DENİZCİLİK TEDARİK ZİNCİRLERİNDE DÖNÜŞÜM: KESİNTİ YÖNETİMİ İÇİN YENİLİKÇİ STRATEJİLER

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 16 Sayı: 2, 300 - 334, 31.12.2024

Tunca Tabaklar

https://doi.org/10.18613/deudfd.1570773

Öz

Bu makale, denizcilik tedarik zincirlerinin kesinti yönetimi çerçevesinde, teknolojik yenilikler, sürdürülebilirlik girişimleri ve iş birliği gibi temel yetenekler üzerinden dönüşümünü incelemektedir. 2019-2023 yılları arasındaki UNCTAD raporlarının analizi ile, COVID-19 pandemisi ve Süveyş Kanalı krizi gibi küresel kesintilere yanıt olarak bu yeteneklerin nasıl geliştiği incelenmiştir. Bulgular, yapay zeka ve blok zinciri gibi teknolojilerin kullanılmasının, risk yönetim stratejilerini ve liman verimliliğini artırmada kritik bir rol oynadığını vurgulamaktadır. Karbonsuzlaştırma ve yeşil girişimler ise çevresel sürdürülebilirliğin denizcilik sektörünün kesinti yönetimi için dönüşümünü hızlandırdığı görülmektedir. Ayrıca, iş birliklerinin, kesinti yönetimi yetenekleri ve operasyonel istikrarın sağlanmasında hayati öneme sahip olduğu görülmektedir. Bu araştırma, denizcilik tedarik zincirlerinin yakın zamanda yaşanan kesintilere nasıl uyum sağladığına dair kapsamlı bir bakış sunmakta ve sürdürülebilir denizcilik tedarik zinciri yönetiminin, kesinti yönetimi çerçevesinde geleceğine ışık tutmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Denizcilik Endüstrisi, Tedarik Zinciri Yönetimi, Endüstriyel Pazarlar, Yetenekler, Karşılaştırma Analizi

TRANSFORMATION IN MARITIME SUPPLY CHAINS: INNOVATIVE STRATEGIES FOR DISRUPTION MANAGEMENT

Öz

This article explores the transformation of maritime supply chains, focusing on key capabilities, including technological adoption, risk management, sustainability initiatives, and collaboration in disruption management. Through an analysis of UNCTAD reports from 2019 to 2023, this study tracks the development of these capabilities in response to disruptions, notably the COVID-19 pandemic and the Suez Canal blockage. The findings highlight the critical role of digitalization, particularly the adoption of technologies such as artificial intelligence and blockchain to enhance risk management strategies and port efficiency. Simultaneously, the increasing emphasis on decarbonization and green initiatives reflects the growing integration of environmental sustainability in the maritime sector. Collaborations were found to be vital for fostering disruption management capabilities and operational stability. This research provides a comprehensive overview of how maritime supply chains have adapted to recent challenges and provides insights into the future of adaptive and sustainable maritime supply chain management.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Maritime Industry, Supply Chain Management, Industrial Markets, Capabilities, Comparative Analysis

