Diş Hekimliğinde Polietereterketon (Peek)

Öz

Polyetheretherketone (Peek) in Dentistry

Öz

İnorganik malzemeler ile takviye edilmiş PEEK potansiyel olarak kuron ve köprü malzemesi olarak kullanılabilir (26). Diş Hekimliğinde; implant ve abutment, implant destekli protezlerde bar, sabit protezlerde alt yapı, parsiyel hareketli protezler uygulamalarında ana bağlayıcı, hassas tutucu, kroşe ve diğer parçaların elde edilmesinde kullanılmaktadır . Cekic-Nagas ve ark. 54 farklı inley materyallerinin kırılma dayanımını değerlendirdikleri çalışmada; fiberle güçlendirmenin köprülerin kırılma dayanımını arttırdığı ve CAD-CAM fiber blok ile PEEK materyalinden yapılan inley tutuculu köprülerin yüksek kırılma dayanımı değerleri sergilediği görülmüştür. Ayrıca PEEK materyalinin oklüzal splint uygulamalarında alternatif bir terapötik seçenek olarak kullanılabileceği yapılan çalışmalarda gösterilmiştir

Anahtar Kelimeler

• polietereterketon
• implant
• protetik restorasyon

Kaynakça

1. KAYNAKLAR 1. Chen F, Ou H, Lu B, Long H. A constitutive model of polyether-ether-ketone (PEEK). J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2016; 53:427–433
2. 2. Tekin S, Cangül S, Adıgüzel Ö, Değer Y. Areas for use of PEEK material in dentistry. Int Dent Res 2018;8(2):84-92
3. 3. Kalaycı E, Avinç O, Yavaş A. Poli Eter Eter Keton (PEEK) Lifleri. Cumhuriyet Üni Fen-Edeb Fak Fen Bilim Derg. 2017;38(2):168–186.
4. 4. Cekic-Nagas I, Egilmez F, Ergun G, Valittu PK, Lassila LVJ. Load-bearing capacity of novel resin-based fixed dental prosthesis materials. Dent Mater J. 2018;37(1): 49-58.
5. 5. R. May, Polyetheretherketones, in: H.F. Mark, N.M. Bikales, C.G. Overberger, G. Menges, J.I. Kroschiwitz (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Polymer Science and Engineering, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1988;313-320
6. 6. Kurz SM, Devine JN. Peek Biomaterials in Trauma, Orthopedic and Spinal İmplants. Biomaterials 2007;28(2):4845-4869
7. 7. Najeeb S, Khurshid Z, Matinlinna JP, Siddiqui F, Nassani MZ, Baroudi K. Nanomodified Peek Dental Implants: Bioactive Composites and Surface Modification—A Review. Int J Dent. 2015; 2015:1-7.
8. 8. Najeeb S, Zafar MS, Khurshid Z, Siddiqui F. Applications of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) in oral implantology and prosthodontics. J Prosthodont Res. 2016 Jan;60(1):12-9.

