BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

AVRUPA ENTEGRASYONU VE YEREL SİSTEMLER ÜZERİNE ETKİSİ: TÜRKİYE BOYUTU

Yıl 2005, Cilt: 20 Sayı: 1 - Cilt: 20 Sayı: 1, 123 - 136, 25.07.2016

SÜLEYMAN YAMAN Koçak

Öz

Bu çalışmada Avrupa Entegrasyonu kavramı, mekanizmaları ve yerel sistemler üzerindeki etkileri incelenmektedir. Ayrıca, kavramı derinlemesine açıklamak için, Avrupa Entegrasyonu kavramının çeşitli kullanılışları ve Avrupa Birliği’ndeki politika transfer sistemleri de değerlendirilmiştir. Avrupa Entegrasyonu’nun hem politika oluşturulmasında hem de uygulanmasında yerel sistemler üzerinde çok büyük etkisi olduğu görülmüştür. Türkiye ile ilgili çıkarsamalarla da, Türkiye’nin henüz müzakere görüşmelerine başlamamasına rağmen, yerel değişim boyutları üzerinde Avrupa Entegrasyon sürecinin çok baskın ve belirleyici olduğu ortaya konulmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Avrupa Entegrasyonu Yerel Sistemler Avrupa Birliği.

Kaynakça

  • BOMBERG, E. and J. PETERSON (2000), “Policy Transfer and European integration”, European integration Online Papers, Queen’s University Belfast, No. 2/2000
  • BORZEL, Tanja A., and Thomas RİSSE (2003), “Conceptualising the Domestic Impact of Europe”, Oxford University Press.
  • BORZEL, T (2002), “Pace-Setting, Foot-Dragging, and Fence-Sitting: Member State Responses to European integration”, Journal of Common Market Studies, Volume 40, No. 2, pp. 193–214.
  • BORZEL, Tanja A. (1999), “Towards Convergence in Europe? Institutional Adaptation to European integration in Germany and Spain” Journal of Common Market Studies 37(4): 573–596
  • CLAUDIO M. Radaelli (2003), “The European integration of Public Policy”, In The Politics of European integration, K. Featherstone and C. Radaelli (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press,: 30.
  • COLE, A. (2001), “National and Partisan Contexts of European integration: the case of the French Socialists”, Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 39, No. 1, March, pp. 15–36.
  • DEVUYST, Y. (1999), “The Community Method after Amsterdam”, Journal of Common Market Studies, 37 (1): 109–20.
  • DUINA, Francesco G. (1999), Harmonizing Europe. Nation-States within the Common Market. New York: State University of New York Press.
  • FEATHERSTONE, K. and C. RADAELLI (2003), “The Politics of European integration”, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • GOUREVITCH, P. (1978), “The Second Image Reversed: The International Sources of Domestic Politics”, International Organisation, 32:4, 881– 911.
  • HAAS, E. (1958), “The Uniting of Europe: Political, Social and Economic Forces”, 1950–1957, Stanford, Stanford University Press.
  • HALL, Peter A., and Rosemary C. R. TAYLOR (1996), “Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms” Political Studies 44: 952-973.
  • HANF, K. and B. SOETENDORP (eds), (1997), “Adapting to European Integration: Small States and the European Union”, London and New York, Longman.
  • HÉRITIER, Adrienne, Christoph Knill, and Susanne MINGERS (1996), Ringing the Changes in Europe. Regulatory Competition and the Redefinition of the State: Britain, France, Germany. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.
  • HÉRITIER, Adrienne (2001), “Differential Europe: National Administrative Responses to Community Policy”, In Transforming Europe. European integration and Domestic Change, edited by Maria Green Cowles, James A. Caporaso and Thomas Risse. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 44–59.
  • HOOGHE, L. and G. MARKS (2001), Multi-level Governance and European Integration, Boulder, Rowman and Littlefield.
  • HOWELL, K. (2003), “The European integration of British Financial Services”, paper presented to the ESRC Seminar Series/UACES Study Group on the European integration of British Politics and Policy-Making, Sheffield, 2nd May.
