What it is and what it isn’t: Introducing… Cultural Studies

Öz

This article addresses the work authored by Toby Miller, a renowned social scientist and cultural studies academic. Miller’s work can be read as a genealogy of Cultural Studies and an attempt to map cultural studies. Miller started his work by stating how cultural studies have been fed from many different disciplines and relate to many different fields such as anthropology, sociology, economics, media and communication studies, and history. The first part of Miller’s work men-tions the phenomenon of interdisciplinarity other disciplines have brought to and nurtured Cultural Studies with. Likewise, the article discusses the dynamics that have affected cultural studies during its birth. These dynamics can be seen as the subculture and counterculture movements of their era, such as the punk, Rastafari, and Teddy Boys movements that fell outside of the domi-nant culture. The paper will then discuss the tense relationship between the critique of political economy and cultural studies, which is based on the distinctions between their origins. While these two currents have converged with each other in places, they diverge in others. The second part of Miller’s work presents the ideas of the pioneers of cultural studies such as Richard Hog-gart and Raymond Williams. This section showed the emergence of the important ideas that de-termine the relations between political economy and Cultural Studies and how the ideas of prede-cessors such as Hoggart and Williams had been significantly influenced by Marxism. The third part of Miller’s work discusses the concepts of cultural studies alongside a comparative analysis. This comparison provides descriptive data regarding what cultural studies are and are not. Miller ends the article by explaining his own approach toward cultural studies.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Cultural studies
• Culture
• Subculture
• Political economy
• Interdisciplinarity

Nedir ve ne değildir: Giriş… Kültürel Çalışmalar

Öz

Çalışma, ünlü bir sosyal bilimci ve kültürel çalışmacı olan Toby Miller tarafından kaleme alınmış olup Kültürel Çalışmalar’ın bir soykütüğü olarak okunabilir. Yazarın yaptığı Kültürel Çalışmalar’ı haritalama girişimidir. Miller, çalışmasına Kültürel Çalışmalar’ın birçok farklı disiplinden beslen-diğini belirterek başlamıştır. Kültürel Çalışmalar, antropoloji, sosyoloji, ekonomi, medya ve ileti-şim çalışmaları ve tarih gibi birçok farklı alanla ilişki halindedir. Çalışmanın ilk bölümünde Kül-türel Çalışmalar’ın beslendiği diğer disiplinlerin getirdiği disiplinlerarasılık olgusuna değinilmek-tedir. Aynı şekilde Kültürel Çalışmalar’ın doğduğu süreçte onu etkileyen dinamikler ele alınmış-tır. Bu dinamikler, kendi döneminin alt kültür ve karşı kültür hareketleri olarak görülebilir. Bu hareketler baskın kültürün dışında kalan punk, Rastafari ve Teddy Boys gibi akımlardır. Çalışma bunun ardından, eleştirel ekonomi politik ve Kültürel Çalışmalar arasındaki gerilimli ilişkiyi tar-tışmaktadır. Eleştirel ekonomi politik ve Kültürel Çalışmalar arasındaki ilişki kökenleri arasında-ki ayrımlara dayanmakta; bu iki akım yer yer birbirleri ile yakınlaşmaktayken, yer yer uzaklaşmaktadır. Miller’ın çalışmasının ikinci bölümünde Kültürel Çalışmalar’ın Richard Hoggart ve Raymond Williams gibi öncülerinin düşünceleri serimlenmiştir. Bu bölümde ekonomi politik ve Kültürel Çalışmalar arasındaki ilişkileri belirleyen önemli düşünceler ortaya çıkmaktadır: Hoggart ve Williams gibi öncüllerin düşüncelerinin Marksizm’den önemli oranda etkilendiği görülmekte-dir. Eserin üçüncü bölümünde ise Kültürel Çalışmalar’ın birlikte tartışıldığı kavramların karşılaş-tırmalı incelemesi yer almaktadır. Bu karşılaştırma Kültürel Çalışmalar’ın ne olup ne olmadığına ilişkin tanımsal bir veri sunmaktadır. Makale, yazarın Kültürel Çalışmalar’a kendi yaklaşımını açıklamasıyla sona ermektedir. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Kültürel Çalışmalar
• kültür
• alt kültür
• ekonomi politik
• disiplinlerarasılık

