Bir Güvenlikleştirme Pratiği Olarak Terörizm Söylemi ve Etiketi: Eleştirel Terörizm Çalışmaları Perspektifinden Kavramsal Bir Analitik Çerçeve

Öz

Bu çalışmada söylemsel bir pratik olarak “teröristleştirme” retoriğinin, politik muhaliflerin meşruiyetini baltalamak amacıyla iktidarlar tarafından bir güvenlikleştirme stratejisi olarak kullanıldığı tartışması yapılmıştır. Makalenin teorik çerçevesi, siyasi liderlerin güvenlik konularını nasıl çerçevelediğini açıklamaya matuf bir kuramsallaştırma biçimi olan güvenlikleştirme teorisidir. Terörizmin nesnel bir gerçeklik fakat sosyal bir inşa olduğunu vurgulayan makale, terörizmin ontolojik güvenliğe bir tehdit oluşundan ötürü kamuoyunda etiketi alan kişilerin ne şekilde ve hangi amaçlar için itibarsızlaştırıldığına dikkat çekmeye çalışmaktadır. Terör teriminin istikrarsız doğası ve belirli tarihsel süreçlerdeki farklılaşan anlam dünyasına Eleştirel Terörizm Çalışmaları’nın yaklaşımlarına dayanarak vurgu yapan makale, politik elitlerin terörist etiketini kullanmasının arkasında yatan çıkarları ortaya koymak için okuyucuya kavramsal bir analitik çerçeve çizmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Makale, terörizmin politik olarak muhalifleri şeytanlaştırmak ve halk nazarında itibarsızlaştırmak amacıyla kullanılan aşağılayıcı bir etiket olduğunu öne sürerek, okuyucuya siyasal şiddet literatüründe kullanılan terimlere daima şüpheyle yaklaşarak eleştirel akıl süzgecinden geçirmesini teklif etmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Terörizm
• Güvenlikleştirme
• Eleştirel Terörizm Çalışmaları
• Terörizm Söylemi
• Eleştirel Söylem Analizi.

Terrorism Discourse and Label as a Securitization Practice: A Conceptual Analytical Framework From The Perspective of Critical Terrorism Studies

Abstract

In this study, it is claimed that the rhetoric of “terroristization” as a discursive practice is used by governments as a securitization strategy in order to undermine the legitimacy of political opponents. The theoretical framework of the article is securitization theory, which is a form of theorizing aimed at explaining how political leaders frame security issues. Arguing that terrorism is an objective reality but a social construction, the article tries to draw attention to how and for what purposes people who take this label are discredited in public because terrorism is a threat to ontological security. Emphasizing the unstable nature of the term terrorism and the different meanings of the term in certain historical processes, based on the approaches of Critical Terrorism Studies, the article aims to draw the reader into a conceptual analytical framework to reveal the interests behind the use of the “terrorist” label by political elites. By arguing that terrorism is a derogatory label used to politically demonize and discredit dissidents, the article offers the reader critical scrutiny of terms used in the literature on political violence, always with skepticism.

Keywords

• Terrorism
• Securitization
• Critical Terrorism Studies
• Terrorism Discourse
• Critical Discourse Analysis.
• Terrorism, Securitization, Critical Terrorism Studies, Terrorism Discourse, Critical Discourse Analysis.

