 5(10), 4329-4348.
43. Ginzarly, M., Roders, A. P., & Teller, J. (2019). Mapping historic urban landscape values through social media. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 36, 1-11.
44. Gough, I. (2013). Climate change, social policy, and global governance. Journal of international and comparative social policy, 29(3), 185-203.
45. Harrington, R., Anton, C., Dawson, T. P., de Bello, F., Feld, C. K., Haslett, J. R., ... & Harrison, P. A. (2010). Ecosystem services and biodiversity conservation: concepts and a glossary. Biodiversity and conservation, 19, 2773-2790.
46. Haustein, E., & Lorson, P. C. (2023). Co-creation and co-production in municipal risk governance–A case study of citizen participation in a German city. Public Management Review, 25(2), 376-403.
47. Heritage, U. I. C. (2019). What is intangible cultural heritage.
48. Holling, C. S. (1996). Engineering resilience versus ecological resilience. Engineering within ecological constraints, 31(1996), 32.
49. Jokilehto, J. (2014). Evolution of the normative framework. Reconnecting the City: Th e Historic Urban Landscape Approach and the Future of Urban Heritage, 203-219.
50. Juhola, S., Filatova, T., Hochrainer-Stigler, S., Mechler, R., Scheffran, J., & Schweizer, P. J. (2022). Social tipping points and adaptation limits in the context of systemic risk: Concepts, models and governance. Frontiers in climate, 4, 1009234.
51. Kortetmäki, T., & Järvelä, M. (2021). Social vulnerability to climate policies: building a matrix to assess policy impacts on well-being. Environmental Science & Policy, 123, 220-228.
52. Kühne, O., & Kühne, O. (2019). The differentiated socialization of landscape. Landscape Theories: A Brief Introduction, 59-72.
53. Labadi, S. (2017). UNESCO, world heritage, and sustainable development: International discourses and local impacts. Collision or collaboration: Archaeology encounters economic development, 45-60.
54. Lechowska, E. (2018). What determines flood risk perception? A review of factors of flood risk perception and relations between its basic elements. Natural Hazards, 94(3), 1341-1366.
55. Lekakis, S., & Dragouni, M. (2020). Heritage in the making: Rural heritage and its mnemeiosis at Naxos island, Greece. Journal of Rural Studies, 77, 84-92.
56. Loulanski, T. (2006). Cultural heritage in socio-economic development: local and global perspectives. Environments, 34(2), 51.
57. Markevičienė, J. (2011). Protection of human rights to the city and preservation of historic urban landscapes: ways to coherence. Town Planning and Architecture, 35(4), 301-309.
58. Martínez Pino, J. (2018). The new holistic paradigm and the sustainability of historic cities in Spain: An approach based on the world heritage cities. Sustainability, 10(7), 2301.
59. Nash, C., Jarrahi, M. H., Sutherland, W., & Phillips, G. (2018). Digital nomads beyond the buzzword: Defining digital nomadic work and use of digital technologies. In International conference on information ( 207-217). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
60. O'brien, K., Selboe, E., & Hayward, B. M. (2018). Exploring youth activism on climate change. Ecology and Society, 23(3).
61. Olsson, P., Folke, C., & Berkes, F. (2004). Adaptive comanagement for building resilience in social– ecological systems. Environmental management, 34, 75-90.
62. Ostrom, E. (2009). A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science, 325(5939), 419-422.
63. Panjabi, S., & Winter, T. (2009). Understanding the tensions in place: conflict and conservation in Kashmir. Historic Environment, 22(1), 19-25.
64. Perihan, M., & Aşur, F. (2020). Tarihi kentsel peyzaj ve kent kimliği ilişkisi. Kent Akademisi, 13(1), 163- 175.
65. Pidgeon, N., Hood, C., Jones, D., Turner, B., & Gibson, R. (1992). Risk perception. Risk: Analysis, perception and management, 89-134.
66. Ranson, S., Stewart, J., Ranson, S., & Stewart, J. (1994). Renewing Democracy. Management for the Public Domain: Enabling the Learning Society, 111-132.
67. Ratzlaff, E. D. (1969). Applications of engineering systems analysis to the human social-ecological system. University of California, Davis.
68. Rey Pérez, J., & González Martínez, P. (2018). Lights and shadows over the Recommendation on the Historic Urban Landscape:‘managing change’in Ballarat and Cuenca through a radical approach focused on values and authenticity. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 24(1), 101-116.
69. Reyers, B., Moore, M. L., Haider, L. J., & Schlüter, M. (2022). The contributions of resilience to reshaping sustainable development. Nature Sustainability, 5(8), 657-664.