9. 9. Stawarczyk B, Sener B, Trottmann A, Roos M, ÖZcan M, Hämmerle CH. Discoloration of manually fabricated resinsand industrially fabricated CAD/CAM blocks versusglass–ceramic: effect of storage media, duration, and subsequent polishing. Dent Mater J. 2012: 31, 377-383.
10. 10. Nicholson JW. The Chemistry of Polymers, 5th Edition. The Royal Society of Chemistry. 2017: 18-19
11. 11. Carraher Jr. CE. Carraher's Polymer Chemistry, Ninth Edition CRC Press; 2016; 130,143,665
12. 12. McKeen L. Fluorinated Coatings and Finishes Handbook: The Definitive User's Guide, Second Edition. William Andrew, 2015: 70-130
13. 13. Gao S, Gao S, Xu B, Yu H. Effects of Different pH-Values on the Nanomechanical Surface Properties of PEEK and CFR-PEEK Compared to Dental Resin-Based Materials. Materials. 2015 Jul 27;8(8):4751-67.
14. 14. Mylläri V, Ruoko T, Järvelä P. The effects of UV irradiation to polyetheretherketone fibres – Characterization by different techniques. Polym Degra ad Stab. 2014 Nov;109:278-84.
15. 15. Tekin S, Deger Y, Demirci F. Evaluation of the use of PEEK material in implantsupported fixed restorations by finite element analysis. Niger J Clin Pract 2019; 22(9):1252–1258. 16. Bathala L, Majeti V, Rachuri N, Singh N, Gedela S. The Role of Polyether Ether Ketone (Peek) in Dentistry – A Review. J Med Life. 2019 Jan;12(1):5-9.
16. 17. Ma R, Tang T. Current Strategies to Improve the Bioactivity of PEEK. The Int J Mol Sci. 2014 Mar 28;15(4):5426-45.
17. 18. Heary RF, Parvathreddy N, Sampath S, Agarwal N. Elastic modulus in the selection of interbody implants. J Spine Surg. 2017 Jun;3(2):163-7.
18. 19. Zoidis P, Bakiri E, Papathanasiou I, Zappi A. Modified PEEK as an alternative crown framework material for weak abutment teeth: a case report. Gen Dent. 2017 Sep-Oct;65(5):37-40
19. 20. Costa-Palau S, Torrents-Nicolas J, Brufau-de Barberà M, Cabratosa-Termes J. Use of polyetheretherketone in the fabrication of a maxillary obturator prosthesis: A clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2014 Sep;112(3):680-2.
20. 21. Hahnel S, Wieser A, Lang R, Rosentritt M. Biofilm formation on the surface of modern implant abutment materials. Clin Oral Implants Res 2015 Nov;26(11):1297-301.
21. 22. Stock V, Schmidlin P, Merk S, Wagner C, Roos M, Eichberger M, et al. PEEK Primary Crowns with Cobalt-Chromium, Zirconia and Galvanic Secondary Crowns with Different Tapers—A Comparison of Retention Forces. Materials. 2016 Mar 10;9(3):187.
22. 23. Stawarczyk B, EichbergerR M, Uhrenbacher J, Wimmer T, Edelhoff D, Schmidlin PR. Three-unit reinforced polyetheretherketone composite FDPs: Influence of fabrication method on load-bearing capacity and failure types. Dent Mater J. 2015;34(1):7-12.
23. 24. Zoidis P, Bakiri E, Polyzois G. Using modified polyetheretherketone (PEEK) as an alternative material for endocrown restorations: A short-term clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2017 Mar;117(3):335-9.
24. 25. Williams D. Polyetheretherketone for long-term implantable devices. Med Device Technol. 2008 Jan-Feb;19(1):8, 10-1.
25. 26. Stawarczyk B, Beuer F, Wimmer T, Jahn D, Sener B, Roos M, Schmidlin PR. Polyetheretherketone – A suitable material for fixed dental prostheses J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater s. 2013; 101: 1209–1216.
26. 27. Benli M, Eker Gümüş B, Kahraman Y, Gökçen-Rohlig B, Evlioğlu G, Huck O. Surface roughness and wear behavior of occlusal splint materials made of contemporary and high-performance polymers. Odontology. 2020 Apr;108(2):240-50.
