Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

Creative Management and Creative Organization -A Discovery Research Based on Ceramic Design and Production-

Yıl 2021, Sayı: 69, 220 - 231, 30.07.2021
https://doi.org/10.51290/dpusbe.875136

Öz

The purpose of this research is to determine the factors affecting creative management and creative organization with a discovering research based on ceramic design and production. For this purpose, which is a qualitative research method, also known as the Grounded Theory, was used. Semi-structured questions were leading in the research. In this context, with a focus on creative management and creative organization, the factors they consider in the location of the region and the city, how they find employees, how they determine customer demands and expectations, what stages they pass their design decision processes, what are their strategies against market risks, the characteristics of the physical structures of the organizations and how they have information needs have been investigated. The factors such as positioning decision in creative management and creative organization, creative employee employment decision, creative focused innovation, creative design decision process, the strategies against the risk of indifference to creative design, creative physical equipment and the need for creative knowledge have been proved to be effective.

Kaynakça

  • Alves, J., Marques, M. J., Saur, I. ve Marques, P. (2005). Building creative ideas for successful new product development. 9th European Conference on Creativity and Innovation (ECCI-9): 'transformations', Lodz, Polónia. Erişim adresi: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Irina_Saur/publication/228732515_Building_creative_ideas_for_successful_new_product_development/links/5645140608ae451880a8b1c4/Building-creative-ideas-for-successful-new-product-development.pdf.
  • Arvidsson, A. (2007). Creative class or administrative class? On advertising and the ‘underground’. Ephemera Theory and Politics in Organization, 7(1), 8-23.
  • Azis, Y., Kartini, D., Bernik, M. ve Harsanto, B. (2014). Managing innovation in creative industries for increasing competitiveness: Case study of companies at bandung-indonesia. International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, 3(11), 17543-17550.
  • Bagwell, S. (2008) Creative clusters and city growth. Creative Industries Journal, 1(1), 31-46.
  • Boerner, S. ve Gebert, D. (2005). Organizational culture and creative processescomparing german theatercompanies and scientific institutes. Nonprofıt Management and Leadership, 16(2), 209-220.
  • Bontje, M. ve Musterd, S. (2009). Creative industries, creative class and competitiveness: Expert opinions critically appraised. Geoform, 40, 843-852.
  • Bulduklu, Y. (2019). Eleştirel çalışmalarda nitel araştırma yöntemi olarak gömülü teori. Kritik İletişim Çalışmaları Dergisi, 1 (1), 1-14.
  • Chen, X., Wei, J. ve Huang, X. (2010). Success factors of innovation in creative industry in china: Case study on animation companies. IEEE International Conference on Management of Innovation and Technology, Singapore, 2010, 800-805.
  • Cohendet, P. ve Simon, L. (2006). Knowledge intensive firms, communities and creative cities. DIME Conference on Communities of Practice, Durham, October 27-28, 2006.
  • Girdauskienė, L., Sakalas, A. ve Savanevičienė, A. (2012). Human resource management in a creative organization. International Conference on Economics Marketing and Management IPEDR, 28, 78-82.
  • Girdauskienė, L. ve Savanevičienė, A. (2012). Leadership role implementing knowledge transfer in creative organization: How does it work? Social and Behavioral Sciences, 41, 15-22.
  • Hart, S. L. (2005). Innovation, creative destruction and sustainability. Research-Technology Management, 48(5), 21-27.
  • Janáková, H. (2012). Creative management and innovation. Creative and Knowledge Society/Internacional Scientific Journal, 2(1), 95-112.
  • Jerrard, R. N., Barnes, N. ve Reid, A. (2008). Design, risk and new product development in five small creative companies. International Journal of Design, 2(1), 21-30.
  • Kamarudin, H. S. ve Sajilan, S. (2013). Critical success factors of technopreneurship in the creative industries: A study of animation ventures. Journal Review Integrative. Business and Economics Research, 2(1), 1-37.
  • Keane, M. (2004). Brave new world. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 10(3), 265-279.
  • Kembaren, P., Simatupang, T. M., Larso, D. ve Wiyancoko, D. (2014). Design driven innovation practices in design-preneur led creative. Journal Technology Management and Innovation, 9(3), 91-105.
  • Keskin, N., Baş, T. ve Yıldız, G. (2009). Halkbank ve pamukbank birleşmesini başarılı kılan faktörlerin belirlenmesine yönelik keşfedici bir araştırma. İktisat İşletme ve Finans, 24(279), 36-67.
  • Kimpeler, S. ve Georgieff, P. (2009). The roles of creative industries in regional innovation and knowledge transfer-The case of austria in measuring creativity. Ernesto, V. (Ed.), Proceedings for the Conference “can creativity be measured”, Brussels, 28 and 29 May, Luxembourg, Publications Office of the European Union, 207-219.
  • Kratzer, J., Leenders, R. Th. A. J. ve Engelen, J. M. L. V. (2004). Stimulating the potential: Creative performance and communication in innovation teams. Creativity and Innovation Management, 13(1), 63-71.
  • Lämmer-Gamp, T. (2014). Creative industries policy recommendations-promotion of cross-innovation from creative industries. Berlin, Germany.
  • Lee, Y. S. (2016). Creative workplace characteristics and innovative start-up companies. Facilities, 34(7-8), 413-432.
  • Martens, Y. (2011). Creative workplace: Instrumental and symbolic support for creativity. Facilities, 29(1-2), 63-79.
  • Martensen, A. ve Dahlgaard, J. J. (1999). Strategy and planning for innovation management-supported by creative and learning organisations. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 16(9), 878-891.
  • McRobbie, A. (2002). Clubs to companies: Notes on the decline of political culture in speeded up creative worlds. Cultural Studies, 16(4), 516-531.
  • Murphy, E., Fox-Rogers, L. ve Redmond, D. (2015). Location decision making of “creative” industries: The media and computer game sectors in Dublin, Ireland. Growth and Change, 46(1), 97-113.
  • Nyström, H. (2000). The postmodern challenge-fromeconomic to creative management. Creativity and Innovation Management, 9(2), 109-114.
  • Pratt, A.C. (2008). Creative cities: The cultural industries and the creative class. Geografiska Annaler, Series B, Human Geo-graphy, 90 (2), 107–117.
  • Taha, V. A., Tej, J. ve Sirkova, M. (2015). Creative management techniques and methods as a part of the management education: Analytical study on students’ perceptions. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 1918-1925.
  • Van Andel, W., Vandenbempt, K. ve Kenis, P. (2015). What makes creative companies ‘jump’: An explorative study into successful business models for creative ındustries. Retrieved 14 December. Erişim adresi: http://r1.zotoi.com/uploads/biblio/document/file/134/Study_into_successful_business_models_for_Creative_Industries.pdf.
  • Xu, F. ve Rickards, T. (2007). Creative management: A predicted development from research into creativity and management. Creativity and Innovation Management, 16(3), 216-228.
  • Zenger, S. (2009). Who’s your target? The creative class as a target group for place branding. Journal of Place Management and Development, 2(1), 23-32.
  • Zheng, J. ve Chan, R. (2014). The impact of ‘creative industry clusters’ on culturaland creative industry development in shanghai city. Culture and Society, 5, 9-22.

