Irregular Migratory Movements from Turkey to Greek Islands: The Effect of the Readmissions Based on the EU - Turkey Statement Over the Rights of the Asylum Seekers

Öz

The main objective of this article is to evaluate the effects of the EU - Turkey Statement of 18 March 2016 on the asylum - related rights of the persons who fall within the scope of the Statement. The said evaluation covers the main characteristics of the Statement such as objective, scope, legal nature as well as Its reflections on the practices of Greece and Turkey. This article highlights that the migratory flow in 2015 from Turkey to Greek islands, which paved the way for the Statement, was merely labeled by the EU as an ‘irregular migratory movement’, although the main characteristic of this flow was that the majority of the migrants on the move were likely to be in need of international protection. By focusing on the ‘irregular’ character of the movement, Statement adopted a deterring approach as an extension of the EU’s externalization of migration and asylum policy and assigned two main tasks on Greece and Turkey: remotion by Greece and readmission by Turkey. The article claims that the Statement’s approach on turning the blind eye to the protection - related character of the migratory flows has not diminished the actual problem. Indeed, the effect of the Statement on the asylum - related practice has exacerbated the need for an effective protection and access to durable solutions. The most significant confirmation of this position can be demonstrated in the recent crisis between Turkish and Greek borders when thousands of migrants including the asylum seekers had to face extremely harsh situations when rushed to the Greek borders following Turkey’s declaration that it wouldn’t prevent the exits from its borders. This incident once more showed that the real solution to the ‘problem’ is not shifting but sharing the physical responsibility with Turkey.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• EU - Turkey Statement
• International Protection
• Asylum
• Readmission
• Hotspots
• Temporary Protection

Türkiye’den Yunanistan’a Yönelen Düzensiz Göç Hareketleri: AB-Türkiye Mutabakatına Dayanan Geri Kabul Uygulamalarının Sığınmacıların Hakları Üzerindeki Etkisi

Öz

Bu makalenin temel amacı, 18 Mart 2016 tarihli AB - Türkiye Mutabakatının, Mutabakat kapsamına giren kişilerin sığınma ile bağlantılı hakları üzerindeki etkilerinin değerlendirilmesidir. Sözü edilen değerlendirme; amaç, kapsam ve hukuki nitelik gibi Mutabakatın temel özelliklerini de kapsamasının yanında, Mutabakatın Yunanistan ve Türkiye uygulamaları üzerindeki yansımalarını da içermektedir. Makalede, 2015 yılında Türkiye’den Yunan adalarına yönelen ve Mutabakatın hazırlanmasına neden teşkil eden göç akının, bu akının kapsamındakilerin çoğunluğunun uluslararası korumaya ihtiyaç duyma olasılığı bulunmasına rağmen, AB tarafından sadece ‘düzensiz göç akını’ olarak nitelendirildiğinin altı çizilmiştir. Göç akınının sadece ‘düzensiz’ niteliğine odaklanmak suretiyle Mutabakat, AB’nin göç ve sığınmanın dışsallaştırılması politikasının da bir uzantısı olarak caydırıcı bir yaklaşım benimseyerek Yunanistan ve Türkiye’ye şu iki görevi yüklemiştir: Yunanistan için uzaklaştırma, Türkiye için geri kabul etme. Bu çerçeve içerisinde makale, Mutabakatın, ilgili göç akınının koruma ile alakalı niteliğini görmezden gelmesinin gerçek problemin varlığını ortadan kaldırmaya yetmediğini iddia etmektedir. Üstelik, Mutabakatın sığınma ile ilgili uygulama üzerindeki etkisi etkin bir koruma ve kalıcı çözümlere erişime duyulan ihtiyacı daha da alevlendirmiştir. Bu durum kendisini en belirgin şekilde, Türkiye ve Yunanistan sınırları arasında, binlerce kişinin, Türkiye’nin sınır kapılarından çıkışları engellemeyeceğini bildirmesi üzerine Yunanistan sınırına akın etmeleri esnasında aşırı derecede sert bir muamele ile karşılaşmaları olayında göstermiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• AB - Türkiye Mutabakatı
• Uluslararası Koruma
• Sığınma
• Geri Kabul
• Göçmen Erişim Noktaları (Hotspots)
• Geçici Koruma

Kaynakça

1. “Ankara Barosu Mülteci Hakları Merkezi Geri Gönderme Merkezleri Deneyim Paylaşımı Çalıştayı”, 01-02 February 2020, http://www. ankarabarosu.org.tr/HaberDuyuru.aspx?DUYURU&=6131 (accessed on 20.07.2020).
2. “Open Letter by 85 Organizations Regarding Rights Violations of Refugees”, 06 March 2020, https://www.hrw.org/news/2020/03/06/open-letter-85-organizations-regarding-rights-violations-refugees (accessed on 28.07.2020).
3. “YUKK Değişiklikleri Hakkında Ortak Değerlendirme”, 04.12.2019, https://www.gocarastirmalaridernegi.org/attachments/article/144/yukk-degisiklikleri-hakkinda-ortak-degerlendirme.pdf (accessed on 20.07.2020).
