BİLİŞİM TEKNOLOJİLERİ UYGULAMALARINDA KULLANIM NİYETİNE ETKİ EDEN DAVRANIŞSAL FAKTÖRLERİ BELİRLEMEYE YÖNELİK BÜTÜNLEŞİK BİR MODEL ÖNERİSİ

Öz

Bilişim sistemleri işletme performansını artırmaya yönelik olarak kurulan ancak aynı zamanda maliyetli ve zaman alıcı projelerdir. Bu projeler uygun bileşenler sağlanmadığında beklenilen yararlara ulaşamayarak başarısızlıkla sonuçlanabilmektedir. Bilişim teknolojisi uygulamalarında temel sorunlardan biri kullanıcıların sistemi kabulündeki zayıflıklarıdır. Teknoloji Kabul Modeli, bilişim teknolojilerinin kabulü ve kullanımı ile ilgili en çok benimsenen model olmakla birlikte, modele ilişkin yapılan araştırmalar modelin geliştirilme gereksinimini ortaya çıkarmıştır. Bu çalışmada kurumsal kaynak planlama sistemlerinin kullanımında, algılanan kullanım kolaylığı ve yararının öncülü olarak teknolojiye hazırlık araştırma modeline dahil edilmiş, kullanım memnuniyeti ise kolaylık ve yarar algıları ile niyet arasında düzenleyici olarak ele alınmıştır. Çözümleme Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi ile test edilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Teknoloji Kabul Modeli, Kullanım Niyeti, Teknolojiye Hazırlık, Kurumsal Kaynak Planlama

AN INTEGRATIVE MODEL PROPOSITION ON BEHAVIOURAL FACTORS AFFECTING INTENTION OF USE IN INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES IMPLICATIONS

Öz

Information systems are established to increase firm performance however they have very high investment costs and they are also time taking projects. Unless appropriate components are supplied they may not achieve expected results and fail. One of the fundamental problems in the information systems practices is the fragility of the users in the acceptance of the system. Although Technology Acceptance Model is highly preferred model concerning the acceptance of information technologies as well as usage, researches prove that there is still a need for the improvement of the model. In this study technology readiness is their reintroduced usage to the model as an antecedent of perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness, whereas satisfaction is considered as a mediator between technology readiness and intention. This model is tested with Structural Equation Modeling.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Technology Readiness, Technology Acceptance Model, Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP)

Kaynakça

1. Bandalos, D.L. (2002). The Effects of Item Parceling on Goodness-of-Fit and Parameter Estimate Bias in Structural Equation Modeling, Structural Equation Modeling, 9(1):78-102.
2. Baron, R.M. ve Kenny, D.A. (1986). The Moderator-Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6):1173-1182.
3. Cattell, R.B. ve Bursdal, C.A. (1975). The Radial Parcel Double Factoring Design: A Solution to the Item-vs-Parcel Controversy, Multivariate Behavioral, 10(2):165-179.
4. Cheng, E.W.L. (2001). SEM Being More Effective than Multiple Regression in Parsimonious Model Testing for Management Development Research, Journal of Management Development, 20(7):650-667.
5. Chou, S.W. ve Chang, Y.C. 2008. The implementation factors that influence the ERP benefits, Decision Support Systems, 46(1):149-157.
6. Cronin, J.J., Brady, M.K. ve Hult, G.T.M. 2000. Assessing the effects of quality, value, and customer satisfaction on consumer behavioral intentions in service environments, Journal of Retailing, 76(2):193-218.
7. Davis, F.D. 1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology, MIS Quarterly, 13(3):319-340.
8. Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P. ve Warshaw, P.R. 1989. User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models, Management Science, 35(8):982-1003.

