AB Genişlemesi: Bir Başarı Öyküsünden Yorgunluğa

Öz

Bu çalışma “genişleme yorgunluğu” bağlamında önemli bir adım olarak gelecek Avrupa Birliği (AB) genişleme ihtimalini incelemektedir. Çalışma 2000'li yıllarda genişleme sürecini gözden geçirmektedir. 1950’lerin sonlarından beri Avrupa’nın bütünleştirilmesi fikri aşamalı olarak Avrupa’ya barış ve istikrar getirmesi çabaları çerçevesinde değerlendirilmiştir. 1957’den 1995’e kadar AB üye sayısını 6’dan 15’e çıkarmıştır. 2004 ve 2007’lerde komünist geçmişe sahip Orta ve Doğu Avrupa ülkelerinin katılmalarıyla bu gelişmenin doruk noktasına ulaşılmıştır. 10 yıllık zorlu politik ve ekonomik reformlardan sonra, üyeliğe başvuran aday ülkeler sonuçta merkezi aşamaya ulaştılar. O zamandan beri, tartışma genişlemenin AB için zorunlu olup olmadığı, yeni üye ülkelerin Avrupa entegrasyonuna ne kadar katkıda bulunabilecekleri ve faydalarını paylaşabilecekleri sorusu üzerine odaklanmıştır. Çalışma, Avrupa Komisyonu ve bu alanda bir çok sayıdaki bağımsız çalışmalardan elde edilen anahtar bulgulara dayanmaktadır. Çalışma literatürde yer alan yorumsal modeller üzerinde durmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Avrupa Birliği, Koşullar, Genişleme, Entegrasyon

EU ENLARGEMENT: FROM A SUCCESS STORY TO FATIGUE

Öz

This paper examines the prospect of European Union (EU) enlargement as a crucialstep in the context of “enlargement fatigue”. It reviews the enlargement process in thepost-2000s. From the late 1950 onwards, the idea of European unification has graduallybeen emphasized by an attempt to bring peace and stability. Between 1957 and 1995, theEU grew from six to fifteen members. The high point of this development was reached in2004 and 2007, with an inclusion of Central and Eastern European countries (CEECs),who had the communist traditions. After a decade of difficult economic and politicalreforms, the applicant countries finally edged toward centre stage. Since then, the debatehas focused on the question of whether enlargement is fundamental to European unity andhow far new member states can contribute to European integration and share the Unin’sbenefits. The study relies on the key findings from the European Commission and thenumber of independent studies in this field. The study draws upon interpretative models inthe existing literature.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• European Union, Conditionality, Enlargement, Integration

Kaynakça

1. ARCHICK, K. and MORELLI, V.L. (2008), European Union Enlargement, CRS Report for Congress, Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade Division, 3 July.
2. BARBERI, T. (2010), EU Suffers an Extreme Case of Balkan Enlargement Fatigue, “European Voice”, June 11. BACHE, I. and GEORGE, S. (2006), Politics in the European Union, Oxford University Press.
3. BRÜCKER, H. and WEISE, C. (2000), EU Eastern Enlargement: Sealing off or Regulated Opening Up? Economic Bulletin, Vol. 37, No.7, July.
4. BURGESS, M. (1989), Political Ideas, Influences, and Strategies in the European Community, 1972-1987, Routledge.
5. BOEDELTJE, F. and HOUNTUM, H.V. (2011), Brussels is Speaking: The Adverse Speech Geo-Politics of the European Union Towards its Neighbours, Geopolitics, Taylor & Francis Group, pp. 130-145.
6. BOGUTCAIA, G., BOSSE, G. and SCHMIDT-FELZMANN, A. (2006), Lost in Translation? Political Elites and the Interpretative Values Gap in the EU’s Neighbourhood Policies, Contemporary Politics, Volume 12, Number , June, pp.117-137.
7. CINI, M. (2007), European Union Politics, Oxford University Press.
8. CHILOSI, A. (2005), Can the EU Neighbourhood Policy be A Valid Substitute of Further EU Enlargement? Sixth International Conference on “Enterprise in Transition”, Piza, Italy, pp.1497-1505.