Kaynakça

1. Agamben, Giorgio. İstisna Hali. Çeviri, Kemal Atakay. İstanbul: Ayrıntı Yayınları.
2. Ağkaya, Onur. 2018. “Eski Terörizm, Yeni Terörizm: 9/11 ve Eskimeyen Terörizm Söylemi.” Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 20 (2): 275-298. DOI: 10.16953/deusosbil.333616
3. Appleby, Nicholas. 2010. “Labelling the Innocent: How Government Counterterrorism Advice Creates Labels That Contribute to the Problem.” Critical Studies on Terrorism 3 (3): 422-424. DOI: 10.1080/17539153.2010.521643.
4. Baele, Stephen J., Olivier C. Sterck, Thibaut Slingeneyer, Gregoire P. Lits. 2017. “What Does the ‘Terrorist’ Label Really Do? Measuring and Explaining the Effects of the ‘Terrorist’ and ‘Islamist’ Categories.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 42 (5): 520-540. DOI: 10.1080/1057610X.2017.1393902.
5. Balzacq, Thierry. 2005. “The Three Faces of Securitization: Political Agency, Audience and Context.” European Journal of International Relations 11 (2): 171-201. DOI: 10.1177/1354066105052960.
6. Balzacq, Thierry. 2010. “A Theory of Securitization: Origins, Core Assumptions, and Variants.” In Securitization Theory How Security Problems Emerge and Dissolve, editör Thierry Balzacq, 1-30. London: Routledge.
7. Bartolucci, Valentina. 2010. “Analysing Elite Discourse on Terrorism and its Implications: The Case of Morocco.” Critical Studies on Terrorism 3 (1), 119-135. DOI: 10.1080/17539151003594269.
8. Baysal, Başar. 2022. “Güvenlikleştirme Teorisi.” Uluslararası İlişkilerde Güvenlik, derleyen Başar Baysal, 107-116. İstanbul: Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.

