MAX WEBER ON POLITICS, REASON, AND THE CLASH OF VALUES AND APPROACHES TO ETHICS

Öz

This article investigates how Max Weber’s theory of value conflict is connected to his realist understanding of politics and how he conceives the relation of politics and ethics. This investigation also covers Weber’s views on the argumentative limits of the social sciences and ethics. The center of Weber’s philosophy of science is constituted by his methodological thoughts on “ethical neutrality” (Wertfreiheit) of the social sciences. The first thesis of this paper contends that Weber’s theory of a clash of irreconcilable values and ideals goes back to Nietzsche. According to the second thesis of the article, the general claim of Weber’s philosophy of science is that there is no possibility of an ultimate rational, philosophical, or scientific grounding of values and normative theories. Weber’s endorsement of an ethics of responsibility in the field of politics led to the criticism that he contradicts his postulate of the “ethical neutrality” (Wertfreiheit) of the scientist. The third thesis of the paper claims that Weber’s arguments for a political ethics of responsibility are compatible with his methodological postulate.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Max Weber
• Politics
• Rationality
• Ethics
• Clash of Values
• Political Realism
• Ethical Neutrality

Kaynakça

1. Anscombe, G.E.M. “Modern Moral Philosophy.” Philosophy 33 / 124 (January 1958): 1–19.
2. Berg-Schlosser, Dirk, and Theo Stammen. Einführung in die Politikwissenschaft. München: Beck, 1995.
3. Berlin, Isaiah. “The Originality of Machiavelli” (first published 1972). Isaiah Berlin, Against the Current. Essays in the History of Ideas, ed. Henry Hardy. 2nd. edition, 33–100. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2013 (original 1979).
4. Bienfait, Agathe. Freiheit, Verantwortung, Solidarität. Zur Rekonstruktion des politischen Liberalismus. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1999.
5. Birnbacher, Dieter. Analytische Einführung in die Ethik. Berlin / New York: De Gruyter, 2003.
6. Broad, C.D. Five Types of Ethical Theory. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co., Ltd., 1930.
7. Bruun, Hans Henrik. Science, Values and Politics in Max Weber’s Methodology. New Expanded Edition. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2007.
8. Frankel, Benjamin, ed. The Roots of Realism. London/Portland: Routledge, 1996.