Kaynakça

1. “Asia/Pacific as Space of Cultural Production.” (1994). Boundary 2 21, no. 1. google scholar
2. “Cultural Studies.” (1989). Critical Studies in Mass Communication 6, no. 4. google scholar
3. “Cultural Studies in the Asia Pacific.” (1994). Southeast Asian Journal of Social Science 22. google scholar
4. “Cultural Studies: Crossing Boundaries.” (1991). Critical Studies 3, no.1. google scholar
5. “Cultural Studies/Les études culturelles.” (1995). Canadian Review of Comparative Literature/Revue Canadienne de Littérature Comparée 22, no. 1. google scholar “The Future of the Field - Between Fragmentation and Cohesion.” (1993). Journal of Communication 43, no. 3. google scholar
6. “Rethinking Black (Cultural) Studies.” (1996). Callaloo 19, no. 1. google scholar
7. “Review Forum on Cultural Studies.” (1993). Victorian Studies 36, no. 4: 455-72. google scholar
8. Workplace. (1999). 2, no. 2. . google scholar

9. Abevole, Henry, Michéle Aina Barale, ve David M. Halperin, ed. (1993). The Lesbian and Gay Studies Reader. New York: Routledge. google scholar
10. Alexander, Jeffrey C. ve Philip Smith. (1993). “The Discourse of American Civil Society: A New Proposal for Cultural Studies.” Theory and Society 22, no. 2: 151-207. google scholar
11. Althusser, Louis. (1977). Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays, çev. Ben Brewster. London: New Left Books. google scholar
12. Baker, Aaron ve Todd Boyd, ed. (1997). Out of Bounds: Sports, Media, and the Politics of Identity, Bloomington: Indiana University Press. google scholar
13. Baker, Houston A., Jr., Manthia Diawara ve Ruth H. Lindeborg, ed. (1996). Black British Cultural Studies: A Reader. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. google scholar
14. Becker, Howard S. ve Michael M. McCall, ed. (1990). Symbolic Interactions and Cultural Studies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. google scholar
15. 4Berry, Sarah ve Toby Miller. (2000). Blackwell Cultural Theory Resource Centre. . google schola
16. 4Blundell, Valda, John Shepherd ve Ian Taylor, ed. (1993). Relocating Cultural Studies: Developments in Theory and Research. London: Routledge. google scholar
17. Brantlinger, Patrick. (1990). Crusoe’s Footsteps: Cultural Studies in Britain and America. New York: Routledge. google scholar
18. Chaney, David. (1994). The Cultural Turn: Scene Setting Essays on Contemporary Cultural Theory. London: Routledge. google scholar
19. Chatterjee, Partha. (1993). The Nation and its Fragments: Colonial an Postcolonial Histories. Princeton: Princeton University Press. google scholar
20. Chen, Kuan-Hsing, ed. (1998). Trajectories: Inter-Asia Cultural Studies. London: Routledge. google scholar
21. Chen, Kuan-Hsing ve David Morley, ed. (1996). Stuart Hall: Critical Dialogues in Cultural Studies. London: Routledge. google scholar
22. Clements, Elisabeth S., Walter W. Powell, Kris McIlwaine ve Dina Okamoto. (1996). “Careers in Print: Books, Journals, and Scholarly Reputations.” American Journal of Sociology 101: 433-94. google scholar
23. Czaplicka, John, Andreas Huyssen, ve Anson Rabinach. (1995). “Introduction: Cultural History and Cultural Studies: Reflections on a Symposium.” New German Critique 22, no 2: 3-17. google scholar
24. Dean, J., ed. (2000). Cultural Studies and Political Theory. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. google scholar
25. Diawara, Manthia. (1994). “Black Studies, Cultural Studies, Performative Acts.” Race, Identity and Representation in Education içinde, ed. Cameron McCarthy ve Waren Crichlow. New York: Routledge, 262-7 google scholar
26. Dirks, Nicholas B., Geoff Eley ve Sherry B. Ortner, ed. (1994). Cultural Power/History: A Reader in Contemporary Social Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press. google scholar
27. During, Simon, ed. (1993). The Cultural Studies Reader. London: Routledge. google scholar
28. Forbes, Jill ve Michael Kelly, ed. (1996). French Cultural Studies: An Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. google scholar
29. Forgacs, David ve Robert Lumley, ed. (1996). Italian Cultural Studies: An Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. google scholar
30. Franklin, Sarah, Celia Lury ve Jackie Stacey, ed. (1991). Off-Centre: Feminism and Cultural Studies. London: Routledge. google scholar
31. Frow, John ve Meaghan Morris. (1993a). Australian Cultural Studies: A Reader. Sydney: Allen and Unwin. google scholar
