LONG NARRATIVE POETRY AS A LYRIC AND NARRATIVE HYBRID FORM: A STYLISTIC ANALYSIS OF DAVID JONES' IN PARENTHESIS

Abstract

This study presents a stylistic analysis of David Jones' long narrative poem In Parenthesis in order to find out and discuss the prominent stylistic features that contribute to the hybrid nature of the poem. In Parenthesis embodies the stylistic features associated with lyric, narrative and drama. Stylistic reading of the poem proposes that the generic hybridity of the poem is supported by the style variations, graphological deviations and other internal deviations that foreground the generic and stylistic varieties in the text. Stylistic analysis of the poem is important so as to define the long narrative poetry as a hybrid form.

Keywords

• In Parenthesis,David Jones,Long Narrative Poem,Stylistics,Stylistic Analysis

LONG NARRATIVE POETRY AS A LYRIC AND NARRATIVE HYBRID FORM: A STYLISTIC ANALYSIS OF DAVID JONES' IN PARENTHESIS

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı David Jones'un In Parenthesis adlı şiirinin biçemsel bir incelemesini yaparak şiirin melez yapısına katkıda bulunan önemli biçemsel öğeleri bulmak ve tartışmaktır. In Parenthesis, lirik şiir, anlatı türleri ve oyun türlerine özgü biçemsel özellikler göstermektedir. Şiirin biçemsel incelemesi göstermiştir ki metin içindeki biçemsel değişkenler, grafolojik sapmalar ve diğer metin içi sapmalar şiirdeki biçemsel melezliğe katkıda bulunmaktadır.Şiirin biçemsel incelemesi uzun anlatı şiirinin melez bir tür olarak tanımının yapılması için önem arz etmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• In Parenthesis,David Jones,Uzun Anlatı Şiiri,Biçembilim,Biçemsel Analiz

Kaynakça

1. Revelation 5:6. Bible Study Tools. Retrieved 18 August 2018 from www.biblestudytools.com/revelation/5-6.html.
2. Abrams, M. H. (1999). A Glossary of Literary Terms (7th ed.). United States of America: Heinle & Heinle.
3. Addison, C. (2009). The Verse Novel as Genre: Contradiction of Hybrid?. Style, 43(4), 539-562. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5325/style.43.4.539.
4. Eaves, C. (1984). The Significance of ‘Y Goddodin’ to David Jones’s ‘In Parenthesis’. Ariel: A Review of International English Literature, 15(3), 51-59. https://journalhousting.ucalgary.ca/index.php./ariel/article/view/32782/26833.
5. Gemmill, J. P. (1971). ‘In Parenthesis’: A Study of Narrative Technique. Journal of Modern Literature, 1(3), 311-328. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3831056.
6. Herman, D. (Ed.). (2010). Routledge Encyclopedia of Narrative Theory. New York and London: Routledge.
7. Jones, D. (2003). In Parenthesis. New York: The New York Review of Books.
8. Leech, G. and Short M. (1994). Style in Fiction. London: Longman Inc.

9. Lonoff, S. (1982). Multiple Narratives & Relative Truths: A Study of The Ring and the Book, The Women in White, and ‘The Moonstone. Browning Institute Studies, 10, 143-161. https://www.jstor.org/stable/25057725.
10. McHale, B. (2010). Affordances of form in stanzaic narrative poetry. Literator, 31(3), 49-60. doi:10.4102/lit.v31i3.57.
11. Morgan, M. R. (2003). Productive Convergences, Producing Converts. Victorian Poetry, 41(4), 500-504. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40007022.
12. Murphy, P. D. (1989). The Verse Novel: The Modern American Poetic Genre. College English, 51(1), 57-72. https:// www.jstor.org/stable/378185.
13. Palmer, A. and Minogue, S. (2015). Modernism and First World War Poetry: Alternative Lines. In Alex Davis and Lee M. Jenkins (eds) A History of Modernist Poetry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 227-251.
14. Short, M. (1996). Exploring the Language of Poems, Play and Prose. Pearson Education Limited.
15. Tasker, M. (1996). Time, Tense, and Genre: A Bakhtinian Analysis of Clough’s ‘Bothie’. Victorian Poetry, 34(2), 193-211. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40002911.