Temsil Üzerine: Mimaride Karakter Fikrinin Yunan ve Roma’daki Kökleri

Öz

Fransızca terim olan “caractère” (karakter), on sekizinci yüzyılın ikinci yarısında sıklıkla tartışılmış olup, bir yapının biçimi ile inşa edilme amacı arasında bir ilişki kurmayı amaçlamıştır. Bunun önemi iki yönlüdür: estetik kaygıların ötesinde mimari formların anlaşılırlık meselesini gündeme getirmesi ve dolayısıyla mimarlığın, sosyal, sivil ve dini anlamlar iletebilen bir dil gibi, şiir veya düz yazı ile benzerlik taşıdığını doğrudan ileri sürmesidir. Bu makale, mimarlık ve edebiyat arasındaki olası paralelliklere vurgu yaparak, karakter kavramının temellerini oluşturan Aristoteles, Theophrastus, Horace, Cicero ve tabii ki Vitruvius gibi isimlere ait bazı antik metinleri analiz etmektedir. Bu “geçmişe dalış”, klasik tarzı (veya klasizmi) yeniden kurma arzusuyla ilgili değildir; aksine, mimarlığın kolektif anlamları yeniden ifade edebilmesini umarak, mimari teorinin felsefi temelini yeniden keşfetmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Sonuçtaki bazı sorular kadim karakter temasını güncel meselelere bağlamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Klasik Kültür
• Mimari Karakter
• Mimarlık ve Felsefe
• Mimarlık ve Poetika
• Mimarlık ve Retorik

Proje Numarası

N/A

On Representation: The Greek and Roman Roots of the Idea of Character in Architecture

Öz

The French term caractère (character) was frequently debated during the second half of the eighteenth century and was meant to establish a relationship between the form of a building and the purpose for which it was built. Its importance was twofold: it raised the issue of the intelligibility of architectural forms beyond their beauty, and, as a consequence, it directly maintained that architecture was similar to a language, in poetry or prose, capable of conveying social, civil, and religious meanings. By emphasizing the possible parallels between architecture and literature, this article analyses some ancient texts—by the likes of Aristotle, Theophrastus, Horace, Cicero, and, of course, Vitruvius—that are at the foundation of the notion of character. This “dive into the past” has nothing to do with the will to reestablish the classical style (or classicism); quite differently, it aims to rediscover the philosophical basis of architectural theory, by means of which architecture can hopefully get back to expressing collective meanings. Some final questions connect the ancient theme of character to open contemporary issues.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Architectural Character
• Architecture and Philosophy
• Architecture and Poetics
• Architecture and rhetoric
• Classic Culture

Destekleyen Kurum

N/A

Proje Numarası

N/A

Etik Beyan

N/A

Teşekkür

N/A

Kaynakça

1. Ackerman, J. S. (1983). The tuscan/rustic order: a study in the metaphorical language of architecture. Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians, 42(1), 15–34. https://doi.org/10.2307/989854
2. Cimatti, F. (2015). Italian philosophy of language. rivista italiana di filosofia del linguaggio, 9(1), 14-36. https://doi.org/10.4396/201506ITA02
3. Damish H. (1980). L’alphabet des masques. Nouvelle Revue de Psychanalyse, 21, 123-132.
4. Egbert, D. D., Van Zanten, D. T., & Van Zanten, D. (1980). The beaux-arts tradition in french architecture. Prince-ton University Press.
5. Djalali, A. (2017). Eisenman beyond Eisenman: language and architecture revisited. The Journal of Architecture, 22(8), 1287-1298. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602365.2017.1394350
6. Etlin, R. A. (1994). Symbolic spaces: French enlightenment architecture and its legacy. The University of Chica-go Press.
7. Forssman, E. (1961). Dorisch, jonisch, korinthisch. Studien über den gebrauch der säulenordnungen in der architektur des 16-18.jahrhunderts. Vieweg+Teubner Verlag Press.
8. Gros, P. (2006). Vitruve et la tradition des traités d’architecture. Fabrica et ratiocinatio. De l’École française de Rome Publications. https://doi.org/10.4000/books.efr.2450

9. Körte, A. (1929). XAPAKTHP. Hermes, 64, 69-86.
10. Labate, M. (1993). I generi letterari a Roma: tra retorica, grammatica e poetica. In Salvatore Settis (Ed.), Civiltà dei Romani (pp.155-160). Electa Publishing.
11. Middleton, R. (1992). The genius of architecture; or, the analogy of that art with our sensations. The Getty Center Press.
12. Mitrovic, B. (2009). Architectural formalism and the demise of the linguistic turn. Log, 17(2), 17-25. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41765632
13. Onians, J. (1988). Bearers of meaning: the classical orders in antiquity, the middle ages, and the renaissance. Princeton University Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv173f208
14. Pérez-Gómez, A. (1993). Ordonnance for the five kinds of columns after the method of the ancients. The Getty Center Press. https://www.getty.edu/publications/resources/virtuallibrary/0892362332.pdf
15. Pérez-Gómez, A. (2006). Built upon love, architectural longing after ethics and aesthetics. The MIT Press.
16. Perniola, M. (1982). Dal πρέπον al decorum: note sulla bellezza effettiva. Rivista di Estetica, 22(12), 44-52.
17. Pohlenz, M. (1933). To prepon: ein beitrag zur geschichte des griechischen geistes. Weidmann Press.
18. Rykwert, J. (1997). The dancing column: on order in architecture. Choice Reviews Online, 34(5), 34–2574. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.34-2574
19. Szambien, W. (1986). Symétrie, goût, caractère. théorie et términologie de l’archietcture a l’âge classique 1550-1800. Éditions Picard Publishing.
20. Sklair, L. (2017). The Icon Project: architecture, cities, and capitalist globalization. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190464189.001.0001
21. Tatarkiewicz, W. (1970). History of aesthetics. Mouton/PWN-Polish Scientific Publishers.
22. Tatarkiewicz, W. (1975). Dzieje sześciu pojęć. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
23. Thoenes, C. (1998). Sostegno e adornamento, saggi sull’architettura del rinascimento: disegni, ordini, magnificenza. Electa Press.
24. Tosi, G. (1991). Architettura e astronomia nel “de architectura” di vitruvio. Archeologia e Astronomia, 9, 74-82.
25. Van Groningen, B. A. (1930). Xapakthpec. Mnemosyne, 58(2), 45-53. https://www.jstor.org/stable/i400434
26. Volt, I. (2007). Character description and invective: peripatetics between ethics, comedy and rhetoric. Tartu University Press. https://www.academia.edu/150918/Character_description_and_invective_Peripatetics_between_ethics_comedy_and_rhetoric