Environmental Impact Assessment for Packaging Materials
Abstract
This paper presents the eco-friendly design efforts carried out at the Daikin Türkiye R&D Center, addressing innovative approaches aimed at reducing carbon emissions and supporting sustainable production. In this context, the environmental impacts of different materials were examined in detail to reduce environmental effects in product development processes and to ensure compliance with sustainability criteria. Within this framework, the 13 sustainable product criteria published by Daikin Japan (DIL), which serve as a guide in sustainable product development processes, were reviewed, and one of these criteria was selected for in-depth analysis. An application example developed in line with the selected criterion is also presented as one of the focal points of this paper.
In the application example, the environmental impacts of different types of packaging materials used in boiler products were evaluated. Environmental impact calculations were supported with technical information in accordance with the Product Category Rules (PCR) and packaging-related regulations. This study aimed to determine the most suitable alternatives in terms of sustainability by comprehensively examining the environmental impacts of four different packaging materials (EPS, 100% recycled cardboard, cardboard honeycomb panel, and molded pulp). The consistency of the obtained data with the literature was also examined in detail.
As a result of the study, the packaging material with the optimum environmental impact value was identified in light of the determined design parameters. It is projected that this packaging material will prevent 62% more emission release compared to equivalent products.
Keywords
Sustainable product, Environmental impact assessment, Packaging material
Supporting Institution
This research received no external funding.
Ethical Statement
This study does not involve human or animal participants. All procedures followed scientific and ethical principles, and all referenced studies are appropriately cited.
Thanks
Mr. Hüseyin Can MENGÜÇ handled the environmental package product research as a project, including technical and design information. This article focuses on the results obtained through the support provided in calculating environmental impacts, a valuation criterion within the project. I would like to express my gratitude to Mr. H.C. MENGÜÇ and my managers for their dedication and knowledge sharing.
References
- Aljolani, O., Heberle, F., & Brüggemann, D. (2024). Thermo-economic and environmental analysis of a CO₂ residential air conditioning system in comparison to HFC-410A and HFC-32 in temperate and subtropical climates. Applied Energy, 353, Article 122073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.122073
- Ankesh, J., & Goyal, S. (2021). Properties of expanded polystyrene (EPS) and its environmental effects. Advances and Applications in Mathematical Sciences, 20(10), 2151–2162.
- Arslan, M. (2023). The predictors of consumers’ purchasing intentions of environment-friendly products [Master’s thesis, Atılım University]. Atılım University Institutional Repository.
- Avery, E., Nduagu, E., & Vozzola, E. (2025). Polyethylene packaging and alternative materials in the United States: A life cycle assessment. Science of the Total Environment, 961, Article 178359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.178359
- Chen, C., Zhao, Z., Xiao, J., & Tiong, R. (2021). A conceptual framework for estimating building embodied carbon based on digital twin technology and life cycle assessment. Sustainability, 13(24), Article 13875. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132413875
- Chen, Y., Wang, L., & Zhang, J. (2024). Exploring the environmental impacts of plastic packaging: A comprehensive life cycle analysis for seafood distribution crates. Science of the Total Environment, 951, 175452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.175452
- Daikin. (2023, September 15). Press release. https://www.daikin.com/press/2023/20230915
- Dhaliwal, H., Browne, M., Flanagan, W., Laurin, L., & Hamilton, M. (2014). A life cycle assessment of packaging options for contrast media delivery: Comparing polymer bottle vs. glass bottle. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 19(12), 1965–1973. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-014-0795-1
- Duman, C. (2019). Elektrikli elektronik atıkların geri dönüşümünde yaşam döngüsü değerlendirmesi [Master’s thesis, Eskişehir Technical University]. Council of Higher Education National Thesis Center.
- Duru, M. N., & Şua, E. (2013). Yeşil Pazarlama ve Tüketicilerin Çevre Dostu Ürünleri Kullanma Eğilimleri. Düzce Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Ormancılık Dergisi, 9(2), 126-136. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/duzceod/article/288999