Kaynakça

• Ambrogio, G., Filice, L., Longo, F. and Padovano, A. (2022). Workforce and supply chain disruption as a digital and technological innovation opportunity for resilient manufacturing systems in the COVID-19 pandemic. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 169, 108158.
• Ampah, J. D., Yusuf, A. A., Afrane, S., Jin, C. and Liu, H. (2021). Reviewing two decades of cleaner alternative marine fuels: Towards IMO's decarbonization of the maritime transport sector. Journal of Cleaner Production, 320, 128871.
• Arjona Aroca, J., Giménez Maldonado, J. A., Ferrús Clari, G., Alonso i García, N., Calabria, L. and Lara, J. (2020). Enabling a green just-in-time navigation through stakeholder collaboration. European Transport Research Review, 12, 1-11.
• Ashrafi, M., Walker, T. R., Magnan, G. M., Adams, M. and Acciaro, M. (2020). A review of corporate sustainability drivers in maritime ports: a multi-stakeholder perspective. Maritime Policy & Management, 47(8), 1027-1044.
• Banomyong, R. (2005). The impact of port and trade security initiatives on maritime supply-chain management. Maritime Policy & Management, 32(1), 3-13.
• Barnes, P. and Oloruntoba, R. (2005). Assurance of security in maritime supply chains: Conceptual issues of vulnerability and crisis management. Journal of international Management, 11(4), 519-540.
• Belhadi, A., Mani, V., Kamble, S. S., Khan, S. A. R. and Verma, S. (2024). Artificial intelligence-driven innovation for enhancing supply chain resilience and performance under the effect of supply chain dynamism: an empirical investigation. Annals of Operations Research, 333(2), 627-652.
• Berle, Ø., Rice Jr, J. B. and Asbjørnslett, B. E. (2011). Failure modes in the maritime transportation system: a functional approach to throughput vulnerability. Maritime Policy & Management, 38(6), 605-632.
• Bichou, K. and Gray, R. (2004). A logistics and supply chain management approach to port performance measurement. Maritime Policy & Management, 31(1), 47-67.
• Boslaugh, S. (2007). An introduction to secondary data analysis. Secondary data sources for public health: A practical guide, 2-10.
• Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative research journal, 9(2), 27-40.
• Can Saglam, Y., Yildiz Çankaya, S. and Sezen, B. (2021). Proactive risk mitigation strategies and supply chain risk management performance: an empirical analysis for manufacturing firms in Turkey. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 32(6), 1224-1244.
• Carbone, V. and Martino, M. D. (2003). The changing role of ports in supply-chain management: an empirical analysis. Maritime Policy & Management, 30(4), 305-320.
• Chaudhuri, A., Boer, H. and Taran, Y. (2018). Supply chain integration, risk management and manufacturing flexibility. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 38(3), 690-712.
• Chávez, C. A. G., Brynolf, S., Despeisse, M., Johansson, B., Rönnbäck, A. Ö., Rösler, J. and Stahre, J. (2024). Advancing sustainability through digital servitization: An exploratory study in the maritime shipping industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 436, 140401.
• Christopher, M. and Peck, H. (2004). Building the Resilient Supply Chain. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 15(2), 1-14.
• Chopra, S. and Sodhi, M. S. (2004). Supply-chain breakdown. MIT Sloan management review, 46(1), 53-61.
• Chua, J. Y., Foo, R., Tan, K. H. and Yuen, K. F. (2022). Maritime resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic: impacts and solutions. Continuity & Resilience Review, 4(1), 124-143.
• Clifford Defee, C. and Fugate, B. S. (2010). Changing perspective of capabilities in the dynamic supply chain era. The international journal of logistics management, 21(2), 180-206.
• Cowton, C. J. (1998). The use of secondary data in business ethics research. Journal of business ethics, 17(4), 423-434.
• Craighead, C. W., Blackhurst, J., Rungtusanatham, M. J. and Handfield, R. B. (2007). The severity of supply chain disruptions: design characteristics and mitigation capabilities. Decision sciences, 38(1), 131-156.
• de la Peña Zarzuelo, I., Soeane, M. J. F. and Bermúdez, B. L. (2020). Industry 4.0 in the port and maritime industry: A literature review. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 20, 100173.
• Del Giudice, M., Di Vaio, A., Hassan, R. and Palladino, R. (2022). Digitalization and new technologies for sustainable business models at the ship–port interface: A bibliometric analysis. Maritime Policy & Management, 49(3), 410-446.
• Duong, L. N. K. and Chong, J. (2020). Supply chain collaboration in the presence of disruptions: a literature review. International Journal of Production Research, 58(11), 3488-3507.
• Fan, S., Yang, Z., Wang, J. and Marsland, J. (2022). Shipping accident analysis in restricted waters: Lesson from the Suez Canal blockage in 2021. Ocean Engineering, 266, 113119.
• Flick, U., Von Kardorff, E. and Steinke, I. (2004). What is qualitative research? An introduction to the field. A companion to qualitative research, 1, 3-11.
• Friday, D., Ryan, S., Sridharan, R. and Collins, D. (2018). Collaborative risk management: a systematic literature review. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 48(3), 231-253.
• Ghadge, A., Wurtmann, H. and Seuring, S. (2020). Managing climate change risks in global supply chains: a review and research agenda. International Journal of Production Research, 58(1), 44-64.