4. AIDA (Asylum Information Database), “Country Report Turkey”, (Turkey 2015), December 2015, https://www.asylumineurope.org/ re-ports/country/turkey (accessed on 09.06.2020).
5. AIDA, “Country Report Greece 2016 Update”, (Greece 2016), https://www.asylumineurope.org/sites/default/files/report-down-load/aida_gr_2016update.pdf (accessed on 20.06.2020).
6. AIDA, “Country Report Greece 2019 Update”, (Greece 2019), https://www.asylumineurope.org/sites/default/files/report-down-load/aida_gr_2019update.pdf (accessed on 20.06.2020).
7. AIDA, “Country Report Turkey 2019 Update”, (Turkey 2019), https://www.asylumineurope.org/reports/country/turkey (accessed on 20.07.2020).
8. AIDA, “Greece: Asylum Reform in the Wake of EU-Turkey Deal”, 04.04.2016, https://www.asylumineurope.org/news/04-04-2016/greece- asylum-reform-wake-eu-turkey-deal (accessed on 20.06.2020).

9. Alpes, M. J. - Tunaboylu, S. - Ulusoy, O. - Hassan, S.: “Post Deportation risks Under the EU-Turkey Statement: What Happens After Re-admission to Turkey?”, (Readmission to Turkey), Policy Brief Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, November 2017, Issue 2017/30, https://cadmus.eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/49005/PB_2017_30_MPC.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed (accessed on 20.07.2020).
10. Alpes, M. J. - Tunaboylu, S. - Van Liempt, I.: “Human Rights Violations by Design: EU-Turkey Statement Prioritises Returns from Greece over Access to Asylum”, Policy Brief Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, November 2017, Issue 2017/29, https://cadmus. eui.eu/bitstream/handle/1814/48904/RSCAS_PB_2017_29_MPC.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (accessed on 02.06.2020).
11. Amnesty International, “Greece: Inhumane asylum measures will put lives at risk”, 2 March 2020, https://www.amnesty.org/en/ la-test/news/2020/03/greece-inhumane-asylum-measures-will-put-lives-at-risk/(accessed on 28.07.2020).
12. Amnesty International, “Turkey: Syrians illegally deported into war ahead of anticipated ‘safe zone’”, 25 October 2019, https://www. am-nesty.org/en/latest/news/2019/10/turkey-syrians-illegally-deported-into-war-ahead-of-anticipated-safe-zone/(accessed on 04.08.2020).
13. Arribas, G. F.: “The EU-Turkey Agreement: A Controversial Attempt at Patching up a Major Problem”, European Papers, 2016, Vol. 1, No. 3, European Forum, Insight of 17 October 2016, http://www. europeanpapers.eu/en/system/files/pdf_version/EP_EF_2016_I_040_Gloria_Fernandez_Arribas_2.pdf (accessed on 02.06.2020)
14. Aydın, E.: “Avrupa Birliği Mevzuatında Güvenli Üçüncü Ülke Kavramı ve Türkiye-AB Geri Kabul Anlaşmasına Yansımaları”, Milletlerarası Hukuk ve Milletlerarası Özel Hukuk Bülteni (Public and Private International Law Bulletin), 2018, Vol. 38, No. 1.
15. Babická, K.: “EU-Turkey Deal Seems to be Schizoprenic”, (EU-Turkey Deal), 22 March 2016, https://migrationonline.cz/en/eu-turkey-deal-seems-to-be-schizophrenic (20.06.2020).
16. Cannizaro, E.: “Disintegration Through Law”, European Papers, 2016, Vol. 1, Issue 1, http://europeanpapers.eu/en/e-journal/disintegration-through-law (accessed on 20.06.2020).
17. Carrera, S. - Den Hertog, L. - Stefan, M.: “It wasn’t me! The Luxembourg Court Orders on the Eu-Turkey Refugee Deal”, CEPS Policy Insights, No. 2017/5, April 2017, https://www.ceps.eu/wp-content/ uploads/2017/04/EU-Turkey%20Deal.pdf (accessed on 02.06.2020).
18. Cherubini, F.: “The ‘Eu-Turkey Statement’ of March 2016: A (Umpteenth) Celebration of Migration Outsourcing”, 2017, https://pdfs. se-manticscholar.org/8cdd/51e2a5e370ee0982e80c2baaa 8b89694396e.pdf?_ga=2.54984489.381479935.1594976236-1248335581. 1594976236 (accessed on 10.06.2020).
19. Clayton J.-Holland, H.: “Over One Million Sea Arrivals Reach Europe in 2015”, 30 December 2015, https://www.unhcr.org/news/latest/2015/12/5683d0b56/million-sea-arrivals-reach-europe-2015.html (accessed on 01.06.2020)
20. CNNTürk, Ahmet Davutoğlu: “Türkiye ve AB arasında bir anlaşmaya vardık”, 18.03.2016, https://www.cnnturk.com/dunya/ahmet-davutoglu- turkiye-ve-ab-arasinda-bir-anlasmaya-vardik (accessed on 20.06.2020).