  • J. CAPORASO Risse, T. and M. COWLES G(2001), “European integration and Domestic Change: Introduction”, in: M. G. Cowles, J. Caporaso, and T. Risse (eds.), Transforming Europe. European integration and Domestic Change (Ithaca, London: Cornell University Press), pp. 1– 20.
  • JONSSON, C., Tagil S. and G. TORNQVIST (2000), Organizing European Space (London:Sage).
  • KASSIM, H., B.G. Peters and V. WRIGHT, (eds), (2000), “The National Co- ordination of EU Policy: The Domestic Level”, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  • KNILL, Christoph, and Dirk LEHMKUHL (1999), “How Europe Matters. Different Mechanisms of European integration”, European Integration on-line Paper 3 (7).
  • KOHLER-KOCH, Beate (1996), “The Strength of Weakness. The Transformation of Governance in the EU”, In The Future of the Nation State. Essays on Cultural Pluralism and Political Integration, edited by Sverker Gustavsson and Leif Lewin. Stockholm: Nerenius & Santerus, 169–210.
  • LADRECH, R. (1994), “European integration of Domestic Politics and Institutions: The Case of France”, Journal of Common Market Studies, 32:1, 69–88.
  • MARCH, James G., and Johan P. OLSEN (1995), “Democratic Governance”, New York: The Free Press.
  • MORAVCSIK, A. (1998), “The Choice for Europe: Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht”, Ithaca, New York, Cornell University Press.
  • MORAVCSIK, A. (1994), “Why the European Community Strengthens the State: Domestic Politics and International Cooperation”, Center for European Studies Working Paper 52, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University.
  • OLSEN, J. (2002), “The Many Faces of European integration”, Journal of Common Market Studies, 40:5, 921–952.
  • PUTNAM, R. (1988), “Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: the Logic of Two- level Games”, International Organisation, 42:3, 427–460.
  • RADAELLI C.M. (2000), “Whither European integration? Concept stretching and substantive change”, EIOP WP.
  • SCHARPF, F. (1999), “Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic”, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  • SCHMIDT, V. A. (2002), “The Futures of European Capitalism”, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • SCHMIDT, V. A. (2001), “European integration and the Mechanisms of Economic Policy Adjustments”, European Integration online Papers 5 (6).
  • SMITH, J. (2001), “Cultural Aspects of European integration: The Case of the Scottish Office”, Public Administration, Vol. 79, No. 1, pp. 147-165
  • STONE Sweet, A. and W. SANDHOLTZ (1997), “European Integration and Supranational Governance”, Journal of European Public Policy, 4:3, 297–317.
  • VINK, M. (2003), “What is european integration? and other questions on a new research agenda”, 2003 European Consortium for Political Research.
  • WALLACE, W. (2000), “Collective Governance: The EU Political Process” in H. Wallace and W. Wallace (eds) Policy-Making in the European Union, 4th edition (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press).
  • WARD M. D. and L. HOUSE (1988), “A Theory of the Behavioral Power of Nations”, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 32, 3–36.

EUROPEAN INTEGRATION AND ITS IMPACT ON DOMESTIC SYSTEMS: INFERENCES FOR TURKEY

Yıl 2005, Cilt: 20 Sayı: 1 - Cilt: 20 Sayı: 1, 123 - 136, 25.07.2016

SÜLEYMAN YAMAN Koçak

Öz

In this study, the European Integration concept, its mechanisms and its effect on domestic systems are investigated. Moreover, to explain the concept in depth, the features of the Integration concept and the policy transfer systems in the European Union are assessed. It is shown that the European Integration has a great effect over the domestic systems in both forming and implementing policies. By determining inferences for Turkey it is clarified that, although Turkey has not started the negotiation talks, the European Integration process is very dominant and significant over its dimensions of domestic change.