• Gunessee, S. and Subramanian, N. (2020). Ambiguity and its coping mechanisms in supply chains lessons from the Covid-19 pandemic and natural disasters. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 40(7/8), 1201-1223.
• Gupta, H., Yadav, A. K., Kusi-Sarpong, S., Khan, S. A. and Sharma, S. C. (2022). Strategies to overcome barriers to innovative digitalisation technologies for supply chain logistics resilience during pandemic. Technology in Society, 69, 101970.
• Hall, P. V. and Jacobs, W. (2010). Shifting proximities: The maritime ports sector in an era of global supply chains. Regional studies, 44(9), 1103- 1115.
• Harris, H. (2001). Content analysis of secondary data: A study of courage in managerial decision making. Journal of business ethics, 34, 191-208.
• Hofmann, E., Sternberg, H., Chen, H., Pflaum, A. and Prockl, G. (2019). Supply chain management and Industry 4.0: conducting research in the digital age. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 49(10), 945-955.
• Ivanov, D., Dolgui, A., Sokolov, B. and Ivanova, M. (2017). Literature review on disruption recovery in the supply chain. International Journal of Production Research, 55(20), 6158-6174.
• Ivanov, D., Dolgui, A. and Sokolov, B. (2019). The impact of digital technology and Industry 4.0 on the ripple effect and supply chain risk analytics. International journal of production research, 57(3), 829-846.
• Ivanov, D. (2021). Digital supply chain management and technology to enhance resilience by building and using end-to-end visibility during the COVID-19 pandemic. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 71, 10485-10495.
• Jasmi, M. F. A. and Fernando, Y. (2018). Drivers of maritime green supply chain management. Sustainable cities and society, 43, 366-383.
• Jüttner, U., Peck, H. and Christopher, M. (2003). Supply chain risk management: outlining an agenda for future research. International Journal of Logistics: research and applications, 6(4), 197-210.
• Kache, F. and Seuring, S. (2014). Linking collaboration and integration to risk and performance in supply chains via a review of literature reviews. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 19(5/6), 664-682.
• Kache, F. and Seuring, S. (2017). Challenges and opportunities of digital information at the intersection of Big Data Analytics and supply chain management. International journal of operations & production management, 37(1), 10-36.
• Kamalahmadi, M. and Parast, M. M. (2017). An assessment of supply chain disruption mitigation strategies. International Journal of Production Economics, 184, 210-230.
• Kırılmaz, O. and Erol, S. (2017). A proactive approach to supply chain risk management: Shifting orders among suppliers to mitigate the supply side risks. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 23(1), 54-65.
• Kilubi, I. (2016). The strategies of supply chain risk management–a synthesis and classification. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 19(6), 604-629.
• Kindström, D., Kowalkowski, C. and Sandberg, E. (2013). Enabling service innovation: A dynamic capabilities approach. Journal of business research, 66(8), 1063-1073.
• Kleindorfer, P. R. and Saad, G. H. (2005). Managing disruption risks in supply chains. Production and operations management, 14(1), 53-68.
• Kouhizadeh, M., Saberi, S. and Sarkis, J. (2021). Blockchain technology and the sustainable supply chain: Theoretically exploring adoption barriers. International journal of production economics, 231, 107831.
• Kwak, D. W., Seo, Y. J. and Mason, R. (2018). Investigating the relationship between supply chain innovation, risk management capabilities and competitive advantage in global supply chains. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 38(1), 2- 21.
• Lambourdiere, E. and Corbin, E. (2020). Blockchain and maritime supplychain performance: dynamic capabilities perspective. Worldwide Hospitality and Tourism Themes, 12(1), 24-34.
• Lau, Y. Y., Chen, Q., Poo, M. C. P., Ng, A. K., & Ying, C. C. (2024). Maritime transport resilience: A systematic literature review on the current state of the art, research agenda and future research directions. Ocean & Coastal Management, 251, 107086.
• Li, G., Fan, H., Lee, P. K. and Cheng, T. C. E. (2015). Joint supply chain risk management: An agency and collaboration perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 164, 83-94.
• Li, X., Chua, J. Y. and Yuen, K. F. (2024). A Review on Maritime Disruption Management: Categories, Impacts, and Strategies. Transport Policy. 154, 40-47.
• Liu, C. L., Shang, K. C., Lirn, T. C., Lai, K. H. and Lun, Y. V. (2018). Supply chain resilience, firm performance, and management policies in the liner shipping industry. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 110, 202-219.
• Liu, J., Wu, J. and Gong, Y. (2023a). Maritime supply chain resilience: From concept to practice. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 182, 109366.
• Liu, J., Zhang, H. and Zhen, L. (2023b). Blockchain technology in maritime supply chains: applications, architecture and challenges. International Journal of Production Research, 61(11), 3547-3563.
• Liu, J., Gu, B. and Chen, J. (2023c). Enablers for maritime supply chain resilience during pandemic: An integrated MCDM approach. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 175, 103777.
