Araştırma Makalesi

Shiprider Agreements and Jurisdiction over International Maritime Crimes (Transition From Combatting Drug and Illicit Trafficking to Fighting Illegal Fishing, Maritime Piracy and Armed Robbery Against Ships)

Cilt: 2 Sayı: 2 24 Nisan 2020
  • Xxx Ademuni-odeke
PDF İndir
EN TR

Shiprider Agreements and Jurisdiction over International Maritime Crimes (Transition From Combatting Drug and Illicit Trafficking to Fighting Illegal Fishing, Maritime Piracy and Armed Robbery Against Ships)

Öz

A Shiprider Agreement (SA), also known as Shiprider Pact and Shiprider Memorandum of Understanding (Shiprider MOU), is a maritime legal mechanism whereby, until recently, states parties undertake to avoid conflict of jurisdiction over arrests and prosecutions of suspected drug trafficking, illicit (narcotics) traffickers and illegal, unlawful and unreported fishing (IUUF). SAs originated and are prevalent between the United States (US) and especially island countries of the Caribbean in the Atlantic and the Pacific Island countries. The intention of the scheme is to link the offense, the flag state, and the offender to a jurisdiction in the maritime space. The end product is like an ancient monarchical practice of the king performing a Coup de-grace on an animal fatally wounded by his courtiers. In its origin, it was more suited to anti-narcotics patrols and later other illicit trades and IUUF in most regions, including West Africa. However, attempts to transpose the system to deal with piracy in East Africa (the Somali Basin and the Northwest Indian Ocean) (‘Somali Piracy’) were not as successful. Other alternative international mechanisms were employed instead. However, there is no agreed definition of SAs. This article attempts to define SAs, deals with its history, functions, and shortcomings, and provides viable alternatives especially with regard to the experiences of Somali piracy. The article uses the three crimes of illicit traffic, piracy and armed robbery against ships, and IUUF. The article argues that the experiment did not seem to work outside US spheres of influence. It also questions whether this is probably because the concept was alien to that part of the world. Instead, other mechanisms had to be adopted. The article concludes that: there are political, economic, diplomatic, and other interfaced factors to consider; the system developed and practiced in North America, the Caribbean, and the Pacific region to deter drug trafficking could not be easily transitioned to combat other maritime crimes (maritime piracy); and for that matter in a different region (East Africa and the Northwest Indian Ocean Region) of the globe.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

  1. Stephen Vasciannie, ‘Political And Policy Aspects Of The Jamaica/United States Shiprider Negotiations’ (1997) 43(3) Caribbean Quarterly, SECURITY IN THE CARIBBEAN https://www.jstor.org/stable/40653997 accessed on 10/12/2019.
  2. Holger W. Henke, ‘Drugs in the Caribbean: The “Shiprider” Controversy and the Question of Sovereignty’ (1998) 64 European Review of Latin American and Caribbean Studies / Revista Europea de Estudios Latinoamericanos y del Caribe https://www.jstor.org/stable/25675778 accessed on 05/12/2019.
  3. PJJ van der Kruit - 2007 “Bilateral Maritime Drug-Interdiction Treaties”, Chapter 6.
  4. Cassidy Gale, ‘Shiprider Shadow: Situating US-Caribbean Interdiction Agreements within the Law of the Sea’ 2017 31(1) https://brill.com/view/journals/ocyo/31/1/article-p418_16.xml accessed on 13/12/2019.
  5. Suzette Haughton, ‘Bilateral Diplomacy: Rethinking the Jamaica-US Shiprider Agreement’ 2008 3(3) The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 3(3) https://brill.com/view/journals/hjd/3/3/article-p253_3.xml?language=en accessed on 01/12/2019.
  6. Elliott Abrams, ‘The Shiprider Solution: Policing the Caribbean’ (1996) The National Interest https://nationalinterest.org/article/the-shiprider-solution-policing-the-caribbean-487 accessed on 01/12/2019.
  7. Editorial Comments, ‘As we review the Shiprider Agreement’ (2019) The Jamaican Observer accessed on 01/12/2019.
  8. US Department of State, Agreement between the Government of the United States and the Government of the Republic of Vanuatu Concerning the Counter Illicit Transnational Maritime Operations https://www.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/39-Signed-Shiprider-Agreement-with-Vanuatu-.pdf.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Uzay, Denizcilik ve Havacılık Hukuku