9. Forslund, H. 2010. ERP Systems’ Capabilities for supply chain performance management, Industrial Management & Data Systems, 110 (3):351-367.
10. Fusilier ve Durlabhji, 2005. An exploration of student internet use in India: the technology acceptance model and the theory of planned behavior, Campus Wide Information Systems, 22(4):233-246.
11. Hau, K. ve Marsh, H.W. (2004). The Use of Item Parcels in Structural Equation Modeling: Non-normal Data and Small Sample Sizes, British Journal of Mathematical Statistical Psychological Society, 57:327-351.
12. Hodgkinson, G.P. ve Sadler-Smith, E. (2003). Complex or Unitary? A Critique and Empirical Re-assessment of the Allinson Hayes Cognitive Style Index, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 76(2):243– 268.
13. Holt, J.K. (2004). Item Parceling in Structural Equation Models for Optimum Solutions, Annual Meeting of the Mid-Western Educational Research Association, Oct 13-16, 2004. Colombus OH, Proceedings:2-7.
14. Judd, C.M., Kenny, D.A. ve McClelland, G.H. (2001). Estimating and Testing Mediation in Within-Subject Designs, Psychological Methods, 6(2):115-134.
15. Kale, P.T, Banwait, S.S. ve Laroiya, S.C. 2010. Performance evaluation of ERP implementation in India SMEs, Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 21(6):758-780.
16. Kenny, D.A., Korchmaros, J.D. ve Bolger N. (2003). Lower Level Mediation in Multilevel Models, Psychological Methods, 8(2):115-128.
17. Kline, R.B. (1998). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. USA:The Guilford Press.
18. Lam, S.Y., Chiang, J. ve Parasuraman, A. 2008. The effects of the dimensions of technology readiness on technology acceptance: an empirical analyses, Journal of Interactive Marketing, 22(4):19-39.
19. Legris, P., Ingham, J. ve Collerette, P. 2003. Why people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model, Information & Management, 40:191-204.
20. Lin, J.S.C. ve Hsieh, P.L. 2006. The role of technology readiness in customers’ perception and adoption of self-service technologies, International Journal of Service Industry Management, 17(5):497-517.
21. Lin, J.S.C. ve Hsieh, P.L. 2007. The influence of technology readiness on satisfaction and behavioral intentions toward self-service technologies, Computers in Human Behavior, 23:1597-1615.
22. Lin, C.H., Shih, H.Y ve Sher. P.J. 2007. Integrating Technology Readiness into Technology acceptance: The TRAM Model, Psychology & Marketing,
23. Little, T.D., Cunningham, W.A., Shahar, G. ve Widaman, K.F. (2002). To Parcel or Not to Parcel: Exploring the Question, Weighing the Metris, Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2):151-173.
24. Marsh, H.W., Hau, K., Balla, J.R. ve Grayson, D. (1998). Is More Ever Too Much? The Number of Indicators Per Factor in Confirmatory Factor Analysis, Multivariate Behavioral Research, 33(2):181-220.
25. Moore, G.C. ve Benbasat, I. 1991. Development of an Instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation, Information Systems Research, 2(3):192-222.
26. Nicolaou, A. ve Bchattacharya, S. 2006. Organizational performance effects of ERP systems usage: The impact of post implementation change, International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 7:18-35.
27. Parasuraman, A. 2000. Technology readiness index (TRI) a multiple-item scale to measure readiness to embrace new technologies, Journal of Service Research, 2(4):307-320.
28. Park, J.H, Suh, H.J. ve Yang, H.D. 2007. Perceived absorptive capacity of individual users of performance of enterprise resource planning (ERP) usage: The case for Korean Firms, Information & Management, 44(3):300-312.
29. Preacher, K.J. ve Hayes, A.F. (2004). SPSS and SAS Procedures for Estimating Indirect Effects in Simple Mediation Models, Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 36(4):717-731.
30. Şimşek, Ö.F. (2007). Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesine Giriş Temel İlkeler ve LISREL Uygulamaları. Ankara:Ekinoks Yayınevi.
31. Venkatesh, V. 2000. Determinants of perceived ease of use: integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into technology acceptance model, Information Systems Research, 11(4):342-365.
32. Venkatesh, V. ve Davis, F.D. 2000. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies, Management Science, 46(2):186-204.
33. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B. ve Davis, F.D. 2003. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view, MIS Quarterly,
34. Wang, E., Chou, H-W ve Jiang, J. 2005, The impacts of charismatic leadership style on team cohesiveness and overall performance during ERP implementation, International Journal of Project Management, 2:173-180.
35. Bandoyopadhyay, K. 2010. User acceptance of ERP systems in the United States,http://www.swdsi.org/swdsi2010/SW2010_Preceedings/papers/PA139.pd f, (Erişim: 03.01.2011)