32. Frow, John ve Meaghan Morris. (1993b). “Introduction.” Australian Cultural Studies: A Reader. Ed. John Frow ve Meaghan Morris. Sydney: Allen and Unwin, vii-xxxii. google scholar
33. Garcia Canclini, Néstor. (1990). Culturas Hibridas: Estrategias para Entrar y Salir de la Modernidad. Mexico, DF: Editorial Grijalbo. google scholar
34. Gibson, Mark ve John Hartley. (1998). “Forty Years of Cultural Studies: An Interview with Richard Hoggart, October 1997.” International Journal of Cultural Studies 1, no. 1: 11-23. google scholar
35. Good, Mary-Jo Delvecchio. (1995). “Cultural Studies of Biomedicine: An Agenda for Research.” Social Science and Medicine 41, no. 4: 461-73. google scholar
36. Gopnik, Adam. (1994). “Read All About It.” New Yorker 70: 84-102. google scholar
37. Graham, Helen ve Jo Labanyi, ed. (1996). Spanish Cultural Studies: An Introduction: The Struggle for Modernity. Oxford: Oxford University Press. google scholar
38. Gramsci, Antonio. (1971). Selections from the Prison Notebooks, çev. Quentin Hoare ve Geoffrey Nowell-Smith. New York: International Publishers. google scholar
39. Gray, Ann ve Jim McGuian, ed. (1993). Studying Culture: An Introductory Reader. London: Edward Arnold. google scholar
40. Grossberg, Lawrence. (1993). “The Formations of Cultural Studies: An American in Birmingham.” Relocating Cultural Studies: Developments in Theory and Research içinde, ed. Valda Blundell, John Shepherd ve Ian Taylor. London: Routledge, 21-66. google scholar
41. Grossberg, Lawrence. (1997). Bringing it all Back Home: Essays on Cultural Studies. Durham: Duke University Press. google scholar
42. Grossberg, Lawrence ve Della Pollock. (1998). “Editorial Statement.” Cultural Studies 12, no. 3: 2. google scholar
43. Grossberg, Lawrence, Cary Nelson ve Paulla Treichler, ed. (1992). Cultural Studies. New York: Routledge. google scholar
44. Guha, Ranajit, ed. (1982-). Subaltern Studies. Delhi: Oxford University Press. google scholar
45. Hall, Stuart. (1997). “Introduction.” Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices içinde, ed. Stuart Hall. London: Sage, 1997, 1-11. google scholar
46. Harris, David. (1992). From Class Struggle to the Politics of Pleasure: The Effects of Gramscianism on Cultural Studies. London: Routledge. google scholar
47. Hartley, John. (1998). ‘’Editorial (with Goanna).” International Journal of Cultural Studies 1, no 1: 5-10. google scholar
48. Hartley, John ve Roberta Pearson, ed. (2000). American Cultural Studies: A Reader. Oxford: Oxford University Press. google scholar
49. Hoggart, Richard. (1957). The Uses of Literacy: Aspects of Working-Class Life with Special Reference to Publications and Entertainments. Harmondsworth: Penguin. google scholar
50. Inglis, Fred. (1993). Cultural Studies. Oxford: Blackwell. google scholar
51. Jenks, Chris, ed. (1993). Cultural Reproduction. London: Routledge. google scholar
52. Jordan, B. ve R. Morgan-Tamosunas, ed. (2000). Contemporary Spanish Cultural Studies. London: Arnold. google scholar
53. Kelly, C. ve D. Shepherd, ed. (1998). Russian Cultural Studies: An Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. google scholar
54. Kimball, Roger. (1996). “’Diversity’, ‘Cultural Studies’ & Other Mistakes.” New Criterion 14, no. 9: 4-9. google scholar
55. Le Hir, Marie-Pierre ve Dana Strand, ed. (2000). French Cultural Studies: Criticism at the Crossroads. Albany: State University of New York Press. google scholar
56. Leonard, Jerry D., ed. (1995). Legal Studies as Cultural Studies: A Reader in (Post) Modern Critical Theory. Albany: State University of New York Press. google scholar
57. Leong, Laurence Wei-Teng. (1992). “Cultural Resistance: The Cultural Terrorism of British Male Working-Class Youth.” Current Perspectives in Social Theory 12: 29-58. google scholar
58. Lewis, Justin. (1999). “The Opinion Poll as Cultural Form.” International Journal of Cultural Studies 2, no. 2: 199: 221. google scholar
59. Lovell, Terry, ed. (1995). Feminist Cultural Studies Volumes I and II. Aldershot: Elgar. google scholar
60. Maddox, John. (1989). “Where Next with Peer-Review?” Nature 339: 11. google scholar
61. Martin, Randy, ed. (1998). Chalk Lines: The Politics of Work in the Managed University. Durham: Duke University Press. google scholar
62. Martin, Randy ve Toby Miller, ed. (1999). SportCult. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. google scholar
63. Martin-Barbero, Jésus. (1993). Communication, Culture, and Hegemony: From the Media to Mediations. London: Sage. google scholar
