Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

The effect of ultrasound-guided suction curettage on reproductive outcomes in patients with cesarean scar pregnancy

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 48 Sayı: 2, 244 - 252, 01.06.2021
https://doi.org/10.5798/dicletip.944332

Öz

Kaynakça

  • 1.Graesslin O, Dedecker F, Quereux C, et al.Conservative treatment of ectopic pregnancy in acesarean scar Obstetrics & Gynecology 2005; 105:869-71.
  • 2.Wang S, Li Y, Ma X. Lower uterine segmentthickness in assessing whether cesarean scarpregnancy patients could be treated with suctioncurettage. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018.https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2018.1531118.
  • 3.Jurkovic D, Hillaby K, Woelfer B, et al. First‐trimester diagnosis and management of pregnanciesimplanted into the lower uterine segment cesareansection scar Ultrasound

The effect of ultrasound-guided suction curettage on reproductive outcomes in patients with cesarean scar pregnancy

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 48 Sayı: 2, 244 - 252, 01.06.2021
https://doi.org/10.5798/dicletip.944332

Öz

Objective: This study aims to evaluate reproductive and pregnancy outcomes in patients with cesarean scar pregnancies (CSP) treated by suction curettage.
Methods: This retrospective observational study included 85 patients with CSP treated by suction curettage in a university hospital between 2013-2017. Reproductive status of the patients who could be reached by phone was inquired at 6-month intervals for three years.
Results: Hospital records and telephone follow-up data of the 44 patients who completed follow-up were analyzed. Nineteen patients did not desire pregnancy, while 25 patients reported wishing to conceive again. Twenty-three of these patients (92%, 23/25) conceived spontaneously, 2 of them (8%, 2/25) unable to conceive due to unexplained secondary infertility. Mean length of time from CSP to subsequent pregnancy was 12.3 months (range 2-36 months). Of these pregnancies, 11 (47.8%, 11/23) resulted in birth without any obstetrical problems. Six patients (26%, 6/23) experienced miscarriage, and three patients (13%, 3/23) recurrent cesarean scar pregnancies. Two patients (8.6%, 2/23) had abnormal placental invasion and one patient (4.3%, 1/23) tubal ectopic pregnancy. The live birth rate among the pregnancies was 52.1% (12/23).
Conclusion: There is no consensus on the primary treatment regarding the reproductive outcomes. Suction curettage is a successful, reliable, inexpensive and easily applicable treatment when appropriate patients are selected. Furthermore, it has a minimal negative effect on fertility, so it can be considered as a first-line treatment option in patients who wish to have children in the future.

Kaynakça

  • 1.Graesslin O, Dedecker F, Quereux C, et al.Conservative treatment of ectopic pregnancy in acesarean scar Obstetrics & Gynecology 2005; 105:869-71.
  • 2.Wang S, Li Y, Ma X. Lower uterine segmentthickness in assessing whether cesarean scarpregnancy patients could be treated with suctioncurettage. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018.https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2018.1531118.
  • 3.Jurkovic D, Hillaby K, Woelfer B, et al. First‐trimester diagnosis and management of pregnanciesimplanted into the lower uterine segment cesareansection scar Ultrasound
Toplam 3 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil İngilizce
Konular Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi
Bölüm Original Articles
Yazarlar

Seyhun Sucu Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Haziran 2021
Gönderilme Tarihi 22 Kasım 2020
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2021 Cilt: 48 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA Sucu, S. (2021). The effect of ultrasound-guided suction curettage on reproductive outcomes in patients with cesarean scar pregnancy. Dicle Medical Journal, 48(2), 244-252. https://doi.org/10.5798/dicletip.944332
AMA Sucu S. The effect of ultrasound-guided suction curettage on reproductive outcomes in patients with cesarean scar pregnancy. diclemedj. Haziran 2021;48(2):244-252. doi:10.5798/dicletip.944332
Chicago Sucu, Seyhun. “The Effect of Ultrasound-Guided Suction Curettage on Reproductive Outcomes in Patients With Cesarean Scar Pregnancy”. Dicle Medical Journal 48, sy. 2 (Haziran 2021): 244-52. https://doi.org/10.5798/dicletip.944332.
EndNote Sucu S (01 Haziran 2021) The effect of ultrasound-guided suction curettage on reproductive outcomes in patients with cesarean scar pregnancy. Dicle Medical Journal 48 2 244–252.
IEEE S. Sucu, “The effect of ultrasound-guided suction curettage on reproductive outcomes in patients with cesarean scar pregnancy”, diclemedj, c. 48, sy. 2, ss. 244–252, 2021, doi: 10.5798/dicletip.944332.
ISNAD Sucu, Seyhun. “The Effect of Ultrasound-Guided Suction Curettage on Reproductive Outcomes in Patients With Cesarean Scar Pregnancy”. Dicle Medical Journal 48/2 (Haziran 2021), 244-252. https://doi.org/10.5798/dicletip.944332.
JAMA Sucu S. The effect of ultrasound-guided suction curettage on reproductive outcomes in patients with cesarean scar pregnancy. diclemedj. 2021;48:244–252.
MLA Sucu, Seyhun. “The Effect of Ultrasound-Guided Suction Curettage on Reproductive Outcomes in Patients With Cesarean Scar Pregnancy”. Dicle Medical Journal, c. 48, sy. 2, 2021, ss. 244-52, doi:10.5798/dicletip.944332.
Vancouver Sucu S. The effect of ultrasound-guided suction curettage on reproductive outcomes in patients with cesarean scar pregnancy. diclemedj. 2021;48(2):244-52.