Anahtar Kelimeler

European Integration Domestic Systems European Union

Kaynakça

  • BOMBERG, E. and J. PETERSON (2000), “Policy Transfer and European integration”, European integration Online Papers, Queen’s University Belfast, No. 2/2000
  • BORZEL, Tanja A., and Thomas RİSSE (2003), “Conceptualising the Domestic Impact of Europe”, Oxford University Press.
  • BORZEL, T (2002), “Pace-Setting, Foot-Dragging, and Fence-Sitting: Member State Responses to European integration”, Journal of Common Market Studies, Volume 40, No. 2, pp. 193–214.
  • BORZEL, Tanja A. (1999), “Towards Convergence in Europe? Institutional Adaptation to European integration in Germany and Spain” Journal of Common Market Studies 37(4): 573–596
  • CLAUDIO M. Radaelli (2003), “The European integration of Public Policy”, In The Politics of European integration, K. Featherstone and C. Radaelli (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press,: 30.
  • COLE, A. (2001), “National and Partisan Contexts of European integration: the case of the French Socialists”, Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 39, No. 1, March, pp. 15–36.
  • DEVUYST, Y. (1999), “The Community Method after Amsterdam”, Journal of Common Market Studies, 37 (1): 109–20.
  • DUINA, Francesco G. (1999), Harmonizing Europe. Nation-States within the Common Market. New York: State University of New York Press.
  • FEATHERSTONE, K. and C. RADAELLI (2003), “The Politics of European integration”, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • GOUREVITCH, P. (1978), “The Second Image Reversed: The International Sources of Domestic Politics”, International Organisation, 32:4, 881– 911.
  • HAAS, E. (1958), “The Uniting of Europe: Political, Social and Economic Forces”, 1950–1957, Stanford, Stanford University Press.
  • HALL, Peter A., and Rosemary C. R. TAYLOR (1996), “Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms” Political Studies 44: 952-973.
  • HANF, K. and B. SOETENDORP (eds), (1997), “Adapting to European Integration: Small States and the European Union”, London and New York, Longman.
  • HÉRITIER, Adrienne, Christoph Knill, and Susanne MINGERS (1996), Ringing the Changes in Europe. Regulatory Competition and the Redefinition of the State: Britain, France, Germany. Berlin, New York: De Gruyter.
  • HÉRITIER, Adrienne (2001), “Differential Europe: National Administrative Responses to Community Policy”, In Transforming Europe. European integration and Domestic Change, edited by Maria Green Cowles, James A. Caporaso and Thomas Risse. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 44–59.
  • HOOGHE, L. and G. MARKS (2001), Multi-level Governance and European Integration, Boulder, Rowman and Littlefield.
  • HOWELL, K. (2003), “The European integration of British Financial Services”, paper presented to the ESRC Seminar Series/UACES Study Group on the European integration of British Politics and Policy-Making, Sheffield, 2nd May.
  • J. CAPORASO Risse, T. and M. COWLES G(2001), “European integration and Domestic Change: Introduction”, in: M. G. Cowles, J. Caporaso, and T. Risse (eds.), Transforming Europe. European integration and Domestic Change (Ithaca, London: Cornell University Press), pp. 1– 20.
  • JONSSON, C., Tagil S. and G. TORNQVIST (2000), Organizing European Space (London:Sage).
  • KASSIM, H., B.G. Peters and V. WRIGHT, (eds), (2000), “The National Co- ordination of EU Policy: The Domestic Level”, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  • KNILL, Christoph, and Dirk LEHMKUHL (1999), “How Europe Matters. Different Mechanisms of European integration”, European Integration on-line Paper 3 (7).
  • KOHLER-KOCH, Beate (1996), “The Strength of Weakness. The Transformation of Governance in the EU”, In The Future of the Nation State. Essays on Cultural Pluralism and Political Integration, edited by Sverker Gustavsson and Leif Lewin. Stockholm: Nerenius & Santerus, 169–210.
  • LADRECH, R. (1994), “European integration of Domestic Politics and Institutions: The Case of France”, Journal of Common Market Studies, 32:1, 69–88.
  • MARCH, James G., and Johan P. OLSEN (1995), “Democratic Governance”, New York: The Free Press.
  • MORAVCSIK, A. (1998), “The Choice for Europe: Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht”, Ithaca, New York, Cornell University Press.
  • MORAVCSIK, A. (1994), “Why the European Community Strengthens the State: Domestic Politics and International Cooperation”, Center for European Studies Working Paper 52, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University.
  • OLSEN, J. (2002), “The Many Faces of European integration”, Journal of Common Market Studies, 40:5, 921–952.
  • PUTNAM, R. (1988), “Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: the Logic of Two- level Games”, International Organisation, 42:3, 427–460.
  • RADAELLI C.M. (2000), “Whither European integration? Concept stretching and substantive change”, EIOP WP.
  • SCHARPF, F. (1999), “Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic”, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  • SCHMIDT, V. A. (2002), “The Futures of European Capitalism”, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • SCHMIDT, V. A. (2001), “European integration and the Mechanisms of Economic Policy Adjustments”, European Integration online Papers 5 (6).
  • SMITH, J. (2001), “Cultural Aspects of European integration: The Case of the Scottish Office”, Public Administration, Vol. 79, No. 1, pp. 147-165
  • STONE Sweet, A. and W. SANDHOLTZ (1997), “European Integration and Supranational Governance”, Journal of European Public Policy, 4:3, 297–317.
  • VINK, M. (2003), “What is european integration? and other questions on a new research agenda”, 2003 European Consortium for Political Research.
  • WALLACE, W. (2000), “Collective Governance: The EU Political Process” in H. Wallace and W. Wallace (eds) Policy-Making in the European Union, 4th edition (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press).
  • WARD M. D. and L. HOUSE (1988), “A Theory of the Behavioral Power of Nations”, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 32, 3–36.
Toplam 37 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Diğer ID JA38KC56RB
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

