LİMAN TEDARİK ZİNCİRİ ORYANTASYONU ve PERFORMANSA ETKİSİ

Yıl 2021, , 17 - 36, 06.09.2021

Hassan Abdi Onur Çetin

https://doi.org/10.18613/deudfd.736015

Öz

Tedarik zinciri yönetimi (TZY) felsefesi tedarik zinciri içindeki üyelerin bağımsız olarak değil de system yaklaşımı içinde bir bütün olarak hareket etmesi sayesinde işletme performansının arttırılabileceğini öne sürmektedir. TZY’nin başarılı bir şekilde uygulanması için tedarik zinciri oryantasyonunun (TZO) bir gereklilik olduğu söylenebilir. Dolayısı ile TZY gibi TZO da tüm sektörler için anahtar faktör olarak görülebilir. Limanlar uluslararası ticaretin ve tedarik zincirlerinin ayrılmaz bir parçasıdır. Limanlar tedarik zincirinin önemli bir parçası olduğundan TZO ve performans değerlendirmesinin liman kullanıcıları tarafından yapılması da önem arz etmektedir. Bununla birlikte limanlarda TZO ile ilegili çalışma sayısı sınırlıdır. Bu çalışma Türkiye’nin en büyük limanlarından birisindeki TZO düzeyini ölçmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Bunun yanında TZO’nun liman performansı üzerindeki etkisini incelemek diğer bir amaçtır. Bulgulara göre TZO düzeyi orta düzeyin biraz üstündedir. Bulgulara göre TZO boyutlarından kanal entegrasyon uygulamaları (CIP) performansın tüm boyutları üzerinde etkili iken, kullanıcı liman ililşkileri (RWU) üç performans boyutundan ikisi üzerinde etkilidir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

liman, tedarik zinciri oryantasyonu, liman tedarik zinciri

Teşekkür

Prof. Dr. Soner Esmer'e katkılarından dolayı teşekkür ederiz.

SEAPORT SUPPLY CHAIN ORIENTATION AND ITS IMPACT ON PERFORMANCE

Öz

Supply chain management (SCM) philosophy proposes that business performance can be improved by embracing a systems approach in which supply chains are viewed as whole rather than independent members in a supply chain (SC). Supply chain orientation (SCO) is seen as a requirement for successful execution of SCM in a chain of inter-connected businesses. Together, SCM and SCO can be seen as key factor for all sectors. Ports are an inseparable part of international trade and SCs. As ports have a key role in supply chains it is very important to assess SCO and performance of ports from users’ perspective. However, the literature analyzing SCO in port sector is limited. This research aims to analyze SCO level in one of the biggest ports of Turkey. Besides this port SCO and its effect on port performance (PP) from port users’ perspectives is analyzed in this research. According to the findings, the level of SCO is moderate. Among SCO dimensions integrations mechanism (CIP) effect all of three performance dimensions where relationship with users (RWU) effect two performance dimensions.