Yaratıcı Yönetim ve Yaratıcı Örgüt -Seramik Tasarım ve Üretimine Dayandırılmış Keşfedici Bir Araştırma-

Yıl 2021, Sayı: 69, 220 - 231, 30.07.2021
https://doi.org/10.51290/dpusbe.875136

Öz

Bu araştırmanın amacı, seramik tasarım ve üretimine dayandırılmış keşfedici bir araştırma ile yaratıcı yönetim ve yaratıcı örgüt olmaya etki eden faktörleri belirlemektir. Nitel bir araştırma yöntemi olan Gömülü Kuram’dan yararlanılmıştır. Araştırmada yarı yapılanmış sorular yönlendirici olmuştur. Bu kapsamda yaratıcı yönetim ve yaratıcı örgüt odaklı olarak, işletmelerin bölge ve şehir konumlanmasında dikkate aldıkları faktörler, işgörenleri nasıl buldukları, müşteri istek ve beklentilerini nasıl belirledikleri, tasarım karar süreçlerini hangi aşamalardan geçirdikleri, pazar riskleri karşısındaki stratejilerinin neler olduğu, örgütlerin fiziksel yapılarının özellikleri ve bilgi ihtiyaçlarını nasıl karşıladıkları araştırılmıştır. Yaratıcı yönetim ve yaratıcı örgüt olmada konumlandırma kararı, yaratıcı işgören istihdam kararı, yaratıcı odaklı inovasyon, yaratıcı tasarım karar süreci, yaratıcı tasarıma ilgisizlik riski karşısında stratejiler, yaratıcı fiziksel donanımlar ve yaratıcı bilgi ihtiyacı gibi faktörlerin etkili olduğu ortaya konulmuştur.