9. Baysal, Başar ve Çağla Lüleci. 2015. “Kopenhag Okulu ve Güvenlikleştirme Teorisi.” Güvenlik Stratejileri Dergisi 11 (22): 61-96.
10. Baysal, Başar ve Berk Esen. 2022. “Güvenlikleştirme ve Demokratik Gerileme İlişkisi: Türkiye Örneği.” Eleştirel Güvenlik ve Türkiye, derleyen Berk Esen ve Başar Baysal, 129-162. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
11. Becker, Howard. 1973. Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviance. 2nd ed. New York: The Free Press.
12. Beyribey, Tuncer. 2021. “Türkiye’de Terörle Mücadelenin Biyopolitikası ve Mediko-Politik Metaforlar (1973-1991).” Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Marmara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
13. Beyribey, Tuncer. 2022. “Terörist Özneyi Tarihselleştirmek: İktidar İlişkileri Çerçevesinde Türkiye’de Terörizm Söyleminin İnşası (1973-1980).” Alternatif Politika 14 (3): 582-611. DOI: 10.53376/ap.2022.20.
14. Bhatia, Michael. 2005. “Fighting Words: Naming Terrorists, Bandit, Rebels and Other Violent Actors.” Third World Quarterly 26 (1): 5-22. DOI: 10.1080/0143659042000322874.
15. Bilgin, Pınar. 2022. “Güvenlikleştirmenin Çalışılmasının Siyaseti? Türkiye’de Kopenhag Okulu.” Eleştirel Güvenlik ve Türkiye, derleyen Berk Esen ve Başar Baysal, 17-40. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
16. Bracic, Ana ve Amanda Murdie. 2020. “Human Rights Abused? Terrorist Labeling and Individual Reactions to Call to Action.” Political Research Quarterly 73 (4): 878-892. DOI: 10.1177/1065912919861154.
17. Breen-Smyth, Marie, Jeroen Gunning, Richard Jackson, George Kassimeris, Piers Robinson 2008. “Critical Terrorism Studies–an introduction.” Critical Studies on Terrorism 1 (1): 1-4. DOI: 10.1080/17539150701868538.
18. Buzan, Barry, Ole Waever, Jaap de Wilde. 1998. Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Pub.
19. Campbell, David. 1998. Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity. revisited ed. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.
20. Connoly, William. 2002. Identity/Difference: Democratic Negotiations of Political Paradox. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.
21. Croft, Stuart. 2006. Culture, Crisis and America’s War on Terror. New York: Cambridge University Press.
22. Çavuşoğlu, Esra. 2020. “Assessing Terrorism as a Hegemonic Conception within the Context of Securitization.” Orta Doğu Etüdleri Dergisi 12 (2): 349-368. DOI: 10.47932/ortetut.720727.
23. Ditrych, Ondrej. 2014. Tracing the Discourses of Terrorism Identity, Genealogy and State. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
24. Erlenbusch-Anderson, Verena. 2018. Genealogies of Terrorism: Revolution, State Violence, Empire. New York: Columbia University Press.
25. Demir, Cenker Korhan. 2020. “Stratejinin Bakış Açısıyla Terörizm.” Strateji Düşüncesi: Kuram, Paradoks, Uygulama, derleyen Ali L. Karaosmanoğlu ve Ersen Aydınlı, 283-312. İstanbul: Bilgi Üniversitesi Yayınları.
26. Dillon, Michael. 1996. Politics of Security. London: Routledge.
27. Dixit, Priya. 2016. “Securitization and Terroristization: ‘Analyzing States’ Usage of the Rhetoric of Terrorism.” In State Terror, State Violence: Global Perspectives, editör Bettina Koch, 31-50. Wiesbaden: Springer.
28. D’Orazio, Vito ve Idean Salehyan. 2018. “Who is a Terrorist? Ethnicity, Group Affiliation, and Understandings of Political Violence.” International Interactions 44 (6): 1017-1039. DOI: 10.1080/03050629.2018.1500911.
29. Emmers, Ralf. 2017. “Güvenlikleştirme.” Çağdaş Güvenlik Çalışmaları, editör Allan Colins, 131-145. Çeviri, Nasuh Uslu. İstanbul: Uluslararası İlişkiler Kütüphanesi.
30. Entman, Robert M. 2007. “Framing Bias: Media in the Distribution of Power.” Journal of Communication 57 (1): 163-173. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00336.x.
31. Fisher, Kathryn Marie. 2015. “Spatial and Temporal Imaginaries in the Securitisation of Terrorism 1.” In Critical Perspectives on Counter-terrorism, editör Lee Jarvis and Michael Lister, 55-76. London and New York: Routledge.
32. Goffman, Erving. 2009. Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Idendity. New York: Touchstone.
33. Gunning, Jeroen. 2007. “A Case for Critical Terrorism Studies?” Goverment and Opposition 42 (3): 363-393. DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-7053.2007.00228.x
34. Hansen, Lene. 2012. “Reconstructing Desecuritisation: The Normative-Political in the Copenhagen School and Directions for How to Apply It.” Review of International Studies 38 (3): 525-546. DOI: 10.1017/S0260210511000581.