64. Mattelart, Armand ve Michéle Mattelart. (1992). Rethinking Media Theory: Signposts and New Directions, çev. James A. Cohen ve Marina Urquidi. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. google scholar
65. Mattelart, Michéle. (1986). Women, Media and Crisis: Femininity and Disorder. London: Comedia. google scholar
66. Maxwell, Richard. (2000). “Cultural Studies.” Understanding Contemporary Society: Theories of the Present içinde, ed. Gary Browning, Abigail Halci ve Frank Webster. London: Sage, 281-95. google scholar
67. McGuigan, Jim. (1992). Cultural Populism. New York: Routledge. google scholar
68. Minogue, Kenneth. (1994). “Philosophy.” Times Literary Supplement Nov. 25: 27-8. google scholar
69. Morley, David. (1998). “So-Called Cultural Studies: Dead Ends and Reinvented Wheels.” Cultural Studies 12, no. 4: 476-97. google scholar
70. Morris, Meaghan. (1992). Ecstasy and Economics: American Essays for John Forbes. Sydney: E. M. Press. google scholar
71. Morrow, Raymond A. (1995). “The Challenge of Cultural Studies.” Canadian Review of Comparative Literature/Revue Caadienne de Littérature Comparéee 22, no. 1: 1- 20. google scholar
72. Murdock, Graham. (1995). “Across the Great Divide: Cultural Analysis and the Condition of Democracy.” Critical Studies in Mass Communication 12, no. 1: 89-95. google scholar
73. Nelson, Cary, ed. (1997). Will Teach for Food: Academic Labor in Crisis. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. google scholar
74. Postrel, Virginia. (1999). “The Pleasures of Persuasion.” Wall Street Journal 2. Aug. google scholar
75. Punter, David, ed. (1986). Introduction to Contemporary Cultural Studies. London: Longman. google scholar
76. Redhead, Steve. (1995). Unpopular Cultures: The Birth of Law and Popular Culture. Manchester: Manchester University Press. google scholar
77. Ross, Andrew, ed. (1997). No Sweat: Fashion, Free Trade, and the Rights of Garment Workers. New York: Verso. google scholar
78. Rosteck, Thomas. (1995). “Cultural Studies and Rhetorical Studies.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 81, no. 3: 385-403. google scholar
79. Salzman, Jack. (1975). “Editor’s Note.” Prospects: An Annual Journal of American Cultural Studies 1: iii. google scholar
80. Shannon, Patrick ve Henry A. Giroux. (1994). “Editor’s Comments.” Review of Education/Pedagogy/ Cultural Studies 16, no. 1: v. google scholar
81. Shiach, Morag, ed. (1999). Feminism & Cultural Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press. google scholar
82. Storey, John. (1993). An Introductory Guide to Cultural Theory and Popular Culture. Athens: University of Georgia Press. google scholar
83. Thompson, E. P. (1968). The Making of the English Working Class. Harmondsworth: Penguin. google scholar
84. Thompson, E. P. (1978). The Poverty of Theory. London: Merlin. google scholar
85. Treichler, Paula. (1999). How to Have Theory in an Epidemic: Cultural Chronicles of AIDS. Durham: Duke University Press. google scholar
86. Tudor, Andrew. (1999). Decoding Culture: Theory and Method in Cultural Studies. London: Sage. google scholar
87. Turner, Graeme. (1990). British Cultural Studies: An Introduction. Boston: Unwin Hyman. google scholar
88. Turner, Graeme, ed. (1993). Nation, Culture, Text: Australian Cultural and Media Studies. London: Routledge. google scholar
89. Williams, Patrick ve Laura Chrisman, ed. (1993). Colonial Discourse/Post-Colonial Theory. New York: Columbia University Press. google scholar
90. Williams, Raymond. (1975). The Long Revolution. Harmondsworth: Pelican. google scholar
91. Williams, Raymond. (1977). Marxism and Literature. Oxford: Oxford University PRess. google scholar
92. Williams, Raymond. (1989). The Politics of Modernism: Against the New Conformists, ed. Tony Pinkney. London: Verso. google scholar
93. Willis, Cecil L. ve Stephen J. McNamee. (1990). “Social Networks of Science and Patterns of Publication in Leading Sociology Journals.” Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion,
94. Utilization 11: 363-81. google scholar
95. Wolfe, Alan. (1996). “The Culture of Cultural Studies.” Partisan Review 53, no. 3: 485-92. google scholar
96. Women’s Studies Group of the Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies. (1978). Women Take Issue: Aspects of Women’s Subordination. London: Hutchinson. google scholar
97. Wright, Handel Kashope. (1996). “Take Birmingham to the Curb, ere Comes African Cultural Studies: An Exercise in Revisionist Historiography.” University of Toronto Quarterly 65, no. 2: 355-65. google scholar