21. Danisi, C.: “Taking the ‘Union’ out of ‘EU’: The EU-Turkey Statement on the Syrian Refugee Crisis as an Agreement between States under International Law”, (EU-Turkey Statement), 20 April 2017, https://www.ejiltalk.org/taking-the-union-out-of-eu-the-eu-turkey-statement-on-the-syrian-refugee-crisis-as-an-agreement-between-states-under-international-law/(accessed on 04.06.2020).
22. De Vries, K.: “The EU-Turkey Statement: A Design for Human Rights Violations, MAIR Thesis European Union Studies Leiden University”, 2 July 2018, https://openaccess.leidenuniv.nl/bitstream/ hand-le/1887/63629/K.%20de%20Vries.%20The%20EU%20Turkey%20State-ment.%20A%20design%20for%20human%20rights%20violations .pdf?sequence=1 (accessed on 20.06.2020)
23. De Vrieze, J.: “The legal nature of the EU-Turkey Statement Putting NF, NG and NM v. European Council in perspective”, LL.M Disser-tation Ghent University, 2018, https://lib.ugent.be/fulltxt/RUG01/ 002/479/ 424/RUG01-002479424_2018_0001_AC.pdf (accessed 02.06.2020).
24. Den Heijer, M.-Spijkerboer, T.: “Is the EU-Turkey Refugee and Migration Deal a Treaty?”, EU Law Analysis, 7 April 2016, http://eulawanalysis.blogspot.com/2016/04/is-eu-turkey-refugee-and-migration-deal.html (accessed on 02.06.2020).
25. Deutsche Welle (DW): “The statment of the Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Faruk Kaymakçı (Kaymakçı: Türkiye Suriyelileri sınırdışı etmiyor)”, 09.09.2019, https://www.dw.com/tr/kaymakçı-türkiye-suriyelileri-sınırdışı-etmiyor/a-50362295 (accessed on 04.08.2020).
26. DGMM, “Frequently Asked Questions-Temporary Protection”, Question 26, 06.01.2020, https://en.goc.gov.tr/temporary-protection (accessed on 01.08.2020).
27. DGMM, “Geri Alım, 4 Nisan 2016 Tarihinden İtibaren Geri Alınan Düzensiz Göçmenler”, https://www.goc.gov.tr/geri-alim (accessed on 28.07.2020).
28. DGMM, “Temporary Protection, Resettlement of Syrians in the 3rd Countries within 2014-2019”, https://en.goc.gov.tr/temporary-pro-tection27 (accessed on 04.08.2020).
29. DGMM, “Temporary Protection, Sheltered and Unsheltered Syrian Refugees by Temporary Shelter Centers”, https://en.goc.gov.tr/tem-porary-protection27 (accessed on 01.08.2020).
30. DGMM, Press Release “Uluslararası Af Örgütü’nün Suriyelilerin Hukuka Aykırı Olarak Sınır Dışı Edildiği İddiasına İlişkin Basın Açıklaması”, 25.10.2019, https://www.goc.gov.tr/uluslararasi-af-or-gutunun-- suriyelilerin-hukuka-aykiri-olarak-sinir-disi-edildigi-iddiasina-iliskin-basin-aciklamasi (accessed on 04.08.2020).
31. DGMM, Press Release, 15.05.2020, https://www.goc.gov.tr/basin-- aciklamasi (accessed on 04.08.2020).
32. DGMM, Statistics, “International Protection (International Protection Applications by Years)”, https://en.goc.gov.tr/international-protec-tion17 (accessed on 28.07.2020).
33. Dutch Council for Refugees (DCR) and European Council on Refugees and Exiles (ECRE), “The DCR/ECRE Desk Research on Application of a Safe Third Country and a First Country of Asylum Concepts to Turkey”, May 2016, https://www.ecre.org/wp-content/up-loads/2016/07/ DCR-and-ECRE-Desk-Research-on-application-of-a-safe-third-country-and-a-first-country-of-asylum-concepts-to-Turkey_May-2016.pdf (accessed on 20.06.2020).
34. ECtHR, Press Release, ECHR 029(2018), 25.01.2018, https://hudoc. echr. coe.int/eng-press#{"fulltext":["22696/16"]} (accessed on 20.06.2020).
35. Ekşi, N.: Türkiye Avrupa Birliği Geri Kabul Anlaşması, İstanbul 2016.
36. ESI (European Stability Initiative), The 2015 Refugee Crisis Through Statistics, 17 October 2015, https://www.esiweb.org/pdf/ESI%20-%20Refugee%20Statistics%20Compilation%20-%2017%20Oct%202015.pdf (accessed on 03.06.2020)
37. European Commission, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions A European Agenda on Migration, (Agenda on Migration), COM (2015) 240 final, 13.05.2015, https://ec.europa.eu/antitrafficking/sites/antitrafficking/ files/communication_on_the_european_agenda_on_migration_en.pdf (accessed on 03.06.2020).