27. 28. Chen F, Gatea S, Ou H, Lu B, Long H. Fracture characteristics of PEEK at various stress triaxialities. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2016 Dec; 64:173-86.
28. 29. Korn P, Elschner C, Schulz M, Range U, Mai R, Scheler U. MRI and dental implantology: Two which do not exclude each other. Biomaterials. 2015 Jun; 53:634-45.
29. 30. Gomes AL, Montero J. Zirconia implant abutments: A review. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2011. doi:10.4317/medoral.16.e50
30. 31. Blatz MB, Bergler M, Holst S, Block MS. Zirconia abutments for single-tooth implants--rationale and clinical guidelines. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;67(11):74-81.
31. 32. AL‐Rabab'ah M, Hamadneh W, Alsalem I, Khraisat A, Abu Karaky A. Use of High Performance Polymers as Dental Implant Abutments and Frameworks: A Case Series Report J Prosthodont. 2019 Apr;28(4):365-72.
32. 33. Patil R. Zirconia versus titanium dental implants: A systematic review. . J Dent Implant. 2015;5(1):39. doi:10.4103/0974-6781.154430
33. 34. Günal B, Ulusoy M, Durmayüksel T, Kurtulmuş YS. Seramik abutmentlerin mekanik, biyolojik ve estetik açıdan değerlendirilmesi. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hek Fak Derg. 2015; 25: 156-148.
34. 35. Bechir ES, Bechir A, Gioga C, Manu R, Burcea A, Dascalu IT. The advantages of BioHPP polymer as superstructure material in oral implantology. MATER PLAS. 2016: 53(3) / 394-8
35. 36. Siewert B, Parra M. A new group of maretial in dentistry. PEEK as a framework material for 12-piece implant-supported bridges. Zahnarztl Implantol. 2013; 29:148-159
36. 37. Schwitalla AD, Abou-Emara M, Lackmann J, Spintig T, Müller W-D. The Application of PEEK in Dental Implant Suprastructures: A Finite Element Analysis. 2nd International PEEK Meeting, Washington, D.C. 2015. April 23-24.
37. 38. Tannous F, Steiner M, Shahin R, Kern M. Retentive forces and fatigue resistance of thermoplastic resin clasps. Dental Mater. 2012; 28:273–8.
38. 39. Zoidis P, Papathanasiou I, Polyzois G. The Use of a Modified Poly-Ether-Ether-Ketone (PEEK) as an Alternative Framework Material for Removable Dental Prostheses. J Prosthodont. 2016;25(7):580-4.
39. 40. Stawarczyk B, Thrun H, Eichberger M, Roos M, Edelhoff D, Schweiger J, et al. Effect of different surface pretreatments and adhesives on the load-bearing capacity of veneered 3-unit PEEK FDPs. J Prosthet Dent. 2015 Nov;114(5):666-73.
40. 41. Karunagaran S, Paprocki GJ, Wicks R, & Markose S. A review of implant abutments-abutment classification to aid prosthetic selection. J Tenn Dent Assoc. 2013;93(2):18-23. 42. Zoidis P, Papathanasiou I. Modified PEEK resin-bonded fixed dental prosthesisas an interim restoration after implant placement. J Prosthet Dent. 2016;116(5):637-641.
41. 43. Rocha RF, Anami LC, Campos TM, Melo RM, Souza RO, Bottino MA. Bonding of the Polymer Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) to Human Dentin: Effect of Surface Treatments. Braz Dent J 2016;27(6):693-9.
42. 44. Heimer S, Schmidlin PR, Roos M, Stawarczyk B. Surface properties of polyetheretherketone after different laboratory and chairside polishing protocols. J Prosthet Dent.2017 Mar;117(3):419-25.
43. 45. Silthampitag P, Chaijareenont P, Tattakorn K, Banjongprasert C, Takahashi H, Arksornnukit M. Effect of surface pretreatments on resin composite bonding to PEEK. Dent Mater J 2016;35(4):668-74.