35. Heath-Kelly, Charlotte. 2016. “Poststructuralism and Constructivism.” In Routledge Handbook of Critical Terrorism Studies, editör Richard Jackson, 136-159. London: Routledge.
36. Heath-Kelly, Charlotte. 2022. “Terörizme Eleştirel Yaklaşımlar.” Terörizmin El Kitabı, editör Andreas Gofas vd., 289-306. Çeviri, Ensar Macit ve İmran Samancı. Ankara: Siyasal Kitabevi.
37. Holland, Jack. 2016. “The Language of Counter-terrorism.” In Routledge Handbook of Critical Terrorism Studies, editör Richard Jackson, 426-448. Abingdon: Routledge.
38. Huysmans, Jef. 2006. The Politics of Insecurity Fear, Migration and Asylum in the EU. Abingdon: Routledge.
39. Huysmans, Jef ve Anastasia Tsoukala. 2008. “Introduction: The Social Construction and Control of Danger in Counterterrorism.” Alternatives 33 (2): 133-156.
40. Hulsse, Rainer ve Alexander Spencer. 2008. “The Metaphor of Terror: Terrorism Studies and the Constructivist Turn.” Security Dialogue 39 (6): 571-592. DOI: 10.1177/0967010608098210.
41. Jackson, Richard. 2005. Writing the War on Terrorism: Language, Politics and Counter-Terrorism. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
42. Jackson, Richard. 2007a. “The Core Commitments of Critical Terrorism Studies.” European Political Science 6 (3): 244-251. DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.eps.2210141.
43. Jackson, Richard. 2007b. “Constructing Enemies: ‘Islamic Terrorism’ in Political and Academic Discourse.” Goverment and Opposition 42 (3): 394-426. DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-7053.2007.00229.x
44. Jackson, Richard 2009. “Knowledge, Power and Politics in the Study of Political Terrorism.” In Critical Terrorism Studies: A New Research Agenda, editör Richard Jackson, Jeroen Gunning, Marie Breen-Smyth, 66-84. Abingdon: Routledge.
45. Jackson, Richard. 2011. “In Defence of ‘Terrorism’: Finding a Way Through a Forest of Misconceptions.” Behavorial Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression 3 (2): 116-130. DOI: 10.1080/19434472.2010.512148.
46. Jackson, Richard, Lee Jarvis, Jeroen Gunning ve Marie Breen-Smyth. 2011. Terrorism: A Critical Introduction. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
47. Jaèger, Siegfried. 2001. “Discourse and Knowledge: Theoretical and Methodological Aspects of a Critical Discourse and Dispositive Analysis.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, editör R.Wodak, M. Meyer, 32-62. London: SAGE Pub.
48. Jarvis, Lee. 2016. “Critical Terrorism Studies After 9/11.” In Routledge Handbook of Critical Terrorism Studies, editör Richard Jackson, 68-91. Abingdon: Routledge.
49. Jenkins, Brian. 1980. The Study of Terrorism: Definitional Problems. Santa Monica: The Rand Corp.
50. Jorgensen, Marianne ve Louise Phillips. 2002. Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method. London: SAGE Pub.
51. Karaffa, Cynthia. 2012. “Intellectual Courage and the Social Construction of Terrorism: Embodying Reality.” Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, University of Pittsburgh.
52. Karaffa, Cynthia. 2015. “The Social Construction of Terrorism.” Terrorism and Counterterrorism Today 20: 67-87. DOI: 10.1108/S1521-613620150000020004.
53. Kearney, Richard. 2002. Strangers, Gods and Monsters: Interpreting Otherness. London: Routledge.
54. Lechner, Zoltán. 2021. “Opposing Discourses of Terror: The Use of the Terrorist Label by the Turkish and Russian Governments in the Northern Syrian Conflict.” Nemzetbiztonsági Szemle 9 (3): 33-53. DOI: 10.32561/nsz.2021.3.3
55. Mcdonald, Matt. 2008. “Securitization and the Construction of Security.” European Journal of International Relations 14 (4): 563-587. DOI: 10.1177/1354066108097553.
56. Milliken, Jennifer. 1999. “The Study of Discourse in International Relations: A Critique of Research and Methods.” European Journal of International Relations 5 (2): 225-254.
57. Moghaddam, Fathali. 2006. From the Terrorist Point of View: What They Experience and Why They Come to Destroy. London: Praeger Security International.
58. Moore, Will H. 2015. “Tilting at a Windmill? The Conceptual Problem in Contemporary Peace Science.” Conflict Management and Peace Science 32 (4): 356-369. DOI: 10.1177/0738894215593721
59. Mouffe, Chantal. 1993. The Return of the Political. London: Verso.
60. Mueller, John. 2006. Overblown: How Politicians and the Terrorism Industry Inflate National Security Threats, and Why We Believe Them. New York: Free Press.
61. Neocleous, Mark. 2014a. Güvenliğin Eleştirisi. Çeviri, Tonguç Ok. Ankara: Notabene Yayınları.
