Review

Advantages and Application Challenges of Composite Material Repair Methods Used in Aircraft

Volume: 14 Number: 1 January 21, 2026
EN TR

Advantages and Application Challenges of Composite Material Repair Methods Used in Aircraft

Abstract

With the development of fiber-reinforced composite materials, composites have become indispensable in modern aircraft structures. Aircraft receive damages from impacts or environmental conditions throughout their service life. Since replacing a damaged composite with a new one is an economically costly task, appropriate repair techniques are keeping its importance. It is possible to restore structural integrity by repairing the damaged part. In addition, since composites are difficult to recycle, their repair contributes to sustainability by reducing the amount of waste material. Although systematic repair methodologies have been well established for thermoset matrix composites, a clear and standardized roadmap for thermoplastic composites has yet to be developed. In this article, damages in composite materials used in today's aircraft, their detection, evaluation and repair methods have been examined. In addition, studies from the literature on ultrasonic, resistance and induction welding methods, which are among the welded repair methods of thermoplastic matrix composites, which have been used increasingly in recent years, have been presented. The advantages of repair methods and the difficulties encountered in application have been evaluated.

Keywords

Supporting Institution

No financial support was used.

Ethical Statement

This is not a study that requires ethical committee approval.

Thanks

The authors would like to thank Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey University.

References

  1. Ageorges, C., & Ye, L. (2001). Resistance welding of metal/thermoplastic composite joints. Journal of Thermoplastic Composite Materials, 14(6), 449–475. https://doi.org/10.1106/PN74-QXKH-7XBE-XKF5
  2. Ageorges, C., Ye, L., & Hou, M. (2001). Advances in fusion bonding techniques for joining thermoplastic matrix composites: a review. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 32(6), 839–857. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-835X(00)00166-4
  3. Ahmed, T. J., Stavrov, D., Bersee, H. E. N., & Beukers, A. (2006). Induction welding of thermoplastic composites—an overview. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing, 37(10), 1638–1651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.10.009
  4. Ashforth, C., Momm, G. G., Seneviratne, W., Trace, A., & Ilcewicz, L. (2023). Aerospace structural bonding: Qualification, quality control, substantiation, and risk mitigation. In D. A. Dillard (Ed.), Advances in Structural Adhesive Bonding (Second Edition) (pp. 779–806). Woodhead Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-91214-3.00029-6
  5. Barroeta Robles, J., Dubé, M., Hubert, P., & Yousefpour, A. (2022). Repair of thermoplastic composites: an overview. Advanced Manufacturing: Polymer & Composites Science, 8(2), 68–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/20550340.2022.2057137
  6. Becker, S., & Mitschang, P. (2022). Process improvement of continuous induction welding of carbon fiber-reinforced polymer composites. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, 31(9), 7049–7060. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-022-06842-0
  7. Benatar, A., Eswaran, R. V., & Nayar, S. K. (1989). Ultrasonic welding of thermoplastics in the near‐field. Polymer Engineering & Science, 29(23), 1689–1698. https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.760292311
  8. Brassard, D., Dubé, M., & Tavares, J. R. (2019). Resistance welding of thermoplastic composites with a nanocomposite heating element. Composites Part B: Engineering, 165, 779–784. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.02.038

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Resource Technologies, Material Design and Behaviors

Journal Section

Review

Publication Date

January 21, 2026

Submission Date

August 13, 2025

Acceptance Date

December 10, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 2026 Volume: 14 Number: 1

APA
Lekesizcan, E., & Güney, B. (2026). Advantages and Application Challenges of Composite Material Repair Methods Used in Aircraft. Duzce University Journal of Science and Technology, 14(1), 299-311. https://doi.org/10.29130/dubited.1762499
AMA
1.Lekesizcan E, Güney B. Advantages and Application Challenges of Composite Material Repair Methods Used in Aircraft. DUBİTED. 2026;14(1):299-311. doi:10.29130/dubited.1762499
Chicago
Lekesizcan, Emre, and Bekir Güney. 2026. “Advantages and Application Challenges of Composite Material Repair Methods Used in Aircraft”. Duzce University Journal of Science and Technology 14 (1): 299-311. https://doi.org/10.29130/dubited.1762499.
EndNote
Lekesizcan E, Güney B (January 1, 2026) Advantages and Application Challenges of Composite Material Repair Methods Used in Aircraft. Duzce University Journal of Science and Technology 14 1 299–311.
IEEE
[1]E. Lekesizcan and B. Güney, “Advantages and Application Challenges of Composite Material Repair Methods Used in Aircraft”, DUBİTED, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 299–311, Jan. 2026, doi: 10.29130/dubited.1762499.
ISNAD
Lekesizcan, Emre - Güney, Bekir. “Advantages and Application Challenges of Composite Material Repair Methods Used in Aircraft”. Duzce University Journal of Science and Technology 14/1 (January 1, 2026): 299-311. https://doi.org/10.29130/dubited.1762499.
JAMA
1.Lekesizcan E, Güney B. Advantages and Application Challenges of Composite Material Repair Methods Used in Aircraft. DUBİTED. 2026;14:299–311.
MLA
Lekesizcan, Emre, and Bekir Güney. “Advantages and Application Challenges of Composite Material Repair Methods Used in Aircraft”. Duzce University Journal of Science and Technology, vol. 14, no. 1, Jan. 2026, pp. 299-11, doi:10.29130/dubited.1762499.
Vancouver
1.Emre Lekesizcan, Bekir Güney. Advantages and Application Challenges of Composite Material Repair Methods Used in Aircraft. DUBİTED. 2026 Jan. 1;14(1):299-311. doi:10.29130/dubited.1762499