70. Rockstrom, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, A., Chapin III, F. S., Lambin, E., ... & Foley, J. (2009). Planetary boundaries: exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecology and society, 14, 1-33.
71. Rodwell, D. (2018). The historic urban landscape and the geography of urban heritage. The Historic Environment: Policy & Practice, 9(3-4), 180-206.
72. Rodwell, D. (2019). Urban heritage, communities, and environmental sustainability. In Securing Urban Heritage ( 62-79). Routledge.
73. Rozmiarek, M., León-Guereño, P., Tapia-Serrano, M. Á., Thuany, M., Gomes, T. N., Płoszaj, K., ... & Malchrowicz-Mośko, E. (2022). Motivation and eco-attitudes among night runners during the COVID- 19 pandemic. Sustainability, 14(3), 1512.
74. Sachs, J. D., Schmidt-Traub, G., Mazzucato, M., Messner, D., Nakicenovic, N., & Rockström, J. (2019). Six transformations to achieve the sustainable development goals. Nature sustainability, 2(9), 805- 814.
75. Salomaa, A., & Juhola, S. (2020). How to assess sustainability transformations: a review. Global Sustainability, 3, e24.
76. Sarmiento-Mateos, P., Arnaiz-Schmitz, C., Herrero-Jáuregui, C., D. Pineda, F., & Schmitz, M. F. (2019). Designing protected areas for social–ecological sustainability: Effectiveness of management guidelines for preserving cultural landscapes. Sustainability, 11(10), 2871.
77. Scazzosi, L. (2004). Reading and assessing the landscape as cultural and historical heritage. Landscape research, 29(4), 335-355.
78. Schmitz, M. F., & Herrero-Jáuregui, C. (2021). Cultural landscape preservation and social–ecological sustainability. Sustainability, 13(5), 2593.
79. Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., & Lichtenstein, S. (1982). Why study risk perception?. Risk analysis, 2(2), 83- 93.
80. Smit, B., & Wandel, J. (2006). Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability. Global environmental change, 16(3), 282-292.
81. Soini, K., & Birkeland, I. (2014). Exploring the scientific discourse on cultural sustainability. Geoforum, 51, 213-223.
82. Tait, M., & While, A. (2009). Ontology and the conservation of built heritage. Environment and planning D: Society and space, 27(4), 721-737.
83. Thomas, D. C., Stahl, G., Ravlin, E. C., Poelmans, S., Pekerti, A., Maznevski, M., & Au, K. (2012). Development of the cultural intelligence assessment. In Advances in global leadership (155-178). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
84. Throsby, D. (1999). Cultural capital. Journal of cultural economics, 23, 3-12.
85. Tunbridge, J. E., & Ashworth, G. J. (1996). Dissonant heritage. The Management of the Past as a Resource in Conflict, 40(2), 547-560.
86. Turner, G. (2015). Culture, politics and the cultural industries: reviving a critical agenda. In The Routledge companion to the cultural industries (535-544). Routledge.
87. Urry, J. (2001). The sociology of space and place. The Blackwell companion to sociology, 1(1), 3-15.
88. Vallury, S., Smith, A. P., Chaffin, B. C., Nesbitt, H. K., Lohani, S., Gulab, S., ... & Allen, C. R. (2022). Adaptive capacity beyond the household: a systematic review of empirical social-ecological research. Environmental research letters, 17(6), 063001.
89. Van der Hoeven, A. (2019). Historic urban landscapes on social media: The contributions of online narrative practices to urban heritage conservation. City, Culture and Society, 17, 61-68.
90. Waldheim, C. (2006). Strategies of indeterminacy in recent landscape practice. Public.
91. Walker, M. A., Walker, D., & Velàzquez, Y. V. (2006). The Wal-Martification of Teotihuacán: issues of resistance and cultural heritage. In Wal-Mart World (213-224). Routledge.
92. Waterton, E., & Smith, L. (2010). The recognition and misrecognition of community heritage. International journal of heritage studies, 16(1-2), 4-15.
93. Wu, J., & Hobbs, R. (2002). Key issues and research priorities in landscape ecology: an idiosyncratic synthesis. Landscape ecology, 17, 355-365.
94. Xie, H., Zhu, Z., He, Y., Zeng, X., & Wen, Y. (2022). Integrated framework of rural landscape research: Based on the global perspective. Landscape Ecology, 37(4), 1161-1184.
95. Zeng, C., & Mu, C. (2024). Two worlds apart: a qualitative study of culture-led rural regeneration projects in China. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 25(3), 406-421.
96. Ziemeļniece, A., Īle, U., & Stokmane, I. (2021). Spatial identity of Latvian cultural landscape within regional context. Landscape Architecture and Art, 19(19), 7-17.