9. DEVRIM, D. and SCHULZ, E. (2009), Enlargement Fatigue in the European Union: From Enlargement to Many Unions, Working Paper /2009.
10. DEVRIM, D. and O’LEARY, M. Jane (2010), Enlargement Works, Why Stop Now? Barcelona, CIDOB, 15 February,http://www.cidob.org/es/publicacions/opinio/europa/enlargement_ works_why_stop_now
11. EUROMOVE (2009), Future Enlargement of the EU, European Parliament.
12. EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2011), Council Decision on the System of Own Resources of the European Union (EC, Euratom), Brussels, 29.6.2011 COM(2011) 510 final 2011/0183 (CNS) Proposal for a{SEC(2011) 876 final}
13. EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2011), Enlargement Strategy and Main Challenges 2011-2012, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council, Brussels, 12.10.2011 COM(2011) final.
14. EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2008), Eurobarometer 70, Public Opinion in the European Union, Autumn.
15. EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2003), ommission of the European Communities, Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament, Wider Europe—Neighbourhood: A New Framework for Relations with our Eastern and Southern Neighbours, Brussels, 11 March 2003, COM(2003) 104 final.
16. EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2001), The Free Movement of Workers in the Context of Enlargement, 6 March.
17. EUROPEAN COMMISSION (1992), Treaty on European Union Official Journal C 191, 29 July 1992.
18. EUROPEAN COUNCIL (1993), Presidency Conclusions Copenhagen European Council, 21-22 June, http://www.europarl.europa.eu/enlargement/ec/pdf/cop_en.pdf
19. EMERSON, M., AYDIN, S., CLERCK-SACHSSE, J.D. and NOUTCHEVA, G. (2006), Just What is This Absorption Capacity of the European Union? Centre For European Policy Studies, Policy Brief, No.113. September.
20. FINANCIAL TIMES (1995), “The EU summit”, 14 December 1995.
21. FLED, S. (2005), Labour Force Trends and Immigration, Centre of Migration Studies, Vol. 39.
22. FRIIS, L and MURPHY, A. (1999), The European Union and Central and Eastern Europe: Governance and Boundaries, Blackwell Publishers Ltd.
23. FOCUS MIGRATION. (2006), EU Expansion and the Free Movement of Workers: Do Continued Restrictions Make Sense for Germany, No.4 July.
24. FORGUE, David G. and SCHUDE, K.N.(2007), Enlargement Fatigue in the European Union, International Law News, Volume 36 Number 2, Spring.
25. GSTÖHL, S. (2002), Reluctant Europeans. Norway, Sweden and Switzerland in the Processof European Integration, Boulder, CO: Lynee Rienner.
26. GUTH, J. (2001), EU enlargement – An overview, International Economic Review, November/December.
27. HOLAND, M. (2004), Future Enlargement: Challenges and Opportunities, European Integration, Pinter Publishers.
28. HOFFMANN, S. (1966), Obstinate or Obsolete? The Fate of the Nation State and the Case of Western Europe, the MIT Press on behalf of American Academy of Arts & Sciences Stable, Vol. 95, No. 3, Tradition and Change (Summer, 1966), pp. 862-915.
29. KUTAY, H.K. (2008), Impact of Integration Theories on the European Union Enlargement, Journal of Administration and Economy, Vol. 15, No.1, Cilt:15 Sayı:1 University of Celal Bayar, Manisa, pp.149-161.
30. Matlı, W. (1999), The Logic of Regional Integration. Europe and Beyond, Cambridge University Press.
31. MENON, A. (2011), The Prospect of EU Membership Could Help North African States Make the Move to Democracy, Time to Shake off Enlargement Fatigue, “European Voice”, 10.03.2011.
32. MORAVCSIK, A. (1993), Preferences and Power in the European Community: A Liberal Intergovernmentalist Approach, Journal of Common Market Studies (30th Anniversary Edition) (December 1993), Vol.31. No. 4.
33. NUGENT, N. (2003), The Government and Politics of the European Union, Palgrave.
34. PRIDHAM, G. (2002), EU Enlargement and Consolidating Democracy in Post-Communist States – Formality and Reality, University of Bristol, JCMS Volume 40. Number 3.
35. PUTTEN, V.D.R. (2002), The Effects of EU Enlargement on Product and Labour Market, Conjuncture.
36. ROSAMOND, B. (2000), Theories of European Integration, Palgrave
37. SANDHOLTZ, W. and SWEET, A.S. (1997), European Integration and Supranational Governance, Oxford University Press.
38. SEDELMEIER, U. and WALLACE, H. (2000), Eastern Enlargement, Oxford University Press.
39. SCMITTER, Philippe C. (2004), Neo-Neofunctionalism, European Integration Theory (Eds) A. Wienner and T. Diez, Oxford University Press, 74.
40. SCHIMMELFENNIG, F. (2007), Europeanization Beyond Europe, Living Rev. Euro. Gov., 2.
41. SCHIMMELFENNIG, F. (2004), Liberal Intergovernmentalism, European Integration Theory (Eds), A. Wienner and T. Diez, Oxford University Press., 75-94.
42. SCHIMMELFENNIG, F. (2001), The Community Trap: Liberal Norms, Rhetorical Action, and the Eastern Enlargement of the European Union Foundation and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology International Organization 55, 1, Winter 2001.
43. SUNDELL, E. and KARLSSON, C. (2010), The Enlargement Strategy, A study of the EU Commission’s Enlargement Strategy Over Time, Uppsala University.
44. STEUNENBERG, B. and DIMITROVA, A. (2007), Compliance in the EU Enlargement Process: The Limits of Conditionality, 22 June, European Integration Online Papers.
45. TURRION, J. and VELAZQUEZ, F.J. (2004), Consequences of European Union Enlargement for Spain, Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
46. VEJVODA, I. (2010), Enlargement Fatigue is not an Option, “Europe’s World”, Autumn 2010 http://www.europesworld.org
47. VIRKKUNEN, J. (2001), Post-Socialist Borderland: Promoting or Challenging the Enlarged European Union, Geografiska Annaler, 83 B.
48. WALLACE, H.., WALLACE, W. and POLLACK, Mark A. (2005), Policy Making in the European Union, The New European Union Series, Oxford University Press.
49. WESLEY, J.S. (2005), The EU and ‘Wider Europe’: Toward an Alternative Geopolitics of Regional Cooperation?Geopolitics, Taylor & Francis, pp. –454.
50. WHITE, S., McALLISTER, I, and LIGHT, M. (2002), Enlargement and the New Outsiders, JCMS 2002, Vol. 40. No. 1.
51. WIENER, A. and DIEZ, T. (2004), European Integration Theory, Oxford University Press.
52. WYLES, J. (2009), The EU Suffers from More than Enlargement Fatigue, “European Voice”, 14.05.2009.