62. Neocleous, Mark. 2014b. Devleti Tahayyül Etmek. Çeviri, Akın Sarı. Ankara: Notabene Yayınları.
63. Neumann, Iver B. 2008. “Discourse Analysis, Qualitative Methods in International Relations.” In Qualitative Methods in International Relations, editör Klotz Audie, Prakash Deepa, 61-77. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
64. Norris, Pippa, Montague Kern, Marion Just. 2003. “Framing Terrorism.” In Framing Terrorism: The News Media, the Government and the Public, editör Pippa Norris, Montague Kern, Marion Just, 3-26. New York: Routledge.
65. Rapoport, David. 2022. Waves of Global Terrorism: From 1879 to the Present. New York: Columbia University Press.
66. Richmond, Oliver P. ve Jason Franks. 2009. “The Impact of Orthodox Terrorism Discourses on the Liberal Peace: Internalisation, Resistance, or Hybridisation?” Critical Studies on Terrorism 2 (2): 201-218. DOI: 10.1080/17539150903010574
67. Rumelili, Bahar ve Umut Can Adısönmez. 2020. “Uluslararası İlişkilerde Kimlik-Güvenlik İlişkisine Dair Yeni Bir Paradigma: Ontolojik Güvenlik Teorisi.” Uluslararası İlişkiler 17 (66): 23-39.
68. Schmid, Alex. 2004. “Terrorism-the definitional problem.” Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law 36 (2-3): 375-420.
69. Schmid Alex P. ve Albert J. Jongman. 1988. Political Terrorism: A New Guide to Actors Authors, Concepts, Data Bases, Theories, & Literature. Amsterdam: Noth-Holland Publishing.
70. Schmitt, Carl. 2005. Siyasi İlahiyat: Egemenlik Kuramı Üzerine Dört Bölüm. Çeviri, A. Emre Zeybekoğlu. Ankara: Dost Kitabevi Yayınları.
71. Silberstein, Sandra. 2004. War of Words: Language, Politics and 9/11. Abingdon: Routledge.
72. Silke, Andrew. 2001. “The Devil You Know: Continuing Problems with Research on Terrorism.” Terrorism and Political Violence 13 (4): 1-14. DOI: 10.1080/09546550109609697.
73. Sluka, Jeffrey. 2008. “Terrorism and Taboo: An Anthropological Perspective on Political Violence Against Civilians.” Critical Studies on Terrorism 1 (2): 167-183. DOI: 10.1080/17539150802184579.
74. Stampnitzky, Lisa. 2013. Disciplining Terror: How Experts Invented “Terrorism”. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
75. Staun, Jorgen. 2010. “When, How and Why Elites Frame Terrorists: a Wittgensteinian Analysis of Terror and Radicalisation.” Critical Studies on Terrorism 3 (3), 403-420. DOI: 10.1080/17539153.2010.521642.
76. Stump, Jacob L. 2009. “The Artful Side of the Terrorism Discourse: A Response to Hülsse & Spencer.” Security Dialogue 40 (6): 661-665. DOI: 10.1177/0967010609350479.
77. Stump, Jacob L. ve Priya Dixit. 2013. Critical Terrorism Studies: An Introduction to Research Methods. Abingdon: Routledge.
78. Sorenson, Jef. 2009. “Constructing Terrorists: Propaganda About Animal Rights.” Critical Studies on Terrorism 2 (2): 237-256. DOI: 10.1080/17539150903010715.
79. Sürücü, Hüseyin. 2021. “Terörizm Olgusuna Schrödinger’in Kedisi Olarak Bakmak.” Üsküdar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 13: 375-413. DOI: 10.32739/uskudarsbd.7.13.94
80. Tilly, Charles. 2004. “Terror, Terrorism, Terrorists.” Sociological Theory 22 (1): 5-13.
81. Van Dijk, Teun. 2001. “Critical Discourse Analysis.” In Handbook of Discourse Analysis, editör D. Tannen, D. Schiffrin, H. Hamilton, 352-371. Oxford: Blackwell.
82. Weimann, Gabriel. 1985. “Terrorists or Freedom Fighters? Labelling Terrorism in the Israeli Press.” Political Communication 2 (4): 433-445.
83. Weldes, Jutta, Mark Laffey, Hugh Gusterson ve Raymond Duvall. 1999. “Introduction: Constructing Insecurity.” In Cultures of Insecurity: States, Communities, and the Production of Danger editör Jutta Weldes, Mark Laffey, Hugh Gusterson ve Raymond Duvall, 1-34. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
84. Wilkinson, Paul. 1974. Political Terrorism. London: The Macmillan Press.
85. Williams, Michael C. 2003. “Words, Images, Enemies: Securitization and International Politics.” International Studies Quarterly 47 (4): 511-531. DOI: 10.1046/j.0020-8833.2003.00277.x
86. Wodak, Ruth. 2001. “What CDA is About- A Summary of its History, Important Concepts and its Developments.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, editör Ruth Wodak ve Michael Meyer, 1-13. London: SAGE Pub.
87. Zora, Kadir. 2015. “Güvenlikleştirme: Hukuksal Meşruiyetten Siyasal Meşruiyete Evrilme ve Kopenhag Okulu.” Selçuk Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi 23 (2), 111-126. DOI: 10.15337/SUH.2017.14.
88. Zulaika, Joseba ve William Douglass. 1996. Terror and Taboo. New York: Routledge.