44. 46. Stawarczyk B, Beuer F, Wimmer T, Jahn D, Sener B, Roos M, et al. Polyetheretherketone-A suitable material for fixed dental prostheses? J Biomed Mater Res-Part B Appl Biomater. 2013 Oct;101(7):1209-16.
45. 47. Zok F, Miserez A. Property maps for abrasion resistance of materials. Acta Mater 2007; 55: 6365–71.
46. 48. Tipton P. High performance polymers -Part one. Private Dentistry. October, 2015:60-65.
47. 49. Magne P. Composite resins and bonded porcelain: the postamalgam era J Calif Dent Assoc. 2006 Feb;34(2):135-47.
48. 50. Alt V, Hannig M, Wöstmann B, Balkenhol M. Fracture strength of temporary fixed partial dentures: CAD/CAM versus directly fabricated restorations. Dent Mater. 2011 Apr;27(4):339-47.
49. 51. Edelhoff D, Beuer F, Schweiger J, Brix O, Stimmelmayr M, Guth JF. CAD/CAM-generated high-density polymer restorations for the pretreatment of complex cases: a case report. Quintessence Int. 2012 Jun;43(6):457-67.
50. 52. Stawarczyk B, Ender A, Trottmann A, Özcan M, Fischer J, Hämmerle CHF. Load-bearing capacity of CAD/CAM milled polymeric three-unit fixed dental prostheses: Effect of aging regimens. Clin Oral Investig 2012 Dec;16(6):1669-77.
51. 53. Carvalho AO, Bruzi G, Giannini M, Magne P. Fatigue resistance of CAD/CAM complete crowns with a simplified cementation process. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2014 Apr;111(4):310-7.
52. 54. Wimmer T, Huffmann AMS, Eichberger M, Schmidlin PR, Stawarczyk B. Twobody wear rate of PEEK, CAD/CAM resin composite and PMMA: Effect of specimen geometries, antagonist materials and test set-up configuration. Dental Materials. 2016 Jun;32(6): e127-e136.
53. 55. Stawarczyk B, Bähr N, Beuer F, Wimmer T, Eichberger M, Gernet W, et al. Influence of plasma pretreatment on shear bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements to polyetheretherketone. Clin Oral Investig. 2014 Jan;18(1):163-70.
54. 56. Taufall S, Eichberger M, Schmidlin PR, Stawarczyk B. Fracture load and failure types of different veneered polyetheretherketone fixed dental prostheses. Clin Oral Investig 2016 Dec;20(9):2493-500.
55. 57. Stawarczyk B, Jordan P, Schmidlin PR, Roos M, Eichberger M, Gernet W, et al. PEEK surface treatment effects on tensile bond strength to veneering resins. J Prosthet Dent. 2014 Nov;112(5):1278-88.
56. 58. Wu X, Liu X, Wei J, Ma J, Deng F, Wei S. Nano-TiO2/PEEK bioactive composite as a bone substitute material: in vitro and in vivo studies. Int J Nanomedicine. 2012;7: 1215-25.
57. 59. Zhao M, Li H, Liu X, Wei J, Ji J, Yang S, et al. Response of Human Osteoblast to n-HA/PEEK--Quantitative Proteomic Study of Bio-effects of Nano- Hydroxyapatite Composite. Sci Rep. 2016 Mar 9;6:22832
58. 60. Ouyang L, Zhao Y, Jin G, Lu T, Li J, Qiao Y, et al. Influence of sulfur content on bone formation and antibacterial ability of sulfonated PEEK. Biomaterials. 2016 Mar; 83:115-26.
59. 61. Schwitalla AD, Bötel F, Zimmermann T, Sütel M, Müller W. The impact of argon/oxygen low-pressure plasma on shear bond strength between a veneering composite and different PEEK materials. Dent Mater. 2017 Sep;33(9):990-4.
60. 62. Çulhaoğlu AK, Özkır SE, Şahin V, Yılmaz B, Kılıçarslan MA. Effect of Various Treatment Modalities on Surface Characteristics and Shear Bond Strengths of Polyetheretherketone‐Based Core Materials. J Prosthodont. 2020 Feb;29(2):136-41.
61. 63. Tsuka H, Morita K, Kato K, Kimura H, Abekura H, Hirata I, et al. Effect of laser groove treatment on shear bond strength of resin-based luting agent to polyetheretherketone (PEEK). J Prosthodont Res. 2019 Jan;63(1):52-