FACTORS AFFECTING SUCCESS OF MINI SCREW APPLICATIONS IN ORTHODONTICS

Öz

    Miniscrews are skeletal temporal anchoring devices which are widely used in orthodontic treatment and facilitate the work of orthodontics. These devices must be placed in the correct anatomical areas with appropriate angle and placement techniques to be successful during the use. However, problems such as loosening of the miniscrews and mucosal tissue infection at the site of implantation occur. Therefore, clinical success indicators of miniscrews are needed. This article provides information on the factors that influence the success of the miniscrew.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• miniscrew,orthodontics,success factors

ORTODONTİDE MİNİ VİDA UYGULAMALARININ BAŞARISINI ETKİLEYEN FAKTÖRLER

Öz

    Mini vidalar ortodontik tedavide yaygın kullanım alanı bulan ve ortodontistlerin işini kolaylaştıran iskeletsel geçici ankraj cihazlarıdır. Bu cihazların kullanımı süresince başarılı olabilmesi için uygun açı ve yerleştirme teknikleriyle doğru anatomik bölgelere yerleştirilmesi gerekir. Bununla birlikte mini vidaların gevşemesi, yerleştirildiği bölgede mukozal doku enfeksiyonu gibi problemler de meydana gelmektedir. Bu yüzden mini vidaların klinik başarı göstergelerine ihtiyaç duyulmaktadır. Bu makale mini vida başarısı üzerinde etkili olan faktörler hakkında bilgiler sunmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• başarı faktörleri,mini vida,ortodonti

Kaynakça

1. 1. Cousley R. The orthodontic mini-implant clinical handbook: Wiley; 2013.
2. 2. Reynders R, Ronchi L, Bipat S. Mini-implants in orthodontics: a systematic review of the literature. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2009;135(5):564. e1-. e19.
3. 3. Manni A, Cozzani M, Tamborrino F, De Rinaldis S, Menini A. Factors influencing the stability of miniscrews. A retrospective study on 300 miniscrews. Eur J Orthod. 2011;33(4):388-95.
4. 4. Suzuki EY, Suzuki B. Placement and removal torque values of orthodontic miniscrew implants. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011;139(5):669-78.
5. 5. Alharbi F, Almuzian M, Bearn D. Miniscrews failure rate in orthodontics: systematic review and meta-analysis. European journal of orthodontics. 2018;40(5):519-30.
6. 6. Cheng SJ, Tseng IY, Lee JJ, Kok SH. A prospective study of the risk factors associated with failure of mini-implants used for orthodontic anchorage. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19(1):100-6.
7. 7. Fritz U, Ehmer A, Diedrich P. Clinical suitability of titanium microscrews for orthodontic anchorage-preliminary experiences. J Orofac Orthop. 2004;65(5):410-8.
8. 8. Kim YH, Yang SM, Kim S, Lee JY, Kim KE, Gianelly AA, et al. Midpalatal miniscrews for orthodontic anchorage: factors affecting clinical success. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010;137(1):66-72.

