A Critical Review of Secularization Debates: Bringing in the Question of Human Agency and Social Movement Dynamics

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 27 Sayı: 52, 127 - 168, 27.08.2022

Zubeyir Nişancı

Öz

This paper critically and comparatively reviews the basic assumptions of two most prominent secularization theories such as the secularization theory and the rational choice theory. Not denying practical values of their conceptual tools, this paper argues that these two theories fell short of providing (1) theoretically and methodologically well-grounded articulations (definitions) of religion and secularity and (2) systematic accounts of the role of social forces (collective action) primarily including social movement dynamics in their sociological studies of secularization. In order to address such limitations in the study of secularization, proposes a new frameworks which combines two alternative perspectives presented by Christian Smith and Charles Taylor. Consequently, this paper argues that (1) secularization should be studied with reference to human agency and collective action, in other words, with regard to social movement dynamics and (2) that we need substantive definitions for the systematic study of secularism and religion which inquire into the philosophical dimensions of the two sides (secular and religious).

Anahtar Kelimeler

Secularization, Secularization, Secularization Theory, Rational Choice Theory, Religious Movements, Revivalism

Kaynakça

• Bainbridge, W. S. (1997). The sociology of religious movements. London: Psychology Press.
• Becker, G. S. (1976). The economic approach to human behavior. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
• Berger, P. L. (1967). The sacred canopy: Elements of a sociological theory of religion. New York: Anchor.
• Berger, P. (2006). The desecularization of the world: resurgent religion and world politics. Washington, D.C: Ethics and Public Policy Center.
• Berkes, N. (1964). The development of secularism in Turkey. Montreal: McGill University Press.
• Beyerlein, K. (2003). Educational elites and the movement to secularize public education: the case of the national education association. In, C. Smith (Ed.), The secular revolution, (pp. 160-196).Berkeley: CA: University of California Press.
• Bruce, S. (Ed.). (1992). Religion and modernization: sociologists and historians debate the secularization thesis. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
• Bruce, S. (1999). Choice and religion: A Critique of rational choice theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Bruce, S. (2002). God is dead: secularization in the West. Oxford: Blackwell.
• Bruce, S. (2013). Secularization: In defense of an unfashionable theory (Reprint edition.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Carroll, A. (2011) Disenchantment, rationality, and the modernity of Max Weber. Forum Philosophicum, 16 (1), 117-137.
• Casanova, J. (1994). Public religions in the modern world. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press.
• Casanova, J. (2011). The secular, secularizations, secularizms. In C. Calhoun & M. Juergensmeyer (Eds.), Rethinking secularism. Oxford: Oxford University Press
• Chaves, M. (1994). Secularization as declining religious authority. Social Forces, 72(3), 49-774.
• Chaves, M. and Cann, D. E. (1992). Regulation, pluralism and religious market structure. Rationality and Society, 4, 272–90.
• Collins, R. (1998). The sociology of philosophies: A global theory of intellectual change. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press
• Dobbelaere, K. (1981). Secularization: A multi-dimensional concept. London: Sage.
• Durkheim, É. (1975). On morality and society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Durkheim, É. (1996). The elementary forms of the religious life. New York: Free Press.
• Evans, J. H. (2003). After the fall: Attempts to establish an explicitly theological voice in debates over science and medicine after 1960. In C. Smith (Ed.), The secular revolution, (Pp. 434-462). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
• Fenn, R. K. (1969). Max Weber on the secular: A typology. Review of Religious Research, 10(3), 159–169.
• Finke, R. (1992). An unsecular America. In Bruce, S (Ed.), Religion and modernization, (pp. 145-169). Oxford: Clarendon.
• Finke, R. (1997). The consequences of religious competition: Supply-side explanations for religious change. In L. A. Young (Ed.), Rational choice theory and religion: Summary and assesment (pp. 45-64). New York: Routledge.
• Finke, R. & Iannaccone, L. R. (1993). Supply-side explanations for religious change. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 527, 27-39.
• Finke, R. & Stark, R. (1988). Religious economies and sacred canopies: Religious mobilization in American cities, 1906. American Sociological Review, 53, 41-49. Finke, R. & Stark, R. (1998). Religious choice and competition. American Sociological Review, 63, 761-766.
• Finke, R. & Stark, R. (2002). The churching of America, 1776-1990: winners and losers in our religious economy. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
• Flory, R. W. (2003). Promoting a secular standard: Secularization and modern journalism, 1870–1930.” In C. Smith (Ed.), The secular revolution (Pp. 395-433). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
• Friedman, J. (1996). The rational controversy theory: economic models of politics reconsidered. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
• Garroutte, E. M. (2003). The positivist attack on Baconian Science and religious knowledge in the 1870s. In C. Smith (Ed.), The Secular revolution (Pp. 269-309). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