38. European Commission, Eu-Turkey Joint Action Plan, https://ec. eu-ropa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/MEMO_15_5860 (accessed on 08.06.2020).
39. European Commission, EU-Turkey Readmission Agreement signed and Visa Liberalisation Dialogue launched, 16 December 2013, https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/what-is-new/news/news/ 2013/20131 216_01_en (accessed on 20.06.2020).
40. European Commission, Hotspot Approach, https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/what-we-do/networks/european_migration_network/ glos-sary_ search/hotspot-approach_en (accessed on 04.06.2020).
41. European Commission, Implementing the EU-Turkey Agreement-Questions and Answers, 4 April 2016, https://ec.europa.eu/commis-sion/presscorner/detail/en/MEMO_16_1221 (accessed on 28.07.2020).
42. European Commission, Implementing the EU-Turkey Statement-Questions and Answers, 15 June 2016, https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/MEMO_16_1664 (accessed on 20.07.2020).
43. European Commission, Managing the Refugee Crisis EU-Turkey Joint Action Plan Implementation Report, https://ec.europa.eu/home-affa-irs/sites/homeaffairs/files/what-we-do/policies/european-agenda-migration/background-information/docs/managing_the_ refugee_ crisis_-_eu-turkey_join_action_plan_implementation_ report_2016 0210_en.pdf (accessed on 01.06.2020).
44. European Commission, Seventh Report on the Progress made in the implementation of the EU-Turkey Statement, (Seventh Report), COM(2017) 470 final, 06.09.2017, https://ec.europa.eu/neighbour-hood-enlargement/sites/near/files/20170906_seventh_report_on_the_ prog-ress_ in_the_implementation_of_the_eu-turkey_statement_en.pdf (accessed on 20.07.2020).
45. European Commission, Sixth Report on the Progress made in the implementation of the EU-Turkey Statement, COM(2017)323final, 13.06.2017, https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/sites/ near/files/170613_6th_report_on_the_progress_made_in_the_implementation_of_the_eu-turkey_statement_en.pdf (accessed on 20.07.2020).
46. European Commission, Turkey 2019 Report, SWD(2019)220final, 29.05.2019, https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/sites/ near/ files/20190529-turkey-report.pdf (accessed on 20.07.2020). European Council Council of the European Union, EU-Turkey state-ment, 18 March 2016, (EU-TR Statement), https://www.consilium. europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2016/03/18/eu-turkey-state-ment/(accessed on 01.06.2020).
47. European Council Council of the European Union, Meeting of the EU heads of state or government with Turkey, 29 November 2015, https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/meetings/international-sum-mit/2015/11/29/(accessed on 07.06.2020).
48. European Council Council of the European Union, Statement of the EU Heads of State or Government, 07/03/2016, (07 March Statement), https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/ 2016/03/08/eu-turkey-meeting-statement/(accessed on 10.06.2020).
49. European Legal Network on Asylum (ELENA), ELENA Weekly Legal Update, 4 October 2019, https://mailchi.mp/ecre/elena-weekly-legal-update-4-october-2019#2 (accessed on 20.06.2020). European Parliamentary Research Service (EPRS), Hotspots at EU’s External Borders (Briefing), June 2018,https://www.europarl. euro-pa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2018/623563/EPRS_BRI(2018)623563_EN.pdf (accessed on 02.06.2020).
50. Frontex, “Migratory Routes”, https://frontex.europa.eu/along-eu-borders/ migratory-routes/eastern-mediterranean-route/(accessed on 03.07.2020
51. Gatti, M.: “The EU-Turkey Statement: A Treaty That Violates Democracy (Part 1 of 2)”, Blog of the European Journal of International Law, April 18 2016, https://www.ejiltalk.org/the-eu-turkey-sta-tement-a-treaty-that-violates-democracy-part-1-of-2/(accessed on 06.06.2020).
52. GCR and OXFAM, “Diminished, Derogated, Denied How the Right to Asylum in Greece is Undermined by the Lack of EU Responsibility Sharing”, Greek Council for Refugees and Oxfam Briefing, 2 July 2020, https://oxfamilibrary.openrepository.com/bitstream/handle/10546/621011/bp-diminished-derogated-denied-greece-refugees-020720-en.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (accessed on 20.07.2020). GCR, “GCR’s Comments on the Draft Bill ‘on International Protection’”, 23 October 2019, https://www.gcr.gr/media/k2/attachments/ GCR_ on_bill_about_International_Protection_en.pdf (accessed on 20.06.2020).
53. GCR, “GCR’s Comments on the Draft law Amending Asylum Legislation”, (Comments), 27 April 2020, https://www.gcr.gr/en/news/ press-releases-announcements/item/1434-gcr-s-comments-on-the-draft-law-amending-asylum-legislation (accessed on 20.06.2020).
