Who Does Superman Represent?: Identity, Ideology, and Gender in Superman

Yıl 2020, Sayı: 66, 234 - 249, 26.10.2020

Murat Göç

Öz

Despite the overwhelming influence of a plethora of superheroes, Superman is still an archetypal blueprint, a trailblazer, and a pioneer of American superheroes in the 20th century. For about a hundred years now, Superman has gained an immense popularity beyond the national borders of the United States. Obviously, the popularity of Superman profoundly relies on its success in representing American identity, ever-changing dynamics of American society and American ideology which remained almost unaltered in their core despite all the changes and transformations they have had to go through. Moreover, Superman is marked with Judeo-Christian mythology that lies at the heart of American culture while Superman, as a national character, is built upon American ideals such as individualism, civilization, nativism, and schizophrenic break-downs caused by American modernity. In this sense, Superman is an embodiment of American mythology that clearly represents the concerns, fears and hopes of American people. Superman also offers a brilliant portrait of American manhood, masculine ideology in America, and crises of masculinity. Superman’s masculinity doesn’t only depict American manhood at its best but also Superman’s conflicts with other men as well as his mostly male archenemies also evoke a discussion of the foundation of hegemonic masculiity and male hierarchy in America. In this regard, this paper aims to discuss the values, norms, ideologies of identity, power, and gender in light of the historical and social evolution of American society. It is considered to be of utmost importance that such a critical reading of Superman as the national emblem of American people will allow an understanding of other superheroes in a broader perspective in postwar America.

Anahtar Kelimeler

superman, american culture, identity, ideology, gender

Superman Kimi Temsil Ediyor?: Superman’de Kimlik, İdeoloji ve Cinsiyet

Öz

Günümüzde diğer süper kahramanların gölgesinde kalmış olsa da, Superman, süper kahraman hikâyelerinin ilk ve en önemli örneklerinden birisidir. Yüzyıla yaklaşan tarihi boyunca popülerliğini yalnızca Amerika Birleşik Devletleri’nde değil dünyanın farklı coğrafyalarında da sürdürmeyi başarmıştır. Kuşkusuz bu popülerliğin ve etkinin en önemli nedeni, Superman’in Amerikan kimliğini, Amerikan toplumunu oluşturan dinamikleri ve yıllar içinde değişiklikler gösterse de temel saikleri aynı kalan ideolojik yapıları başarı ile temsil ediyor oluşudur. Superman, bir taraftan Amerikan uygarlığının kendini dayandırdığı Hristiyan mitolojisinin izlerini taşırken, bir yandan da Amerikan ulusunu inşa eden değerlerin, bireyciliğin, uygarlığın, yerlici tepkilerin ve modernitenin yol açtığı şizofrenik kırılmanın temsilcisidir. Bu bağlamda, Superman Amerikan mitolojisinin vücuda gelmiş halidir, Amerikan halkının endişelerini, korkularını ve umutlarının net bir yansımasıdır. Superman, aynı zamanda, Amerikan erkeklik ideolojisinin ve bu ideolojinin yaşadığı krizlerin de temsilcisidir. Superman’in temsil ettiği erkeklik yalnızca Amerika’da erkeklik olgusuna dair ipuçları vermekle kalmaz, Superman’in düşmanı olan diğer erkeklerle olan ilişkisi, erkekler arası hiyerarşinin ve hegemonik mücadelenin inşasını da başarı ile yansıtır. Bu bağlamda, bu makale Superman’in temsil ettiği değerlerin, ideolojilerin, toplumsal cinsiyet görünümlerinin temel unsurlarını, Amerikan toplumunun tarihsel ve toplumsal gelişimi ışığında okumayı hedeflemektedir. Böylesi bir eleştirel okumanın, Superman’in savaş sonrası Amerikan kültüründe sayısı ve çeşitliliği artan süper kahraman hikâyelerinin de anlaşılmasına yardımcı olacağı düşünülmektedir. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