• Germain, G. G. (1993). A discourse on disenchantment: Reflections on politics and technology. New York: SUNY Press.
• Hadden, J. K. (1987). Toward desacralizing secularization theory. Social Forces, 65, 587-611.
• Hall, B.B. & Bold, F. (1998). Product variety in religious markets, Review of Social Economy, 56(1), 1-19.
• Hamberg, E.M. & Peterson, T. (1994). The religious market: denominational competition and religious participation in contemporary Sweden. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 33, 205-216.
• Hechter, M. & Kanazawa, S. (1997). Sociological rational choice theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 23, 191–214.
• Hout, M, & Greeley, A. M. (1987). The center doesn't hold: Church attendance in the United States, 1940-1984. American Sociological Review, 52, 325-45.
• Iannaccone, L. R. (1997). Rational choice: Framework for the scientific study of religion. In Young, A. Lawrence (Ed.), Rational choice theory's and religion: Summary and assessment (pp. 25-44). New York: Routledge.
• Koenig, M. (2005). Politics and religion in European nation-states: Institutional variations and contemporary transformation. In B. Giesen & D. Suber (Eds.), Religion and politics: cultural perspectives (pp. 291-316). Boston: Brill.
• Lechner, F. J. (1991). The case against secularization: A rebuttal. Social Forces, 69, (4), 1103-1119.
• Loen, A. E. (1967). Secularization - science without God?. (M. Kohl, Trans.) London: SCM-Canterbury Press Ltd.
• Ma'oz, M. (1968). Ottoman reform in Syria and Palestine, 1840-1861: The impact of the Tanzimat on politics and society. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
• Martin, D. (1965). Towards eliminating the concept of secularization. In J. Gould. (Ed.), Penguin survey of the social sciences (pp. 169-182). Baltimore: Penguin.
• Martin, D. (2005). On secularization: Towards a revised general theory. Aldershot (UK): Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.
• Martin, D. A. (1979). A general theory of secularization. New York: Harper Colophon Books.
• Meador, K. G. (2003). “My own salvation”: The Christian century and psychology's secularizing of American Protestantism. In C. Smith (Ed.), The secular revolution (pp. 269-309). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
• Satz, D., & Ferejohn, J. (1994). Rational choice and social theory. The Journal of Philosophy, 91(2), 71–87.
• Sherkat, D. E. (1997). Preferences and social constraints into rational choice theories of religious behavior. In L. A. Young (Ed.), Rational choice theory and religion: Summary and Assessment. New York: Routledge.
• Shiner, L. (1967). The concept of secularization in empirical research. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 6, 207–20.
• Sikkink, D. (2003). From Christian civilization to individual civil liberties: Framing religion in the legal field, 1880-1949. In, C. Smith (Ed.), The secular revolution, (pp. 310-354). Berkeley: CA: University of California Press.
• Simpson, J. H. (1990). The Stark-Bainbridge theory of religion. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 29(3), 367-371.
• Smith, C. (Ed.). (2003). The secular revolution: Power, interests, and conflict in the secularization of American public life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Stark, R. (1997) Bringing theory back in. In L. A. Young (Ed.), Rational choice theory and religion (pp. 3-23). New York: Routledge.
• Stark, R. (1999). Secularization, R.I.P. Sociology of Religion, 60(3), 249–273.
• Stark, R., & Bainbridge, W. S. (1985). The future of religion: Secularization, revival, and cult formation. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
• Stark, R., & Bainbridge, W. S. (1996). A theory of religion. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
• Stark, R., & Finke, R. (2000). Acts of faith: Explaining the human side of religion. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
• Swedberg, R. (1990). Economics and Sociology. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
• Taylor, C. (1992). Sources of the self: The making of the modern identity. Boston: Harvard University Press.
• Taylor, C. (2007). A secular age). Boston: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
• Taylor, C., (2003). Closed world structures. In M. A. Wrathall (Ed.), Religion after Metaphysics (47-68). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Thomas, G. M., Peck, L. R. & De Haan, C. G. (2003). Reforming education, transforming religion, 1876–1931. In, C. Smith (Ed.), The secular revolution (pp. 355-394). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
• Volpi, F. (2010) Political Islam observed. New York: Columbia University Press.
• Wallace, A. F. C. (1966). Religion: An anthropological view. New York: Random House.
• Wallis, R., & Bruce, S. (1992). Secularization: The orthodox model. In S. Bruce (Ed.), Religion and modernization: Sociologists and historians debate the secularization thesis (pp.8-30). Oxford: Clarendon Press).
• Warner, R. S. (1993). Work in progress toward a new paradigm for the sociological study of religion in the United States. American Journal of Sociology, 98(5), 1044–1093.
• Weber, M. (2012). The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. Charleston, SC: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.
• Weber, M., Parsons, T., & Swidler, A. (1993). The sociology of religion. Boston: Beacon Press.
• Weiker, W. F. (1968). The Ottoman bureaucracy: Modernization and reform. Administrative Science Quarterly, 13(3), 451–470.
• Wilson, B. (1982) Religion in sociological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Wilson, B. R. (1969). Religion in secular society. New York: Penguin Books Ltd.
• Zafirovski, M. (2010). The enlightenment and its effects on modern society. New York: Springer.