54. GCR, “Overview of the Legal Framework Greece, Asylum Information Database (AIDA)”, https://www.asylumineurope.org/reports/ co-untry/greece/overview-legal-framework (accessed on 17.07.2020).
55. Global Detention Project (GDP) and Greek Council for Refugees (GCR), “Joint Submission to the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention in Preparation for its Mission to Greece in December 2019”, 2019, https://www.globaldetentionproject.org/joint-submission-to-the- working-group-on-arbitrary-detention-greece (accessed on 20.06.2020).
56. Göç Araştırmaları Derneği (GAR), “Türkiye-Yunanistan Sınırında Neler Oldu?”, 27 Şubat-27 Mart 2020 Haber Derlemesi (Hazırlayan: Fırat Çoban), https://gocarastirmalaridernegi.org/attachments/artic-le/160/ turkiye-yunanistan-sinirinda-neler-oldu..pdf (accessed on 04.08.2020).
57. Göç İdaresi Genel Müdürlüğü (DGMM), “2019 Yılı Faaliyet Raporu (Activity Report for the Year of 2019”-Available in Turkish), https://www.goc.gov.tr/kurumlar/goc.gov.tr/Mali-Tablolar/FAALIYET-RAPORU/yeni/2019-Faaliyet-Raporu.pdf (accessed on 28.07.2020).
58. Göçmen, İ.: “Türkiye ile Avrupa Birliği Arasındaki Geri Kabul Anlaşmasının Hukuki Yönden Analizi”, Ankara Avrupa Çalışmaları Dergisi, (2014), Vol. 13, Issue 2.
59. Greek National Commission for Human Rights (GNCHR), “GNCHR Statement: Reviewing asylum and Immigration policies and safeguarding human rights at the EU borders”, 05.03.2020, https://ccdh. public.lu/dam-assets/fr/actualites/2020/GNCHR-STATEMENT-Borders.pdf (accessed on 28.07.2020).
60. GUE/NGL Delegation to Turkey, “What Merkel, Tusk and Timmermans Should Have Seen During Their Visit to Turkey”, (Visit to Turkey), Report from GUE/NGL Delegation to Turkey, May 2-4 2016, https://www.statewatch.org/media/documents/news/2016/may/ep-GUENGL-report-refugees-Turkey-deal.pdf (accessed on 20.07.2020).
61. Haber 3, “2019'da gönüllü olarak Suriye'ye dönen Suriyeli sayısı açıklandı”, 01.01.2020, https://www.haber3.com/guncel/2019da-gonullu-olarak-suriyeye-donen-suriyeli-sayisi-aciklandi-haberi-5069244 (accessed on 04.08.2020).
62. Hathaway, J. C.: “Three Legal Requirements for the EU-Turkey Deal: an Interview with James Hathaway”, Verfassungsblog, 9 March 2016, https://verfassungsblog.de/three-legal-requirements-for-the-eu-turkey-deal-an-interview-with-james-hathaway/ (accessed on 20.06.2020)
63. Henckaerts, J. M.: Mass Expulsion in Modern International Law and Practice, The Hague 1995.
64. HIAS, Press release issued by HIAS on 6 July 2020 cited in Deportation Monitoring Aegean, Hias Greece, “Criminal charges pressed against the asylum seekers who arrived in Lesvos in March 2020”, (Press Release), https://dm-aegean.bordermonitoring.eu/2020/07/19/hias-greece-criminal-charges-pressed-against-the-asylum-seekers-who-arrived-in-lesvos-in-march-2020/(accessed on 04.08.2020).
65. Human Rights Watch, “‘Repatriation’ of Syrians in Turkey needs EU Action”, 7 November 2019, https://www.hrw.org/news/2019/11/ 07/repatriation-syrians-turkey-needs-eu-action (accessed on 04.08.2020).
66. Human Rights Watch, “Greece: Grant Asylum Access to New Arrivals”, 20 March 2020, https://www.hrw.org/news/2020/03/20/greece-grant-asylum-access-new-arrivals (28.07.2020).
67. Human Rights Watch, “Greece: Violence Against Asylum Seekers at Border”, https://www.hrw.org/news/2020/03/17/greece-violence-against-asylum-seekers-border (accessed on 04.08.2020).
68. İçduygu, A.-Aksel, D. B.: “Two-to-Tango in Migration Diplomacy: Negotiating Readmission Agreement between the EU and Turkey”, European Journal of Migration and Law, (2014), Vol. 16.
69. Idriz, N.: “Taking the EU-Turkey Deal to Court?” (EU-Turkey Deal), Verfassungsblog, 20 December 2017, https://verfassungsblog. de/taking-the-eu-turkey-deal-to-court/(accessed on 02.06.2020).
70. Idriz, N.: “The EU-Turkey statement or the ‘refugee deal’: the extra-legal deal of extraordinary times?” (EU-Turkey Statement), Asser Institute Research Paper Series 06, December 2017, https://papers. ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3080881 (accessed on 07.06.2020).
