Araştırma Makalesi

Effetcs of Near-Fault and Far-Fault Ground Motions on Cable-Stayed Bridges

Cilt: 4 Sayı: 1 18 Haziran 2018
PDF İndir
EN

Effetcs of Near-Fault and Far-Fault Ground Motions on Cable-Stayed Bridges

Abstract

In this paper, the response of a long span cable-stayed bridge is investigated under the effect of near-fault and far-fault ground motions. Because cable-stayed bridges has been started to be used for center spans reaching to 1000 m it has become important to investigate the cable-stayed bridges under the effect of near-fault ground motions. Therefore, in this study a cable-stayed bridge is considered to determine the effects of near-fault and far-fault ground motions on the seismic responses of these types of bridges. Tatara Bridge constructed in Japan is chosen as a cable-stayed bridge model. Total length of the Tatara Bridge is 1480 m having a main span of 890 m. As near-fault and far-fault ground motions, 1995 Kobe, 1999 Chi-Chi, 1999 Kocaeli and 1999 Duzce strong ground motion records are used. Classifying near-fault ground motions as pulse type and none pulse type ground motions, the effect of near-fault ground motions on cable-stayed bridges has been investigated considerably. Bridge responses obtained from the near-fault and far-fault ground motion cases are compared with each other to emphasize the importance of earthquake ground motions on bridge responses. The results have underlined the remarkable effect of the pulse type near-fault ground motions on the dynamic responses of cable-stayed bridges.   

Keywords

Kaynakça

  1. Adanur S, Altunışık AC, Bayraktar A, Akköse M (2012) Comparison of near-fault and far-fault ground motion effects on geometrically nonlinear earthquake behavior of suspension bridges. Nat. Hazards 64:593-614
  2. Brown A, Saiidi MS (2011) Investigation of effect of near-fault motions on substandard bridge structures. Earthq. Eng.&Eng. Vib 10:1-11
  3. Ismail M, Casas JR, Rodellar J (2013) Near-fault isolation of cable-stayed bridges using RNC isolator. Engineering Structures 56:327-342
  4. Jalali RS, Jokandan MS, Trifunac MD (2012) Earthquake response of a three-span simply supported bridge to near-field pulse and permanent-displacement step. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 43:380-397
  5. Jia JF, Ou JP (2008) Seismic analyses of long-span cable-stayed bridges subjected to near-fault pulse-type ground motions. In: 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing
  6. Jonsson MH, Bessason B, Haflidason E (2010) Earthquake response of a base-isolated bridge subjected to strong near-fault ground motion. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 30:447-455
  7. Liao WI, Loh CH, Lee BH (2004) Comparison of dynamic response of isolated and non-isolated continuous girder bridges subjected to near-fault ground motions. Engineering Structures 26:2173-2183
  8. McCallen D, Astaneh-Asl A, Larsen S, Hutchings L (2006) Dynamic response of the suspension spans of the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge. In: 8th U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, San Francisco, CA, 2005

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Mühendislik

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Hayrettin Karaca *
Bozok University
Türkiye

Kurtuluş Soyluk
Gazi University
Türkiye

Yayımlanma Tarihi

18 Haziran 2018

Gönderilme Tarihi

15 Mart 2018

Kabul Tarihi

10 Mayıs 2018

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2018 Cilt: 4 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

Chicago
Karaca, Hayrettin, ve Kurtuluş Soyluk. 2018. “Effetcs of Near-Fault and Far-Fault Ground Motions on Cable-Stayed Bridges”. Disaster Science and Engineering 4 (1): 12-21. https://izlik.org/JA48DE67NU.