9. 9. Moon CH, Park HK, Nam JS, Im JS, Baek SH. Relationship between vertical skeletal pattern and success rate of orthodontic mini-implants. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010;138(1):51-7.
10. 10. Miyawaki S, Koyama I, Inoue M, Mishima K, Sugahara T, Takano-Yamamoto T. Factors associated with the stability of titanium screws placed in the posterior region for orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003;124(4):373-8.
11. 11. Kuroda S, Tanaka E. Risks and complications of miniscrew anchorage in clinical orthodontics. Japanese Dental Science Review. 2014;50(4):79-85.
12. 12. Lemieux G, Hart A, Cheretakis C, Goodmurphy C, Trexler S, McGary C, et al. Computed tomographic characterization of mini-implant placement pattern and maximum anchorage force in human cadavers. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011;140(3):356-65.
13. 13. Baumgaertel S, Hans MG. Buccal cortical bone thickness for mini-implant placement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;136(2):230-5.
14. 14. Farnsworth D, Rossouw PE, Ceen RF, Buschang PH. Cortical bone thickness at common miniscrew implant placement sites. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011;139(4):495-503.
15. 15. Ono A, Motoyoshi M, Shimizu N. Cortical bone thickness in the buccal posterior region for orthodontic mini-implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;37(4):334-40.
16. 16. Silvestrini Biavati A, Tecco S, Migliorati M, Festa F, Marzo G, Gherlone E, et al. Three‐dimensional tomographic mapping related to primary stability and structural miniscrew characteristics. Orthodontics & craniofacial research. 2011;14(2):88-99.
17. 17. Motoyoshi M, Matsuoka M, Shimizu N. Application of orthodontic mini-implants in adolescents. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;36(8):695-9.
18. 18. Marquezan M, Lau TC, Mattos CT, Cunha AC, Nojima LI, Sant'Anna EF, et al. Bone mineral density. Angle Orthod. 2012;82(1):62-6.
19. 19. Bra-nemark P-I, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T, Rosen HM. Tissue-integrated prostheses. osseointegration in clinical dentistry. LWW; 1986.
20. 20. Kinner FSK, Schlegel KD. The anatomic basis for palatal implants in orthodontics. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg. 2002;17:133-9.
21. 21. Misch CE. Contemporary implant dentistry. Implant Dentistry. 1999;8(1):90.
22. 22. Kravitz ND, Kusnoto B. Risks and complications of orthodontic miniscrews. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2007;131(4):S43-S51.
23. 23. Suarez D. Miniscrews and the orthodontist: should they be used. ConnventioNNews Spring. 2005.
24. 24. Hutton JE, Heath MR, Chai JY, Harnett J, Jemt T, Johns RB, et al. Factors related to success and failure rates at 3-year follow-up in a multicenter study of overdentures supported by Brånemark implants. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants. 1995;10(1).
25. 25. Kim K-D, Yu W-J, Park H-S, Kyung H-M, Kwon O-W. Optimization of orthodontic microimplant thread design. Korean Journal of Orthodontics. 2011;41(1):25-35.
26. 26. Ludwig B, Glasl B, Kinzinger GS, Lietz T, Lisson JA. Anatomical guidelines for miniscrew insertion: Vestibular interradicular sites. J Clin Orthod. 2011;45(3):165-73.
27. 27. Park HS, Jeong SH, Kwon OW. Factors affecting the clinical success of screw implants used as orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006;130(1):18-25.
28. 28. Wu T-Y, Kuang S-H, Wu C-H. Factors associated with the stability of mini-implants for orthodontic anchorage: a study of 414 samples in Taiwan. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2009;67(8):1595-9.
29. 29. Cousley RR. A clinical strategy for maxillary molar intrusion using orthodontic mini‐implants and a customized palatal arch. Journal of orthodontics. 2010;37(3):202-8.
30. 30. Chen YJ, Chang HH, Huang CY, Hung HC, Lai EHH, Yao CCJ. A retrospective analysis of the failure rate of three different orthodontic skeletal anchorage systems. Clinical oral implants research. 2007;18(6):768-75.
31. 31. Bayat E, Bauss O. Effect of smoking on the failure rates of orthodontic miniscrews. Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics/Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie. 2010;71(2):117-24.
32. 32. Song YY, Cha JY, Hwang CJ. Mechanical characteristics of various orthodontic mini-screws in relation to artificial cortical bone thickness. Angle Orthod. 2007;77(6):979-85.
33. 33. Cha JY, Takano-Yamamoto T, Hwang CJ. The effect of miniscrew taper morphology on insertion and removal torque in dogs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010;25(4):777-83.
34. 34. Holm L, Cunningham SJ, Petrie A, Cousley RR. An in vitro study of factors affecting the primary stability of orthodontic mini-implants. Angle Orthod. 2012;82(6):1022-8.
35. 35. Büchter A, Wiechmann D, Koerdt S, Wiesmann HP, Piffko J, Meyer U. Load‐related implant reaction of mini‐implants used for orthodontic anchorage. Clinical oral implants research. 2005;16(4):473-9.
36. 36. Gracco A, Cirignaco A, Cozzani M, Boccaccio A, Pappalettere C, Vitale G. Numerical/experimental analysis of the stress field around miniscrews for orthodontic anchorage. The European Journal of Orthodontics. 2008;31(1):12-20.
37. 37. Becker A, Chaushu S. Success rate and duration of orthodontic treatment for adult patients with palatally impacted maxillary canines. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003;124(5):509-14.
38. 38. Turkoz C, Atac MS, Tuncer C, Balos Tuncer B, Kaan E. The effect of drill-free and drilling methods on the stability of mini-implants under early orthodontic loading in adolescent patients. Eur J Orthod. 2011;33(5):533-6.
39. 39. Sung J-H, Kyung H-M, Seong-Min B, McNamara JA. Microimplants in orthodontics: Dentos Korea; 2006.
40. 40. Chen Y, Kyung HM, Zhao WT, Yu WJ. Critical factors for the success of orthodontic mini-implants: a systematic review. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2009;135(3):284-91.
41. 41. Wilmes B, Su YY, Drescher D. Insertion angle impact on primary stability of orthodontic mini-implants. Angle Orthod. 2008;78(6):1065-70.
42. 42. Inaba M. Evaluation of primary stability of inclined orthodontic mini-implants. J Oral Sci. 2009;51(3):347-53.
43. 43. Chen Y, Shin HI, Kyung HM. Biomechanical and histological comparison of self-drilling and self-tapping orthodontic microimplants in dogs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;133(1):44-50.
44. 44. Lee YK, Kim JW, Baek SH, Kim TW, Chang YI. Root and bone response to the proximity of a mini-implant under orthodontic loading. Angle Orthod. 2010;80(3):452-8.
45. 45. Chen YH, Chang HH, Chen YJ, Lee D, Chiang HH, Yao CC. Root contact during insertion of miniscrews for orthodontic anchorage increases the failure rate: an animal study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008;19(1):99-106.
46. 46. Wei X, Zhao L, Xu Z, Tang T, Zhao Z. Effects of cortical bone thickness at different healing times on microscrew stability. Angle Orthod. 2011;81(5):760-6.