71. Ilias, A. - Leivaditi, N. - Papatzani, E. - Petracou, E.: “Border Management and Migration Controls in Greece RESPOND Working Papers”, Paper 2019/22, July 2019, https://www.respondmigration. com/wp-blog/2019/2/15/comparative-dataset-on-migration-border-management-and-migration-controls-greece (accessed on 20.06.2020).
72. İneli-Ciğer, M.: “How Have the European Union and the EU Asylum Acquis Affected Protection of Forced Migrants in Turkey?” in The New Asylum and Transit Countries in Europe During and in the Aftermath of the 2015/2016 Crisis (Vladislava Stoyanova and Eleni Karageorgiou, Eds.), Leiden-Boston 2019, pp. 115-139.
73. İneli-Ciğer, M.: “Protecting Syrians in Turkey: A Legal Analysis, International Journal of Refugee Law”, (2017), Vol. 29, Issue 4.
74. International Organization for Migration (IOM), “Greece Records Highest Weekly Migration Inflows in 2015 So Far”, 23.10.2015, https://www.iom.int/news/greece-records-highest-weekly-migration-inflows-2015-so-far (accessed on 03.06.2020).
75. Kirişçi, K.: “Will the readmission agreement bring the EU and Turkey together or pull them apart?”, CEPS Commentary, 4 February 2014, https://www.ceps.eu/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/KK%20EU-Tur-key%20readmission%20agreement.pdf (accessed on 20.06.2020)
76. Koenig, N. – Walter - Franke, M.: “One Year On: What Lessons From the Eu-Turkey Deal?”, Jacques Delors Institut Berlin, 17 March 2017, https://hertieschool-f4e6.kxcdn.com/fileadmin/user_upload/20170317_ EU-Turkey-deal-one-year-on-NK-MW.pdf (accessed on 02.06.2020).
77. Labayle, H. - De Bruycker, P.: “The EU-Turkey Agreement on migration and asylum: False pretences or a fool’s bargain?”, EU Immigration and Law and Policy, https://eumigrationlawblog.eu/the-eu-turkey-agreement-on-migration-and-asylum-false-pretences-or-a-fools-bargain/(accessed on 02.06.2020).
78. Leino, P.-Wyatt, D.: “No Public Interest in Whether the EU-Turkey Refugee Deal Respects EU Treaties and International Human Rights”, (EU-Turkey Refugee Deal), European Law Blog, 28 February 2018, https://europeanlawblog.eu/2018/02/28/no-public-interest-in-whether-the-eu-turkey-refugee-deal-respects-eu-treaties-and-international-human-rights/(accessed on 20.06.2020).
79. Matuşescu, C.: “Considerations on the Legal Nature and Validity of the EU-Turkey Refugee Deal”, Union of Jurists of Romania Law Review, 2016, Vol. VI, Special Issue, http://www.internationallaw review. eu/fisiere/pdf/9_4.pdf (accessed on 02.06.2020).
80. Mültecilerle Dayanışma Derneği (Mülteci-Der), “Observations on the Situation of Refugees in Turkey”, 22 April 2016, p. 5, http://www.multeci.org.tr/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/MULTECI-DER-S-OBSERVATIONS-ON-REFUGEE-SITUATION-IN-TURKEY-APRIL-2016.pdf (accessed on 20.07.2020).
81. OHCHR, “Working Group on Arbitrary Detention: Preliminary Findings from its visit to Greece” (2-13 December 2019), https://www.ohchr. org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx? NewsID=25421&LangID=E (accessed on 20.06.2020).
82. Ott, A.: “EU Turkey Cooperation in Migration Matters: A Game changer in a Multi-Layered Relationship?”, Centre for the Law of EU External Relations, Cleer Paper Series 2017/4, https://papers. ssrn.com/ sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3118921&download=yes (accessed on 02.06.2020).
83. OXFAM and GCR, “No Rights Zone”, Oxfam and Greek Council for Refugees Briefing Paper, December 2019, https://www. oxfamfran-ce.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/Oxfam-GCR-Briefing-Paper-No-Rights-Zone-.pdf (accessed on 20.06.2020).
84. OXFAM, “New Greek Law Reneges on Right to Asylum”, 26 March 2020, https://www.oxfam.org/en/press-releases/new-greek-law-reneges- right-asylum (accessed on 28.07.2020).
85. Öztürk, N. Ö.: “Geçici Korumanın Uluslararası Koruma Rejimine Uyumu Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme”, Ankara Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, (2017), Vol. 66, Iss. 1.
86. Öztürk, N. Ö.: “Reflections of the Past Expectations for the Future: A Legal Analysis on the Development of Asylum Law in Turkey”, Research and Policy on Turkey, (2017), Vol. 2, Iss. 2.
87. Öztürk, N. Ö.: Mültecinin Hukuki Statüsünün Belirlenmesi, Ankara 2015.
88. Papatzani, E. - Leivaditi, N. - Ilias, A. - Petracou, E.: “Reception Poli-cies, Practices and Responses Greece Country Report”, RESPOND Working Papers, Paper 2020/42, (Reception), February 2020, https://www.respondmigration.com/wp-blog/refugee-reception-policies- practices-responses-greece-country-report (accessed on 20.06.2020).