SÜLEYMAN YAMAN Koçak Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 25 Temmuz 2016
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2005 Cilt: 20 Sayı: 1 - Cilt: 20 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA Koçak, S. Y. (2016). AVRUPA ENTEGRASYONU VE YEREL SİSTEMLER ÜZERİNE ETKİSİ: TÜRKİYE BOYUTU. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 20(1), 123-136.
AMA Koçak SY. AVRUPA ENTEGRASYONU VE YEREL SİSTEMLER ÜZERİNE ETKİSİ: TÜRKİYE BOYUTU. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. Temmuz 2016;20(1):123-136.
Chicago Koçak, SÜLEYMAN YAMAN. “AVRUPA ENTEGRASYONU VE YEREL SİSTEMLER ÜZERİNE ETKİSİ: TÜRKİYE BOYUTU”. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 20, sy. 1 (Temmuz 2016): 123-36.
EndNote Koçak SY (01 Temmuz 2016) AVRUPA ENTEGRASYONU VE YEREL SİSTEMLER ÜZERİNE ETKİSİ: TÜRKİYE BOYUTU. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 20 1 123–136.
IEEE S. Y. Koçak, “AVRUPA ENTEGRASYONU VE YEREL SİSTEMLER ÜZERİNE ETKİSİ: TÜRKİYE BOYUTU”, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 20, sy. 1, ss. 123–136, 2016.
ISNAD Koçak, SÜLEYMAN YAMAN. “AVRUPA ENTEGRASYONU VE YEREL SİSTEMLER ÜZERİNE ETKİSİ: TÜRKİYE BOYUTU”. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 20/1 (Temmuz 2016), 123-136.
JAMA Koçak SY. AVRUPA ENTEGRASYONU VE YEREL SİSTEMLER ÜZERİNE ETKİSİ: TÜRKİYE BOYUTU. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. 2016;20:123–136.
MLA Koçak, SÜLEYMAN YAMAN. “AVRUPA ENTEGRASYONU VE YEREL SİSTEMLER ÜZERİNE ETKİSİ: TÜRKİYE BOYUTU”. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, c. 20, sy. 1, 2016, ss. 123-36.
Vancouver Koçak SY. AVRUPA ENTEGRASYONU VE YEREL SİSTEMLER ÜZERİNE ETKİSİ: TÜRKİYE BOYUTU. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi. 2016;20(1):123-36.