Amerikan kültürü, ideoloji, kimlik, toplumsal cinsiyet

Kaynakça

• Arnaudo, M. (2013). The myth of the superhero. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP.
• Bahlmann, A. R. (2016). The mythology of the superhero. North Carolina: Mcfarland And Company Inc. Publishers.
• Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter. London: Routledge.
• Campbell, N., & Kean, A. (1997). American cultural studies. London: Routledge.
• Catano, J. V. (1990). Rhetoric of masculinity: Origins, institutions and the myth of the self-made man. College English, 52 (4), 421-436.
• Crevecoeur, St. J. De. (1999). What Is An American?. In Gordon Hutner (Ed.), American Culture American Literature (pp. 5-11). New York: Oxford UP.
• Dace, P. (2007). Nietzsche contra superman: An examination of the work of Frank Miller. South African Journal Of Philosophy, 26, 98-106.
• Darowski, J. H. (2012). The ages of superman: Essays on the man of steel in changing times. North Carolina: Mcfarland.
• Eco, U. (2004). The myth of superman. In J. Heer & K. Worcester (Ed.), Arguing comics: Literary masters on a popular medium (pp.146-164). Mississippi: University Of Mississippi Press.
• Engle, G. (1992). What makes superman so darned American?. In J. Nachbar, J. G. Nachbar & K. Lausé (Ed.), Popular culture: An introductory text (pp. 331-343). Ohio: Popular Press.
• Fiedler, L. A. (1990). Mythicizing the unspeakable. Journal Of American Folklore, 103, 390-402.
• Frye, N. (2000). The mythos of summer: Romance. In D. Duff (Ed.), Modern genre theory (pp. 98-118). London: Routledge.
• Geraghty, L. (2011). Introduction: Investigating Smalville. In L. Geraghty (Ed), The Smallville chronicles: Critical essays on the television series (pp. vii-xxviii). London: Scarecrow Press.
• Gibson, M. (2016). Who does she thinks she is? Female comic book characters, second wave feminism, and feminist film theory. In M. Gibson, D. Huxley & J. Ormrod (Ed.), Superheroes and identities (pp. 135-146). London: Routledge.
• Gordon, I. (2017). Superman: The persistence of an American icon. New Brunswick: Rutgers UP.
• Grunzke, A. L. (2019). Education and the female superhero: Slayers, cyborgs, sorority sisters, and schoolteacher. London: Lexington Books.
• Hofstadter, R. (1962). Anti-intellectualism in America. NY: Vintage.
• Hoppenstand, G. (1992). Yellow peril doctors and opium dens: The yellow peril stereotype in mass media entertainment. In J. Nachbar & K. Lause (Ed.), Popular culture: An introductory text (pp. 277-291). Ohio: Popular Press.
• Karl, F. R. (1974). The adversary of literature: The English novel in the eighteenth century-a study in genre. NY: Farrar.
• Leverenz, D. (1995). The last real men in America: From Natty Bumppo to Batman. In G. Hutner (Ed.), The American literary history reader (pp. 262-290). NY: Oxford UP.
• Mcnamara, K. (2005). Affective Democracy And The Body (Im)Politic. [Culture In (City] In Culture)(pp. 13-30). İzmir: Ege University Press.
• Merrifield, A. (2000). Henri Lefebvre: A socialist in space. In M. Crang & N. Thrift (Ed.), Thinking space (pp. 167-182). London: Routledge.
• Miles, J. E. (2018). Superheroes and their ancient Jewish parallels: A comparative study. North Carolina: Mcfarland.
• Mills, A. (2013). American theology, superhero comics, and cinema. London: Routledge.
• Oskay, Ü. (1982). Çağdaş fantazya. Ankara: Ayko Yayıncılık.
• Punter, D. (1980). The Literature of terror: A history of gothic fictions from 1765 to the present day. Longman.
• Rabow, J., & Stanko, E. A. (1989). Review: What do men want?. Gender And Society, 3(3), 407-418.
• Regalado, A. (2005). Modernity, race, and the American superhero. In J. Mclaughlin (Ed.), Comics as philosophy (pp. 84-99). Mississippi: University Press Of Mississippi.
• Regalado, A. J. (2015). Bending steel: Modernity and the American superhero. Mississippi: University Press Of Mississippi.
• Robb, B. J. (2014). A brief history of superheroes: From Superman to the Avengers, the evolution of comic book legends. London: Constable And Robinson Press.
• Rutherford, J. (1988). Who’s that man. In R. Chapman & J. Rutherford (Ed.), Male order: Unwrapping masculinity (pp. 21-67). London: Lawrence And Wishart.
• Saunders, B. (2011). Do the Gods wear capes?: Spirituality, fantasy, and superheroes. London: Bloomsburry.
• Scivally, B. (2007). Superman on film, television, radio and broadway. North Carolina: Mcfarland.
• Schenck, K. (2005). Superman: A popular culture Messiah. In B. J. Oropeza (Ed.), The gospel according to superheroes: Religion and pop culture (pp. 33-48). Bern: Peter Lang.
• Seidler, V. J. (2002). Masculinity, violence, and emotional life. In G. Bendelow & S. J. Williams (Ed.), Emotions in social life: Critical themes and contemporary issues (pp. 193-210). London: Routledge.
• Shain, B. A. (1994). The myth of American individualism: The Protestant origins of American political thought. New Jersey: Princeton UP.
• Smith, M. J. (2001). The tyranny of the melting pot metaphor: Wonder woman as the Americanized immigrant. In M. P. Mc. Allister et. al (Ed.), Comics and ideology (pp. 129-150). Bern: Peter Lang.
• Stevens, J. R. (2015). Captain America, masculinity, and violence: The evolution of a national icon. Ny: Syracuse UP.
• Telotte, J. P. (2001). Science fiction film. New York: Cambridge UP.
• Trushell, J. M. (2004). American dreams of mutants: The X-Men-"pulp" fiction, science fiction, and superheroes. Journal Of Popular Culture, 38 (1), 149-168.
• Tye, L. (2012). Superman: The high-flying history of America's most enduring hero. NY: Random House.
• Upton, B. (2014). Hollywood And the end of the cold war: Signs of cinematic change. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
• Waugh, P. (1988). Feminine fictions. London: Routledge.
• Weiner, R. G. (2009). Captain America and the struggle of the superhero: Critical essays. North Carolina: Mcfarland.
• Whannel, G. (2002). Media sport stars: Masculinities and moralities. London: Routledge.