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Xxx Ademuni-odeke Bu kişi benim
0000-0002-1573-6171
Türkiye

Erken Görünüm Tarihi

8 Ağustos 2024

Yayımlanma Tarihi

24 Nisan 2020

Gönderilme Tarihi

30 Aralık 2019

Kabul Tarihi

22 Ocak 2020

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2019 Cilt: 2 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA
Ademuni-odeke, X. (2020). Shiprider Agreements and Jurisdiction over International Maritime Crimes (Transition From Combatting Drug and Illicit Trafficking to Fighting Illegal Fishing, Maritime Piracy and Armed Robbery Against Ships). DEHUKAM Journal of the Sea and Maritime Law, 2(2), 345-414. https://izlik.org/JA97DX88LU
AMA
1.Ademuni-odeke X. Shiprider Agreements and Jurisdiction over International Maritime Crimes (Transition From Combatting Drug and Illicit Trafficking to Fighting Illegal Fishing, Maritime Piracy and Armed Robbery Against Ships). DEHUKAMDER. 2020;2(2):345-414. https://izlik.org/JA97DX88LU
Chicago
Ademuni-odeke, Xxx. 2020. “Shiprider Agreements and Jurisdiction over International Maritime Crimes (Transition From Combatting Drug and Illicit Trafficking to Fighting Illegal Fishing, Maritime Piracy and Armed Robbery Against Ships)”. DEHUKAM Journal of the Sea and Maritime Law 2 (2): 345-414. https://izlik.org/JA97DX88LU.
EndNote
Ademuni-odeke X (01 Nisan 2020) Shiprider Agreements and Jurisdiction over International Maritime Crimes (Transition From Combatting Drug and Illicit Trafficking to Fighting Illegal Fishing, Maritime Piracy and Armed Robbery Against Ships). DEHUKAM Journal of the Sea and Maritime Law 2 2 345–414.
IEEE
[1]X. Ademuni-odeke, “Shiprider Agreements and Jurisdiction over International Maritime Crimes (Transition From Combatting Drug and Illicit Trafficking to Fighting Illegal Fishing, Maritime Piracy and Armed Robbery Against Ships)”, DEHUKAMDER, c. 2, sy 2, ss. 345–414, Nis. 2020, [çevrimiçi]. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA97DX88LU
ISNAD
Ademuni-odeke, Xxx. “Shiprider Agreements and Jurisdiction over International Maritime Crimes (Transition From Combatting Drug and Illicit Trafficking to Fighting Illegal Fishing, Maritime Piracy and Armed Robbery Against Ships)”. DEHUKAM Journal of the Sea and Maritime Law 2/2 (01 Nisan 2020): 345-414. https://izlik.org/JA97DX88LU.
JAMA
1.Ademuni-odeke X. Shiprider Agreements and Jurisdiction over International Maritime Crimes (Transition From Combatting Drug and Illicit Trafficking to Fighting Illegal Fishing, Maritime Piracy and Armed Robbery Against Ships). DEHUKAMDER. 2020;2:345–414.
MLA
Ademuni-odeke, Xxx. “Shiprider Agreements and Jurisdiction over International Maritime Crimes (Transition From Combatting Drug and Illicit Trafficking to Fighting Illegal Fishing, Maritime Piracy and Armed Robbery Against Ships)”. DEHUKAM Journal of the Sea and Maritime Law, c. 2, sy 2, Nisan 2020, ss. 345-14, https://izlik.org/JA97DX88LU.
Vancouver
1.Xxx Ademuni-odeke. Shiprider Agreements and Jurisdiction over International Maritime Crimes (Transition From Combatting Drug and Illicit Trafficking to Fighting Illegal Fishing, Maritime Piracy and Armed Robbery Against Ships). DEHUKAMDER [Internet]. 01 Nisan 2020;2(2):345-414. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA97DX88LU