89. Papoutsi, A. - Painter, J. - Papada, E. - Vradis, A.: “The EC Hotspot Approach in Greece: Creating Liminal Territory”, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X. 2018.1 468351. Peers, S. - Roman, E.: “The EU, Turkey and the Refugee Crisis: What could possibly go wrong?”, EU Law Analysis, 5 February 2016, http://eulawanalysis.blogspot.com/2016/02/the-eu-turkey-and-re-fugee-crisis-what.html (accessed on 20.06.2020).
90. Peers, S.: “The draft EU/Turkey deal on migration and refugees: is it legal? EU Law Analysis”, 16 March 2016, (Draft Deal), http://eulawanalysis.blogspot.com/2016/03/the-draft-euturkey-deal-on-migration.html (accessed on 02.06.2020).
91. Peers, S.: “The final EU/Turkey refugee deal: a legal assessment (Refugee Deal)”, 18 March 2016, http://eulawanalysis.blogspot.com/ 2016/03/the-final-euturkey-refugee-deal-legal.html (accessed on 02.06.2020).
92. Pichou, M.: “Reception or Detention Centres? The Detention of Migrants and the EU ‘Hotspot’ Approach in the Light of the European Convention on Human Rights”, Critical Quarterly for Legislation and Law, 2016, Vol. 99, No. 2.
93. Pijnenburg, A.: “JR and Others v. Greece: What Does the Court (not) Say about the EU-Turkey Statement?”, 21 February 2018, Strasbourg Observers, https://strasbourgobservers.com/2018/02/21/jr-and-others-v-greece-what-does-the-court-not-say-about-the-eu-turkey-statement/(accessed on 20.06.2020).
94. Poon, J.: “EU-Turkey Deal: Violation of, or Consistency with, International Law”, European Papers, 2016, Vol. 1, No. 3, http://www. europeanpapers.eu/en/system/files/pdf_version/EP_EF_2016_I_054_Jenny_Poon.pdf (accessed on 02.06.2020)
95. Refugee Rights Turkey (Mülteci Hakları Merkezi), “Access to State Funded Legal Aid Services by Asylum-Seekers and Migrants in Turkey: Challenges and Opportunities”, January 2019, https://www.mhd.org.tr/images/yayinlar/MHM-74-EN.pdf (accessed on 20.07.2020).
96. Refugee Support Aegean (RSA), “RSA Comments on the International Protection Bill”, October 2019, p. 5, https://rsaegean.org/wp-con-tent/ uploads/ 2019/10/RSA_Comments_IPA.pdf (accessed on 20.06.2020).
97. Reuters, “Two Migrants were Killed at Turkey-Greece Border: Amnesty”, https://www.reuters.com/article/us-eu-migrants-turkey/two-migrants-were-killed-at-turkey-greece-border-amnesty-idUSKBN21L22D (accessed on 04.08.2020).
98. Soykan, C.: “AB-Türkiye Anlaşması Mülteci Hukuku Açısından Ne Anlama Geliyor?”, Biamag, 26 Mart 2016, http://bianet. org/biamag/siyaset/173361-ab-turkiye-anlasmasi-multeci-hukuku-acisindan-ne-anlama-geliyor (accessed on 02.06.2020)
99. Tazzioli, M.: “Containment Through Mobility: Migrants’ Spatial Disobediences and the Reshaping of Control Through the Hotspot System”, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 2018, Vol. 44, No. 16. Thym, D.: “Why the Eu-Turkey Deal Can Be Legal and a Step in the Right direction”, EU Immigration and Asylum Law and Policy, 11 March 2016, http://eumigrationlawblog.eu/why-the-eu-turkey-deal-can-be-legal-and-a-step-in-the-right-direction/(accessed on 02.06.2020)
100. Triandafyllidou, A. - Dimitriadi, A. - Angeli, D.: “Detention as Punish-ment: Can Indefinite Detention be Greece’s Main Policy Tool to Manage Its Irregular Migrant Population?”, MIDAS (Migration and Detention Assessment) Policy Brief, April 2014, https://cadmus.eui. eu/bitstream/handle/1814/31592/Mi-das_PolicyBrief_2014_04.pdf?sequence=2&isAllowed=y (accessed on 20.06.2020). Tunaboylu, M. S. - Van Liempt, I.: “A Lack of Legal Protection and Limited Ways Out: How Asylum Seekers Cope with Liminality on Greek Islands: Lesbos and Chios”, Journal of Refugee Studies, 2020, feaa002, https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/feaa002.
101. Turan, Y. - Şaşkın, O.: “AB’ye İltica Başvurularının Değerlendirilmesinde Geri Kabul ve Güvenli Üçüncü Ülke Tartışmaları”, PESA International Journal of Social Studies, February 2017, Vol. 3, Issue 1. Ulusoy, O. - Battjes, H.: “Situation of Readmitted Migrants and Refugees from Greece to Turkey under the EU-Turkey Statement”, Vrije Universiteit (VU) Migration Law Series, 2017, No. 15, https://rechten.vu.nl/en/Images/UlusoyBattjes_Migration_Law_ Se-ries_No_15_tcm248-861076.pdf (accessed on 20.06.2020).