• Luthra, S., Sharma, M., Kumar, A., Joshi, S., Collins, E. and Mangla, S. (2022). Overcoming barriers to cross-sector collaboration in circular supply chain management: a multi-method approach. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 157, 102582.
• Matsuo, H. (2015). Implications of the Tohoku earthquake for Toyota ׳s coordination mechanism: Supply chain disruption of automotive semiconductors. International journal of production economics, 161, 217- 227.
• Maxwell, J. A. (2013). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach: An interactive approach. USA: Sage.
• McAdam, R. and McCormack, D. (2001). Integrating business processes for global alignment and supply chain management. Business Process Management Journal, 7(2), 113-130.
• Min, H. (2019). Blockchain technology for enhancing supply chain resilience. Business Horizons, 62(1), 35-45.
• Modgil, S., Gupta, S., Stekelorum, R. and Laguir, I. (2022). AI technologies and their impact on supply chain resilience during COVID- 19. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 52(2), 130-149.
• Mousavi, S., Bossink, B. and van Vliet, M. (2019). Microfoundations of companies' dynamic capabilities for environmentally sustainable innovation: Case study insights from high‐tech innovation in science‐based companies. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(2), 366-387.
• Munir, M., Jajja, M. S. S., Chatha, K. A. and Farooq, S. (2020). Supply chain risk management and operational performance: The enabling role of supply chain integration. International Journal of Production Economics, 227, 107667.
• Notteboom, T. E. and Rodrigue, J. P. (2005). Port regionalization: towards a new phase in port development. Maritime Policy & Management, 32(3), 297-313.
• Nguyen, T. T., My Tran, D. T., Duc, T. T. H. and Thai, V. V. (2023). Managing disruptions in the maritime industry–a systematic literature review. Maritime business review, 8(2), 170-190.
• Oke, A. and Gopalakrishnan, M. (2009). Managing disruptions in supply chains: A case study of a retail supply chain. International journal of production economics, 118(1), 168-174.
• Osobajo, O. A., Koliousis, I. and McLaughlin, H. (2021). Making sense of maritime supply chain: a relationship marketing approach. Journal of shipping and trade, 6(1), 1-17.
• Özkanlısoy, Ö. and Akkartal, E. (2022). The effect of Suez Canal blockage on supply chains. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Denizcilik Fakültesi Dergisi, 14(1), 51-79.
• Pagoropoulos, A., Maier, A. and McAloone, T. C. (2017). Assessing transformational change from institutionalising digital capabilities on implementation and development of Product-Service Systems: Learnings from the maritime industry. Journal of cleaner production, 166, 369-380.
• Pallis, P. L. (2017). Port risk management in container terminals. Transportation research procedia, 25, 4411-4421.
• Park, Y., Hong, P. and Roh, J. J. (2013). Supply chain lessons from the catastrophic natural disaster in Japan. Business horizons, 56(1), 75-85.
• Pettit, T. J., Fiksel, J. and Croxton, K. L. (2010). Ensuring supply chain resilience: development of a conceptual framework. Journal of business logistics, 31(1), 1-21.
• Ponomarov, S. Y. and Holcomb, M. C. (2009). Understanding the concept of supply chain resilience. The international journal of logistics management, 20(1), 124-143.
• Poulsen, R. T., Ponte, S. and Lister, J. (2016). Buyer-driven greening? Cargo-owners and environmental upgrading in maritime shipping. Geoforum, 68, 57-68.
• Power, D. (2005). Supply chain management integration and implementation: a literature review. Supply chain management: an International journal, 10(4), 252-263.
• Praharsi, Y., Jami’in, M. A., Suhardjito, G. and Wee, H. M. (2021). The application of Lean Six Sigma and supply chain resilience in maritime industry during the era of COVID-19. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 12(4), 800-834.
• Raza, Z., Woxenius, J., Vural, C. A. and Lind, M. (2023). Digital transformation of maritime logistics: Exploring trends in the liner shipping segment. Computers in Industry, 145, 103811.
• Rejeb, A., Keogh, J. G., Simske, S. J., Stafford, T. and Treiblmaier, H. (2021). Potentials of blockchain technologies for supply chain collaboration: a conceptual framework. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 32(3), 973-994.
• Rogerson, S., Svanberg, M., Altuntas Vural, C., von Wieding, S. and Woxenius, J. (2024). Comparing flexibility-based measures during different disruptions: evidence from maritime supply chains. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 54(2), 163-191.
• Sabahi, S. and Parast, M. M. (2020). Firm innovation and supply chain resilience: a dynamic capability perspective. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 23(3), 254-269.
• Schoemaker, P. J., Heaton, S. and Teece, D. (2018). Innovation, dynamic capabilities, and leadership. California management review, 61(1), 15-42.
• Seo, Y. J., Dinwoodie, J. and Roe, M. (2015). Measures of supply chain collaboration in container logistics. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 17, 292-314.
• Shen, B. and Li, Q. (2017). Market disruptions in supply chains: a review of operational models. International transactions in operational research, 24(4), 697-711.
• Singh Srai, J. and Gregory, M. (2008). A supply network configuration perspective on international supply chain development. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 28(5), 386-411.
