SOURCES OF GROWTH IN TURKISH PUBLIC AND PRIVATE MANUFACTURING SECTORS

Öz

The aim of this study is to investigate the sources of growth in selected public and private sectors of Turkish Manufacturing Industry between the years 1990 and 2000. For this, a 2-Deflator Growth Accounting Approach (Harberger, 1997, 1998) has been used in the study. According to the results of the study, the sources of growth vary across the manufacturing sector. Since capital`s contribution to output growth is significantly negative, labour`s contribution explains most of the changes in output growth in Turkish Manufacturing Industry. Raw labour`s contribution (RLC) to growth is negative whereas human capital`s (HCC) contribution to growth is found to be positive, and this explains most of the contribution of labour. Half of the public sector and all of the private sector have positive rates of total factor productivity (TFP) growth until 1994, the year of economic and financial crisis. Since then, all the public and private sectors industries considered in our study show negative TFP growth rates. This study argues that measuring growth at the disaggregated level helps to understand growth at the aggregate level in a better way.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Growth, TFP growth, manufacturing industry, public and private

Kaynakça

1. AKDEDE, Sacit Hadi (2001), “Economic Liberalization, Markups and TFP Growth in Turkey`s Manufacturing Industries”, Adnan Menderes University, Aydin, www.spo.gov.tr
2. CEPEDA, Leonardo Egidio Torre (2000), “Productivity, Profitability in the Mexican Manufacturing Sector: 1984-1994”, PhD. Dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles
3. CHO, Mansung Michael (2000), “Productivity, Profitability, and Economic Growth”, PhD. Dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles
4. COELLI, T. J., PRASADA RAO, D. S., and BATTESE, G. E. (1998), “An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis”, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, pg. 271
5. GERDIN, Anders (2002), “Productivity and Economic Growth in Kenyan agriculture, 1964-1996”, Agricultural Economics, Vol.27, pg. 7-15
6. GORTON, Matthew, and DAVIDOVA, Sophia (2004), “Farm Productivity and Efficiency in the CEE Applicant Countries: A Synthesis of Results”, Agricultural Economics, Vol. 30, pg. 1-16
7. HARBERGER, Arnold C. (1997), (1998), “A Vision of the Growth Process”, American Economic Review, 88 (1), pg. 1-32
8. KEPENEK, Yakup, “Some Technological Aspects of the Turkish Manufacturing Exports during the 1990s”, www.intech.unu.edu/publications/conference-wokshop- reports/seville/kepenek.pdf

9. KIM, Hyongwon (2001), “Growth Process based on the Behavior of Firms”, PhD. Dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles
10. MUKHERJEE, Anit N., and KURODA, Yoshimi (2003), “Productivity Growth in Indian Agriculture: Is there Evidence of Convergence across States?” Agricultural Economics, Vol.29, 43-53
11. NOTARO, Giovanni (2003), “ICT, Output and Productivity Growth in the United Kingdom: A Sectoral Analysis”, International Productivity Monotor, www.netaddress.com/tpl
12. PATTNAYAK, Sanja Samirana (2001), “Economic Liberalization and Productivity Growth: A Disaggregated Analysis of Indian Manufacturing Industries”, www.crnec.auckland.ac.nz/esam2001/prog/p78.html
13. ROBLES, Edgar (1997), “An Exploration into the Sources and Causes of Economic Growth in the United States and Fourteen Latin American Countries”, PhD. Dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles
14. Statistical Year Book of Turkey, 1990-2000, State Institute of Statistics (SIS), Prime Ministry of Turkish Republic