ÇEVRESEL DÜZENLEMELERİN DIŞ TİCARET VE REKABET GÜCÜ ÜZERİNE ETKİSİ

Yıl 2002, Sayı: 7, - , 20.06.2015

Ekrem Gül Aykut Ekinci

Öz

Regulations have developed for environmental problems affecting the production costs of firms and competitiveness. On the other hand, firms gain a new competitive advantage in both local and international markets by producing environment-friendly products. In this study, both negative and positive impacts of environmental regulations' role is comparatively discussed on the competitiveness of the firms

Anahtar Kelimeler

-

ÇEVRESEL DÜZENLEMELERİN DIŞ TİCARET VE REKABET GÜCÜ ÜZERİNE ETKİSİ

Öz

Çevre sorunlarının çözümüne yönelik olarak geliştirilen çevresel düzenlemeler firmaların üretim maliyetleri ve rekabet güçleri üzerinde olumsuz etki yaratmaktadır. Diğer taraftan, çevre dostu ürünler üretip sunan firmalar ulusal ve uluslar arası piyasalarda yeni bir rekabet gücü kazanırlar. Bu çalışmada çevresel düzenlemelerin rekabet gücü üzerindeki etkileri araştırılmış olup, olumlu ve olumsuz etkiler karşılaştırmalı olarak tartışılmıştır

Anahtar Kelimeler

-

Kaynakça

• COMMON, Mick,
• "Environmental Policy and International
• Competitiveness", Environmental Economics Seminar Series, 1996,
• (Çevrimiçi) http://www.environmet.gov.au, 16 Mayıs 2000.
• COSBEY, Aaron, Trade and Sustainable Development: The Global Picture, International Institute for Sustainable Development, Winnipeg, Canada, 1996.
• EUROPEAN UNION, ECU Press Release, No:12696, Feruary 28, 1996.
• EUROPEAN COMMISSION, The EU Eco-Industry’s Export Potential, Copenhagen, September 1999.
• GATT Secretariat, "Trade and Environment", International Trade 1990- 1991, Geneva, General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, (Çevrimiçi) http://www.wto.org/trade_environment /html, 2 Mart 2000.
• JICKLING, Mark, Offshore Manufacturing: Why U.S. Firms Go Abroad, Washington D.C, Congressional Research Service, Report No: 92-438 E, May 18, 1992.
• JUBB, C.D., “International Competitiveness and Environmental Regulation: distinguishing fact from fiction”, Environmental Economics Seminar Series, 1996, (Çevrimiçi) http://www.environment. gov.au, 16 Mayıs 2000.
• KRISSOFF, Barry ve diğerleri, Exploring Linkages Among Agriculture, Trade and the Environment, U.S.A, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Agricultural Economic Report No:738, May 1996.
• LOW, Patrick Alexander Yeats, Do “Dirty” Industries Migrate?, Washinton D.C, World Bank Discussion Papers No:159, 1992.
• NISHIJIMA, Yoichi, Internalization of Environmental Cost and Industry Competitiveness, Paris, OECD Workshop on Environmental Policies and Industrial Competitiveness, January 1993.
• OECD, Environmental Policies and Industrial Competitiveness, Paris, OECD, OCDE/GD(93)83, January 1993.
• -------, Future Liberalization of Trade in Environmental Goods and Services, Paris, OECD, COM/TD/ENV(98)37/FINAL, 1999.
• OFFICE of Technology Assessment, Trade and Environment, Washington D.C, U.S. Congress May 1992.
• PALMER, K. L. Simpson, “Environmental Policy as Industrial Policy”, Resources, No:112, Summer 1993.
• PIERRE, Antonie, Industrial Competitiveness, Trade and the Environment in Canada, Paris, OECD Workshop on Environmental Policies and Industrial Competitiveness, January 1993.