Kaynakça

  • Alves, J., Marques, M. J., Saur, I. ve Marques, P. (2005). Building creative ideas for successful new product development. 9th European Conference on Creativity and Innovation (ECCI-9): 'transformations', Lodz, Polónia. Erişim adresi: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Irina_Saur/publication/228732515_Building_creative_ideas_for_successful_new_product_development/links/5645140608ae451880a8b1c4/Building-creative-ideas-for-successful-new-product-development.pdf.
  • Arvidsson, A. (2007). Creative class or administrative class? On advertising and the ‘underground’. Ephemera Theory and Politics in Organization, 7(1), 8-23.
  • Azis, Y., Kartini, D., Bernik, M. ve Harsanto, B. (2014). Managing innovation in creative industries for increasing competitiveness: Case study of companies at bandung-indonesia. International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, 3(11), 17543-17550.
  • Bagwell, S. (2008) Creative clusters and city growth. Creative Industries Journal, 1(1), 31-46.
  • Boerner, S. ve Gebert, D. (2005). Organizational culture and creative processescomparing german theatercompanies and scientific institutes. Nonprofıt Management and Leadership, 16(2), 209-220.
  • Bontje, M. ve Musterd, S. (2009). Creative industries, creative class and competitiveness: Expert opinions critically appraised. Geoform, 40, 843-852.
  • Bulduklu, Y. (2019). Eleştirel çalışmalarda nitel araştırma yöntemi olarak gömülü teori. Kritik İletişim Çalışmaları Dergisi, 1 (1), 1-14.
  • Chen, X., Wei, J. ve Huang, X. (2010). Success factors of innovation in creative industry in china: Case study on animation companies. IEEE International Conference on Management of Innovation and Technology, Singapore, 2010, 800-805.
  • Cohendet, P. ve Simon, L. (2006). Knowledge intensive firms, communities and creative cities. DIME Conference on Communities of Practice, Durham, October 27-28, 2006.
  • Girdauskienė, L., Sakalas, A. ve Savanevičienė, A. (2012). Human resource management in a creative organization. International Conference on Economics Marketing and Management IPEDR, 28, 78-82.
  • Girdauskienė, L. ve Savanevičienė, A. (2012). Leadership role implementing knowledge transfer in creative organization: How does it work? Social and Behavioral Sciences, 41, 15-22.
  • Hart, S. L. (2005). Innovation, creative destruction and sustainability. Research-Technology Management, 48(5), 21-27.
  • Janáková, H. (2012). Creative management and innovation. Creative and Knowledge Society/Internacional Scientific Journal, 2(1), 95-112.
  • Jerrard, R. N., Barnes, N. ve Reid, A. (2008). Design, risk and new product development in five small creative companies. International Journal of Design, 2(1), 21-30.
  • Kamarudin, H. S. ve Sajilan, S. (2013). Critical success factors of technopreneurship in the creative industries: A study of animation ventures. Journal Review Integrative. Business and Economics Research, 2(1), 1-37.
  • Keane, M. (2004). Brave new world. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 10(3), 265-279.
  • Kembaren, P., Simatupang, T. M., Larso, D. ve Wiyancoko, D. (2014). Design driven innovation practices in design-preneur led creative. Journal Technology Management and Innovation, 9(3), 91-105.
  • Keskin, N., Baş, T. ve Yıldız, G. (2009). Halkbank ve pamukbank birleşmesini başarılı kılan faktörlerin belirlenmesine yönelik keşfedici bir araştırma. İktisat İşletme ve Finans, 24(279), 36-67.
  • Kimpeler, S. ve Georgieff, P. (2009). The roles of creative industries in regional innovation and knowledge transfer-The case of austria in measuring creativity. Ernesto, V. (Ed.), Proceedings for the Conference “can creativity be measured”, Brussels, 28 and 29 May, Luxembourg, Publications Office of the European Union, 207-219.
  • Kratzer, J., Leenders, R. Th. A. J. ve Engelen, J. M. L. V. (2004). Stimulating the potential: Creative performance and communication in innovation teams. Creativity and Innovation Management, 13(1), 63-71.
  • Lämmer-Gamp, T. (2014). Creative industries policy recommendations-promotion of cross-innovation from creative industries. Berlin, Germany.
  • Lee, Y. S. (2016). Creative workplace characteristics and innovative start-up companies. Facilities, 34(7-8), 413-432.
  • Martens, Y. (2011). Creative workplace: Instrumental and symbolic support for creativity. Facilities, 29(1-2), 63-79.
  • Martensen, A. ve Dahlgaard, J. J. (1999). Strategy and planning for innovation management-supported by creative and learning organisations. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 16(9), 878-891.
  • McRobbie, A. (2002). Clubs to companies: Notes on the decline of political culture in speeded up creative worlds. Cultural Studies, 16(4), 516-531.
  • Murphy, E., Fox-Rogers, L. ve Redmond, D. (2015). Location decision making of “creative” industries: The media and computer game sectors in Dublin, Ireland. Growth and Change, 46(1), 97-113.
  • Nyström, H. (2000). The postmodern challenge-fromeconomic to creative management. Creativity and Innovation Management, 9(2), 109-114.
  • Pratt, A.C. (2008). Creative cities: The cultural industries and the creative class. Geografiska Annaler, Series B, Human Geo-graphy, 90 (2), 107–117.
  • Taha, V. A., Tej, J. ve Sirkova, M. (2015). Creative management techniques and methods as a part of the management education: Analytical study on students’ perceptions. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 1918-1925.
  • Van Andel, W., Vandenbempt, K. ve Kenis, P. (2015). What makes creative companies ‘jump’: An explorative study into successful business models for creative ındustries. Retrieved 14 December. Erişim adresi: http://r1.zotoi.com/uploads/biblio/document/file/134/Study_into_successful_business_models_for_Creative_Industries.pdf.
  • Xu, F. ve Rickards, T. (2007). Creative management: A predicted development from research into creativity and management. Creativity and Innovation Management, 16(3), 216-228.
  • Zenger, S. (2009). Who’s your target? The creative class as a target group for place branding. Journal of Place Management and Development, 2(1), 23-32.
  • Zheng, J. ve Chan, R. (2014). The impact of ‘creative industry clusters’ on culturaland creative industry development in shanghai city. Culture and Society, 5, 9-22.
Toplam 33 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm ARAŞTIRMA MAKALELERİ
Yazarlar