Anahtar Kelimeler

⎯ port, supply chain orientation, port supply chain

Kaynakça

• Biber, G. (2014). Marmara Bölgesi Konteyner Terminallerinde Gerçekleşen Ticarette Tekirdağ Asyaport Limanı’nın Sahip Olacağı Payın İncelenmesi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, , Namık Kemal Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Tekirdağ.
• Branch, A. E. (1986). Elements of Port Operations and Management. London: Chapman and Hall Ltd.
• Davis-Sramek, B., Omar, A., and Germain, R. (2019). Leveraging supply chain orientation for global supplier responsiveness: The impact of institutional distance. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 30(1), 39-56.
• Defee, C.C., Stank, T.P., Esper, T.L. and Mentzer, J.T. (2009), The role of followers in supply chains. Journal of Business Logistics, 30 (2), 65-84.
• Diniz, J. D. and Fabbe-Costes, N. (2007). Supply chain management and supply chain orientation: key factors for sustainable development projects in developing countries? International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 10(3), 235-250.
• Ducruet C., C. Rozenblat and F. Zaidi, Ports in multilevelmaritime networks: Evidence from the Atlantic (1996-2006), Journal of Transport Geography, Vol.18, No. 4,2010, pp. 508-518.
• Esper, T. L., Clifford Defee, C., and Mentzer, J. T. (2010). A framework of supply chain orientation. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 21(2), 161-179.
• Gaurav R., “Closed loop transport management”, Logistics & Transport Focus, Vol. 6, No.9, 2004, pp. 44-7.
• Hall, P.V. and Robbins, G. (2007), Which link, in which chain? Inserting Durban into global automotive supply chains, In Wang, J., Olivier, D., Notteboom, T. and Slack, B. (Ed.) Ports, Cities and Global Supply Chains, England: Ashgate, 221- 231.
• Hamid, A. B. A. and Sukati, I. (2011). The relationship between firm integration and supply chain orientation. Jurnal Kemanusiaan, 9(1).
• Hult, G. T. M., Ketchen Jr, D. J., Adams, G. L., & Mena, J. A. (2008). Supply chain orientation and balanced scorecard performance. Journal of Managerial Issues, 526-544.
• Jadhav, A., Orr, S., and Malik, M. (2018). The role of supply chain orientation in achieving supply chain sustainability. International Journal of Production Economics.
• Jüttner, U., and Christopher, M. (2013). The role of marketing in creating a supply chain orientation within the firm. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 16(2), 99-113.
• Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford publications.
• Kurtuluş, E., Çetin, Ç. K., & Deveci, D. A. Türkiye’nin Ege Bölgesindeki Konteyner Terminallerinin Tedarik Zincirlerine Entegrasyonu. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Denizcilik Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(1), 159-179.
• Lam, J. S. L., & Song, D. W. (2013). Seaport network performance measurement in the context of global freight supply chains. Polish Maritime Research, 20(Special Issue), 47-54.
• Lengnick-Hall, M. L., Lengnick-Hall, C. A., & Rigsbee, C. M. (2013). Strategic human resource management and supply chain orientation. Human Resource Management Review, 23(4), 366-377.
• Mangan, J. and Lalwani, C. (2008), Port-centric logistics, International Journal of Logistics Management, 19(1), 29-41.
• Mentzer, J. T., DeWitt, W., Keebler, J. S., Min, S., Nix, N. W., Smith, C. D., & Zacharia, Z. G. (2001). Defining Supply Chain Management. Journal of Business Logistics, 22(2), 1-25.
• Mermutlu, E., Mahmutoğlu, Y., & Şans, G. (2012). İstanbul-Ambarlı Heyelanının İzlenmesi ve Analizi. 65.Türkiye Jeoloji Kurultayı. İstanbul.
• Min, S., Mentzer, J. T., & Ladd, R. T. (2007). A Market Orientation in Supply Chain Management. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 35(4).
• Miocevic, D., & Crnjak-Karanovic, B. (2012). The mediating role of key supplier relationship management practices on supply chain orientation—The organizational buying effectiveness link. Industrial Marketing Management, 41(1), 115-124.
• Omar, A., Davis‐Sramek, B., Fugate, B. S., & Mentzer, J. T. (2012). Exploring the complex social processes of organizational change: supply chain orientation from a manager’s perspective. Journal of Business Logistics, 33(1), 4-19.
• Patel, P. C., Azadegan, A., & Ellram, L. M. (2013). The effects of strategic and structural supply chain orientation on operational and customer‐focused performance. Decision Sciences, 44(4), 713-753.
• Panayides, P. M., & Song, D.-W. (2008). Port integration in global supply chains: measures and implications for maritime logistics. International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications, 12(2), 133-145.
• Panayides, P. M., & Song, D.-W. (2008). Evaluating the Integration of Seaport Container Terminals in Supply Chains. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 38(7), 562-584.
• Paixao, A. C., and Marlow, P. B. (2003), Fourth generation ports- a question of agility? International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 33(4), 355-376.
• Robinson, R. (2002). Ports as elements in value-driven chain systems: the new paradigm. Maritime Policy & Management, 29 (3), 241-255.
• Sakagawa, Y., Kajalo, S., & Morimura, F. (2018). The Impact of Market Orientation and Supply Chain Orientation on Business Performance in Japanese Retailing. In: 2018 Global Marketing Conference at Tokyo, 1483-1486.
• Shanmugan, J., & Kabiraj, S. (2012). A Case Study Approach for Understanding Supply Chain Orientation in Indian Pharmaceutical Firms. Kuwait Chapter of the Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review, 1(9).
• Song, D. W., & Panayides, P. M. (2008). Global supply chain and port/terminal: integration and competitiveness. Maritime Policy & Management, 35(1), 73-87.
• Şen, A. (2008). Tedarik Zinciri Yönetiminde Soğuk Lojistik Uygulamarının Etkinliğinin Arttırlmasına Yönelik Bir Çalışma. Yüksel Lisans Tezi, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İzmir. Tinney, J. M. (2012). The Effects of Supply Chain Orientation, Supply Chain Management, and Collaboration on Perceived Firm Performance. Air Force Institute of Technology. Wright-Patterson, Ohio, USA.
• Tongzon, J., Chang, Y.-T., & Lee, S.-Y. (2009). How Supply Chain Oriented is the Port Sector? International Journal of Production Economics (122), 21-34.
• Tseng, P. H., & Liao, C. H. (2015). Supply chain integration, information technology, market orientation and firm performance in container shipping firms. The International Journal of Logistics Management 26(1),82-103.
• Shah, R., & Goldstein, S. M. (2006). Use of structural equation modeling in operations management research: Looking back and forward. Journal of Operations management, 24(2), 148-169.
• Yuen, K. F., & Thai, V. (2017). Barriers to supply chain integration in the maritime logistics industry. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 19(3), 551-572.
• Yuen, K. F., Wang, X., Ma, F., Lee, G., & Li, X. (2019). Critical success factors of supply chain integration in container shipping: an application of resource-based view theory. Maritime Policy & Management, 46(6), 653-668.
• Woo, S. H. (2010). Seaport Supply Chain Integration and Orientation, and Their Impact on Performance. Doctor of Philosophy, Cardiff University, UK. Woo, S.-H., Pettit, S.J. and Beresford, A.K.C. (2008). A New Port Performance Measurement Framework in a Changing Logistics Environment. In: Proceedings o f the LRN 2008 Annual Conference. Liverpool, UK.
• Woo, S. H., Pettit, S. J., & Beresford, A. K. (2013). An assessment of the integration of seaports into supply chains using a structural equation model. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 18(3), 235-252.