9. Gerner, Andrea. Wissenschaft und Leben. Max Webers Antwort auf eine Frage Friedrich Nietzsches. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1994.
10. Gölz, Walter. Begründungsprobleme der praktischen Philosophie. Stuttgart/Bad Cannstadt: Fromann-Holzboog, 1978.
11. Hennis, Wilhelm. “Die Spuren Nietzsches im Werk Max Webers.” Max Webers Fragestellung. Studien zur Biographie des Werkes, ed. Wilhelm Hennis, 167-91. Tübingen: Mohr / Siebeck, 1987.
12. Knoll, Manuel. “Nietzsches Kritik am Willen zum Wissen und die intellektuelle Tugend der Redlichkeit.” Nietzsches Wissenschaftsphilosophie. Hintergründe, Wirkungen und Aktualität, eds. Günther Abel, Marco Brusotti, and Helmut Heit, 257-70. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter, 2012.
13. ---. “Max Webers Machiavelli-Rezeption. Die Konsequenzen des politischen Realismus für das Verhältnis von Ethik und Politik.“ Der Machtstaat. Niccolò Machiavelli als Theoretiker der Macht im Spiegel der Zeit, eds. Volker Reinhardt, Rüdiger Voigt, and Stefano Saracino, 241-67. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2015.
14. ---. “Deep Disagreements on Social and Political Justice: Their Meta-Ethical Relevance and the Need for a New Research Perspective.” New Perspectives on Distributive Justice. Deep Disagreements, Pluralism, and the Problem of Consensus, ed. Manuel Knoll, Stephen Snyder, and Nurdane Şimşek, 23-51. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter, 2019.
15. ---. “Machiavelli’s Consequentialist Ethics of Responsibility.” History of Political Thought 40 (2019/4): 631-48.
16. Mann, Michael. The Sources of Social Power, Vol. II: The rise of classes and nation-states, 1760–1914. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.
17. Nietzsche, Friedrich. Beyond Good and Evil. Trans. W. Kaufmann. New York: Vintage Books, 1989 (original 1966).
18. ---. The Gay Science. Trans. J. Nauckhoff. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
19. ---. On the Genealogy of Morality. Trans. C. Diethe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
20. ---. Thus Spoke Zarathustra. Trans. A. del Caro. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
21. ---. “Twighlight of the Idols.” Friedrich Nietzsche, The Antichrist, Ecce Homo, Twighlight of the Idols, and other Writing. Trans. J. Norman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
22. Palonen, Kari. Eine Lobrede für Politik. Ein Kommentar zu Max Webers “Politik als Beruf.” Opladen: Leske & Buderich, 2002.
23. Peukert, Detlev. Max Webers Diagnose der Moderne. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1989.
24. Radbruch, Gustav. “Anglo-American Jurisprudence Through Continental Eyes.” Law Quarterly Review 208 (1936): 530-45.
25. Radbruch, Gustav. Einführung in die Rechtswissenschaft. 2nd. Edition. Leipzig: Quelle & Meyer, 1913 (original 1910).
26. Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1971.
27. ---. “Kantian Constructivism in Moral Theory: The Dewey Lectures 1980,” The Journal of Philosophy 77 (1980): 515-72.
28. ---. “Justice as Fairness: Political not Metaphysical.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 14 (1984): 223-51.
29. ---. Political Liberalism. Expanded edition. New York: Columbia University Press, 2005.
30. Schluchter, Wolfgang. Religion und Lebensführung, Bd. 1: Studien zu Max Webers Kultur- und Werttheorie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1988.
31. Schwaabe, Christian, Freiheit und Vernunft in der unversöhnten Moderne. Max Webers kritischer Dezisionismus als Herausforderung des politischen Liberalismus. München: Fink, 2002.
32. Schwaabe, Christian. “Das Schicksal des Menschen im Schatten des toten Gottes. Zur Bedeutung Friedrich Nietzsches für Max Webers Diagnose der Moderne.” Der Wille zur Macht und die “große Politik” – Friedrich Nietzsches Staatsverständnis, ed. Hans-Martin Schönherr-Mann, 235-57. Baden Baden: Nomos, 2010.
33. Shaw, Tamsin. “The ‘Last Man’ Problem: Nietzsche and Weber on Political Attitudes to Suffering.” Nietzsche as Political Philosopher, ed. Manuel Knoll and Barry Stocker, 345-80. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter, 2014.
34. Turner, Stephen P., and Factor, Regis A. Max Weber and the Dispute over Reason and Value: A Study in Philosophy, Ethics, and Politics. London: Routledge, 1984.
35. Waldron, Jeremy. Law and Disagreement. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.
36. Waas, Lothar. Max Weber und die Folgen. Die Krise der Moderne und der moralisch-politische Dualismus des 20. Jahrhunderts. Frankfurt am Main / New York: Campus, 1995.
37. Weber, Marianna. Max Weber. Ein Lebensbild. München/Zürich: Pieper, 1989 (original 1926).
38. Weber, Max. “The Meaning of ‘Ethical Neutrality’ in Sociology and Economics.” Max Weber, The Methodology of the Social Sciences, trans. and eds. Edward Shills and Henry Finch, 1-47. Illinois: The Free Press of Glencoe, 1949.
39. ---. “‘Objectivity’ in Social Science and Social Policy.” Max Weber, The Methodology of the Social Sciences, trans. and eds. by Edward Shills and Henry Finch, 50-112. Illinois: The Free Press of Glencoe, 1949.
40. ---. Gesammelte Politische Schriften, ed. Johannes Winckelmann. UTB für Wissenschaft, and Uni-Taschenbücher 1491; Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr / PaulSiebeck, 1988, 5th ed.
41. ---. “Parliament and Government in Germany under a New Political Order.” Weber. Political Writings, eds. Peter Lassmann and Ronald Speirs, 130-271. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
42. ---. “The Profession and Vocation of Politics.” Weber. Political Writings, eds. Peter Lassmann and Ronald Speirs, 309-69. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
43. ---. “Science as Vocation.” From Max Weber. Essays in Sociology, trans. and eds. H.H. Gerth and C. Wright Mills, 129-56. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1946.
44. ---. “On the Situation of Constitutional Democracy in Russia.” Weber. Political Writings, eds. Peter Lassmann and Ronald Speirs, 29-74. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
45. ---. “The Social Psychology of the World Religions.” From Max Weber. Essays in Sociology, trans. and eds. H.H. Gerth and C. Wright Mills, 267-301. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1946.
46. Westphal, Kenneth R. “Cosmopolitanism without Commensurability: Why Incommensurable Values are Worthless.” Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik 27 (2019); Gedächtnisschrift für Joachim Hruschka (forthcoming, †10.12.2017).