• Sodhi, M. S., & Tang, C. S. (2021). Supply chain management for extreme conditions: Research opportunities. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 57(1), 7-16.
• Spieske, A. and Birkel, H. (2021). Improving supply chain resilience through industry 4.0: A systematic literature review under the impressions of the COVID-19 pandemic. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 158, 107452.
• Talley, W. K. (2013). Maritime transportation research: topics and methodologies. Maritime policy & management, 40(7), 709-725.
• Talley, W. K. (2014). Maritime transport chains: carrier, port and shipper choice effects. International Journal of Production Economics, 151, 174- 179.
• Tate, W. L., Ellram, L. M. and Kirchoff, J. F. (2010). Corporate social responsibility reports: a thematic analysis related to supply chain management. Journal of supply chain management, 46(1), 19-44.
• Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic management journal, 28(13), 1319-1350.
• Teece, D. J. (2010). Technological Innovation and the Theory of the Firm: The Role of Enterprise-Level Knowledge, Complementarities, and (Dynamic) Capabilities, in N. Rosenberg & B. Hall (Eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, Vol. 1, pp. 679–730. Amsterdam: North- Holland.
• Teece, D. J. (2020). Hand in glove: Open innovation and the dynamic capabilities framework. Strategic Management Review, 1(2), 233-253.
• Thun, J. H. (2010). Angles of integration: an empirical analysis of the alignment of internet‐based information technology and global supply chain integration. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 46(2), 30-44.
• Tijan, E., Jović, M., Aksentijević, S. and Pucihar, A. (2021). Digital transformation in the maritime transport sector. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 170, 120879.
• Tseng, P. H. and Liao, C. H. (2015). Supply chain integration, information technology, market orientation and firm performance in container shipping firms. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 26(1), 82-106.
• Tukamuhabwa, B. R., Stevenson, M., Busby, J. and Zorzini, M. (2015). Supply chain resilience: definition, review and theoretical foundations for further study. International journal of production research, 53(18), 5592- 5623.
• UNCTAD. (2019). Review of Maritime Transport. https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/rmt2019_en.pdf, Access Date: 12.06.2024. UNCTAD. (2020). Review of Maritime Transport. https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/rmt2020_en.pdf, Access Date: 12.06.2024.
• UNCTAD. (2021). Review of Maritime Transport. https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/rmt2021_en_0.pdf, Access Date: 12.06.2024.
• UNCTAD. (2022). Review of Maritime Transport. https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/rmt2022_en.pdf, Access Date: 24.09.2024.
• UNCTAD. (2023). Review of Maritime Transport. https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/rmt2023_en.pdf, Access Date: 10.10.2024.
• Verschuur, J., Pant, R., Koks, E. and Hall, J. (2022). A systemic risk framework to improve the resilience of port and supply-chain networks to natural hazards. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 1-18.
• Vilko, J., Ritala, P. and Hallikas, J. (2019). Risk management abilities in multimodal maritime supply chains: Visibility and control perspectives. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 123, 469-481.
• Wang, T., Cheng, P. and Zhen, L. (2023). Green development of the maritime industry: Overview, perspectives, and future research opportunities. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 179, 103322.
• Wang, X., Yuen, K. F., Wong, Y. D. and Li, K. X. (2020). How can the maritime industry meet Sustainable Development Goals? An analysis of sustainability reports from the social entrepreneurship perspective. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 78, 102173.
• Wendler-Bosco, V. and Nicholson, C. (2020). Port disruption impact on the maritime supply chain: a literature review. Sustainable and Resilient Infrastructure, 5(6), 378-394.
• Wiengarten, F., Humphreys, P., Gimenez, C. and McIvor, R. (2016). Risk, risk management practices, and the success of supply chain integration. International Journal of Production Economics, 171, 361-370.
• Wilson, M. C. (2007). The impact of transportation disruptions on supply chain performance. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 43(4), 295-320.
• Yin, R. K. (2009). How to Do Better Case Studies, in L. Bickman & D. J. Rog (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Applied Social Research Methods, pp. 254–282. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
• Yu, W., Chavez, R., Jacobs, M. A. and Wong, C. Y. (2022). Openness to technological innovation, supply chain resilience, and operational performance: exploring the role of information processing capabilities. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 71, 1258-1270.
• Yuen, K. F. and Thai, V. (2017). Barriers to supply chain integration in the maritime logistics industry. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 19, 551-572.
• Zhao, N., Hong, J. and Lau, K. H. (2023). Impact of supply chain digitalization on supply chain resilience and performance: A multimediation model. International Journal of Production Economics, 259, 108817.