Hakan Kara 0000-0001-9480-4904

Yayımlanma Tarihi 30 Temmuz 2021
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2021 Sayı: 69

Kaynak Göster

APA Kara, H. (2021). Yaratıcı Yönetim ve Yaratıcı Örgüt -Seramik Tasarım ve Üretimine Dayandırılmış Keşfedici Bir Araştırma-. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi(69), 220-231. https://doi.org/10.51290/dpusbe.875136
AMA Kara H. Yaratıcı Yönetim ve Yaratıcı Örgüt -Seramik Tasarım ve Üretimine Dayandırılmış Keşfedici Bir Araştırma-. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. Temmuz 2021;(69):220-231. doi:10.51290/dpusbe.875136
Chicago Kara, Hakan. “Yaratıcı Yönetim Ve Yaratıcı Örgüt -Seramik Tasarım Ve Üretimine Dayandırılmış Keşfedici Bir Araştırma-”. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, sy. 69 (Temmuz 2021): 220-31. https://doi.org/10.51290/dpusbe.875136.
EndNote Kara H (01 Temmuz 2021) Yaratıcı Yönetim ve Yaratıcı Örgüt -Seramik Tasarım ve Üretimine Dayandırılmış Keşfedici Bir Araştırma-. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 69 220–231.
IEEE H. Kara, “Yaratıcı Yönetim ve Yaratıcı Örgüt -Seramik Tasarım ve Üretimine Dayandırılmış Keşfedici Bir Araştırma-”, Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, sy. 69, ss. 220–231, Temmuz 2021, doi: 10.51290/dpusbe.875136.
ISNAD Kara, Hakan. “Yaratıcı Yönetim Ve Yaratıcı Örgüt -Seramik Tasarım Ve Üretimine Dayandırılmış Keşfedici Bir Araştırma-”. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 69 (Temmuz 2021), 220-231. https://doi.org/10.51290/dpusbe.875136.
JAMA Kara H. Yaratıcı Yönetim ve Yaratıcı Örgüt -Seramik Tasarım ve Üretimine Dayandırılmış Keşfedici Bir Araştırma-. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2021;:220–231.
MLA Kara, Hakan. “Yaratıcı Yönetim Ve Yaratıcı Örgüt -Seramik Tasarım Ve Üretimine Dayandırılmış Keşfedici Bir Araştırma-”. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, sy. 69, 2021, ss. 220-31, doi:10.51290/dpusbe.875136.
Vancouver Kara H. Yaratıcı Yönetim ve Yaratıcı Örgüt -Seramik Tasarım ve Üretimine Dayandırılmış Keşfedici Bir Araştırma-. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2021(69):220-31.

Dergimiz EBSCOhost, ULAKBİM/Sosyal Bilimler Veri Tabanında, SOBİAD ve Türk Eğitim İndeksi'nde yer alan uluslararası hakemli bir dergidir.