102. Ulusoy, O.: “Turkey as a Safe Third Country”, (Safe Third Country), Border Criminologies Blog, 29 March 2016, https://www.law. ox.ac.uk/research-subject-groups/centre-criminology/centreborder-criminologies/blog/2016/03/turkey-safe-third (accessed on 20.06.2020)
103. UN Human Rights Council, “Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Human Rights of Migrants on His Mission to Greece”, Thirty-fifth Session, Agenda item 3, 6-23 June 2017, https://reliefweb. int/sites/ reliefweb.int/files/resources/G1709841.pdf (accessed on 20.06.2020).
104. UNHCR, “Conclusion on International Cooperation and Burden and Responsibility Sharing in Mass Influx Situations No. 100 (LV)-2004, Executive Committee 55th session, Contained in United Nations General Assembly document A/AC.96/1003”, 08 October 2004, https://www. unhcr.org/excom/exconc/41751fd82/conclusion-international-cooperation-burden-responsibility-sharing-mass.html (accessed on 22.06.2020).
105. UNHCR, “Europe Refugees & Migrants Emergency Response Nationality of Arrivals to Greece, Italy and Spain” (January-December 2015), https://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/Monthly TrendsofNationalities-ArrivalstoGreeceItalyandSpain-31December 2015.pdf (accessed on 03.06.2020).
106. UNHCR, “Figures at a Glance”, 18 June 2020, https://www.unhcr. org/figures-at-a-glance.html (accessed on 07.07.2020).
107. UNHCR, “Mediterranean Situation”, https://data2.unhcr.org/en/situations/mediterranean (accessed on 04.07.2020).
108. UNHCR, “Procedural Standards for Refugee Status Determination under UNHCR’s Mandate”, https://www.unhcr.org/4317223c9.pdf (accessed on 22.06.2020).
109. UNHCR, “Returns from Greece to Turkey”, 31 January 2020, https://data2.unhcr.org/en/documents/download/74125 (accessed on 20.06.2020).
110. UNHCR, “Syria Regional Refugee Response Turkey”, https://data2. unhcr.org/en/situations/syria/location/113#_ga=2.197885807.1371847231.1594106911-1716941026.1593873655 (accessed on 06.06.2020).
111. UNHCR, “Turkey 2019 Operational Highlights”, https://data2. unhcr.org/en/documents/download/74411 (accessed on 01.08.2020).
112. UNHCR, “UNHCR Comments on the Law on ‘International Protection and Other Provisions’”, (Comments), 12 June 2020, https://www. refworld.org/publisher,UNHCR,,,5ee3590e4,0.html (accessed on 15.07.2020).
113. UNHCR, “UNHCR Statement on the Situation at the Turkey-EU Border”, 02 March 2020, https://www.unhcr.org/news/press/2020/3/ 5e5d08ad4/unhcr-statement-situation-turkey-eu-border.html (accessed on 28.07.2020).
114. UNHCR, “Vulnerability Screening Tool”, 2016, https://www.unhcr. org/protection/detention/57fe30b14/unhcr-idc-vulnerability-scre-ening-tool-identifying-addressing-vulnerability.html (accessed on 22.06.2020).
115. UNHCR, Glossary, https://www.unhcr.org/449267670.pdf (accessed on 04.06.2020).
116. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, “Top Ten Refugee Hosting Countries in 2015”, 15 September 2016, https://www.un.org/development/desa/publications/graphic/top-10-refugee-hosting-countries-in-2015 (accessed on 06.06.2020).
117. United Nations Human Rights Office of the High Commissioner (OHCHR), “UN Special Rapporteur on the Human Rights of Migrants Concludes His Followup Country Visit to Greece”, (Country Visit), 16 May 2016, https://www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pa-ges/DisplayNews. aspx?NewsID=19972&LangID=E (accessed on 22.06.2020).
118. VOA, “Greece Blocks Iranian From Plotting to Arm Asylum Seekers”, https://www.voanews.com/europe/greece-blocks-iranian-plotting-arm-asylum-seekers (accessed on 04.08.2020).
119. Wolff, S.: “The Politics of Negotiating EU Readmission Agreements: Insights from Morocco and Turkey”, European Journal of Migration and Law, (2014), Vol. 16.
120. Ziebritzki, C.: “Implementation of the EU-Turkey Statement: EU Hotspots and Restriction of Asylum Seekers’ Freedom of Movement, (Freedom of Movement)”, EU Immigration and Asylum Law and Policy, 22 June 2018, https://eumigrationlawblog.eu/implementation-of-the-eu-turkey-statement-eu-hotspots-and-restriction-of-asylum-seekers-freedom-of-movement / (accessed on 20.06.2020).